Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Docker Compose
Reverse proxy & API ACL
tunnusT
I'm trying to allow anonymous access from a local network to /api/v1/log, but the problem now with the reverse proxy configuration is that this access is open via proxy to the internet. At least I wasn't able to configure ACL so that only an access from a local network would be permitted. reactor.yaml: baseurl: "http://192.168.1.12:8111" proxy_baseurl: "https://external.com:30000" trusted_proxy: "192.168.1.12" Local traffic would originate from 192.168.1.0/24 network. Synology is acting as a reverse proxy and hosting MSR as a docker container (which has its own network and IP 172.18.0.5). MSR build is latest-26298-fbb75fb8 users.yaml: - url: "/api/v1/log" method: "GET" source_ip: 172.18.0.0/24 allow: true Using the above ACL works, but it enables access via proxy also. If I use source_ip: 192.168.1.0/24, then it doesn't work either locally or remotely. So I'm kinda lost what should I use as source_ip in this case?
Multi-System Reactor
MFA
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Grouped devices
G
I've seen many of you using Dynamic Group Controller. I'm using it myself for monitoring device battery levels. I've read and re-read the Dynamic Group Controller docs and still cannot come to an answer for my question so let me paint my scenario: I've migrated from EchoSpeaks in Hubitat ('cause borked and seemingly unmaintained) to Alexa Devices in Home Assistant ('cause not borked in 2026.11.0) to be able to send TTS to my Echo devices. In EchoSpeaks I could create groups. Sweet. In Alexa Devices I don't seem to be able to do so. As such, my thought was "wait - isn't there a way in MSR?" Is this an effective scenario that Dynamic Group Controller can be used for?
Multi-System Reactor
Login protections
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Inspect - a small read-only helper panel for MSR
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Build 26284 stuck at Loading Reactor UI
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
MSR with reverse proxy
tunnusT
I'm trying to use MSR via reserve proxy in Synology DSM, but MSR page does not load https://<public ip>:30000/reactor/en-US/ At the same time logging page loads normally https://<public ip>:30000/api/v1/log I thought maybe authentication was messing it up, but there was no deny entries in the log, and also disabling authentication did not make any difference. For this use case VPN is not an option (that works, but as said not an option for this particular use case). Any ideas what could cause this? MSR build latest-26242-28d69aa8, Chrome browser
Multi-System Reactor
Missing attribute after upgrade
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Native fan capabilty
therealdbT
Nothing more to add. I see we have hvac_blower, but, anyway, maybe a native fan on the same assumptions of the fan from HASS could be reasonable. I have a couple of them. ie, this is from ESPHome via HASS. x_hass.domain="fan" x_hass.entity_id="fan.kitchen_seashell_hood_ventilation_fan" x_hass.floor_id=null x_hass.services=["fan","esphome"] x_hass.source="esphome" x_hass.state="off" x_hass_attr.friendly_name="Seashell Hood Ventilation Fan" x_hass_attr.percentage=50 x_hass_attr.percentage_step=25 x_hass_attr.preset_mode="" x_hass_attr.preset_modes=[] x_hass_attr.supported_features=49 Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Rule do not fire
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Rule condition shows TRUE in UI but Rule never transitions to SET — survives full restart
N
Build: latest-26221-b25bb3e3, Docker on Synology. Hi, I have a Rule whose Trigger/Constraints reference other Rules via Rule State ... is TRUE. At some point it stops firing. Expanding the rule's condition tree in the UI shows every Trigger and Constraint condition green/TRUE — confirmed live by walking into the room and watching Motion go true in real time. Rule History shows no new SET, just old reset entries. Tried, on the same rule, same evening: recreating the trigger conditions with fresh IDs, recreating the constraint conditions with fresh IDs (flat and wrapped in a new Group — wrapping in a Group produced one SET, but it didn't reproduce on repeat attempts with the same structure), and finally a full container restart with a verified-correct saved rule. Still no SET, even with a fresh live motion event right after the restart. Separately, I found that this rule (and its 10 per-room clones) share identical internal condition/group IDs with each other — leftover from a batch clone done months ago, never regenerated. Not sure if that's related, since fixing the IDs didn't reliably fix the symptom either. Has anyone seen a Rule State condition show TRUE in the UI without the Rule ever producing a SET, surviving a clean restart? Thanks in advance
Multi-System Reactor
DynamicGroupController and attributes
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits I'm back to trying to optimize a couple of things based on dynamic group. First of all, I think I found a typo in the doc: primary_attribute: "binary_sensor.state" primary_attribute_value: | d = false; each id in members: d = getEntity(id)?.attributes?.power_switch?.state or d, d I think the correct code snippet is d = false, All that said, my use case for dynamic groups is to group 3 different climate devices, so I could easily command them at the same time. Commands are good, but sometimes I want to check if any of the devices are on, and that's easily done with a similar snippet as the one you have in the docs. But this is limited to the primary attribute, while I want to have any of the attributes in the group to be driven by a similar logic (while all are null in the group). ie, access hvac_control.mode and see if any of the unit is set to cool, or heat. Is that possible, without re-defining an expression in each of my rules? Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Unofficial thread for compatibility
tunnusT
As there are statements about compatibility for home assistant versions in MSR new version announcements (e.g. "HassController: Bless Hass to 2025.7.3"), I thought it would be good idea to track other controllers as well. As an example, I can confirm that build "latest-25208-c53e8513" works with Hubitat Elevation C-8 platform version 2.4.2.134 using Maker API. Updates: (the latest versions first in the list) OK: build "latest-25264-2fbe9217" with Hubitat C-8 platform v. 2.4.3.123
Multi-System Reactor
Ooops - Deleted Reactor Ex Machina II
R
I accidentally deleted Reactor Ex Machina II (REM II) from my Reactor rules. I tried to recover it by deleting the .json and .dval in the Rules subdirectory and then recreating it from Togglebits original posting, but that did not work. Does anyone know how to recover REM ll ?
Multi-System Reactor
Bail out of failed reaction?
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
CrilleC
Edit: Solved in latest-26221. Bare-metal latest-26193 I have this group: "OKforLarm": name: OK för Larm select: - include_controller: vera - include_capability: door_sensor filter_expression: entity.attributes.door_sensor.state It contains the entities I expect but behaves a bit odd. When I open vera>device_10097 the entity attribute door_sensor.state changes to true but it won't show up as member in the group, when I also open vera>device_10095 they both shows as members and when I close vera>device_10095 it disappear from the group but when I close vera>device_10097 it lingers in the group until I restart Reactor.
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade Issues
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Docker Compose

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
11 Posts 3 Posters 3.1k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • toggledbitsT Offline
    toggledbitsT Offline
    toggledbits
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    What was the compose file issue? There has been several fixes recently. Where did you get yours?

    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

    B 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

      What was the compose file issue? There has been several fixes recently. Where did you get yours?

      B Offline
      B Offline
      Buxton
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      @toggledbits The compose file was not pulling down the latest image. Is my specification correct?

       MSR:
        container_name: reactor
        image: toggledbits/reactor:latest-generic-amd64
        restart: "on-failure"
        environment:
         REACTOR_DATA_PREFIX: /var/reactor
         TZ: America/Los_Angeles
        expose:
         - 8111
        ports:
         - 8111:8111
        volumes:
         - /home/kevinb/reactor:/var/reactor
         - /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro
         - /home/kevinb/reactor/tmpfs:/tmp
        logging:
         driver: "json-file"
         options:
          max-file: "5"
          max-size: 2m
      

      When I pulled "docker-compose pull MSR" from the command line, the image updated and all was good. But using "docker-compose up -d -- remove-orphans" at the CLI did not update files (it did, however, rebuild the container).

      So like I said, it could be something wacky on my end, or the/my image tags are not correct.

      The bug I saw was that:

      reactor:
        # baseurl - The base URL to access the Reactor system.
        baseurl: "http://10.17.2.41:8111"
      

      where the baseurl needs an "http://" in front of the ip address. This should be changed in the config template.

      toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • B Buxton

        @toggledbits The compose file was not pulling down the latest image. Is my specification correct?

         MSR:
          container_name: reactor
          image: toggledbits/reactor:latest-generic-amd64
          restart: "on-failure"
          environment:
           REACTOR_DATA_PREFIX: /var/reactor
           TZ: America/Los_Angeles
          expose:
           - 8111
          ports:
           - 8111:8111
          volumes:
           - /home/kevinb/reactor:/var/reactor
           - /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro
           - /home/kevinb/reactor/tmpfs:/tmp
          logging:
           driver: "json-file"
           options:
            max-file: "5"
            max-size: 2m
        

        When I pulled "docker-compose pull MSR" from the command line, the image updated and all was good. But using "docker-compose up -d -- remove-orphans" at the CLI did not update files (it did, however, rebuild the container).

        So like I said, it could be something wacky on my end, or the/my image tags are not correct.

        The bug I saw was that:

        reactor:
          # baseurl - The base URL to access the Reactor system.
          baseurl: "http://10.17.2.41:8111"
        

        where the baseurl needs an "http://" in front of the ip address. This should be changed in the config template.

        toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbits
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        @buxton said in Docker Compose:

        where the baseurl needs an "http://" in front of the ip address. This should be changed in the config template.

        Not sure where you got the config template, but that is in the default template.

        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

        B 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

          @buxton said in Docker Compose:

          where the baseurl needs an "http://" in front of the ip address. This should be changed in the config template.

          Not sure where you got the config template, but that is in the default template.

          B Offline
          B Offline
          Buxton
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          @toggledbits I first deleted the reactor image and its volumes, and then I deleted the folder structure that the volumes pointed to. I did this through Portainer and to be extra sure, through docker. Then, using the "docker-compose pull MSR" command, everything was re-created. I know the container was re-created from scratch because my settings in the new config file were gone and the files/folders that were previously deleted were back with the startup example in the config file specified an IP address only.

          So make of that what you will, but I can tell you from this experience, that the container will not function without the addition of the http:// designation in the config file. I only caught the problem because of the log entries in Portainer.

          toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B Buxton

            @toggledbits I first deleted the reactor image and its volumes, and then I deleted the folder structure that the volumes pointed to. I did this through Portainer and to be extra sure, through docker. Then, using the "docker-compose pull MSR" command, everything was re-created. I know the container was re-created from scratch because my settings in the new config file were gone and the files/folders that were previously deleted were back with the startup example in the config file specified an IP address only.

            So make of that what you will, but I can tell you from this experience, that the container will not function without the addition of the http:// designation in the config file. I only caught the problem because of the log entries in Portainer.

            toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbits
            wrote on last edited by toggledbits
            #6

            @buxton said in Docker Compose:

            I can tell you from this experience, that the container will not function without the addition of the http:// designation in the config file.

            Indeed, and I would not expect it to. Unfortunately, I can't duplicate your results. I can confirm that the default value in the distribution template is:

            # See the Reactor documentation at https://reactor.toggledbits.com/docs/
            # Template version 21184
            ---
            reactor:
              # baseurl - The base URL to access the Reactor system.
              baseurl: "http://192.168.0.164:8111"
              #
            

            And I can confirm that this is what I see when I use docker-compose to turn up a new container with the bind location of /var/reactor in the container bound to a non-existent directory in the host filesystem (i.e. starting from scratch).

            The baseurl here is, in fact, the IP address of one of my test systems, and probably a long shot to be the same IP address that someone else may use. There is no automated construction or replacement of this value, no "guess" as to what your system IP address actually would be, etc. Unless Portainer magically knows something about Reactor, which would be a revelation to me, any value other than http://192.168.0.164:8111 didn't come from the template, at least not without help.

            I guess this will remain a mystery.

            Edit: You might confirm that the version number shown in the Reactor UI is latest-21270-... (as of this writing). If it's not that, your image isn't the latest; your pull isn't doing what you expect.

            Edit 2: Also see this post; seems to describe a problem similar to yours: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37685581/how-to-get-docker-compose-to-use-the-latest-image-from-repository

            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

            B 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

              @buxton said in Docker Compose:

              I can tell you from this experience, that the container will not function without the addition of the http:// designation in the config file.

              Indeed, and I would not expect it to. Unfortunately, I can't duplicate your results. I can confirm that the default value in the distribution template is:

              # See the Reactor documentation at https://reactor.toggledbits.com/docs/
              # Template version 21184
              ---
              reactor:
                # baseurl - The base URL to access the Reactor system.
                baseurl: "http://192.168.0.164:8111"
                #
              

              And I can confirm that this is what I see when I use docker-compose to turn up a new container with the bind location of /var/reactor in the container bound to a non-existent directory in the host filesystem (i.e. starting from scratch).

              The baseurl here is, in fact, the IP address of one of my test systems, and probably a long shot to be the same IP address that someone else may use. There is no automated construction or replacement of this value, no "guess" as to what your system IP address actually would be, etc. Unless Portainer magically knows something about Reactor, which would be a revelation to me, any value other than http://192.168.0.164:8111 didn't come from the template, at least not without help.

              I guess this will remain a mystery.

              Edit: You might confirm that the version number shown in the Reactor UI is latest-21270-... (as of this writing). If it's not that, your image isn't the latest; your pull isn't doing what you expect.

              Edit 2: Also see this post; seems to describe a problem similar to yours: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37685581/how-to-get-docker-compose-to-use-the-latest-image-from-repository

              B Offline
              B Offline
              Buxton
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              @toggledbits The template I used had your 192... address. I placed my local IP in its place. Trying to use a browser to this IP generated the error. After adding "http://" to the IP in the config file, the container worked as expected.

              The portainer aspect is that the reactor container came up using docker compose and was visible in portainer. However, the reactor container wouldn't allow a browser connection and the log errors visible in portainer were complaining about a prefix to the IP.

              Everything works now, so I don't know what happened there. Here's a snapshot of the top of the config file

              Reactor.png

              My version of compose was a year old, and that may have had something to do with the container not updating to the latest. My original compose version was manually installed and was missing from my package updaters. It's now part of PIP, so that should keep it up to date.

              Thanks for running this down as install errors usually make me throw in the towel before giving an app a chance.

              toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • B Buxton

                @toggledbits The template I used had your 192... address. I placed my local IP in its place. Trying to use a browser to this IP generated the error. After adding "http://" to the IP in the config file, the container worked as expected.

                The portainer aspect is that the reactor container came up using docker compose and was visible in portainer. However, the reactor container wouldn't allow a browser connection and the log errors visible in portainer were complaining about a prefix to the IP.

                Everything works now, so I don't know what happened there. Here's a snapshot of the top of the config file

                Reactor.png

                My version of compose was a year old, and that may have had something to do with the container not updating to the latest. My original compose version was manually installed and was missing from my package updaters. It's now part of PIP, so that should keep it up to date.

                Thanks for running this down as install errors usually make me throw in the towel before giving an app a chance.

                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbits
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                @buxton said in Docker Compose:

                @toggledbits The template I used had your 192... address. I placed my local IP in its place. Trying to use a browser to this IP generated the error. After adding "http://" to the IP in the config file, the container worked as expected.

                Wait, are you saying it had http://192.168.0.164:8111 and you replaced it with 10.17.2.41 without the http:// at first?

                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                B 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                  @buxton said in Docker Compose:

                  @toggledbits The template I used had your 192... address. I placed my local IP in its place. Trying to use a browser to this IP generated the error. After adding "http://" to the IP in the config file, the container worked as expected.

                  Wait, are you saying it had http://192.168.0.164:8111 and you replaced it with 10.17.2.41 without the http:// at first?

                  B Offline
                  B Offline
                  Buxton
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  @toggledbits No, the template had "192.168.0.164:8111" as the guide. At first, I replaced the template IP with "10.17.2.41". When that failed, I added the "http://" and everything worked.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbits
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    Well, my testing doesn't reproduce that, and I don't see how it could happen otherwise, so I guess we're back to remaining a mystery.

                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • parkercP Offline
                      parkercP Offline
                      parkerc
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      Just an FYI - the Docker compose I used to create MSR on my QNAP (intel) is below

                      version: '3'
                      services:
                          reactor:
                              image: toggledbits/reactor:1.0.1-generic-amd64
                              container_name: reactor
                              environment:
                                  - PUID=1000
                                  - PGID=1000
                                  - TZ=Europe/London
                              volumes:
                                  - /share/Container/reactor:/var/reactor
                              network_mode: host
                              restart: always
                      
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      Recent Topics

                      • Reverse proxy & API ACL
                        tunnusT
                        tunnus
                        0
                        9
                        360

                      • MFA
                        T
                        tamorgen
                        0
                        28
                        1.0k

                      • Grouped devices
                        G
                        gwp1
                        0
                        3
                        137

                      • Login protections
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        0
                        2
                        183

                      • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        5
                        152
                        157.7k

                      • Reactor Inspect - a small read-only helper panel for MSR
                        G
                        gwp1
                        2
                        6
                        459

                      • Reactor Build 26284 stuck at Loading Reactor UI
                        T
                        tamorgen
                        0
                        16
                        1.7k

                      • MSR with reverse proxy
                        tunnusT
                        tunnus
                        0
                        12
                        826

                      • Missing attribute after upgrade
                        3
                        3rdStng
                        0
                        3
                        636

                      • Use of Google Gemini as an MSR and Hubitat configuration aid
                        therealdbT
                        therealdb
                        0
                        2
                        294

                      • [MSR] Native fan capabilty
                        therealdbT
                        therealdb
                        1
                        3
                        280

                      • [MSR] Rule do not fire
                        therealdbT
                        therealdb
                        0
                        4
                        404
                      Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                      Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Unsolved