Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Anybody Installed MSR on unRaid Docker
[Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
toggledbitsT
This post does not apply to users of Intel/AMD-based systems. If you are using a Reactor image tagged latest-amd64 or stable-amd64, then this post does not apply to you. It also does not apply to bare-metal installs; it's for users of docker images on ARM-based systems only (principally Raspberry Pi hosts, but could be others). After January 15, 2026, I will no longer produce the aarch64-tagged docker image for Reactor. The ARM images will be arm64 for 64-bit operating systems, and armv7l for 32-bit operating systems. For those of you running a container from the aarch64 image today, this will be a relatively simple change: you just need to switch the image used for your docker container to a differently-tagged image. If you are using docker-compose, then this is a relatively simple matter of changing the image line in your docker-compose.yaml file and then stopping (docker-compose down) and restarting (docker-compose up -d) your Reactor daemon. But there's a catch... not all of you can safely just switch from the aarch64 image to the arm64 image. And, you can't just trust the output of uname -m, for example, because this exposes the CPU architecture, but not the word size of the OS running on that CPU. For Raspberry Pi systems, the transition to 64-bit operating systems was long (starting in 2016) and not always obvious — although there was a first "official" 64-bit OS for RPis in 2020, it did not become a default recommendation in the Raspberry Pi Imager until 2021, and then that was only the default for Pi 3/4 systems with >4GB RAM; it was 2022 before it was universally recommended for all 64-bit CPUs regardless of RAM size. Depending on when you first imaged your RPi system and what default you may have been offered/chosen, you could today easily have a 64-bit CPU Raspberry Pi running a 32-bit version of the operating system. Upgrades along the way would not change this; changing it to fully 64-bit requires a full reimage of the system. To establish if your OS is 64- or 32-bit, log in to your Pi and run: sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH. If the response is arm64 or aarch64, then you are running a 64-bit OS and you should use the arm64-tagged image. If it's anything else, you are running a 32-bit OS, and you should use the armv7l-tagged image. pi@rpi4-1:~ $ sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH armhf pi@rpi4-1:~ $ uname -m aarch64 pi@rpi4-1:~ $ In the example above, the uname command reports that the CPU is 64-bit architecture (aarch64), which is true for the host on which I ran these commands, but the DEB_HOST_ARCH value is armhf, indicating a 32-bit operating system. This system has to use the armv7l-tagged image. Other systems will have their own ways of determining the word size of the running OS. Since the majority of Reactor users running ARM systems are on Raspberry Pis, I am able to supply the above instructions, but if you happen to have a different ARM system, you'll need to do some web searching to figure out how to expose that information. Or, you can just try the arm64 image, and if it doesn't start up, try the armv7l image. Remember to always back up your system before making any changes. For everyone, please make this change as soon as possible, and if you have any trouble finding a working image, please (1) go back to the current aarch64 image; and (2) let me know in this thread along with as much detail about your host system as you can offer (including the output of the dpkg-architecture command mentioned above).
Multi-System Reactor
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] reactor-mqtt-contrib package for additional MQTT templates
therealdbT
I'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only). Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package: https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go. I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them. The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression. Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests
Multi-System Reactor
HA 2025.9.4 Supported Yet?
CatmanV2C
Tangentially did I miss 2025.9.4 getting blessed in MSR? I've been holding off Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Rule Set UI bug - RESOLVED
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Anybody Installed MSR on unRaid Docker

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
11 Posts 4 Posters 1.0k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Greetings,

    I'm not a Docker expert hence the choice of using unRaid but I would like to install MSR in a Docker and I'm looking for details on the settings used as I have not installed one manually yet.

    I have installed MSR on Windows Server 2019 but I'm receiving (3 vulnerabilities (1 low, 2 high)) error messages with 'npm' and the audit fix breaks it ('npm').

    Thanks for any help you can provide.

    David

    3 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      On the Windows side, try doing npm i --no-save --omit dev... it looks like a couple of the development dependencies are the cause of the audit warnings.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ? Offline
        ? Offline
        A Former User
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        I ran that and now the Reactor Windows Service Terminates unexpectedly.

        *** I was able to install MSR in a Docker on unRaid so the details below are for your reference only as I plan on uninstalling Reactor in Windows. ***

        Event Log Shows - ''Child process [7664 - C:\Program Files\nodejs\node.exe C:\reactor\node_modules\node-windows\lib\wrapper.js --file C:\reactor\app.js --scriptoptions= --log "Reactor wrapper" --grow 0.25 --wait 1 --maxrestarts 3 --abortonerror n --stopparentfirst undefined] finished with 1''

        ''C:\reactor>npm i --no-save --omit dev
        npm WARN EBADENGINE Unsupported engine {
        npm WARN EBADENGINE package: 'jsdoc@0.0.0',
        npm WARN EBADENGINE required: { node: '~v0.4.10' },
        npm WARN EBADENGINE current: { node: 'v16.13.1', npm: '8.1.2' }
        npm WARN EBADENGINE }

        removed 5 packages, and audited 90 packages in 1s

        12 packages are looking for funding
        run npm fund for details

        1 high severity vulnerability

        To address all issues (including breaking changes), run:
        npm audit fix --force

        Run npm audit for details.''

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ? Offline
          ? Offline
          A Former User
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          If anyone else is running Dockers on unRaid and wants instructions for Installing Reactor, see below.

          Installing Multi-system Reactor in a unRaid Docker Notes. 01/22/22

          unRaid Version 6.9.2

          Preparation:

          Based on Generic Notes from:

          Installation - Reactor - Multi-Hub Automation

          Typically for Generic (modify with username below):

          docker run --name reactor -d --restart on-failure -p 8111:8111
          -v /home/username/reactor:/var/reactor
          --mount type=bind,src=/etc/localtime,target=/etc/localtime
          toggledbits/reactor:latest-generic-amd64

          Create a Share called "reactor" and use "Prefer Cache" if cache drive is available.
          Under SMB settings - Export = Yes so that you can edit config files. Set security per your needs.

          Go to the Docker tab click Add Container and click Advanced View for additional settings.

          Enter:
          Name = reactor

          Overview = Reactor (Multi-system, aka MSR) is an automation engine for multiple home automation systems. It allows you to develop automations that respond to and control devices across platforms. For example, you could have a motion sensor on a Hubitat controller used as a trigger for set of lights, some of which are connected through a VeraPlus and some through HomeAssistant.

          Please see https://reactor.toggledbits.com/docs for more information.

          Repository = toggledbits/reactor:latest-generic-amd64
          For Latest otherwise choose a specific version

          Docker Hub URL = https://hub.docker.com/r/toggledbits/reactor

          No icon path has been found

          WebUI = http://[IP]:[PORT:8111]/

          CPU Pinning as you see fit.

          Network Type = Bridge
          Console shell command = Shell

          WebGUI = http://[IP]:[PORT:8111]/

          Extra Parameters = --restart=on-failure

          Click Add another Path, Port, Variable, Label or Device.
          Choose Path -
          Name = data
          Container Path = /var/reactor
          Host Path = /mnt/user/reactor (previous share path)
          Access = Read/Write
          Display = Always
          Required = No
          Password Mask = No

          Click Add another Path, Port, Variable, Label or Device.
          Choose Port -
          Name = Host Port 1
          Container Port = 8111
          Host Port = 8111
          Default Value = 8111
          Type = TCP
          Description will auto populate with "Container Port: 8111" once Saved
          Display = Yes
          Required = Yes
          Password Mask = No
          Save

          Click Add another Path, Port, Variable, Label or Device.
          Choose Variable -
          Name Key 1
          Key = UMASK
          Val and Default = 100
          Description will auto populate
          Display = Yes
          Required = No
          Password Mask = No
          Save and repeat adding Variables for below:
          Key 2: Container Variable: PUID = 99
          Key 3: Container Variable: PGID = 100

          Click Apply

          Script should look similar to:

          root@localhost:# /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/dynamix.docker.manager/scripts/docker create --name='reactor' --net='bridge' -e TZ="America/Chicago" -e HOST_OS="Unraid" -e 'UMASK'='000' -e 'PUID'='99' -e 'PGID'='100' -p '8111:8111/tcp' -v '/mnt/user/reactor/':'/var/reactor':'rw' --restart=on-failure 'toggledbits/reactor:latest-generic-amd64'

          The command finished successfully!

          Notes:

          • The docker manager script will add the Time Zone based on unRaid's config.
          • If variables (uid/gid <> 99/100) then you must run the "New Permissions" script under Tools
            and select the User Share reactor otherwise the Reactor files will be R/O except for the Docker container.
          • WebUI Access = "http://[your NAS IP]:8111"
          • Follow the reactor configuration documentation for your Hub(s).

          Regards

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbits
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            If you're getting an error mentioning jsdoc when using npm with --omit dev, I'm wondering if you are trying to install the latest version (22021) or something older?

            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ? Offline
              ? Offline
              A Former User
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              It was the latest version (22021). It was running fine but doing "npm audit fix --force" and the command you requested broke it.
              To get it running again I reinstalled node.js and ran the Reactor setup scripts but I didn't like having the audit issues so I'm off of Windows now, deleted the Service and moved to a Docker.

              Thanks for your quick replies but you can pass on my Windows install issue.

              CrilleC 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ? A Former User

                It was the latest version (22021). It was running fine but doing "npm audit fix --force" and the command you requested broke it.
                To get it running again I reinstalled node.js and ran the Reactor setup scripts but I didn't like having the audit issues so I'm off of Windows now, deleted the Service and moved to a Docker.

                Thanks for your quick replies but you can pass on my Windows install issue.

                CrilleC Offline
                CrilleC Offline
                Crille
                wrote on last edited by Crille
                #7

                @droy said in Anybody Installed MSR on unRaid Docker:

                npm audit fix --force

                This broke my bare metal install on Ubuntu as well. Downgraded and did npm update -- no-save and then upgraded and ran npm i --omit dev then MSR started fine but the vulnerability warning is present. Don't know how to get all packages up to date and have MSR running...

                Edit: Definitely not trying to hijack, just a FYI. Will do more troubleshooting tomorrow and report in an appropriate topic.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbits
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Make sure you also remove any lockfile (package-lock.json) created by any previous attempts at the command without --no-save --omit dev as well.

                  I've got one of them resolved. Working on the other.

                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • ? A Former User

                    Greetings,

                    I'm not a Docker expert hence the choice of using unRaid but I would like to install MSR in a Docker and I'm looking for details on the settings used as I have not installed one manually yet.

                    I have installed MSR on Windows Server 2019 but I'm receiving (3 vulnerabilities (1 low, 2 high)) error messages with 'npm' and the audit fix breaks it ('npm').

                    Thanks for any help you can provide.

                    David

                    3 Offline
                    3 Offline
                    3rdStng
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Yes - I have been running my MSR in my unRAID docker for a long time now. Great details you have noted above @droy. And since a picture is worth a thousand words, I thought I would share my docker setup/UI view. This is the basic view. The only thing I have added within the advance view was an Icon URL. I also run my Reactor on it's own IP and not my unRAID, hence the br0 Network Type.

                    For my Icon URL: I put the following https://smarthome.community/assets/uploads/profile/9-profileavatar.png
                    I suppose if @toggledbits changes his profile icon, my Reactor Docker icon will update too.

                    facf18e4-7933-4b2c-af02-8bdbfa52b311-image.png

                    ? 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • 3 3rdStng

                      Yes - I have been running my MSR in my unRAID docker for a long time now. Great details you have noted above @droy. And since a picture is worth a thousand words, I thought I would share my docker setup/UI view. This is the basic view. The only thing I have added within the advance view was an Icon URL. I also run my Reactor on it's own IP and not my unRAID, hence the br0 Network Type.

                      For my Icon URL: I put the following https://smarthome.community/assets/uploads/profile/9-profileavatar.png
                      I suppose if @toggledbits changes his profile icon, my Reactor Docker icon will update too.

                      facf18e4-7933-4b2c-af02-8bdbfa52b311-image.png

                      ? Offline
                      ? Offline
                      A Former User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @3rdstng Thanks for the feedback and link to an icon. I'll save that off and put it local.
                      One note - I try to avoid “privileged” mode for containers. It allows it to run containers with (almost) all the capabilities of their host machine, regarding kernel features and device access.

                      Regards

                      3 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ? A Former User

                        @3rdstng Thanks for the feedback and link to an icon. I'll save that off and put it local.
                        One note - I try to avoid “privileged” mode for containers. It allows it to run containers with (almost) all the capabilities of their host machine, regarding kernel features and device access.

                        Regards

                        3 Offline
                        3 Offline
                        3rdStng
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        @droy said in Anybody Installed MSR on unRaid Docker:

                        I try to avoid “privileged” mode for containers

                        Yeah. I don't remember why I set it that way. I'll disable it and see if anything breaks.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        Recent Topics

                        • [Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
                          CrilleC
                          Crille
                          0
                          5
                          67

                        • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          5
                          130
                          73.8k

                        • Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
                          G
                          gwp1
                          0
                          6
                          91

                        • Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          1
                          1
                          50

                        • Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
                          M
                          mgvra
                          1
                          3
                          133

                        • Script action and custom timers
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          4
                          148

                        • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
                          CatmanV2C
                          CatmanV2
                          0
                          12
                          406

                        • There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
                          akbooerA
                          akbooer
                          1
                          2
                          120

                        • Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
                          CrilleC
                          Crille
                          0
                          6
                          168

                        • Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          17
                          485

                        • Shelly Wall Display XL
                          akbooerA
                          akbooer
                          2
                          9
                          806

                        • [Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          26
                          899
                        Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                        Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Unsolved