Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Set Entity value in expression?
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] reactor-mqtt-contrib package for additional MQTT templates
therealdbT
I'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only). Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package: https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go. I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them. The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression. Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests
Multi-System Reactor
HA 2025.9.4 Supported Yet?
CatmanV2C
Tangentially did I miss 2025.9.4 getting blessed in MSR? I've been holding off Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Rule Set UI bug - RESOLVED
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Copy&Paste of Rules
therealdbT
I don't know if I'm the only one, but managing more than one Reactor installs, the need to have some sort of copy&paste for rules has grown on me. While I understand the technical challenges, I'm wondering if a "god mode" where I could copy the raw JSON rule and paste it into another rule could be an advanced, flag only feature that could benefit power users. I know I can copy the JSON file and proceed, but I must stop Reactor and when doing maintenance, it's more clicks to do. Just an idea
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Help with scene controller cycling logic
therealdbT
I’ve added a couple of Shelly Wave i4 as scene controllers and I’m planning to add more, since I can just use standard buttons instead of battery-powered scene controllers, which also looks better aesthetically. That said, I’m struggling to figure out how to write a simple rule that cycles between states every time I press a button. Example: Light 1 ON → OFF, then Light 2 ON → OFF. The part I can’t get right is handling the case where Light 1 or Light 2 might already be ON independently of the rule. Maybe it’s just too much sun and relaxation clouding my brain, but any hint would be appreciated.
Multi-System Reactor
Stop the MSR by an external switch on Hubitat.
wmarcolinW
Use case: When performing home maintenance, such as air conditioning, I want all rules involving air conditioning to be disabled. To do this, to day, I have a virtual switch that I placed within all rules involving air conditioning, meaning that if I turn it off, none of them work. Then another situation: the water pump system and garden irrigation, another switch. In short, I had to create several virtual switches in Hubitat to disable rules in MSR. Unfortunately, however, I was unable to cover all scenarios, so I wondered if it would be possible for MSR to support a virtual MSR switch, which, when configured in the reactor settings, would function as a general on/off switch for MSR. If it is configured and turned off, the entire rules and actions in MSR stops working, except for the status change reading process, specifically for this switch, which, when turned on, would restart the MSR. Would it be possible to do something like this? Any recommendations from the experts?
Multi-System Reactor

Set Entity value in expression?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
20 Posts 4 Posters 2.0k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 3 Offline
    3 Offline
    3rdStng
    wrote on last edited by 3rdStng
    #9

    I did this exact same thing within Reactor and it became more trouble than it was worth and ultimately removed that rule. A very quick recap of the way I had it was:

    Conditions (now triggers):
    -- AC is ON
    (AND)
    -- Motion sensor tripped
    Activity (now Reaction):
    IF TRUE:
    -- GetLoadState of device (entity) and set that to a non-defined variable.
    -- Turn the fan on to XX%.
    IF FALSE:
    -- Turn fan to {variable}%

    Now how it became more trouble than it was worth probably could have been solved my adding an additional condition/trigger. If I walked into a room and then back out, but the AC was on, the fan would turn on. No sense in having the fan on if nobody was in the room. Thinking back, I would add that Motion has been detected and needs to remain detected/tripped for 120 seconds. (Assuming that your motion sensors reset in less than 120 seconds)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Offline
      S Offline
      sebby
      wrote on last edited by sebby
      #10

      Thanks guys, my problem seems to be even more basic than all of that. what i cannot figure out is the "service" variable to use for the specific actions. I hope this image works, have tried everything i can think of to make it readable to all.

      Screen Shot 2021-08-06 at 4.24.56 PM.png

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbits
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        The x_vera_device.set_variable action is the same as luup.variable_set() on Vera -- it sets the value of a state variable on the device. The service would be a Vera service ID. This is not what you want for turning a switch on or off. You cannot, in MSR or on Vera/Luup, turn a switch on or off by setting a state variable. You have to use an on/off action.

        I just uploaded the new build to latest (21218). This has a power_switch.set action that takes a boolean, as you are trying to do here. Update to the new latest build, then in your screen shot above, where you have x_vera_device.set_variable, you will select power_switch.set. It will give you a single parameter in which you can specify a boolean value (e.g. true or false), or use a variable substitution as I posted earlier.

        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • S Offline
          S Offline
          sebby
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          wow, thank you so much for that, as always greatly appreciated.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • S Offline
            S Offline
            sebby
            wrote on last edited by
            #13

            Hi Rigpapa, I updated the build, the variable is a drop-down with only the true/false option and not a variable that can be substituted. do i need to do something else to make it a string entry?

            S 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbits
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              https://smarthome.community/post/9103

              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • S sebby

                Hi Rigpapa, I updated the build, the variable is a drop-down with only the true/false option and not a variable that can be substituted. do i need to do something else to make it a string entry?

                S Offline
                S Offline
                sebby
                wrote on last edited by
                #15

                @sebby Screen Shot 2021-08-06 at 8.59.30 PM.png

                LibraSunL 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S sebby

                  @sebby Screen Shot 2021-08-06 at 8.59.30 PM.png

                  LibraSunL Offline
                  LibraSunL Offline
                  LibraSun
                  wrote on last edited by LibraSun
                  #16

                  @sebby said... (see above screenshot)

                  Based on your screenshot, it kinda looks like you can't (yet) override the two preset drop-down choices in that menu, in order to insert your own ${{ }} expression? (I'm not using 'Latest' so haven't tested myself.)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbits
                    wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                    #17

                    Whoops! Forgot about that (booleans use a fixed list rather than the generic multi-value path/datalist control)... fix coming...

                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • S Offline
                      S Offline
                      sebby
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      no rush, i was able to work around it by inserting the status of the fans as a number:

                      {
                      "Livingroom Fan" : getEntity("vera>Livingroom Fan").attributes.power_switch.state == false ? 0 : 1, 
                      "Loft Fan" : getEntity("vera>Loft Fan").attributes.power_switch.state == false ? 0 : 1, 
                      "Office Fan" : getEntity("vera>Office Fan").attributes.power_switch.state == false ? 0 : 1
                      }
                      

                      then used the SetTarget entity action to turn them on or off.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toggledbitsT Offline
                        toggledbitsT Offline
                        toggledbits
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #19

                        OK. Build 21219 is up, allows expression substitution in boolean.

                        A couple of other things...

                        • ...attributes.power_switch.state == false ? 0 : 1 can be more succinctly written as attributes.power_switch.state ? 1 : 0
                        • The performAction() expression function will perform an action from an expression. If you have an object stored in a variable old_status that contains data like this: [ { id: "vera>Livingroom Fan", status: true }, { id: "vera>Loft Fan", status: false }, { id: "vera>Office Fan", status: true } ], then you can set those statuses in one expression: each d in old_status: performAction( d.id, "power_switch.set", d.status )

                        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                          OK. Build 21219 is up, allows expression substitution in boolean.

                          A couple of other things...

                          • ...attributes.power_switch.state == false ? 0 : 1 can be more succinctly written as attributes.power_switch.state ? 1 : 0
                          • The performAction() expression function will perform an action from an expression. If you have an object stored in a variable old_status that contains data like this: [ { id: "vera>Livingroom Fan", status: true }, { id: "vera>Loft Fan", status: false }, { id: "vera>Office Fan", status: true } ], then you can set those statuses in one expression: each d in old_status: performAction( d.id, "power_switch.set", d.status )
                          S Offline
                          S Offline
                          sebby
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #20
                          • The performAction() expression function will perform an action from an expression. If you have an object stored in a variable old_status that contains data like this: [ { id: "vera>Livingroom Fan", status: true }, { id: "vera>Loft Fan", status: false }, { id: "vera>Office Fan", status: true } ], then you can set those statuses in one expression: each d in old_status: performAction( d.id, "power_switch.set", d.status )

                          This is exactly what i was looking for! thank you!!!!!! i was looking at the docs and completely glossed over that section...

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          Recent Topics

                          • Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
                            M
                            mgvra
                            1
                            1
                            15

                          • Script action and custom timers
                            toggledbitsT
                            toggledbits
                            0
                            2
                            36

                          • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
                            CatmanV2C
                            CatmanV2
                            0
                            12
                            169

                          • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                            CatmanV2C
                            CatmanV2
                            5
                            128
                            72.5k

                          • There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
                            akbooerA
                            akbooer
                            1
                            2
                            59

                          • Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
                            CrilleC
                            Crille
                            0
                            6
                            52

                          • Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
                            toggledbitsT
                            toggledbits
                            0
                            17
                            245

                          • Shelly Wall Display XL
                            akbooerA
                            akbooer
                            2
                            9
                            662

                          • [Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
                            toggledbitsT
                            toggledbits
                            0
                            26
                            393

                          • [Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
                            CrilleC
                            Crille
                            0
                            12
                            330

                          • No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
                            toggledbitsT
                            toggledbits
                            0
                            2
                            79

                          • Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
                            toggledbitsT
                            toggledbits
                            0
                            2
                            112
                          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                          Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Unsolved