Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. [SOLVED] restricting lights from a certain hour
Set Reaction > Script Action
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Errors after updating to MQTTController build 25139
tunnusT
I'm running MSR build 25139 on Docker, using MQTT controller 24293, and everything working as expected. But if I try to upgrade to MQTTController build 25139, I'm getting the following errors on MSR UI: An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa auto heating off" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute value_sensor.god Last 11:20:37 An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa auto heating off" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute temperature_sensor.green Last 11:20:37 An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa filter pump auto off" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute temperature_sensor.red Last 11:20:37 An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa filter pump auto run" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute value_sensor.pump Last 11:20:37 An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa watchdog" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute value_sensor.status Last 11:20:37 My MQTT configuration (local_mqtt_devices.yaml) for the related entity is: layzspa_message: type: ValueSensor capabilities: ["temperature_sensor", "value_sensor", "power_sensor"] primary_attribute: power_sensor.value events: "layzspa/message": "power_sensor.value": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.PWR )' expr: "float(payload.PWR)" "value_sensor.air": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.AIR )' expr: "float(payload.AIR)" "value_sensor.pump": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.FLT )' expr: "float(payload.FLT)" "value_sensor.god": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.GOD )' expr: "float(payload.GOD)" "value_sensor.lock": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.LCK )' expr: "float(payload.LCK)" "value_sensor.unit": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.UNT )' expr: "float(payload.UNT)" "value_sensor.error": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.ERR )' expr: "float(payload.ERR)" "temperature_sensor.green": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.GRN )' expr: "float(payload.GRN)" "temperature_sensor.red": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.RED )' expr: "float(payload.RED)" "temperature_sensor.target": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.TGT )' expr: "float(payload.TGT)" "temperature_sensor.value": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.TMP )' expr: "float(payload.TMP)" "temperature_sensor.virtual": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.VTM )' expr: "round(float(payload.VTM), 1)" "temperature_sensor.ambient": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.AMB )' expr: "float(payload.AMB)" "layzspa/Status": "value_sensor.status": if_expr: '! isnull( payload )' expr: "payload" "layzspa/button": "value_sensor.button": if_expr: '! isnull( payload )' expr: "payload" and in reactor.yaml I have: "layzspa_states": name: "Lay-Z-Spa States" friendly_name: 'Lay-Z-Spa States' include: layzspa_message I realize my MQTT configuration might be a bit unorthodox, but could there still be something unintentional in the latest MQTTController build? If needed, I can provide detailed logs.
Multi-System Reactor
🎉 My very first MSR controller: OpenSprinkler
therealdbT
Since today is my birthday - and I still pretend to be unconventional - I'm giving away a present to this wonderful community and I'm releasing my first OpenSprinkler controller for MSR. It was real fun to code it - and while it's still WIP, it seems to work OK for me. It's polling-based at the moment, but I'll add support for updates via MQTT very soon (it's already partially coded). Get it at (install is similar to MQTTController and such): https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-opensprinkler Feel free to try it. It's beta software, but it's stable. I'll update it weekly until all the tasks from my todo list are empty. Since I've learnt a lot from this controller, I'll explore new controllers soon.
Multi-System Reactor
Advice reqeusted to migrate MSR from Bare Metal to Container
T
Good day all, I'm in the process of trying to shut down my 10 year old Linux home server that served many purposes, but primarily it's what I used for my NAS/Plex Media server. I migrated the NAS aspect of the server in November of last year to a true NAS solution (Ubiquti UNAS Pro), which is rack mount and much more efficient than my old tower, which it's only side benefit was heating my home office during the winter. Unfortunately it also means heating my home office during the summer, which were about to be in full swing. I have two things running on this 10 year old server at this point. MSR and pi-hole. I'm running Plex Media Server on Fedora Workstation in Podman on mini PC, which is much more energy efficient than my old tower. My next step is to migrate MSR. I know there are images of MSR out there, and creating it is well documented. I'm going to be using Podman instead of Docker for various reasons, but they work very similar. What I don't know, is what I need to do to migrate my existing Bare Metal installation over to a container. Has anyone done this? Any advice?
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Can´t restart or upgrade/deploy MSR
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Limit HA Entity in MSR
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Organizing/ structuring rule sets and rules
R
Hi guys, Just wondering how you guys organize your rule sets and rules. I wish I had an extra layer to have some more granularity, but my feature request was not popular. Maybe there are better ways to organize my rule sets. I use the rule sets now primarily for rooms. So a rule set per room. But maybe grouping by functionality works better. Any examples/ suggestions would be appreciated.
Multi-System Reactor
Moving MSR from a QNAP container to RP 5 - some issues
Tom_DT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Widget deletion does not work and landing page (status) is empy
M
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Need help reducing false positive notifications
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Deleting widgets
tunnusT
Hopefully a trivial question, but how do you delete widgets in a status page? Using build 22266
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT configuration question
tunnusT
I have the following yaml configuration in local_mqtt_devices file x_mqtt_device: set_speed: arguments: speed: type: str topic: "command/%friendly_name%" payload: type: json expr: '{ "fan": parameters.speed }' While this works fine, I'm wondering how this could be changed to "fixed" parameters, as in this case "fan" only accepts "A", "Q" or a numeric value of 1-5?
Multi-System Reactor
System Configuration Check - time is offset
F
Hi! I get this message when I'm on the status tab: System Configuration Check The time on this system and on the Reactor host are significantly different. This may be due to incorrect system configuration on either or both. Please check the configuration of both systems. The host reports 2025-04-01T15:29:29.252Z; browser reports 2025-04-01T15:29:40.528Z; difference 11.276 seconds. I have MSR installed as a docker on my Home Assistant Blue / Hardkernel ODROID-N2/N2+. MSR version is latest-25082-3c348de6. HA versions are: Core 2025.3.4 Supervisor 2025.03.4 Operating System 15.1 I have restarted HA as well as MSR multiple times. This message didn´t show two weeks ago. Don´t know if it have anything to do with the latest MSR version. Do anyone know what I can try? Thanks in advance! Let's Be Careful Out There (Hill Street reference...) /Fanan
Multi-System Reactor
Programmatically capture HTTP Request action status code or error
therealdbT
I have a very strange situation, where if InfluxDB restarts, other containers may fail when restarting at the same time (under not easy to understand circumstances), and InfluxDB remains unreachable (and these containers crashes). I need to reboot these containers in an exact order, after rebooting InfluxDB. While I understand what's going on, I need a way to reliable determine that InfluxDB is not reachable and these containers are not reachable, in order to identify this situation and manually check what's going on - and, maybe, in the future, automatically restart them if needed. So, I was looking at HTTP Request action, but I need to capture the HTTP response code, instead of the response (becase if ping is OK, InfluxDB will reply with a 204), and, potentially, a way to programmatically detect that it's failing to get the response. While I could write a custom HTTP controller for this or a custom HTTP virtual device, I was wondering if this is somewhat on you roadmap @toggledbits Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
ZwaveJSUI - RGBWW BULB - Warm/Cold White interfered with RGB settings - Bulb doesn't change color if in WarmWhite state.
N
Hi , I'm on -Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-25067-62e21a2d -Docker on Synology NAS -ZWaveJSUI 9.31.0.6c80945 Problem with ZwaveJSUI: When I try to change color to a bulb RGBWW, it doesn't change to the RGB color and the bulb remains warm or cold white. I tryed with Zipato RGBW Bulb V2 RGBWE2, Hank Bulb HKZW-RGB01, Aentec 6 A-ZWA002, so seems that it happens with all RGBWW bulb with reactor/zwavejsui. I'm using from reator the entity action: "rgb_color.set" and "rgb_color.set_rgb". After I send the reactor command, It changes in zwavejsui the rgb settings but doesn't put the white channel to "0", so the prevalent channel remains warm/cold White and the bulb doesn't change into the rgb color. This is the status of the bulb in zwavejsui after "rgb_color.set" (235,33,33,) and the bulb is still warmWhite. x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor={"warmWhite":204,"coldWhite":0,"red":235,"green":33,"blue":33} The "cold white" and "warm white" settings interfer with the rgb color settings. Reactor can change bulb colors with rgb_color set — (value, ui8, 0x000000 to 0xffffff) or rgb_color set_rgb — (red, green, blue, all ui1, 0 to 255) but if warm or cold white are not to "0", zwavejsui doesn't change them and I can't find a way to change into rgb or from rgb back to warm white. So if I use from reactor: rgb_color set_rgb — (235,33,33) in zwavejsui I have x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_targetColor={"red":235,"green":33,"blue":33} 14/03/2025, 16:43:57 - value updated Arg 0: └─commandClassName: Color Switch └─commandClass: 51 └─property: targetColor └─endpoint: 0 └─newValue └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─prevValue └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─propertyName: targetColor 14/03/2025, 16:43:57 - value updated Arg 0: └─commandClassName: Color Switch └─commandClass: 51 └─property: currentColor └─endpoint: 0 └─newValue └──warmWhite: 204 └──coldWhite: 0 └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─prevValue └──warmWhite: 204 └──coldWhite: 0 └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─propertyName: currentColor In zwavejsui, the bulb changes rgb set but warm White remains to "204" and the bulb remais on warm White channel bacause is prevalent on rgb set. x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_0=204 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_1=0 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_2=235 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_3=33 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_4=33 Is it possible to targetColor also for "warmWhite" and "coldWhite" and have something similar to this? x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_targetColor={"warmWhite":0,"coldWhite":0,"red":235,"green":33,"blue":33} Thanks in advance.
Multi-System Reactor
Problem with simultaneous notifications.
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Problem after upgrading to 25067
R
MSR had been running fine, but I decided to follow the message to upgrade to 25067. Since the upgrade, I have received the message "Controller "<name>" (HubitatController hubitat2) could not be loaded at startup. Its ID is not unique." MSR throws the message on every restart. Has anyone else encountered this problem? I am running MSR on a Raspberry Pi4 connecting to two Hubitat units over an OpenVPN tunnel. One C8 and a C8 Pro. Both are up-to-date. It appears that despite the error message that MSR may be operating properly.
Multi-System Reactor
Global expressions not always evaluated
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

[SOLVED] restricting lights from a certain hour

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
42 Posts 3 Posters 2.2k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G gwp1

    @toggledbits Hmmm... that's an interesting approach. Mode + After alarm time = lights allowed. Let me try that.

    Edited to add screenshot of updated ruleset:
    1eb6e773-8a25-41a7-8abe-03627dce1649-image.png

    G Offline
    G Offline
    gwp1
    wrote on last edited by
    #20

    @gwp1 Sadness abounds. Lights this morning. I've emailed @toggledbits the logs he requested in full.

    Of note: when I was originally creating this rule I noticed something with the Weekday and Weekend "button/links"... when saved, the days chosen by using those were blank again. Only way I could save them visibly was by manually checking them. I should have filed a bug - work intervened and then it slipped my mind. Perhaps unrelated - perhaps not, if the choices aren't really saved.

    *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.177
    *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

    *HASS 2025.6.0
    w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

    *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
    MSR: latest-25139-fbd67abc
    MQTTController: 25139
    ZWave Controller: 25139

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by toggledbits
      #21

      The log shows that this rule set at 20:28 and ran the "Rainstorm Lights ON" reaction from its set reaction. It remained set until 22:55, when it reset and ran the "Rainstorm lights OFF" reaction from its reset reaction.

      The rule remained reset for the remainder of the log. It did not set at 05:30 or any other time, it did not start its set reaction or the "Rainstorm Lights ON" reaction it references.

      However, the "Rainstorm Lights ON" reaction was run by another reaction at 05:30. So you've got a mention of this somewhere. I can't easily tell which (I'd need a higher level of debug), but it is probably one of active objects (or something they start):

      • Rule Notify: Mode Day ON<SET>
      • Rule Notify: Mode Night ON<RESET>
      • Rule Notify: Screened room door<RESET>
      • Cooling All Modes but Night: ON<SET>
      • Reaction Sunset light group on

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      G 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

        The log shows that this rule set at 20:28 and ran the "Rainstorm Lights ON" reaction from its set reaction. It remained set until 22:55, when it reset and ran the "Rainstorm lights OFF" reaction from its reset reaction.

        The rule remained reset for the remainder of the log. It did not set at 05:30 or any other time, it did not start its set reaction or the "Rainstorm Lights ON" reaction it references.

        However, the "Rainstorm Lights ON" reaction was run by another reaction at 05:30. So you've got a mention of this somewhere. I can't easily tell which (I'd need a higher level of debug), but it is probably one of active objects (or something they start):

        • Rule Notify: Mode Day ON<SET>
        • Rule Notify: Mode Night ON<RESET>
        • Rule Notify: Screened room door<RESET>
        • Cooling All Modes but Night: ON<SET>
        • Reaction Sunset light group on
        G Offline
        G Offline
        gwp1
        wrote on last edited by gwp1
        #22

        @toggledbits
        "this rule set at 20:28 and ran the "Rainstorm Lights ON" reaction from its set reaction. It remained set until 22:55, when it reset and ran the "Rainstorm lights OFF" reaction from its reset reaction."

        Yes, makes sense as this rule gets included in the @sunset rule for those two lights it controls. That would be sunset (20:28 until sleep time 22:55). Reaction Sunset light group on contains the rest of the lights that come on at sunset, of which this is a subset.

        I'll look at what's happening at 05:30 (IIFC it's just a mode change ruleset).

        Rule Notify: Mode Day ON<SET> This is the 05:30 mode change
        Rule Notify: Mode Night ON<RESET> I would gather this is Night Mode ON deactivating
        Rule Notify: Screened room door<RESET> This is the screened room door sensor alert being turned off after Night mode is deactivated
        Cooling All Modes but Night: ON<SET> This is HVAC switching from Night Mode to everything else with the mode change.

        *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.177
        *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

        *HASS 2025.6.0
        w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

        *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
        MSR: latest-25139-fbd67abc
        MQTTController: 25139
        ZWave Controller: 25139

        G 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • G gwp1

          @toggledbits
          "this rule set at 20:28 and ran the "Rainstorm Lights ON" reaction from its set reaction. It remained set until 22:55, when it reset and ran the "Rainstorm lights OFF" reaction from its reset reaction."

          Yes, makes sense as this rule gets included in the @sunset rule for those two lights it controls. That would be sunset (20:28 until sleep time 22:55). Reaction Sunset light group on contains the rest of the lights that come on at sunset, of which this is a subset.

          I'll look at what's happening at 05:30 (IIFC it's just a mode change ruleset).

          Rule Notify: Mode Day ON<SET> This is the 05:30 mode change
          Rule Notify: Mode Night ON<RESET> I would gather this is Night Mode ON deactivating
          Rule Notify: Screened room door<RESET> This is the screened room door sensor alert being turned off after Night mode is deactivated
          Cooling All Modes but Night: ON<SET> This is HVAC switching from Night Mode to everything else with the mode change.

          G Offline
          G Offline
          gwp1
          wrote on last edited by gwp1
          #23

          @gwp1 "However, the "Rainstorm Lights ON" reaction was run by another reaction at 05:30."

          Wouldn't it be triggered because of the mode change? Mode (either day or evening) is a trigger for Rainstorm lights ON - but having the time restriction should stop it from turning on those lights, no?

          *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.177
          *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

          *HASS 2025.6.0
          w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

          *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
          MSR: latest-25139-fbd67abc
          MQTTController: 25139
          ZWave Controller: 25139

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbits
            wrote on last edited by
            #24

            No, it looks like something else, not the rule we've been looking at, is running that reaction. The rule never went true/set after 22:55

            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

            G 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

              No, it looks like something else, not the rule we've been looking at, is running that reaction. The rule never went true/set after 22:55

              G Offline
              G Offline
              gwp1
              wrote on last edited by
              #25

              @toggledbits Rule ID: rule-198 should run Rainstorm Lights ON reactions plus Sunset Light group ON reaction together to equal turning on all necessary lighting at sunset.

              *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.177
              *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

              *HASS 2025.6.0
              w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

              *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
              MSR: latest-25139-fbd67abc
              MQTTController: 25139
              ZWave Controller: 25139

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbits
                wrote on last edited by
                #26

                Something ran "Rainstorm Lights ON" at 05:30. It was likely one of the rules or the reaction I listed above, as those were active at the time. The rule "Rainstorm: on, off with UV" was not active at this time, so it did not run it.

                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                G 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                  Something ran "Rainstorm Lights ON" at 05:30. It was likely one of the rules or the reaction I listed above, as those were active at the time. The rule "Rainstorm: on, off with UV" was not active at this time, so it did not run it.

                  G Offline
                  G Offline
                  gwp1
                  wrote on last edited by gwp1
                  #27

                  @toggledbits Rule Notify: Mode Day ON<SET> This is the 05:30 mode change and the mode change is a condition for the running of Rainstorm Lights ON - but shouldn't/wouldn't the conditions around not before <xx time> belay that order? (That was my intent, anyway.)

                  Would moving the time conditions to Constraints be a better approach?

                  *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.177
                  *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                  *HASS 2025.6.0
                  w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                  *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                  MSR: latest-25139-fbd67abc
                  MQTTController: 25139
                  ZWave Controller: 25139

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • LibraSunL Offline
                    LibraSunL Offline
                    LibraSun
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #28

                    I hope what I'm about to mention applies to your situation... running Rule B's SET (or RESET) reaction from Rule A:

                    1. Does NOT cause Rule B to show as "Set"
                    2. Does NOT leave a lasting trace in the Status page
                    3. Does NOT change the "Last set" timestamp on Rule B
                      ...is therefore sometimes a real challenge to catch in the act, much less diagnose, without lots of Log-intensive scrutiny.
                      These are the reasons I requested some features along those lines, to help "see" what's happening.
                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • LibraSunL LibraSun

                      I hope what I'm about to mention applies to your situation... running Rule B's SET (or RESET) reaction from Rule A:

                      1. Does NOT cause Rule B to show as "Set"
                      2. Does NOT leave a lasting trace in the Status page
                      3. Does NOT change the "Last set" timestamp on Rule B
                        ...is therefore sometimes a real challenge to catch in the act, much less diagnose, without lots of Log-intensive scrutiny.
                        These are the reasons I requested some features along those lines, to help "see" what's happening.
                      G Offline
                      G Offline
                      gwp1
                      wrote on last edited by gwp1
                      #29

                      @librasun I'm going to temporarily divorce the @sunset rule from the Rainstorm rule just to see what happens come morning. Moved the day/time/weekday conditions to Constraints first. At least then I can rule that out.

                      Might be harder to track tomorrow depending on how bright it is at 07:30.

                      I'm wondering if I'm falling into the pit of trying to "make a truth truthier" when it comes to the triggers.

                      *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.177
                      *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                      *HASS 2025.6.0
                      w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                      *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                      MSR: latest-25139-fbd67abc
                      MQTTController: 25139
                      ZWave Controller: 25139

                      G 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • G gwp1

                        @librasun I'm going to temporarily divorce the @sunset rule from the Rainstorm rule just to see what happens come morning. Moved the day/time/weekday conditions to Constraints first. At least then I can rule that out.

                        Might be harder to track tomorrow depending on how bright it is at 07:30.

                        I'm wondering if I'm falling into the pit of trying to "make a truth truthier" when it comes to the triggers.

                        G Offline
                        G Offline
                        gwp1
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #30

                        @gwp1 No change, lights still came on at 05:30. I did roll over and grab my phone, load up the MSR UI and manually trigger the ruleset only to have it turn the lights back off. Before retriggering, I looked at the status of the ruleset and it met everything it was supposed to - the lights were just still on (having come on when they really shouldn't have.)

                        Trying to rethink how to write this to get to the goal.

                        *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.177
                        *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                        *HASS 2025.6.0
                        w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                        *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                        MSR: latest-25139-fbd67abc
                        MQTTController: 25139
                        ZWave Controller: 25139

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • toggledbitsT Offline
                          toggledbitsT Offline
                          toggledbits
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #31

                          @gwp1 before you change anything, do this: archive your entire "storage" subdirectory (ZIP) and send it to me.

                          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                          G 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                            @gwp1 before you change anything, do this: archive your entire "storage" subdirectory (ZIP) and send it to me.

                            G Offline
                            G Offline
                            gwp1
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #32

                            @toggledbits Done.

                            *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.177
                            *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                            *HASS 2025.6.0
                            w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                            *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                            MSR: latest-25139-fbd67abc
                            MQTTController: 25139
                            ZWave Controller: 25139

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbits
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #33

                              The rule "Sunset Lights: On" is the one that triggered at 05:30 and ran the "Rainstorm Lights ON" reaction. It did that because "Day" is an acceptable mode in its first condition (but "Night" is not listed and so this condition was false before), and at the moment apparently 05:30 is before sunrise, so the second condition was also met.

                              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                              G 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                The rule "Sunset Lights: On" is the one that triggered at 05:30 and ran the "Rainstorm Lights ON" reaction. It did that because "Day" is an acceptable mode in its first condition (but "Night" is not listed and so this condition was false before), and at the moment apparently 05:30 is before sunrise, so the second condition was also met.

                                G Offline
                                G Offline
                                gwp1
                                wrote on last edited by gwp1
                                #34

                                @toggledbits Talking this thru...

                                Ruleset "Sunset Lights: On" should have run at sunset 20:29 (local sunset time on Friday 06/11/2021). It should include two Reactions, "Sunset Light Group On" and "Rainstorm Lights On" (done this way to prevent race condition/overlap if the same lamps were included in both reactions as well as prevent a gap at sunset when I'd have to turn off "Rainstorm Lights: On" lamps one minute before sunset kicks in.) I don't know why "Sunset Lights: On" would have run at 05:30 as it shouldn't be driven by mode but only by sunset/sunrise.

                                Day would be an acceptable mode for ruleset "Rainstorm Lights: On" because, well, that's basically the point - we need these lights during the day as a storm has made it very dark during non-traditional times. I would expect "Rainstorm Lights: On" to run at 05:30 when mode switches to Day - but that's the reason for the after <time> conditions/constraints - to prevent it from taking action until after those time stops.

                                EDIT: Ok, looking harder at that last half a sentence you wrote: "05:30 is before sunrise so the second condition was also met" - that would explain why "Sunset Lights: On" ran which would explain why Reaction "Rainstorm Lights On" ran. Since that reaction doesn't have the constraints, it seems that's overriding the ruleset "Rainstorm Lights: On" ?

                                *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.177
                                *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                                *HASS 2025.6.0
                                w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                                *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                                MSR: latest-25139-fbd67abc
                                MQTTController: 25139
                                ZWave Controller: 25139

                                G toggledbitsT 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • G gwp1

                                  @toggledbits Talking this thru...

                                  Ruleset "Sunset Lights: On" should have run at sunset 20:29 (local sunset time on Friday 06/11/2021). It should include two Reactions, "Sunset Light Group On" and "Rainstorm Lights On" (done this way to prevent race condition/overlap if the same lamps were included in both reactions as well as prevent a gap at sunset when I'd have to turn off "Rainstorm Lights: On" lamps one minute before sunset kicks in.) I don't know why "Sunset Lights: On" would have run at 05:30 as it shouldn't be driven by mode but only by sunset/sunrise.

                                  Day would be an acceptable mode for ruleset "Rainstorm Lights: On" because, well, that's basically the point - we need these lights during the day as a storm has made it very dark during non-traditional times. I would expect "Rainstorm Lights: On" to run at 05:30 when mode switches to Day - but that's the reason for the after <time> conditions/constraints - to prevent it from taking action until after those time stops.

                                  EDIT: Ok, looking harder at that last half a sentence you wrote: "05:30 is before sunrise so the second condition was also met" - that would explain why "Sunset Lights: On" ran which would explain why Reaction "Rainstorm Lights On" ran. Since that reaction doesn't have the constraints, it seems that's overriding the ruleset "Rainstorm Lights: On" ?

                                  G Offline
                                  G Offline
                                  gwp1
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #35

                                  @gwp1 Thinking further...

                                  Removing the Reaction "Rainstorm Lights On" from this ruleset of "Sunset Lights: On" because it's redundant - let ruleset "Rainstorm Lights: On" handle the heavy lifting all on it's own.
                                  de1ffaf1-2c40-414e-b4ad-fd8d709de4a4-image.png

                                  You can reference the ruleset from earlier images, this is the Set Reaction Reset Reaction to that ruleset.
                                  5ba95d64-6638-43e9-bcff-28da41f56b31-image.png

                                  *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.177
                                  *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                                  *HASS 2025.6.0
                                  w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                                  *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                                  MSR: latest-25139-fbd67abc
                                  MQTTController: 25139
                                  ZWave Controller: 25139

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • G gwp1

                                    @toggledbits Talking this thru...

                                    Ruleset "Sunset Lights: On" should have run at sunset 20:29 (local sunset time on Friday 06/11/2021). It should include two Reactions, "Sunset Light Group On" and "Rainstorm Lights On" (done this way to prevent race condition/overlap if the same lamps were included in both reactions as well as prevent a gap at sunset when I'd have to turn off "Rainstorm Lights: On" lamps one minute before sunset kicks in.) I don't know why "Sunset Lights: On" would have run at 05:30 as it shouldn't be driven by mode but only by sunset/sunrise.

                                    Day would be an acceptable mode for ruleset "Rainstorm Lights: On" because, well, that's basically the point - we need these lights during the day as a storm has made it very dark during non-traditional times. I would expect "Rainstorm Lights: On" to run at 05:30 when mode switches to Day - but that's the reason for the after <time> conditions/constraints - to prevent it from taking action until after those time stops.

                                    EDIT: Ok, looking harder at that last half a sentence you wrote: "05:30 is before sunrise so the second condition was also met" - that would explain why "Sunset Lights: On" ran which would explain why Reaction "Rainstorm Lights On" ran. Since that reaction doesn't have the constraints, it seems that's overriding the ruleset "Rainstorm Lights: On" ?

                                    toggledbitsT Offline
                                    toggledbitsT Offline
                                    toggledbits
                                    wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                                    #36

                                    @gwp1 said in restricting lights from a certain hour:

                                    Since that reaction doesn't have the constraints, it seems that's overriding the ruleset "Rainstorm Lights: On" ?

                                    You're mixing rules with global reactions. Global reactions are not bound by any rule. If you tell a global reaction to run, it runs. The fact that some rule may run it and at some specific time the rule would not run it is not a factor. The global reaction doesn't even know that rule exists. It's a one-way connection (rule -> global reaction); there is no connection the other way.

                                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                      @gwp1 said in restricting lights from a certain hour:

                                      Since that reaction doesn't have the constraints, it seems that's overriding the ruleset "Rainstorm Lights: On" ?

                                      You're mixing rules with global reactions. Global reactions are not bound by any rule. If you tell a global reaction to run, it runs. The fact that some rule may run it and at some specific time the rule would not run it is not a factor. The global reaction doesn't even know that rule exists. It's a one-way connection (rule -> global reaction); there is no connection the other way.

                                      G Offline
                                      G Offline
                                      gwp1
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #37

                                      @toggledbits This actually supports what I'm thinking happens here, then.

                                      The ruleset has Constraints but, because the Reaction doesn't know of it, it's riding right over those constraints.

                                      This makes me feel even more confident that removing the call to the Reaction will resolve this issue. The ruleset "Rainstorm Lights: On" has the conditions and constraints necessary to correctly call for reaction "Rainstorm Lights On" - there's no need for ruleset "Sunset Lights: On" to ALSO call the Reaction - it's covered already.

                                      *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.177
                                      *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                                      *HASS 2025.6.0
                                      w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                                      *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                                      MSR: latest-25139-fbd67abc
                                      MQTTController: 25139
                                      ZWave Controller: 25139

                                      G 1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • G gwp1

                                        @toggledbits This actually supports what I'm thinking happens here, then.

                                        The ruleset has Constraints but, because the Reaction doesn't know of it, it's riding right over those constraints.

                                        This makes me feel even more confident that removing the call to the Reaction will resolve this issue. The ruleset "Rainstorm Lights: On" has the conditions and constraints necessary to correctly call for reaction "Rainstorm Lights On" - there's no need for ruleset "Sunset Lights: On" to ALSO call the Reaction - it's covered already.

                                        G Offline
                                        G Offline
                                        gwp1
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #38

                                        @gwp1 Ok, bear with me: unsure if this ran correctly as now I saw the "Sunset Lights: On" trigger all lights because it was not yet sunrise but it was after 05:30 which is when DAY mode returns. As Sunset Lights: On runs during Day or Evening modes, it is correct (as currently configured) to act this way.

                                        Doing some housecleaning on rulesets as I fear I may have a few that are duplicating efforts and a couple that need some Constraints.

                                        *Hubitat C-7 2.4.1.177
                                        *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                                        *HASS 2025.6.0
                                        w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                                        *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                                        MSR: latest-25139-fbd67abc
                                        MQTTController: 25139
                                        ZWave Controller: 25139

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • LibraSunL Offline
                                          LibraSunL Offline
                                          LibraSun
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #39

                                          The task of curating one's Rules is never quite done, I find. I visit them every day to tend to them like delicate violets.

                                          G 1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Recent Topics

                                          • Set Reaction > Script Action
                                            wmarcolinW
                                            wmarcolin
                                            0
                                            11
                                            220

                                          • Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            5
                                            61

                                          • Wiring Samotech SM308-S into light fitting
                                            akbooerA
                                            akbooer
                                            0
                                            2
                                            85

                                          • Errors after updating to MQTTController build 25139
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            6
                                            152

                                          • 🎉 My very first MSR controller: OpenSprinkler
                                            therealdbT
                                            therealdb
                                            5
                                            13
                                            744

                                          • Advice reqeusted to migrate MSR from Bare Metal to Container
                                            T
                                            tamorgen
                                            0
                                            5
                                            163

                                          • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            5
                                            122
                                            42.3k

                                          • Z-Wave Future....
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            5
                                            237

                                          • Can´t restart or upgrade/deploy MSR
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            4
                                            189

                                          • [Solved] Limit HA Entity in MSR
                                            wmarcolinW
                                            wmarcolin
                                            0
                                            7
                                            352

                                          • Disaster recovery and virtualisation
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            5
                                            779

                                          • Remote access of Zwave stick from Z-wave server
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            3
                                            494
                                          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                          Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Unsolved