Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. [SOLVED] restricting lights from a certain hour
Set reaction triggering wrong z-wave device
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Can you run MSR on Home Assistant OS ?
cw-kidC
Looking at using Home Assistant for the first time, either on a Home Assistant Green, their own hardware or buying a cheap second hand mini PC. Sounds like Home Assistant OS is linux based using Docker for HA etc. Would I also be able to install things like MSR as well on their OS ? On the same box? Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
cw-kidC
Hello I haven't updated my installation of MSR in a very long time. Its a bare metal Linux install currently on version 24366-3de60836 I see the latest version is now latest-26011-c621bbc7 I assume I cannot just jump from a very old version to the latest version? Or can I? Thanks
Multi-System Reactor
This trigger no longer working - complaining about the operator needing changing
cw-kidC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Self test
CatmanV2C
Having been messing around with some stuff I worked a way to self trigger some tests that I wanted to do on the HA <> MSR integration This got me wondering if there's an entity that changes state / is exposed when a configured controller goes off line? I can't see one but thought it might be hidden or something? Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
tunnusT
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration: users: # This section defines your valid users. admin: ******* groups: # This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application # and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to # more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here. admin_group: users: - admin applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications guests: users: "*" applications: - dashboard api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin_group allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: true session: timeout: 7200 # (seconds) rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true # If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged. log_acls: true # If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged. debug_acls: true My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
Multi-System Reactor
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request 2?
CatmanV2C
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks. Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option? No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor

[SOLVED] restricting lights from a certain hour

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
42 Posts 3 Posters 6.3k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • LibraSunL LibraSun

    I hope what I'm about to mention applies to your situation... running Rule B's SET (or RESET) reaction from Rule A:

    1. Does NOT cause Rule B to show as "Set"
    2. Does NOT leave a lasting trace in the Status page
    3. Does NOT change the "Last set" timestamp on Rule B
      ...is therefore sometimes a real challenge to catch in the act, much less diagnose, without lots of Log-intensive scrutiny.
      These are the reasons I requested some features along those lines, to help "see" what's happening.
    G Offline
    G Offline
    gwp1
    wrote on last edited by gwp1
    #29

    @librasun I'm going to temporarily divorce the @sunset rule from the Rainstorm rule just to see what happens come morning. Moved the day/time/weekday conditions to Constraints first. At least then I can rule that out.

    Might be harder to track tomorrow depending on how bright it is at 07:30.

    I'm wondering if I'm falling into the pit of trying to "make a truth truthier" when it comes to the triggers.

    *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
    *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

    *HAOS
    Core 2026.1.1
    w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
    FW: v1.1
    SDK: v7.23.1

    *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
    MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
    MQTTController: 25139
    ZWave Controller: 25139

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • G gwp1

      @librasun I'm going to temporarily divorce the @sunset rule from the Rainstorm rule just to see what happens come morning. Moved the day/time/weekday conditions to Constraints first. At least then I can rule that out.

      Might be harder to track tomorrow depending on how bright it is at 07:30.

      I'm wondering if I'm falling into the pit of trying to "make a truth truthier" when it comes to the triggers.

      G Offline
      G Offline
      gwp1
      wrote on last edited by
      #30

      @gwp1 No change, lights still came on at 05:30. I did roll over and grab my phone, load up the MSR UI and manually trigger the ruleset only to have it turn the lights back off. Before retriggering, I looked at the status of the ruleset and it met everything it was supposed to - the lights were just still on (having come on when they really shouldn't have.)

      Trying to rethink how to write this to get to the goal.

      *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
      *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

      *HAOS
      Core 2026.1.1
      w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
      FW: v1.1
      SDK: v7.23.1

      *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
      MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
      MQTTController: 25139
      ZWave Controller: 25139

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbits
        wrote on last edited by
        #31

        @gwp1 before you change anything, do this: archive your entire "storage" subdirectory (ZIP) and send it to me.

        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

        G 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

          @gwp1 before you change anything, do this: archive your entire "storage" subdirectory (ZIP) and send it to me.

          G Offline
          G Offline
          gwp1
          wrote on last edited by
          #32

          @toggledbits Done.

          *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
          *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

          *HAOS
          Core 2026.1.1
          w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
          FW: v1.1
          SDK: v7.23.1

          *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
          MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
          MQTTController: 25139
          ZWave Controller: 25139

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbits
            wrote on last edited by
            #33

            The rule "Sunset Lights: On" is the one that triggered at 05:30 and ran the "Rainstorm Lights ON" reaction. It did that because "Day" is an acceptable mode in its first condition (but "Night" is not listed and so this condition was false before), and at the moment apparently 05:30 is before sunrise, so the second condition was also met.

            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

            G 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

              The rule "Sunset Lights: On" is the one that triggered at 05:30 and ran the "Rainstorm Lights ON" reaction. It did that because "Day" is an acceptable mode in its first condition (but "Night" is not listed and so this condition was false before), and at the moment apparently 05:30 is before sunrise, so the second condition was also met.

              G Offline
              G Offline
              gwp1
              wrote on last edited by gwp1
              #34

              @toggledbits Talking this thru...

              Ruleset "Sunset Lights: On" should have run at sunset 20:29 (local sunset time on Friday 06/11/2021). It should include two Reactions, "Sunset Light Group On" and "Rainstorm Lights On" (done this way to prevent race condition/overlap if the same lamps were included in both reactions as well as prevent a gap at sunset when I'd have to turn off "Rainstorm Lights: On" lamps one minute before sunset kicks in.) I don't know why "Sunset Lights: On" would have run at 05:30 as it shouldn't be driven by mode but only by sunset/sunrise.

              Day would be an acceptable mode for ruleset "Rainstorm Lights: On" because, well, that's basically the point - we need these lights during the day as a storm has made it very dark during non-traditional times. I would expect "Rainstorm Lights: On" to run at 05:30 when mode switches to Day - but that's the reason for the after <time> conditions/constraints - to prevent it from taking action until after those time stops.

              EDIT: Ok, looking harder at that last half a sentence you wrote: "05:30 is before sunrise so the second condition was also met" - that would explain why "Sunset Lights: On" ran which would explain why Reaction "Rainstorm Lights On" ran. Since that reaction doesn't have the constraints, it seems that's overriding the ruleset "Rainstorm Lights: On" ?

              *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
              *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

              *HAOS
              Core 2026.1.1
              w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
              FW: v1.1
              SDK: v7.23.1

              *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
              MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
              MQTTController: 25139
              ZWave Controller: 25139

              G toggledbitsT 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • G gwp1

                @toggledbits Talking this thru...

                Ruleset "Sunset Lights: On" should have run at sunset 20:29 (local sunset time on Friday 06/11/2021). It should include two Reactions, "Sunset Light Group On" and "Rainstorm Lights On" (done this way to prevent race condition/overlap if the same lamps were included in both reactions as well as prevent a gap at sunset when I'd have to turn off "Rainstorm Lights: On" lamps one minute before sunset kicks in.) I don't know why "Sunset Lights: On" would have run at 05:30 as it shouldn't be driven by mode but only by sunset/sunrise.

                Day would be an acceptable mode for ruleset "Rainstorm Lights: On" because, well, that's basically the point - we need these lights during the day as a storm has made it very dark during non-traditional times. I would expect "Rainstorm Lights: On" to run at 05:30 when mode switches to Day - but that's the reason for the after <time> conditions/constraints - to prevent it from taking action until after those time stops.

                EDIT: Ok, looking harder at that last half a sentence you wrote: "05:30 is before sunrise so the second condition was also met" - that would explain why "Sunset Lights: On" ran which would explain why Reaction "Rainstorm Lights On" ran. Since that reaction doesn't have the constraints, it seems that's overriding the ruleset "Rainstorm Lights: On" ?

                G Offline
                G Offline
                gwp1
                wrote on last edited by
                #35

                @gwp1 Thinking further...

                Removing the Reaction "Rainstorm Lights On" from this ruleset of "Sunset Lights: On" because it's redundant - let ruleset "Rainstorm Lights: On" handle the heavy lifting all on it's own.
                de1ffaf1-2c40-414e-b4ad-fd8d709de4a4-image.png

                You can reference the ruleset from earlier images, this is the Set Reaction Reset Reaction to that ruleset.
                5ba95d64-6638-43e9-bcff-28da41f56b31-image.png

                *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                *HAOS
                Core 2026.1.1
                w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                FW: v1.1
                SDK: v7.23.1

                *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                MQTTController: 25139
                ZWave Controller: 25139

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • G gwp1

                  @toggledbits Talking this thru...

                  Ruleset "Sunset Lights: On" should have run at sunset 20:29 (local sunset time on Friday 06/11/2021). It should include two Reactions, "Sunset Light Group On" and "Rainstorm Lights On" (done this way to prevent race condition/overlap if the same lamps were included in both reactions as well as prevent a gap at sunset when I'd have to turn off "Rainstorm Lights: On" lamps one minute before sunset kicks in.) I don't know why "Sunset Lights: On" would have run at 05:30 as it shouldn't be driven by mode but only by sunset/sunrise.

                  Day would be an acceptable mode for ruleset "Rainstorm Lights: On" because, well, that's basically the point - we need these lights during the day as a storm has made it very dark during non-traditional times. I would expect "Rainstorm Lights: On" to run at 05:30 when mode switches to Day - but that's the reason for the after <time> conditions/constraints - to prevent it from taking action until after those time stops.

                  EDIT: Ok, looking harder at that last half a sentence you wrote: "05:30 is before sunrise so the second condition was also met" - that would explain why "Sunset Lights: On" ran which would explain why Reaction "Rainstorm Lights On" ran. Since that reaction doesn't have the constraints, it seems that's overriding the ruleset "Rainstorm Lights: On" ?

                  toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbits
                  wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                  #36

                  @gwp1 said in restricting lights from a certain hour:

                  Since that reaction doesn't have the constraints, it seems that's overriding the ruleset "Rainstorm Lights: On" ?

                  You're mixing rules with global reactions. Global reactions are not bound by any rule. If you tell a global reaction to run, it runs. The fact that some rule may run it and at some specific time the rule would not run it is not a factor. The global reaction doesn't even know that rule exists. It's a one-way connection (rule -> global reaction); there is no connection the other way.

                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                  G 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                    @gwp1 said in restricting lights from a certain hour:

                    Since that reaction doesn't have the constraints, it seems that's overriding the ruleset "Rainstorm Lights: On" ?

                    You're mixing rules with global reactions. Global reactions are not bound by any rule. If you tell a global reaction to run, it runs. The fact that some rule may run it and at some specific time the rule would not run it is not a factor. The global reaction doesn't even know that rule exists. It's a one-way connection (rule -> global reaction); there is no connection the other way.

                    G Offline
                    G Offline
                    gwp1
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #37

                    @toggledbits This actually supports what I'm thinking happens here, then.

                    The ruleset has Constraints but, because the Reaction doesn't know of it, it's riding right over those constraints.

                    This makes me feel even more confident that removing the call to the Reaction will resolve this issue. The ruleset "Rainstorm Lights: On" has the conditions and constraints necessary to correctly call for reaction "Rainstorm Lights On" - there's no need for ruleset "Sunset Lights: On" to ALSO call the Reaction - it's covered already.

                    *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                    *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                    *HAOS
                    Core 2026.1.1
                    w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                    FW: v1.1
                    SDK: v7.23.1

                    *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                    MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                    MQTTController: 25139
                    ZWave Controller: 25139

                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • G gwp1

                      @toggledbits This actually supports what I'm thinking happens here, then.

                      The ruleset has Constraints but, because the Reaction doesn't know of it, it's riding right over those constraints.

                      This makes me feel even more confident that removing the call to the Reaction will resolve this issue. The ruleset "Rainstorm Lights: On" has the conditions and constraints necessary to correctly call for reaction "Rainstorm Lights On" - there's no need for ruleset "Sunset Lights: On" to ALSO call the Reaction - it's covered already.

                      G Offline
                      G Offline
                      gwp1
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #38

                      @gwp1 Ok, bear with me: unsure if this ran correctly as now I saw the "Sunset Lights: On" trigger all lights because it was not yet sunrise but it was after 05:30 which is when DAY mode returns. As Sunset Lights: On runs during Day or Evening modes, it is correct (as currently configured) to act this way.

                      Doing some housecleaning on rulesets as I fear I may have a few that are duplicating efforts and a couple that need some Constraints.

                      *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                      *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                      *HAOS
                      Core 2026.1.1
                      w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                      FW: v1.1
                      SDK: v7.23.1

                      *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                      MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                      MQTTController: 25139
                      ZWave Controller: 25139

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • LibraSunL Offline
                        LibraSunL Offline
                        LibraSun
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #39

                        The task of curating one's Rules is never quite done, I find. I visit them every day to tend to them like delicate violets.

                        G 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • LibraSunL LibraSun

                          The task of curating one's Rules is never quite done, I find. I visit them every day to tend to them like delicate violets.

                          G Offline
                          G Offline
                          gwp1
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #40

                          @librasun I need to get better at making use of comments because I find myself forgetting why I created a specific ruleset.

                          *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                          *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                          *HAOS
                          Core 2026.1.1
                          w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                          FW: v1.1
                          SDK: v7.23.1

                          *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                          MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                          MQTTController: 25139
                          ZWave Controller: 25139

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • LibraSunL Offline
                            LibraSunL Offline
                            LibraSun
                            wrote on last edited by LibraSun
                            #41

                            Comments are vital! I include them both as Comment entries within the Rule body, as well as #comments at the end of a line within an Expression. Example:

                            AddOne := a = 0, #start at zero
                                      b = a + 1 #add one
                            
                            G 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • LibraSunL LibraSun

                              Comments are vital! I include them both as Comment entries within the Rule body, as well as #comments at the end of a line within an Expression. Example:

                              AddOne := a = 0, #start at zero
                                        b = a + 1 #add one
                              
                              G Offline
                              G Offline
                              gwp1
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #42

                              @librasun @toggledbits I am delighted to say there were no lights between 05:30 and 06:30 (as planned) this morning.

                              Review:

                              • Removed duplicate Set Reaction from ruleset "Sunset Lights: On" - this was already called elsewhere and was overriding the "Rainstorm Lights: On" ruleset.

                              • Removed Day as a considered mode from "Sunset Lights: On" as they're going on at sunset and Day mode ends then. It makes Day a mode that should never trigger - but it was at 05:30 incorrectly as that's when Day mode restores.

                              • Returned the weekend and weekday exclusions to the Conditions from Constraints set as after the appropriate alarm clock times.

                              My thanks to both of you - I really appreciate your feedback and guidance here!

                              *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                              *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                              *HAOS
                              Core 2026.1.1
                              w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                              FW: v1.1
                              SDK: v7.23.1

                              *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                              MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                              MQTTController: 25139
                              ZWave Controller: 25139

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              Recent Topics

                              • Set reaction triggering wrong z-wave device
                                T
                                tamorgen
                                0
                                17
                                91

                              • Can you run MSR on Home Assistant OS ?
                                CatmanV2C
                                CatmanV2
                                0
                                12
                                150

                              • RPi Alternative: Orange Pi 4 LTS (3GB RAM/16GB eMMC)
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                0
                                2
                                1.7k

                              • RPi Alternative: Orange Pi Zero 2 (1GB)
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                2
                                3
                                3.5k

                              • RPi Alternative: Libre Computer AML-S905X-CC "Le Potato" (2GB RAM)
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                5
                                6
                                3.1k

                              • HA and AI
                                therealdbT
                                therealdb
                                0
                                4
                                144

                              • How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
                                CatmanV2C
                                CatmanV2
                                0
                                26
                                419

                              • This trigger no longer working - complaining about the operator needing changing
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                0
                                18
                                168

                              • Self test
                                CatmanV2C
                                CatmanV2
                                0
                                3
                                114

                              • Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                0
                                2
                                127

                              • VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
                                S
                                SweetGenius
                                1
                                1
                                92

                              • Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                3
                                1
                                84
                              Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                              Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • Unsolved