Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Ezlo Plus - Philips Hue devices duplicates in MSR
Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
tunnusT
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration: users: # This section defines your valid users. admin: ******* groups: # This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application # and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to # more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here. admin_group: users: - admin applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications guests: users: "*" applications: - dashboard api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin_group allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: true session: timeout: 7200 # (seconds) rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true # If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged. log_acls: true # If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged. debug_acls: true My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
Multi-System Reactor
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request 2?
CatmanV2C
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks. Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option? No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reset a delay
CatmanV2C
I'm sure this has been asked, and answered, but damned if I can figure it out Use case: I have a rear garden with lights. A door from the kitchen into the garden and a door from the garage. Currently if I open the kitchen door the lights come on (yay) and a 3 minute delay starts. After 3 minutes, no matter what else happens, the lights go off (Boo! But also yay!) What I would like is for the 3 minute delay until the lights go off to start from the latest door open event. That is, if I'm going from kitchen to garage, and back again, the lights stay on until there's three minutes of no activity. I've tried 'hacking' with a virtual switch, but can't seem to stop the delay. Any pointers? TIA C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Loading Screen Safari
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Constraints states visually do not match actual
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Feature request: For Each action on arrays/groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Ezlo Plus - Philips Hue devices duplicates in MSR

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
14 Posts 2 Posters 1.5k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cw-kidC Offline
    cw-kidC Offline
    cw-kid
    wrote on last edited by cw-kid
    #1

    Just noticed I have two devices in the Entities list with the same name coming from the same controller (Ezlo Plus) and I am not sure why this is ?

    The device in question is called "Cabinet Light Strip (Hue)"

    Using the Ezlo online API tool I did a hub.devices.list query and searching the output I can only find one device called "Cabinet Light Strip (Hue)"

    This is the entry for ir, from the API Tool.

    {
            "_id": "6300d20b123e4318ec576f13",
            "batteryPowered": false,
            "category": "dimmable_light",
            "deviceTypeId": "ezlo.philips_hue_lamp",
            "gatewayId": "6300d1d5123e4318ec576e99",
            "info": {
              "id": "1",
              "parent_device_id": "6300d1fb123e4318ec576e9a"
            },
            "name": "Cabinet Light Strip (Hue)",
            "parentDeviceId": "",
            "persistent": false,
            "reachable": true,
            "ready": true,
            "roomId": "62bec965123e43124ea13972",
            "security": "no",
            "status": "idle",
            "subcategory": "dimmable_bulb",
            "type": "light.controller"
        
    

    This is what I see in the Entities list in MSR

    58497342-faf4-4e8e-b70e-c8cf96fa5673-image.png

    Entry #1 -

    color_temperature.value=null
    dimming.level=0.64
    dimming.step=0.1
    power_switch.state=false
    rgb_color.blue=125
    rgb_color.green=141
    rgb_color.red=129
    x_ezlo_device.battery_powered=false
    x_ezlo_device.category="dimmable_light"
    x_ezlo_device.manufacturer=null
    x_ezlo_device.model=null
    x_ezlo_device.parent="62baddaf123e4347bb149fec"
    x_ezlo_device.reachable=true
    x_ezlo_device.ready=true
    x_ezlo_device.room="62bec965123e43124ea13972"
    x_ezlo_device.status="idle"
    x_ezlo_device.subcategory="dimmable_bulb"
    x_ezlo_device.type_id="ezlo.philips_hue_lamp"
    x_ezlo_item.alert="select"
    x_ezlo_item.dimmer=64
    x_ezlo_item.dimmer_down=0
    x_ezlo_item.dimmer_stop=0
    x_ezlo_item.dimmer_up=0
    x_ezlo_item.effect="none"
    x_ezlo_item.hue=37777
    x_ezlo_item.rgbcolor={"blue":125,"green":141,"red":129}
    x_ezlo_item.rgbcolor_down=0
    x_ezlo_item.rgbcolor_stop=0
    x_ezlo_item.rgbcolor_up=0
    x_ezlo_item.saturation=107
    x_ezlo_item.switch=false
    x_ezlo_object.id="62bade0a123e4347bb14a040"
    Capabilities: color_temperature, dimming, power_switch, rgb_color, x_ezlo_device, x_ezlo_item, x_ezlo_object
    Actions: color_temperature.set, dimming.down, dimming.set, dimming.up, power_switch.off, power_switch.on, power_switch.set, rgb_color.set, rgb_color.set_rgb, x_ezlo_device.device_check, x_ezlo_device.set_item_value, x_ezlo_device.set_name, x_ezlo_device.set_room, x_ezlo_device.status_check
    
    

    Enrty #2 -

    color_temperature.value=null
    dimming.level=0
    dimming.step=0.1
    power_switch.state=false
    rgb_color.blue=0
    rgb_color.green=0
    rgb_color.red=0
    x_ezlo_device.battery_powered=false
    x_ezlo_device.category="dimmable_light"
    x_ezlo_device.manufacturer=null
    x_ezlo_device.model=null
    x_ezlo_device.parent=""
    x_ezlo_device.reachable=true
    x_ezlo_device.ready=true
    x_ezlo_device.room="62bec965123e43124ea13972"
    x_ezlo_device.status="idle"
    x_ezlo_device.subcategory="dimmable_bulb"
    x_ezlo_device.type_id="ezlo.philips_hue_lamp"
    x_ezlo_item.alert="lselect"
    x_ezlo_item.dimmer=0
    x_ezlo_item.dimmer_down=0
    x_ezlo_item.dimmer_stop=0
    x_ezlo_item.dimmer_up=0
    x_ezlo_item.effect="none"
    x_ezlo_item.hue=61509
    x_ezlo_item.rgbcolor={"blue":0,"green":0,"red":0}
    x_ezlo_item.rgbcolor_down=0
    x_ezlo_item.rgbcolor_stop=0
    x_ezlo_item.rgbcolor_up=0
    x_ezlo_item.saturation=227
    x_ezlo_item.switch=false
    x_ezlo_object.id="6300d20b123e4318ec576f13"
    Capabilities: color_temperature, dimming, power_switch, rgb_color, x_ezlo_device, x_ezlo_item, x_ezlo_object
    Actions: color_temperature.set, dimming.down, dimming.set, dimming.up, power_switch.off, power_switch.on, power_switch.set, rgb_color.set, rgb_color.set_rgb, x_ezlo_device.device_check, x_ezlo_device.set_item_value, x_ezlo_device.set_name, x_ezlo_device.set_room, x_ezlo_device.status_check
    

    x_ezlo_object.id="62bade0a123e4347bb14a040"

    and

    x_ezlo_object.id="6300d20b123e4318ec576f13"

    The one ending in 6f13 is the one I see listed in the Ezlo Online API Tool output.

    If I search the output for "62bade0a123e4347bb14a040" its not found at all.

    So I don't know what this other duplicated device is or where its come from.

    These are newish Philips Hue plugin devices from Ezlo's own Hue plugin.

    So then I searched the Entities list for another "Hue" device called "TV Backlight (Hue)" and I have two of those listed also.

    b19b7716-d5d7-40c0-bffc-450bcf2f12dd-image.png

    x_ezlo_object.id="62bade08123e4347bb14a031"

    and

    x_ezlo_object.id="6300d20d123e4318ec576f21"

    Searching again the data output from the Ezlo API tool for these two device ID's I only see one of them. The one ending in 6f21.

    {
            "_id": "6300d20d123e4318ec576f21",
            "batteryPowered": false,
            "category": "dimmable_light",
            "deviceTypeId": "ezlo.philips_hue_lamp",
            "gatewayId": "6300d1d5123e4318ec576e99",
            "info": {
              "id": "2",
              "parent_device_id": "6300d1fb123e4318ec576e9a"
            },
            "name": "TV Backlight (Hue)",
            "parentDeviceId": "",
            "persistent": false,
            "reachable": true,
            "ready": true,
            "roomId": "62bec965123e43124ea13972",
            "security": "no",
            "status": "idle",
            "subcategory": "dimmable_bulb",
            "type": "light.controller"
    

    Maybe their new Philips Hue plugin is doing something funky? But I cannot see these duplicated device ID's listed in the hub.device.list API query and I do not see two of these Hue devices in their web GUI with the same names either.

    So bit confused now as to what is happening.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Since they have different IDs, it stands to reason that 62baddaf123e4347bb149fec existed at some point. Since EzloController doesn't yet do deadmarking (that's coming in this weekend's build as I said in your other thread), it would not yet be marked as a missing entity. Why the ID changed is up to Ezlo's firmware and/or your actions. Reactor just acts on what it gets.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • cw-kidC Offline
        cw-kidC Offline
        cw-kid
        wrote on last edited by cw-kid
        #3

        Yeah like you say the other ID / device must of existing at one point or MSR would not of imported it.

        Actually thinking about it more now, I remember I had to install and setup their Hue plugin twice, as they have no plugin upgrade process in place yet, for newer version numbers of the same plugin, they need to sort that out !

        So the first version of the Hue plugin I had to remove and this deleted all the imported Hue devices off the Ezlo controller.

        I then had to install their newer version of their Hue plugin and pair it with the bridge again, thus importing all the devices again with new ID's presumably.

        So I think that is probably why I now have duplicated Ezlo Hue plugin devices in MSR.

        OK looking forward to your new build with dead marking.

        Thanks

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

          Since they have different IDs, it stands to reason that 62baddaf123e4347bb149fec existed at some point. Since EzloController doesn't yet do deadmarking (that's coming in this weekend's build as I said in your other thread), it would not yet be marked as a missing entity. Why the ID changed is up to Ezlo's firmware and/or your actions. Reactor just acts on what it gets.

          cw-kidC Offline
          cw-kidC Offline
          cw-kid
          wrote on last edited by cw-kid
          #4

          @toggledbits

          Patrick may I ask another question here please?

          On the Ezlo Hue Plugin devices in their own rules engine "Meshbots" there is an "alert" option that makes the lights blink.

          c264f354-1d56-4acc-bb97-f3633d35fa79-image.png

          I don't see this "alerts" option in an MSR rules action however.

          f95f8374-35c0-4fe4-aac2-b0e3b64da1e7-image.png

          I guess its similar to the Vera controller plugins? Where sometimes you had to add support for that particular plugins functions is that correct?

          When I select a Hue Plugin device in their Meshbot Action these are the options I see:

          14160176-b17a-43ed-a40c-3724f066c34a-image.png 3a4fb5a2-d061-44f8-a2f2-304ddd776111-image.png

          Thanks.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbits
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            I PM'd you a like to upload your ezlo_inventory.json file (in logs). I can see there if anything is published that would lead to that action, or if it's "special knowledge" (i.e. kludge) in Ezlo's Reactor clone.

            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

            cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cw-kidC Offline
              cw-kidC Offline
              cw-kid
              wrote on last edited by cw-kid
              #6

              OK thanks I uploaded the requested file. All my rules are still in MSR so could be handy if I could use this blink feature on the Hue lights, but not mission critical.

              I did look under the AltHue plugin on the Vera Plus but could not find "alert" and a forum post I read suggested it was never added by that dev.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                I PM'd you a like to upload your ezlo_inventory.json file (in logs). I can see there if anything is published that would lead to that action, or if it's "special knowledge" (i.e. kludge) in Ezlo's Reactor clone.

                cw-kidC Offline
                cw-kidC Offline
                cw-kid
                wrote on last edited by cw-kid
                #7

                @toggledbits

                Damn looks like I won't be able to upgrade MSR anytime soon. I can no longer login to the Debian box MSR runs on for some reason. Not sure what happened and went wrong.

                https://smarthome.community/topic/1015/help-please-cannot-login-to-debian-msr-box

                EDIT: I've managed to fix my login problems now.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cw-kidC Offline
                  cw-kidC Offline
                  cw-kid
                  wrote on last edited by cw-kid
                  #8

                  Couple of nice updates there for me !

                  VeraController: Ensure x_vera_device.failed and .configured are null if Vera fails to provide state for these values.
                  EzloController: Dead-marking and automatic removal (after delay) of entities for Ezlo devices/rooms/scenes that no longer exist (functional parity with other hub Controller objects).

                  I am going to update MSR now.

                  Thanks

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • cw-kidC Offline
                    cw-kidC Offline
                    cw-kid
                    wrote on last edited by cw-kid
                    #9

                    Seems to be working and detecting dead devices now from the Ezlo Plus controller.

                    So after 24 hours it would auto remove them from MSR right.

                    Or I can just manually remove them now.

                    Cheers

                    c139cc58-c95b-4ff5-a164-8f6ab53a2cd5-image.png

                    toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • cw-kidC cw-kid

                      Seems to be working and detecting dead devices now from the Ezlo Plus controller.

                      So after 24 hours it would auto remove them from MSR right.

                      Or I can just manually remove them now.

                      Cheers

                      c139cc58-c95b-4ff5-a164-8f6ab53a2cd5-image.png

                      toggledbitsT Offline
                      toggledbitsT Offline
                      toggledbits
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @cw-kid said in Ezlo Plus - Philips Hue devices duplicates in MSR:

                      So after 24 hours it would auto remove them from MSR right.
                      Or I can just manually remove them now.

                      Yes.

                      For the alert, use the x_ezlo_device.set_item_value action with the item name and desired value:

                      04b747b3-40fa-4b56-aabc-7c11a0899aa4-image.png

                      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                      cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                        @cw-kid said in Ezlo Plus - Philips Hue devices duplicates in MSR:

                        So after 24 hours it would auto remove them from MSR right.
                        Or I can just manually remove them now.

                        Yes.

                        For the alert, use the x_ezlo_device.set_item_value action with the item name and desired value:

                        04b747b3-40fa-4b56-aabc-7c11a0899aa4-image.png

                        cw-kidC Offline
                        cw-kidC Offline
                        cw-kid
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        @toggledbits

                        Even better thanks. I will give the alert a try.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • cw-kidC Offline
                          cw-kidC Offline
                          cw-kid
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          The "alert" works I just tested it.

                          Thanks.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • toggledbitsT Offline
                            toggledbitsT Offline
                            toggledbits
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            A bit of background here. Unlike Vera, which had actions separate from values (state variables) to make things happen, the Ezlo firmware uses the Z-Wave approach of modifying values as a way of stimulating action. It's not surprising they would use this model, as Z-Wave is the philosophical core of their system. There is therefore no need for separate actions, which on Vera was the byproduct of attempting to implement UPnP (and didn't quite get there).

                            Since actions on Ezlo are actually just item value changes, using x_ezlo_device.set_item_value, you can set the value of any item associated with a device, even if the value isn't mapped to one of Reactor's capabilities or attributes, and whatever action that may stimulate either in the firmware or on the device itself will occur.

                            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                            cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                              A bit of background here. Unlike Vera, which had actions separate from values (state variables) to make things happen, the Ezlo firmware uses the Z-Wave approach of modifying values as a way of stimulating action. It's not surprising they would use this model, as Z-Wave is the philosophical core of their system. There is therefore no need for separate actions, which on Vera was the byproduct of attempting to implement UPnP (and didn't quite get there).

                              Since actions on Ezlo are actually just item value changes, using x_ezlo_device.set_item_value, you can set the value of any item associated with a device, even if the value isn't mapped to one of Reactor's capabilities or attributes, and whatever action that may stimulate either in the firmware or on the device itself will occur.

                              cw-kidC Offline
                              cw-kidC Offline
                              cw-kid
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              @toggledbits

                              Thanks for the additional information, that is certainly good to know about.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              Recent Topics

                              • Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                0
                                2
                                43

                              • VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
                                S
                                SweetGenius
                                1
                                1
                                34

                              • Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                2
                                1
                                29

                              • Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
                                G
                                gwp1
                                0
                                1
                                63

                              • [Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
                                CrilleC
                                Crille
                                0
                                4
                                92

                              • [Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
                                therealdbT
                                therealdb
                                0
                                3
                                106

                              • Possible feature request 2?
                                CatmanV2C
                                CatmanV2
                                0
                                3
                                78

                              • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                5
                                133
                                80.1k

                              • Genuinely impressed with Zigbee and HA / Reactor
                                CatmanV2C
                                CatmanV2
                                1
                                9
                                391

                              • Copying a global reaction
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                0
                                3
                                117

                              • [HowTo] Using HABridge with Reactor
                                CatmanV2C
                                CatmanV2
                                0
                                9
                                453

                              • [Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                0
                                4
                                173
                              Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                              Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • Unsolved