Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. [SOLVED] Expressions not auto-updating when dependencies change (22022)
Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
tunnusT
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration: users: # This section defines your valid users. admin: ******* groups: # This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application # and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to # more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here. admin_group: users: - admin applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications guests: users: "*" applications: - dashboard api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin_group allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: true session: timeout: 7200 # (seconds) rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true # If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged. log_acls: true # If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged. debug_acls: true My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
Multi-System Reactor
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request 2?
CatmanV2C
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks. Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option? No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reset a delay
CatmanV2C
I'm sure this has been asked, and answered, but damned if I can figure it out Use case: I have a rear garden with lights. A door from the kitchen into the garden and a door from the garage. Currently if I open the kitchen door the lights come on (yay) and a 3 minute delay starts. After 3 minutes, no matter what else happens, the lights go off (Boo! But also yay!) What I would like is for the 3 minute delay until the lights go off to start from the latest door open event. That is, if I'm going from kitchen to garage, and back again, the lights stay on until there's three minutes of no activity. I've tried 'hacking' with a virtual switch, but can't seem to stop the delay. Any pointers? TIA C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Loading Screen Safari
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Constraints states visually do not match actual
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Feature request: For Each action on arrays/groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

[SOLVED] Expressions not auto-updating when dependencies change (22022)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
25 Posts 5 Posters 4.1k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Alan_F
    wrote on last edited by Alan_F
    #1

    Reactor 22022, Raspberry PI4 Buster, Docker

    What is expected: When an expression value changes, dependent expression values will also change

    What is occurring: When an expression changes, dependent expressions only update if I click "Try this expression".

    After updating to 22021 and then 22022 I noticed that my Thermostat routine started having issues. While looking into the cause I found that dependent expression were not updating automatically.

    My specific application is as follows: I have MSR poll the Lennox "iComfort" API to get the current state of the Thermostat via an HTTP request every minute.
    The request returns a JSON response. The polling rule captures that response to an expression:

    a398c3ff-2735-4116-8038-de74a9ea270c-image.png

    That expression is being updated as expected:

    65884882-389a-4497-b125-e28a6e7ccf30-image.png

    Other expressions are set to the values of various parts of the g_iComfort response. For example the cool set point expression is set as follows:

    397cea16-6af4-4919-b858-add26fc53d0d-image.png

    These screen shots show that g_iComfort has the cool set point at 74, but g_tstat_csp is still 72 as I hadn't clicked the "Try this expression" button.

    I have additional expressions set up for the heat set point, the operation mode, the humidity, etc.

    Since g_tstat_csp is dependent on g_iComfort, if g_iComfort changes g_tstat_csp should change. When the polling rule runs each minute the g_iComfort expression updates, but none of the expressions that are dependent on g_iComfort update. If I click the "Try this expression" button, they update. On versions before 22021 they updated as expected.

    As a test I set up two simpler expressions, one a string and one set to mirror that string:

    b7f5cd4a-e1de-4b86-81d5-2ef79a65996c-image.png

    The attached screen shot was after I set g_test3 to "bar" and clicked Save, then clicked "Try this expression" on g_test4 which caused it to update to "bar". I then changed g_test4 to "foo" and clicked Save which resulted in this screen shot where g_test3 is "foo" but g_test4 is still showing "bar".

    wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • G Offline
      G Offline
      gwp1
      wrote on last edited by gwp1
      #2

      This is exactly what I've tried to explain in https://smarthome.community/topic/873/api-poll-doesn-t-un-set-or-populate-child-expressions, mine is bare metal.

      *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
      *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

      *HAOS
      Core 2026.1.1
      w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
      FW: v1.1
      SDK: v7.23.1

      *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
      MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
      MQTTController: 25139
      ZWave Controller: 25139

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A Alan_F

        Reactor 22022, Raspberry PI4 Buster, Docker

        What is expected: When an expression value changes, dependent expression values will also change

        What is occurring: When an expression changes, dependent expressions only update if I click "Try this expression".

        After updating to 22021 and then 22022 I noticed that my Thermostat routine started having issues. While looking into the cause I found that dependent expression were not updating automatically.

        My specific application is as follows: I have MSR poll the Lennox "iComfort" API to get the current state of the Thermostat via an HTTP request every minute.
        The request returns a JSON response. The polling rule captures that response to an expression:

        a398c3ff-2735-4116-8038-de74a9ea270c-image.png

        That expression is being updated as expected:

        65884882-389a-4497-b125-e28a6e7ccf30-image.png

        Other expressions are set to the values of various parts of the g_iComfort response. For example the cool set point expression is set as follows:

        397cea16-6af4-4919-b858-add26fc53d0d-image.png

        These screen shots show that g_iComfort has the cool set point at 74, but g_tstat_csp is still 72 as I hadn't clicked the "Try this expression" button.

        I have additional expressions set up for the heat set point, the operation mode, the humidity, etc.

        Since g_tstat_csp is dependent on g_iComfort, if g_iComfort changes g_tstat_csp should change. When the polling rule runs each minute the g_iComfort expression updates, but none of the expressions that are dependent on g_iComfort update. If I click the "Try this expression" button, they update. On versions before 22021 they updated as expected.

        As a test I set up two simpler expressions, one a string and one set to mirror that string:

        b7f5cd4a-e1de-4b86-81d5-2ef79a65996c-image.png

        The attached screen shot was after I set g_test3 to "bar" and clicked Save, then clicked "Try this expression" on g_test4 which caused it to update to "bar". I then changed g_test4 to "foo" and clicked Save which resulted in this screen shot where g_test3 is "foo" but g_test4 is still showing "bar".

        wmarcolinW Offline
        wmarcolinW Offline
        wmarcolin
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @toggledbits in another similar example, updating a global expression no longer triggers a rule that uses this variable.

        23cc0a0e-2b14-4e03-816e-09dff5f1ec50-image.png

        9684aa74-64f7-41d5-86a8-08fe24b1efa8-image.png

        Until version 22004 there was no problem.

        If I manually activate the Reset Rule. the update is performed on the chosen rule.

        Thanks.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Offline
          A Offline
          Alan_F
          wrote on last edited by Alan_F
          #4

          @gwp1

          I searched through old topics looking to see if this was already reported, but somehow i missed your post.

          I'm also seeing the issue where even when I update the expression, the new value doesn't appear in a rule that references it unless I manually reset the rule.

          G 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Alan_F

            @gwp1

            I searched through old topics looking to see if this was already reported, but somehow i missed your post.

            I'm also seeing the issue where even when I update the expression, the new value doesn't appear in a rule that references it unless I manually reset the rule.

            G Offline
            G Offline
            gwp1
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @alan_f I cannot verify that as I've rolled back to build 22004 given I'll be away from the house for a bit this afternoon.

            *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
            *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

            *HAOS
            Core 2026.1.1
            w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
            FW: v1.1
            SDK: v7.23.1

            *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
            MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
            MQTTController: 25139
            ZWave Controller: 25139

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • wmarcolinW Offline
              wmarcolinW Offline
              wmarcolin
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Opened Mantis 298 from the problem above.

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • wmarcolinW Offline
                wmarcolinW Offline
                wmarcolin
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                SOLVED v. 22023! Thanks!

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • G Offline
                  G Offline
                  gwp1
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Ditto - just updated and a minute later the APIs ran as expected, lots of green status'. Many thanks, @toggledbits! Will close out the linked thread.

                  *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                  *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                  *HAOS
                  Core 2026.1.1
                  w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                  FW: v1.1
                  SDK: v7.23.1

                  *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                  MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                  MQTTController: 25139
                  ZWave Controller: 25139

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • G gwp1 referenced this topic on
                  • therealdbT Offline
                    therealdbT Offline
                    therealdb
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    I'm still experiencing a strange behavior with 22023. I have a couple of reactions using expression, where they are null and are only updating when I manually press play, thus not firing the associated reaction when an expression changes. Am I the only one with such a problem?

                    --
                    On a mission to automate everything.

                    My MS Reactor contrib
                    My Luup Plug-ins

                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • therealdbT therealdb

                      I'm still experiencing a strange behavior with 22023. I have a couple of reactions using expression, where they are null and are only updating when I manually press play, thus not firing the associated reaction when an expression changes. Am I the only one with such a problem?

                      G Offline
                      G Offline
                      gwp1
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @therealdb Mine have been working as expected since the latest build.

                      *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                      *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                      *HAOS
                      Core 2026.1.1
                      w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                      FW: v1.1
                      SDK: v7.23.1

                      *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                      MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                      MQTTController: 25139
                      ZWave Controller: 25139

                      therealdbT 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • A Offline
                        A Offline
                        Alan_F
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        I still had issues, but then I realized that even after 22023 was posted, my install of the Docker 'latest' version re-installed 22022. Once I got 22023 the expressions seem to be working properly.

                        Probably unrelated to the updates, but I had a rare misfire this morning where Reactor didn't see a switch thrown on my Hubitat hub. I turned on a virtual switch via a Hubitat dashboard. That switch being on should start a reaction to set my Thermostat to daytime settings. The switch turns off automatically 5 seconds later. The MSR logs don't show the switch turning on (or off) the first time I clicked it, but the Hubitat dashboard showed it in an 'on' state for 5 seconds. When I clicked it again it worked as expected. I use that function every night and every morning and this is the first time I can remember it failing.

                        toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • G gwp1

                          @therealdb Mine have been working as expected since the latest build.

                          therealdbT Offline
                          therealdbT Offline
                          therealdb
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          @gwp1 I’m 110% sure I’m on the latest version, since it’s reported at the top.

                          --
                          On a mission to automate everything.

                          My MS Reactor contrib
                          My Luup Plug-ins

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • wmarcolinW Offline
                            wmarcolinW Offline
                            wmarcolin
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            @gwp1 @Alan_F and @therealdb

                            Trying to collaborate with the discussion, what I have seen is that actions that occur during the update process, ie if I turn on or off some switch, or if there was an action in progress and I perform the update the state of the action would end during the update, this action remains activated and switch with old status. In other words, it seems to me that maybe there has to be something that downloads all the actions, performs the update, and then when restarting with the new version restarts the actions. Or also take the updated status of the devices.

                            In theory that's what MSR does, that's what I see in the logs, but my feeling is that again we come back to the issue that MSR is much faster than Hubitar and things get left behind when rebooting. When we manually reload an action, or turn a switch on or off, we do a manual re-sync.

                            My suggestion is on the next update, we have to watch the ongoing actions that are paused and the status of devices, perform the upgrade, look at the log when it returns and try to create some consistency in this eventual problem scenario.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • A Alan_F

                              I still had issues, but then I realized that even after 22023 was posted, my install of the Docker 'latest' version re-installed 22022. Once I got 22023 the expressions seem to be working properly.

                              Probably unrelated to the updates, but I had a rare misfire this morning where Reactor didn't see a switch thrown on my Hubitat hub. I turned on a virtual switch via a Hubitat dashboard. That switch being on should start a reaction to set my Thermostat to daytime settings. The switch turns off automatically 5 seconds later. The MSR logs don't show the switch turning on (or off) the first time I clicked it, but the Hubitat dashboard showed it in an 'on' state for 5 seconds. When I clicked it again it worked as expected. I use that function every night and every morning and this is the first time I can remember it failing.

                              toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbits
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              @alan_f said in [SOLVED] Expressions not auto-updating when dependencies change (22022):

                              Probably unrelated to the updates, but I had a rare misfire this morning where Reactor didn't see a switch thrown on my Hubitat hub. I turned on a virtual switch via a Hubitat dashboard. That switch being on should start a reaction to set my Thermostat to daytime settings. The switch turns off automatically 5 seconds later. The MSR logs don't show the switch turning on (or off) the first time I clicked it, but the Hubitat dashboard showed it in an 'on' state for 5 seconds.

                              Do you have the community Hub Information app installed, with a device created for it?

                              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                              A 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                @alan_f said in [SOLVED] Expressions not auto-updating when dependencies change (22022):

                                Probably unrelated to the updates, but I had a rare misfire this morning where Reactor didn't see a switch thrown on my Hubitat hub. I turned on a virtual switch via a Hubitat dashboard. That switch being on should start a reaction to set my Thermostat to daytime settings. The switch turns off automatically 5 seconds later. The MSR logs don't show the switch turning on (or off) the first time I clicked it, but the Hubitat dashboard showed it in an 'on' state for 5 seconds.

                                Do you have the community Hub Information app installed, with a device created for it?

                                A Offline
                                A Offline
                                Alan_F
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                @toggledbits Yes, I have the hub information app and I see the data from it in MSR and Influx.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • A Offline
                                  A Offline
                                  Alan_F
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  Had the same issue with the same switch last night. Google assistant turns the virtual switch on. The Hubitat turns it off 5 seconds later. Reactor should see the switch on and initiate the night thermostat and lights-off actions. The logs on the Hubitat show the switch turned on, but Reactor missed it. On a second attempt, Reactor reacted. I definitely notice if this reaction fails, as the lights in the bedroom don't turn out. I can't remember any failures prior to version 22021. I haven't made any changes to the default settings related to the communications with Hubitat, but I was under the impression that those related to ensuring that MSR didn't hit Hubitat with too many commands at once, so I'm not sure they would have any relationship to MSR not receiving an entity update from Hubitat.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • toggledbitsT Offline
                                    toggledbitsT Offline
                                    toggledbits
                                    wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                                    #17

                                    In logging.yaml, turn up the logging on HubitatController by adding a section like that shown below. Indent the HubitatController: line like the other items already in the file. If HubitatController: is already in the file, just modify it as shown. Then restart Reactor. Capture the log file (name shown below) the next time this happens (make sure the time range in the file includes the time range of the miss). I will need the entire log without redaction, the time of the (non-)event, and your timezone. I'll give you a safe place to post the log when you have it.

                                    Do not take any corrective actions. At least, don't do anything for at least 5 minutes. Then you can fix whatever should have happened. But leave it alone at least 5 minutes after the expected event.

                                      HubitatController:
                                        level: 5
                                        streams:
                                          - type: file
                                            name: hubitat.log
                                            keep: 2
                                            level: 999
                                    

                                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • A Offline
                                      A Offline
                                      Alan_F
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      Done. At the rate it's been going I'd expect it to be at least a few days before I get anything.

                                      I am connected to two Hubitat devices... one at my house and one at my parents' house. If there is a way to filter by name should I have it only do the detailed logs for one to keep the log size more manageable?

                                      If I get a misfire, will I need to pull the logs right away (after the 5 minute wait to re-issue the command) before they get overwritten? Since this happens at bedtime my wife would probably be happier if I wait until morning to pull the logs... she already won't be super happy with the 5 minute wait to turn out the lights. But it wouldn't be the first time I got out of bed to go to the computer and troubleshoot home automation 🙂

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • toggledbitsT Offline
                                        toggledbitsT Offline
                                        toggledbits
                                        wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                                        #19

                                        You should have plenty of time before the logs rotate away. If in doubt, up the keep value to something higher, maybe even 10. How much it logs really depends on your system activity. Just to be safe, also remove the recycle: true line (starts a new log on every Reactor restart -- don't need that, maybe don't want that).

                                        To limit the log to just the one unit, make the HubitatController: line read "HubitatController#id":, where id is the ID you assigned to it in your config. I always quote when introducing special characters.

                                        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • A Offline
                                          A Offline
                                          Alan_F
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          Ok. Currently I have log from 14:47 hours at 1.3 MB, log.1 from 1411 hours at 2 MB, and log.2 from 13:31 hours at 2 MB, so it looks like I'm getting about 40 minutes per log file. I'll bump up the keep value and filter to just the one device id to make sure they persist until morning.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Recent Topics

                                          • Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            2
                                            34

                                          • VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
                                            S
                                            SweetGenius
                                            1
                                            1
                                            28

                                          • Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            2
                                            1
                                            26

                                          • Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
                                            G
                                            gwp1
                                            0
                                            1
                                            57

                                          • [Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
                                            CrilleC
                                            Crille
                                            0
                                            4
                                            79

                                          • [Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
                                            therealdbT
                                            therealdb
                                            0
                                            3
                                            98

                                          • Possible feature request 2?
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            3
                                            75

                                          • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            5
                                            133
                                            80.0k

                                          • Genuinely impressed with Zigbee and HA / Reactor
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            1
                                            9
                                            381

                                          • Copying a global reaction
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            3
                                            116

                                          • [HowTo] Using HABridge with Reactor
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            9
                                            449

                                          • [Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            4
                                            168
                                          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                          Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Unsolved