Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. [Solved] Migrating MSR to Docker on Proxmox
Error: Command timeout
G
at _ClientAPI._commandTimeout (http://192.168.1.100:8111/client/ClientAPI.js:807:179 Seeing this randomly when returning to open browser tab after being away awhile. Once, maybe twice a day. "What did you do to trigger it?" Literally nothing, just walked away and returned and there it was. Actions taken in reasonably close proximity to this particular instance of it popping up: I'd restarted the MSR container in Portainer. I'll try to grab some logs here shortly.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
toggledbitsT
This post does not apply to users of Intel/AMD-based systems. If you are using a Reactor image tagged latest-amd64 or stable-amd64, then this post does not apply to you. It also does not apply to bare-metal installs; it's for users of docker images on ARM-based systems only (principally Raspberry Pi hosts, but could be others). After January 15, 2026, I will no longer produce the aarch64-tagged docker image for Reactor. The ARM images will be arm64 for 64-bit operating systems, and armv7l for 32-bit operating systems. For those of you running a container from the aarch64 image today, this will be a relatively simple change: you just need to switch the image used for your docker container to a differently-tagged image. If you are using docker-compose, then this is a relatively simple matter of changing the image line in your docker-compose.yaml file and then stopping (docker-compose down) and restarting (docker-compose up -d) your Reactor daemon. But there's a catch... not all of you can safely just switch from the aarch64 image to the arm64 image. And, you can't just trust the output of uname -m, for example, because this exposes the CPU architecture, but not the word size of the OS running on that CPU. For Raspberry Pi systems, the transition to 64-bit operating systems was long (starting in 2016) and not always obvious — although there was a first "official" 64-bit OS for RPis in 2020, it did not become a default recommendation in the Raspberry Pi Imager until 2021, and then that was only the default for Pi 3/4 systems with >4GB RAM; it was 2022 before it was universally recommended for all 64-bit CPUs regardless of RAM size. Depending on when you first imaged your RPi system and what default you may have been offered/chosen, you could today easily have a 64-bit CPU Raspberry Pi running a 32-bit version of the operating system. Upgrades along the way would not change this; changing it to fully 64-bit requires a full reimage of the system. To establish if your OS is 64- or 32-bit, log in to your Pi and run: sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH. If the response is arm64 or aarch64, then you are running a 64-bit OS and you should use the arm64-tagged image. If it's anything else, you are running a 32-bit OS, and you should use the armv7l-tagged image. pi@rpi4-1:~ $ sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH armhf pi@rpi4-1:~ $ uname -m aarch64 pi@rpi4-1:~ $ In the example above, the uname command reports that the CPU is 64-bit architecture (aarch64), which is true for the host on which I ran these commands, but the DEB_HOST_ARCH value is armhf, indicating a 32-bit operating system. This system has to use the armv7l-tagged image. Other systems will have their own ways of determining the word size of the running OS. Since the majority of Reactor users running ARM systems are on Raspberry Pis, I am able to supply the above instructions, but if you happen to have a different ARM system, you'll need to do some web searching to figure out how to expose that information. Or, you can just try the arm64 image, and if it doesn't start up, try the armv7l image. Remember to always back up your system before making any changes. For everyone, please make this change as soon as possible, and if you have any trouble finding a working image, please (1) go back to the current aarch64 image; and (2) let me know in this thread along with as much detail about your host system as you can offer (including the output of the dpkg-architecture command mentioned above).
Multi-System Reactor
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] reactor-mqtt-contrib package for additional MQTT templates
therealdbT
I'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only). Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package: https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go. I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them. The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression. Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests
Multi-System Reactor
HA 2025.9.4 Supported Yet?
CatmanV2C
Tangentially did I miss 2025.9.4 getting blessed in MSR? I've been holding off Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor

[Solved] Migrating MSR to Docker on Proxmox

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
12 Posts 2 Posters 1.9k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    gwp1
    wrote on last edited by gwp1
    #1
    • Zero issues installing Proxmox on a new MiniPC.
    • Zero issues migrating my HA instance over to the new hotness (I know, I was surprised, too!)

    And then MSR...

    My first issue: I'm logged into the msr CT as reactor (I used the suggested username just to keep things simple as this is new space for me and I was high off my success of migrating HA over).

    When I run

    docker pull toggledbits/reactor:latest-amd64
    

    ... it assigns the \reactor\ subdirectory where installed root ownership. I am absolutely logged in with the correct non-root user.
    1c58aead-85ca-4b2c-8f48-c3d1f57d7fe3-image.png

    Second issue: I copied over the following folders:
    67e7e4a5-cee8-4de1-90c7-1df35f1070b9-image.png When MSR loads, all of my Global Expressions are missing.

    Third issue:
    All controllers connect wonderfully (Hubitat, etc)... except HA.
    After changing ownership of the logs to reactor again I can see this when MSR calls HA:

    
    [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:43.128Z <HubitatController:INFO> HubitatController#hubitat successful connection to ws://192.168.1.214/eventsocket
    [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:43.151Z <HubitatController:NOTICE> HubitatController#hubitat current mode is Evening (2)
    [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:43.212Z <HubitatController:NOTICE> HubitatController#hubitat HSM status is disarmed
    [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:43.214Z <Controller:NOTICE> Controller HubitatController#hubitat is now online.
    [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:43.255Z <MQTTController:INFO> MQTTController#mqtt2 connected; opening subscriptions
    [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:43.371Z <MQTTController:INFO> MQTTController#mqtt2 sending inits and going online!
    [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:43.373Z <Controller:NOTICE> Controller MQTTController#mqtt2 is now online.
    [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:47.179Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to ws://192.168.1.123:8123/api/websocket
    [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:47.180Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.1.123:8123 [-]
    [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:47.180Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass ws error code ECONNREFUSED
    [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:47.180Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to ws://192.168.1.123:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation
    [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:47.180Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.1.123:8123 [-]
    [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:52.181Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to ws://192.168.1.123:8123/api/websocket
    [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:52.183Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.1.123:8123 [-]
    [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:52.183Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass ws error code ECONNREFUSED
    [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:52.183Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to ws://192.168.1.123:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation
    [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:52.183Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.1.123:8123 [-]
    

    Yes, I created a fresh new long-lived access token for the MSR containerized install and updated the reactor.yaml config file correctly.

    Honestly, all-in-all, for my total lack of expertise here I'm very pleased that I only have these three issues. But they are def blockers atm.

    My RPi bare metal install of MSR hooked right up to the new HA and is humming along just fine (I used hostnames were possible and shuffled some IPs in other places so I wouldn't run into things later that were mapped incorrectly that I'd forgotten about.)

    • Proxmox 8.3.2
    • MSR lives in an Ubuntu 24.04 Proxmox container
    • MSR is latest docker version

    What else can I provide to those smarter than me here?

    *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.158
    *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

    *HASS 2025.11.1
    w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
    FW: v1.1
    SDK: v7.23.1

    *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
    MSR: latest-25323-d340b7d9
    MQTTController: 25139
    ZWave Controller: 25139

    G toggledbitsT 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • G gwp1
      • Zero issues installing Proxmox on a new MiniPC.
      • Zero issues migrating my HA instance over to the new hotness (I know, I was surprised, too!)

      And then MSR...

      My first issue: I'm logged into the msr CT as reactor (I used the suggested username just to keep things simple as this is new space for me and I was high off my success of migrating HA over).

      When I run

      docker pull toggledbits/reactor:latest-amd64
      

      ... it assigns the \reactor\ subdirectory where installed root ownership. I am absolutely logged in with the correct non-root user.
      1c58aead-85ca-4b2c-8f48-c3d1f57d7fe3-image.png

      Second issue: I copied over the following folders:
      67e7e4a5-cee8-4de1-90c7-1df35f1070b9-image.png When MSR loads, all of my Global Expressions are missing.

      Third issue:
      All controllers connect wonderfully (Hubitat, etc)... except HA.
      After changing ownership of the logs to reactor again I can see this when MSR calls HA:

      
      [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:43.128Z <HubitatController:INFO> HubitatController#hubitat successful connection to ws://192.168.1.214/eventsocket
      [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:43.151Z <HubitatController:NOTICE> HubitatController#hubitat current mode is Evening (2)
      [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:43.212Z <HubitatController:NOTICE> HubitatController#hubitat HSM status is disarmed
      [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:43.214Z <Controller:NOTICE> Controller HubitatController#hubitat is now online.
      [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:43.255Z <MQTTController:INFO> MQTTController#mqtt2 connected; opening subscriptions
      [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:43.371Z <MQTTController:INFO> MQTTController#mqtt2 sending inits and going online!
      [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:43.373Z <Controller:NOTICE> Controller MQTTController#mqtt2 is now online.
      [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:47.179Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to ws://192.168.1.123:8123/api/websocket
      [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:47.180Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.1.123:8123 [-]
      [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:47.180Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass ws error code ECONNREFUSED
      [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:47.180Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to ws://192.168.1.123:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation
      [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:47.180Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.1.123:8123 [-]
      [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:52.181Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to ws://192.168.1.123:8123/api/websocket
      [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:52.183Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.1.123:8123 [-]
      [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:52.183Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass ws error code ECONNREFUSED
      [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:52.183Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to ws://192.168.1.123:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation
      [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:52.183Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.1.123:8123 [-]
      

      Yes, I created a fresh new long-lived access token for the MSR containerized install and updated the reactor.yaml config file correctly.

      Honestly, all-in-all, for my total lack of expertise here I'm very pleased that I only have these three issues. But they are def blockers atm.

      My RPi bare metal install of MSR hooked right up to the new HA and is humming along just fine (I used hostnames were possible and shuffled some IPs in other places so I wouldn't run into things later that were mapped incorrectly that I'd forgotten about.)

      • Proxmox 8.3.2
      • MSR lives in an Ubuntu 24.04 Proxmox container
      • MSR is latest docker version

      What else can I provide to those smarter than me here?

      G Offline
      G Offline
      gwp1
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      So I searched this forum earlier but didn't find this thread. A generic global Internet search netted me this old nugget of info on exactly the first issue, the MSR>HA connectivity.

      Using @toggledbits one-liner

          curl -o - 'http://192.168.0.15:8123/api/config'
      

      returned just what I needed to determine it was an IP configuration error. I'd taken painstaking efforts to re-IP the new HA to the old HA's original IP... and then (for some inexplicable reason) updated the reactor.yaml with the new long-lived access token AND the temporary IP. Dunno what I was thinking... or if I was thinking... in that moment. But that's fixed now and MSR and HA are happily chatting away.

      So now I have the two issues remaining:

      My first issue: I'm logged into the msr CT as reactor (I used the suggested username just to keep things simple as this is new space for me and I was high off my success of migrating HA over).

      When I run

      docker pull toggledbits/reactor:latest-amd64
      ... it assigns the \reactor\ subdirectory where installed root ownership. I am absolutely logged in with the correct non-root user.
      

      a1810504-8d20-43ac-aa45-e34a4db3404b-image.png

      Second issue: I copied over the following folders:
      cd74d3a0-250c-41a6-aa6f-e05e6e9b5329-image.png

      When MSR loads, all of my Global Expressions are missing.

      *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.158
      *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

      *HASS 2025.11.1
      w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
      FW: v1.1
      SDK: v7.23.1

      *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
      MSR: latest-25323-d340b7d9
      MQTTController: 25139
      ZWave Controller: 25139

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • G gwp1
        • Zero issues installing Proxmox on a new MiniPC.
        • Zero issues migrating my HA instance over to the new hotness (I know, I was surprised, too!)

        And then MSR...

        My first issue: I'm logged into the msr CT as reactor (I used the suggested username just to keep things simple as this is new space for me and I was high off my success of migrating HA over).

        When I run

        docker pull toggledbits/reactor:latest-amd64
        

        ... it assigns the \reactor\ subdirectory where installed root ownership. I am absolutely logged in with the correct non-root user.
        1c58aead-85ca-4b2c-8f48-c3d1f57d7fe3-image.png

        Second issue: I copied over the following folders:
        67e7e4a5-cee8-4de1-90c7-1df35f1070b9-image.png When MSR loads, all of my Global Expressions are missing.

        Third issue:
        All controllers connect wonderfully (Hubitat, etc)... except HA.
        After changing ownership of the logs to reactor again I can see this when MSR calls HA:

        
        [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:43.128Z <HubitatController:INFO> HubitatController#hubitat successful connection to ws://192.168.1.214/eventsocket
        [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:43.151Z <HubitatController:NOTICE> HubitatController#hubitat current mode is Evening (2)
        [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:43.212Z <HubitatController:NOTICE> HubitatController#hubitat HSM status is disarmed
        [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:43.214Z <Controller:NOTICE> Controller HubitatController#hubitat is now online.
        [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:43.255Z <MQTTController:INFO> MQTTController#mqtt2 connected; opening subscriptions
        [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:43.371Z <MQTTController:INFO> MQTTController#mqtt2 sending inits and going online!
        [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:43.373Z <Controller:NOTICE> Controller MQTTController#mqtt2 is now online.
        [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:47.179Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to ws://192.168.1.123:8123/api/websocket
        [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:47.180Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.1.123:8123 [-]
        [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:47.180Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass ws error code ECONNREFUSED
        [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:47.180Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to ws://192.168.1.123:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation
        [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:47.180Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.1.123:8123 [-]
        [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:52.181Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to ws://192.168.1.123:8123/api/websocket
        [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:52.183Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.1.123:8123 [-]
        [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:52.183Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass ws error code ECONNREFUSED
        [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:52.183Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to ws://192.168.1.123:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation
        [latest-24366]2025-01-12T00:03:52.183Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error] connect ECONNREFUSED 192.168.1.123:8123 [-]
        

        Yes, I created a fresh new long-lived access token for the MSR containerized install and updated the reactor.yaml config file correctly.

        Honestly, all-in-all, for my total lack of expertise here I'm very pleased that I only have these three issues. But they are def blockers atm.

        My RPi bare metal install of MSR hooked right up to the new HA and is humming along just fine (I used hostnames were possible and shuffled some IPs in other places so I wouldn't run into things later that were mapped incorrectly that I'd forgotten about.)

        • Proxmox 8.3.2
        • MSR lives in an Ubuntu 24.04 Proxmox container
        • MSR is latest docker version

        What else can I provide to those smarter than me here?

        toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbits
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @gwp1 said in Migrating MSR to Docker on Proxmox:

        My first issue: ... it assigns the \reactor\ subdirectory where installed root ownership

        That would be correct. Reactor runs as root inside its docker container (very common with docker).

        @gwp1 said in Migrating MSR to Docker on Proxmox:

        Second issue: When MSR loads, all of my Global Expressions are missing.

        Always look at the logs. Something is probably in there. Your screen shot doesn't show permissions, but that's likely the issue. Reactor runs as root in the container, and will have rootish behavior in the config, logs, storage, etc.

        VMs often have virtual network switches/routers and virtual firewalls. That could be the issue. It could also be that filtering/firewall on the HA side doesn't like the IP address the Reactor VM is coming from. That seems more likely as other controller endpoints are connectable.

        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

        G 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

          @gwp1 said in Migrating MSR to Docker on Proxmox:

          My first issue: ... it assigns the \reactor\ subdirectory where installed root ownership

          That would be correct. Reactor runs as root inside its docker container (very common with docker).

          @gwp1 said in Migrating MSR to Docker on Proxmox:

          Second issue: When MSR loads, all of my Global Expressions are missing.

          Always look at the logs. Something is probably in there. Your screen shot doesn't show permissions, but that's likely the issue. Reactor runs as root in the container, and will have rootish behavior in the config, logs, storage, etc.

          VMs often have virtual network switches/routers and virtual firewalls. That could be the issue. It could also be that filtering/firewall on the HA side doesn't like the IP address the Reactor VM is coming from. That seems more likely as other controller endpoints are connectable.

          G Offline
          G Offline
          gwp1
          wrote on last edited by gwp1
          #4

          @toggledbits very helpful on the docker explanation - this is my very first foray into docker (using it with MSR) so it's all fresh and new to me. Thank you.

          I resolved the HA <-> MSR issue - it was a bad IP in the reactor.yaml file.

          What file do Global Expressions live in? They are literally gone from the UI.

          50009eec-b417-49fc-a651-f5f3f58c5576-image.png

          And I have LOTS of them in production.
          eea488c3-264f-4fbe-ad94-0632049cbf76-image.png

          The log shows this, which is not surprising given none of them are there:

          [latest-24366]2025-01-12T16:58:29.554Z <Rule:ERR> Predicate#rule-m34m60yh/trig condition refers to undefined global `ambient_windspeed'
          

          *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.158
          *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

          *HASS 2025.11.1
          w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
          FW: v1.1
          SDK: v7.23.1

          *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
          MSR: latest-25323-d340b7d9
          MQTTController: 25139
          ZWave Controller: 25139

          toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • G gwp1

            @toggledbits very helpful on the docker explanation - this is my very first foray into docker (using it with MSR) so it's all fresh and new to me. Thank you.

            I resolved the HA <-> MSR issue - it was a bad IP in the reactor.yaml file.

            What file do Global Expressions live in? They are literally gone from the UI.

            50009eec-b417-49fc-a651-f5f3f58c5576-image.png

            And I have LOTS of them in production.
            eea488c3-264f-4fbe-ad94-0632049cbf76-image.png

            The log shows this, which is not surprising given none of them are there:

            [latest-24366]2025-01-12T16:58:29.554Z <Rule:ERR> Predicate#rule-m34m60yh/trig condition refers to undefined global `ambient_windspeed'
            
            toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbits
            wrote on last edited by toggledbits
            #5

            @gwp1 said in Migrating MSR to Docker on Proxmox:

            The log shows this,

            Look at the startup messages. Reactor loads the global expressions at startup. That's where the useful messages will be.

            @gwp1 said in Migrating MSR to Docker on Proxmox:

            What file do Global Expressions live in?

            They live in storage/expressions.json, but recent similar experience suggests that if one file has broken permissions, many do, so whatever you learn from that one file will likely need to be applied to many. Log in to your virtual machine, do ls -la from inside the storage subdirectory, and post the entire output. Also fetch http://reactor-ip-address:port/api/v1/system and post that output.

            By the way, it's also plausible that you haven't mapped your docker container to the right directory. Can you describe how you are launching the docker container, and post any commands you may have executed doing that?

            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

            G 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

              @gwp1 said in Migrating MSR to Docker on Proxmox:

              The log shows this,

              Look at the startup messages. Reactor loads the global expressions at startup. That's where the useful messages will be.

              @gwp1 said in Migrating MSR to Docker on Proxmox:

              What file do Global Expressions live in?

              They live in storage/expressions.json, but recent similar experience suggests that if one file has broken permissions, many do, so whatever you learn from that one file will likely need to be applied to many. Log in to your virtual machine, do ls -la from inside the storage subdirectory, and post the entire output. Also fetch http://reactor-ip-address:port/api/v1/system and post that output.

              By the way, it's also plausible that you haven't mapped your docker container to the right directory. Can you describe how you are launching the docker container, and post any commands you may have executed doing that?

              G Offline
              G Offline
              gwp1
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @toggledbits the link to @cw-kid's issue was the key: what he saw was exactly what I saw. 1kb file size, all of it.

              I did copy the entire storage folder (along with the rest) vs cherry-picking but somehow the file size thing he saw was replicated here. I recopied but checked <user> <group> the expressions.json file (after confirming both file size and contents) and started the new MSR and it's all there. I even did a test Rule Set > Rule create/del and all is well.

              I've shut down the RPi legacy system for now... gonna test run the new one.

              QQ... at the bottom of the rules now I see a history that I don't recall seeing in my legacy system (which is bare metal and current). I went back and it's in the legacy system - very nice. Shamefully going to ask when that was added.

              *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.158
              *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

              *HASS 2025.11.1
              w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
              FW: v1.1
              SDK: v7.23.1

              *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
              MSR: latest-25323-d340b7d9
              MQTTController: 25139
              ZWave Controller: 25139

              toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • G gwp1

                @toggledbits the link to @cw-kid's issue was the key: what he saw was exactly what I saw. 1kb file size, all of it.

                I did copy the entire storage folder (along with the rest) vs cherry-picking but somehow the file size thing he saw was replicated here. I recopied but checked <user> <group> the expressions.json file (after confirming both file size and contents) and started the new MSR and it's all there. I even did a test Rule Set > Rule create/del and all is well.

                I've shut down the RPi legacy system for now... gonna test run the new one.

                QQ... at the bottom of the rules now I see a history that I don't recall seeing in my legacy system (which is bare metal and current). I went back and it's in the legacy system - very nice. Shamefully going to ask when that was added.

                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbits
                wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                #7

                @gwp1 said in Migrating MSR to Docker on Proxmox:

                Shamefully going to ask when that was added.

                Check the release notes.

                @gwp1 said in Migrating MSR to Docker on Proxmox:

                I even did a test Rule Set > Rule create/del and all is well.

                Make sure you restart Reactor after doing a create, and make sure the rule still exists, and then delete it, restart, and make sure it stays gone after the restart. If not, your storage permissions don't have sufficient write privileges. The reason for this particular sequence is that Reactor caches writes to reduce load on flash memories (like the MicroSD cards typical of Pi's), so it may be several minutes before stuff in memory is written to disk. Restarting Reactor forces the write during shudown.

                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                G 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                  @gwp1 said in Migrating MSR to Docker on Proxmox:

                  Shamefully going to ask when that was added.

                  Check the release notes.

                  @gwp1 said in Migrating MSR to Docker on Proxmox:

                  I even did a test Rule Set > Rule create/del and all is well.

                  Make sure you restart Reactor after doing a create, and make sure the rule still exists, and then delete it, restart, and make sure it stays gone after the restart. If not, your storage permissions don't have sufficient write privileges. The reason for this particular sequence is that Reactor caches writes to reduce load on flash memories (like the MicroSD cards typical of Pi's), so it may be several minutes before stuff in memory is written to disk. Restarting Reactor forces the write during shudown.

                  G Offline
                  G Offline
                  gwp1
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @toggledbits Fair enough 🙂

                  *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.158
                  *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                  *HASS 2025.11.1
                  w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                  FW: v1.1
                  SDK: v7.23.1

                  *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                  MSR: latest-25323-d340b7d9
                  MQTTController: 25139
                  ZWave Controller: 25139

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbits
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Also see the edit I just made regarding your test. Apologies for brevity. I'm on the run today.

                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                    G 2 Replies Last reply
                    1
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                      Also see the edit I just made regarding your test. Apologies for brevity. I'm on the run today.

                      G Offline
                      G Offline
                      gwp1
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @toggledbits AH - will do that post-haste. Thanks. And fully appreciate the "on the run".

                      *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.158
                      *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                      *HASS 2025.11.1
                      w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                      FW: v1.1
                      SDK: v7.23.1

                      *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                      MSR: latest-25323-d340b7d9
                      MQTTController: 25139
                      ZWave Controller: 25139

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                        Also see the edit I just made regarding your test. Apologies for brevity. I'm on the run today.

                        G Offline
                        G Offline
                        gwp1
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        @toggledbits Confirmed. Added test Ruleset and Rule. Tools>Restart, they stuck. Deleted test Rule and Ruleset, Tools>Restart, they were still gone.

                        Next up: docker-compose

                        *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.158
                        *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                        *HASS 2025.11.1
                        w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                        FW: v1.1
                        SDK: v7.23.1

                        *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                        MSR: latest-25323-d340b7d9
                        MQTTController: 25139
                        ZWave Controller: 25139

                        G 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • G gwp1

                          @toggledbits Confirmed. Added test Ruleset and Rule. Tools>Restart, they stuck. Deleted test Rule and Ruleset, Tools>Restart, they were still gone.

                          Next up: docker-compose

                          G Offline
                          G Offline
                          gwp1
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          To bring this all full circle, I had installed Portainer just to see what it was/did. Rereading the manual for MSR I stumbled across Portainer-specific instructions.

                          Short story long, I deleted the original container and created a new one thru the Portainer path. Done in mere minutes, runs flawlessly and I don't need to worry about the docker-compose errors I was getting.

                          Going to mark this topic as solved as all of the three issues were addressed.

                          *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.158
                          *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                          *HASS 2025.11.1
                          w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                          FW: v1.1
                          SDK: v7.23.1

                          *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                          MSR: latest-25323-d340b7d9
                          MQTTController: 25139
                          ZWave Controller: 25139

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          Recent Topics

                          • Error: Command timeout
                            toggledbitsT
                            toggledbits
                            0
                            2
                            37

                          • [Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
                            CrilleC
                            Crille
                            0
                            5
                            130

                          • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                            toggledbitsT
                            toggledbits
                            5
                            130
                            74.1k

                          • Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
                            G
                            gwp1
                            0
                            6
                            138

                          • Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
                            toggledbitsT
                            toggledbits
                            1
                            1
                            65

                          • Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
                            M
                            mgvra
                            1
                            3
                            153

                          • Script action and custom timers
                            toggledbitsT
                            toggledbits
                            0
                            4
                            161

                          • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
                            CatmanV2C
                            CatmanV2
                            0
                            12
                            451

                          • There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
                            akbooerA
                            akbooer
                            1
                            2
                            132

                          • Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
                            CrilleC
                            Crille
                            0
                            6
                            185

                          • Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
                            toggledbitsT
                            toggledbits
                            0
                            17
                            546

                          • Shelly Wall Display XL
                            akbooerA
                            akbooer
                            2
                            9
                            854
                          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                          Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Unsolved