Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. [Solved] Big change in my system - How to update MSR as best as possible?
Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
tunnusT
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration: users: # This section defines your valid users. admin: ******* groups: # This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application # and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to # more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here. admin_group: users: - admin applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications guests: users: "*" applications: - dashboard api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin_group allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: true session: timeout: 7200 # (seconds) rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true # If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged. log_acls: true # If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged. debug_acls: true My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
Multi-System Reactor
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request 2?
CatmanV2C
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks. Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option? No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reset a delay
CatmanV2C
I'm sure this has been asked, and answered, but damned if I can figure it out Use case: I have a rear garden with lights. A door from the kitchen into the garden and a door from the garage. Currently if I open the kitchen door the lights come on (yay) and a 3 minute delay starts. After 3 minutes, no matter what else happens, the lights go off (Boo! But also yay!) What I would like is for the 3 minute delay until the lights go off to start from the latest door open event. That is, if I'm going from kitchen to garage, and back again, the lights stay on until there's three minutes of no activity. I've tried 'hacking' with a virtual switch, but can't seem to stop the delay. Any pointers? TIA C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Loading Screen Safari
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Constraints states visually do not match actual
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Feature request: For Each action on arrays/groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

[Solved] Big change in my system - How to update MSR as best as possible?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
17 Posts 7 Posters 2.6k Views 7 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    Cadwizzard
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    I've found that this odd behavior if reactions won't run with triggers, nor the button above the reaction, but will with the button to the right of each individual action,..... Then it needs updating.

    MatohlM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C Cadwizzard

      I've found that this odd behavior if reactions won't run with triggers, nor the button above the reaction, but will with the button to the right of each individual action,..... Then it needs updating.

      MatohlM Offline
      MatohlM Offline
      Matohl
      wrote on last edited by Matohl
      #5

      @cadwizzard I have notised that myself. Probably by design, and the reason I left MSR.

      C tunnusT 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • MatohlM Matohl

        @cadwizzard I have notised that myself. Probably by design, and the reason I left MSR.

        C Offline
        C Offline
        Cadwizzard
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        @matohl
        My biggest concern is that this happens without me knowing in future and all sorts of things break if i'm away and I have guests looking after the house (including my heating system which is entirely smart home controlled with logic in MSR!)

        And how to build MSR logic to alert if the triggers don't run?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • MatohlM Matohl

          @cadwizzard I have notised that myself. Probably by design, and the reason I left MSR.

          tunnusT Offline
          tunnusT Offline
          tunnus
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          @matohl said in [Solved] Big change in my system - How to update MSR as best as possible?:

          @cadwizzard I have notised that myself. Probably by design, and the reason I left MSR.

          Which exactly is by design?

          Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT & ZWA-2

          MatohlM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • PerHP Offline
            PerHP Offline
            PerH
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            @Matohl - If you're thinking about when the only way to make actions happen is the "play" button next to each individual action, I really doubt that its by design, nor being an automated way to say that an update is available. My system had a cascade of dead entities, and I suspect that had something to do with it.

            The proper thing to do in that case is to save logs/setup files and open a mantis ticket, just like I didn't here. 😉 That how bugs disappear.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C Offline
              C Offline
              Cadwizzard
              wrote on last edited by Cadwizzard
              #9

              @PerH
              I think MSR is great (came from many years of reactor in Vera), but we never saw this behaviour there. I actually miss the easy way to check for and install updates from the UI in Vera a lot, it has an easy way to pull new databases, and hopefully this will come to MSR. I've seen someone ask for it already. Even a check & warning that there is an update needed would be a great step. MSR checks for HA version compatibility ready, so should be possible)
              When this happened to me, it was from an install that i'd done a while ago setting up HASS, but had never added any Zwave devices (or any other integrations). I added a first device onto the zwave network (simple double boiler switch) and began testing the automations and that MSR worked before getting into a huge amount of logic work. It was then I first saw the issue, before there was hardly anything system wise that could have gone wrong or dead etc.

              G 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Cadwizzard

                @PerH
                I think MSR is great (came from many years of reactor in Vera), but we never saw this behaviour there. I actually miss the easy way to check for and install updates from the UI in Vera a lot, it has an easy way to pull new databases, and hopefully this will come to MSR. I've seen someone ask for it already. Even a check & warning that there is an update needed would be a great step. MSR checks for HA version compatibility ready, so should be possible)
                When this happened to me, it was from an install that i'd done a while ago setting up HASS, but had never added any Zwave devices (or any other integrations). I added a first device onto the zwave network (simple double boiler switch) and began testing the automations and that MSR worked before getting into a huge amount of logic work. It was then I first saw the issue, before there was hardly anything system wise that could have gone wrong or dead etc.

                G Offline
                G Offline
                gwp1
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                @cadwizzard Set this thread to send you notifications. That's where @toggledbits posts all release announcements.

                *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                *HAOS
                Core 2026.1.1
                w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                FW: v1.1
                SDK: v7.23.1

                *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                MQTTController: 25139
                ZWave Controller: 25139

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbits
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  Next build will have update notices. It's already done.

                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • tunnusT tunnus

                    @matohl said in [Solved] Big change in my system - How to update MSR as best as possible?:

                    @cadwizzard I have notised that myself. Probably by design, and the reason I left MSR.

                    Which exactly is by design?

                    MatohlM Offline
                    MatohlM Offline
                    Matohl
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    @tunnus

                    Which exactly is by design?

                    For me ”by design” is a behavior that is intended by the creator witch means it’s in the design.

                    Well, suddenly one day all automations didin’t work anymore. I was way behind updating the MSR updates (I guess +150 days or something) because everything was working as it should and I didn’t se the need for updating. I realised that I was not alone but the thread is lost for me now.

                    So, I had the impression that after a certain time the automations in MSR, if not updated, it will stop to function ”by design” . My guess was that (I could be wrong, that happens) that is probably ”by design” in the code by the creator to force the user to upgrade and not have to deal with questions about old versions. I’m fine with that, it is the creators code, but I can not have something at in my home that suddenly stops working for this reason.
                    This got me thinking about my options and I went in an another direction. Don’t get me wrong I really like MSR but I’m not there anymore.

                    G CatmanV2C tunnusT 3 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • MatohlM Matohl

                      @tunnus

                      Which exactly is by design?

                      For me ”by design” is a behavior that is intended by the creator witch means it’s in the design.

                      Well, suddenly one day all automations didin’t work anymore. I was way behind updating the MSR updates (I guess +150 days or something) because everything was working as it should and I didn’t se the need for updating. I realised that I was not alone but the thread is lost for me now.

                      So, I had the impression that after a certain time the automations in MSR, if not updated, it will stop to function ”by design” . My guess was that (I could be wrong, that happens) that is probably ”by design” in the code by the creator to force the user to upgrade and not have to deal with questions about old versions. I’m fine with that, it is the creators code, but I can not have something at in my home that suddenly stops working for this reason.
                      This got me thinking about my options and I went in an another direction. Don’t get me wrong I really like MSR but I’m not there anymore.

                      G Offline
                      G Offline
                      gwp1
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      @matohl This is my opinion only, let me say that.

                      I believe it is unrealistic to expect a piece of software to NOT change and grow and improve as new technologies and approaches for coding are discovered and implemented - and as that happens legacy functionality would be deprecated and replaced by something else.

                      The only way "one day all automations didn't work" happens is if something is changed. If I'm reading the OP correctly, other elements were changed that weren't in place when the older version of MSR was installed thus creating an incompatibility. That's not the fault of MSR. To believe that "after a certain time the automations in MSR, if not updated, will stop to function" if nothing else in the chain has changed (ie dependencies) is woefully inaccurate.

                      *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                      *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                      *HAOS
                      Core 2026.1.1
                      w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                      FW: v1.1
                      SDK: v7.23.1

                      *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                      MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                      MQTTController: 25139
                      ZWave Controller: 25139

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • MatohlM Matohl

                        @tunnus

                        Which exactly is by design?

                        For me ”by design” is a behavior that is intended by the creator witch means it’s in the design.

                        Well, suddenly one day all automations didin’t work anymore. I was way behind updating the MSR updates (I guess +150 days or something) because everything was working as it should and I didn’t se the need for updating. I realised that I was not alone but the thread is lost for me now.

                        So, I had the impression that after a certain time the automations in MSR, if not updated, it will stop to function ”by design” . My guess was that (I could be wrong, that happens) that is probably ”by design” in the code by the creator to force the user to upgrade and not have to deal with questions about old versions. I’m fine with that, it is the creators code, but I can not have something at in my home that suddenly stops working for this reason.
                        This got me thinking about my options and I went in an another direction. Don’t get me wrong I really like MSR but I’m not there anymore.

                        CatmanV2C Offline
                        CatmanV2C Offline
                        CatmanV2
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        @matohl said in [Solved] Big change in my system - How to update MSR as best as possible?:

                        So, I had the impression that after a certain time the automations in MSR, if not updated, it will stop to function ”by design” . My guess was that (I could be wrong, that happens) that is probably ”by design” in the code by the creator to force the user to upgrade and not have to deal with questions about old versions. I’m fine with that, it is the creators code, but I can not have something at in my home that suddenly stops working for this reason.

                        I am absolutely, 100% sure that is NOT the case. But as you say, you've moved on.

                        C

                        The Ex-Vera abuser know as CatmanV2.....

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • MatohlM Matohl

                          @tunnus

                          Which exactly is by design?

                          For me ”by design” is a behavior that is intended by the creator witch means it’s in the design.

                          Well, suddenly one day all automations didin’t work anymore. I was way behind updating the MSR updates (I guess +150 days or something) because everything was working as it should and I didn’t se the need for updating. I realised that I was not alone but the thread is lost for me now.

                          So, I had the impression that after a certain time the automations in MSR, if not updated, it will stop to function ”by design” . My guess was that (I could be wrong, that happens) that is probably ”by design” in the code by the creator to force the user to upgrade and not have to deal with questions about old versions. I’m fine with that, it is the creators code, but I can not have something at in my home that suddenly stops working for this reason.
                          This got me thinking about my options and I went in an another direction. Don’t get me wrong I really like MSR but I’m not there anymore.

                          tunnusT Offline
                          tunnusT Offline
                          tunnus
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #15

                          @matohl Deliberate aging? Quite outrageous accusation

                          Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT & ZWA-2

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • PerHP PerH

                            Sorry about that, I just had a slight hope for a "you just forgot to push that button" kind of answer..

                            In any case, I cleaned out my rules over the board and updated the MSR image, and now it's running like a charm..

                            For future reference, is there in fact a "this entity is now gone from the system, choose a replacement" function, or did i just dream that one? If not, it would be a great addition! 🙂

                            Again, a big thankyou to @toggledbits for sharing this great machine!

                            G Offline
                            G Offline
                            gwp1
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #16

                            @perh

                            @perh said in [Solved] Big change in my system - How to update MSR as best as possible?:

                            this entity is now gone from the system, choose a replacemen

                            If an entity or ruleset is gone that was used in other rulesets, the remaining ruleset will have a yellow triangle next to it and the field for the missing element has missing? (or something similar to that wording) in it. I don't have any examples atm or I'd shared a screenshot.

                            *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                            *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                            *HAOS
                            Core 2026.1.1
                            w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                            FW: v1.1
                            SDK: v7.23.1

                            *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                            MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                            MQTTController: 25139
                            ZWave Controller: 25139

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • PerHP Offline
                              PerHP Offline
                              PerH
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #17

                              @gwp1 : Yes, I've seen (100s!) of those, no problem there! 😉

                              I just had this notion that there was some other function in place, where if a device was gone, it would prompt you "This entity is gone, select replacement here", and that this would do replacement of all uses of that entity/device.

                              To the other discussion:
                              My problems started when I moved ALL devices to a new system, as in all entity addresses changed.
                              I have previously been on the same MSR version for long periods of time without any issues, so I very much doubt any "planned obsolesence". 😉

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              Recent Topics

                              • Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                0
                                2
                                51

                              • VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
                                S
                                SweetGenius
                                1
                                1
                                45

                              • Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                2
                                1
                                35

                              • Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
                                G
                                gwp1
                                0
                                1
                                67

                              • [Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
                                CrilleC
                                Crille
                                0
                                4
                                101

                              • [Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
                                therealdbT
                                therealdb
                                0
                                3
                                117

                              • Possible feature request 2?
                                CatmanV2C
                                CatmanV2
                                0
                                3
                                87

                              • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                5
                                133
                                80.2k

                              • Genuinely impressed with Zigbee and HA / Reactor
                                CatmanV2C
                                CatmanV2
                                1
                                9
                                396

                              • Copying a global reaction
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                0
                                3
                                121

                              • [HowTo] Using HABridge with Reactor
                                CatmanV2C
                                CatmanV2
                                0
                                9
                                457

                              • [Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                0
                                4
                                178
                              Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                              Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • Unsolved