Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Updated to latest MSR 21243 and no entities are being executed I Hubitat
Device log?
G
@toggledbits is there a log that will show me what rule is turning on a specific device? I've got a switch that has been kicking on at 2200 ET for several nights now and the reactor.log doesn't have a thing in it that I can see on a device level (it being more rules-based).
Multi-System Reactor
Midnight crossing not working in date/time condition (build 25325)
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Error: Command timeout
G
at _ClientAPI._commandTimeout (http://192.168.1.100:8111/client/ClientAPI.js:807:179 Seeing this randomly when returning to open browser tab after being away awhile. Once, maybe twice a day. "What did you do to trigger it?" Literally nothing, just walked away and returned and there it was. Actions taken in reasonably close proximity to this particular instance of it popping up: I'd restarted the MSR container in Portainer. I'll try to grab some logs here shortly.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
toggledbitsT
This post does not apply to users of Intel/AMD-based systems. If you are using a Reactor image tagged latest-amd64 or stable-amd64, then this post does not apply to you. It also does not apply to bare-metal installs; it's for users of docker images on ARM-based systems only (principally Raspberry Pi hosts, but could be others). After January 15, 2026, I will no longer produce the aarch64-tagged docker image for Reactor. The ARM images will be arm64 for 64-bit operating systems, and armv7l for 32-bit operating systems. For those of you running a container from the aarch64 image today, this will be a relatively simple change: you just need to switch the image used for your docker container to a differently-tagged image. If you are using docker-compose, then this is a relatively simple matter of changing the image line in your docker-compose.yaml file and then stopping (docker-compose down) and restarting (docker-compose up -d) your Reactor daemon. But there's a catch... not all of you can safely just switch from the aarch64 image to the arm64 image. And, you can't just trust the output of uname -m, for example, because this exposes the CPU architecture, but not the word size of the OS running on that CPU. For Raspberry Pi systems, the transition to 64-bit operating systems was long (starting in 2016) and not always obvious — although there was a first "official" 64-bit OS for RPis in 2020, it did not become a default recommendation in the Raspberry Pi Imager until 2021, and then that was only the default for Pi 3/4 systems with >4GB RAM; it was 2022 before it was universally recommended for all 64-bit CPUs regardless of RAM size. Depending on when you first imaged your RPi system and what default you may have been offered/chosen, you could today easily have a 64-bit CPU Raspberry Pi running a 32-bit version of the operating system. Upgrades along the way would not change this; changing it to fully 64-bit requires a full reimage of the system. To establish if your OS is 64- or 32-bit, log in to your Pi and run: sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH. If the response is arm64 or aarch64, then you are running a 64-bit OS and you should use the arm64-tagged image. If it's anything else, you are running a 32-bit OS, and you should use the armv7l-tagged image. pi@rpi4-1:~ $ sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH armhf pi@rpi4-1:~ $ uname -m aarch64 pi@rpi4-1:~ $ In the example above, the uname command reports that the CPU is 64-bit architecture (aarch64), which is true for the host on which I ran these commands, but the DEB_HOST_ARCH value is armhf, indicating a 32-bit operating system. This system has to use the armv7l-tagged image. Other systems will have their own ways of determining the word size of the running OS. Since the majority of Reactor users running ARM systems are on Raspberry Pis, I am able to supply the above instructions, but if you happen to have a different ARM system, you'll need to do some web searching to figure out how to expose that information. Or, you can just try the arm64 image, and if it doesn't start up, try the armv7l image. Remember to always back up your system before making any changes. For everyone, please make this change as soon as possible, and if you have any trouble finding a working image, please (1) go back to the current aarch64 image; and (2) let me know in this thread along with as much detail about your host system as you can offer (including the output of the dpkg-architecture command mentioned above).
Multi-System Reactor
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Updated to latest MSR 21243 and no entities are being executed I Hubitat

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
47 Posts 6 Posters 8.3k Views 6 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Matteburk
    wrote on last edited by
    #37

    I edited them directly on the pie in the textfile.

    this is what the var log file said:

    Sep 6 22:17:23 raspberrypi dhcpcd[428]: wlan0: fe80::465:fde6:f33:2344 is reachable again
    Sep 6 22:17:23 raspberrypi avahi-daemon[429]: Withdrawing address record for fe80::2598:15e9:620:fe7d on eth0.
    Sep 6 22:17:26 raspberrypi dhcpcd[428]: eth0: leased 192.168.68.126 for 7200 seconds
    Sep 6 22:17:26 raspberrypi avahi-daemon[429]: Joining mDNS multicast group on interface eth0.IPv4 with address 192.168.68.126.
    Sep 6 22:17:26 raspberrypi dhcpcd[428]: eth0: adding route to 192.168.68.0/24
    Sep 6 22:17:26 raspberrypi dhcpcd[428]: eth0: adding default route via 192.168.68.1
    Sep 6 22:17:26 raspberrypi avahi-daemon[429]: New relevant interface eth0.IPv4 for mDNS.
    Sep 6 22:17:26 raspberrypi avahi-daemon[429]: Registering new address record for 192.168.68.126 on eth0.IPv4.
    Sep 6 22:17:34 raspberrypi systemd[1]: systemd-fsckd.service: Succeeded.
    Sep 6 22:50:34 raspberrypi systemd-timesyncd[339]: Synchronized to time server for the first time 178.16.128.13:123 (2.debian.pool.ntp.org).
    Sep 6 22:50:41 raspberrypi systemd[1]: systemd-hostnamed.service: Succeeded.
    Sep 6 22:53:32 raspberrypi dbus-daemon[626]: [session uid=1000 pid=626] Activating service name='ca.desrt.dconf' requested by ':1.28' (uid=1000 pid=1084 comm="mousepad /var/log/syslog ")
    Sep 6 22:53:32 raspberrypi dbus-daemon[626]: [session uid=1000 pid=626] Successfully activated service 'ca.desrt.dconf'
    Sep 6 22:54:50 raspberrypi dbus-daemon[418]: [system] Activating via systemd: service name='org.freedesktop.hostname1' unit='dbus-org.freedesktop.hostname1.service' requested by ':1.51' (uid=1000 pid=1100 comm="/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser-v7 --fo")
    Sep 6 22:54:50 raspberrypi systemd[1]: Starting Hostname Service...
    Sep 6 22:54:50 raspberrypi dbus-daemon[418]: [system] Successfully activated service 'org.freedesktop.hostname1'
    Sep 6 22:54:50 raspberrypi systemd[1]: Started Hostname Service.
    Sep 6 22:54:50 raspberrypi gvfsd[665]: mkdir failed on directory /var/cache/samba: Åtkomst nekas
    Sep 6 22:54:50 raspberrypi gvfsd[665]: mkdir failed on directory /var/cache/samba: Åtkomst nekas
    Sep 6 22:54:51 raspberrypi gvfsd[665]: mkdir failed on directory /var/cache/samba: Åtkomst nekas
    Sep 6 22:54:51 raspberrypi gvfsd[665]: mkdir failed on directory /var/cache/samba: Åtkomst nekas
    Sep 6 22:54:52 raspberrypi gvfsd[665]: mkdir failed on directory /var/cache/samba: Åtkomst nekas
    Sep 6 22:54:52 raspberrypi gvfsd[665]: mkdir failed on directory /var/cache/samba: Åtkomst nekas
    Sep 6 22:54:53 raspberrypi gvfsd[665]: mkdir failed on directory /var/cache/samba: Åtkomst nekas
    Sep 6 22:54:53 raspberrypi gvfsd[665]: mkdir failed on directory /var/cache/samba: Åtkomst nekas
    Sep 6 22:54:54 raspberrypi gvfsd[665]: mkdir failed on directory /var/cache/samba: Åtkomst nekas
    Sep 6 22:54:54 raspberrypi gvfsd[665]: mkdir failed on directory /var/cache/samba: Åtkomst nekas
    Sep 6 22:54:55 raspberrypi gvfsd[665]: mkdir failed on directory /var/cache/samba: Åtkomst nekas
    Sep 6 22:54:55 raspberrypi gvfsd[665]: mkdir failed on directory /var/cache/samba: Åtkomst nekas

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by toggledbits
      #38

      I just noticed, the ExecStart line in your edited service file is incomplete. It should read:

          ExecStart=/home/pi/.local/lib/nodejs/node-v14.15.4-linux-armv7l/bin/node app -p
      

      Fix that. Then do:

          sudo systemctl daemon-reload
          sudo systemctl restart reactor
      

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      M 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

        I just noticed, the ExecStart line in your edited service file is incomplete. It should read:

            ExecStart=/home/pi/.local/lib/nodejs/node-v14.15.4-linux-armv7l/bin/node app -p
        

        Fix that. Then do:

            sudo systemctl daemon-reload
            sudo systemctl restart reactor
        
        M Offline
        M Offline
        Matteburk
        wrote on last edited by
        #39

        @toggledbits said in Updated to latest MSR 21243 and no entities are being executed I Hubitat:

        ExecStart=/home/pi/.local/lib/nodejs/node-v14.15.4-linux-armv7l/bin/node app -p

        Changed it and now i can reach msr thrue UI!

        Here is the reactor.log

        2021-09-06T21:05:42.633Z app:null Reactor "1.0.1-21243-ab6d917" starting on v14.15.4
        2021-09-06T21:05:42.636Z app:INFO Process ID 1780; platform linux/arm #1408 SMP Mon Mar 22 12:49:24 GMT 2021; locale [ "sv-SE", "UTF-8" ]
        2021-09-06T21:05:42.637Z app:INFO Basedir /home/pi/reactor; data in /home/pi/reactor/storage
        2021-09-06T21:05:42.637Z app:INFO NODE_PATH /home/pi/reactor; module paths [ "/home/pi/reactor/node_modules", "/home/pi/node_modules", "/home/node_modules", "/node_modules" ]
        2021-09-06T21:05:42.781Z Plugin:null Module Plugin v21173
        2021-09-06T21:05:42.797Z default:INFO Module Entity v21177
        2021-09-06T21:05:42.805Z Controller:null Module Controller v21226
        2021-09-06T21:05:42.806Z default:null Module Structure v21229
        2021-09-06T21:05:42.822Z default:null Module Ruleset v21096
        2021-09-06T21:05:42.823Z default:null Module Rulesets v21096
        2021-09-06T21:05:42.869Z default:null Module Rule v21224
        2021-09-06T21:05:42.880Z default:null Module Engine v21213
        2021-09-06T21:05:42.881Z default:null Module httpapi v21238
        2021-09-06T21:05:42.886Z default:null Module httpproxy v21054
        2021-09-06T21:05:42.925Z default:null Module wsapi v21196
        2021-09-06T21:05:42.928Z app:NOTICE Starting Structure...
        2021-09-06T21:05:42.936Z Structure:INFO Structure#1 starting controller interface vera (VeraController)
        2021-09-06T21:05:42.944Z Structure:INFO Structure#1 starting controller interface hubitat (HubitatController)
        2021-09-06T21:05:42.947Z Structure:INFO Structure#1 starting controller interface reactor_system (SystemController)
        2021-09-06T21:05:43.018Z default:null Module VeraController v21236
        2021-09-06T21:05:43.026Z default:null Module HubitatController v21243
        2021-09-06T21:05:43.029Z default:null Module SystemController v21102
        2021-09-06T21:05:43.037Z VeraController:NOTICE VeraController#vera starting
        2021-09-06T21:05:43.145Z VeraController:INFO VeraController#vera loaded mapping ver 21236 rev 1 format 1 notice
        2021-09-06T21:05:43.148Z VeraController:INFO VeraController: deviceclass vera_system_object capability sys_system does not provide attribute state
        2021-09-06T21:05:43.227Z Controller:NOTICE Controller SystemController#reactor_system is now online.
        2021-09-06T21:05:43.339Z app:INFO Structure running; pausing for controllers' initial ready
        2021-09-06T21:05:43.347Z Controller:NOTICE HubitatController#hubitat not ready; performing initial connect/query
        2021-09-06T21:05:43.896Z VeraController:NOTICE Controller VeraController#vera is now online.
        2021-09-06T21:05:45.291Z Controller:ERR HubitatController#hubitat mapped capability x_hubitat_healthcheck has no implementation
        2021-09-06T21:05:45.322Z Controller:ERR HubitatController#hubitat mapped capability x_hubitat_healthcheck has no implementation
        2021-09-06T21:05:45.383Z Controller:ERR HubitatController#hubitat mapped capability x_hubitat_healthcheck has no implementation
        2021-09-06T21:05:45.387Z Controller:ERR HubitatController#hubitat mapped capability x_hubitat_healthcheck has no implementation
        2021-09-06T21:05:45.391Z Controller:ERR HubitatController#hubitat mapped capability x_hubitat_healthcheck has no implementation
        2021-09-06T21:05:45.394Z Controller:ERR HubitatController#hubitat mapped capability x_hubitat_healthcheck has no implementation
        2021-09-06T21:05:45.409Z Controller:ERR HubitatController#hubitat mapped capability x_hubitat_healthcheck has no implementation
        2021-09-06T21:05:45.414Z Controller:ERR HubitatController#hubitat mapped capability x_hubitat_healthcheck has no implementation
        2021-09-06T21:05:45.418Z Controller:ERR HubitatController#hubitat mapped capability x_hubitat_healthcheck has no implementation
        2021-09-06T21:05:45.510Z Controller:INFO HubitatController#hubitat connecting to hub's eventsocket WebSocket API at ws://192.168.68.145/eventsocket
        2021-09-06T21:05:45.517Z Controller:NOTICE Controller HubitatController#hubitat is now online.
        2021-09-06T21:05:45.522Z app:NOTICE Starting Reaction Engine...
        2021-09-06T21:05:45.524Z Engine:INFO Reaction Engine starting
        2021-09-06T21:05:45.525Z Engine:INFO Checking rule sets...
        2021-09-06T21:05:45.542Z Engine:INFO Checking rules...
        2021-09-06T21:05:45.544Z Engine:INFO Data check complete; no corrections.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by
          #40

          That's better. OK, no more command line. Do this as well:

              sudo systemctl enable reactor
          

          This will tell systemd to start Reactor at boot (which you should then test). If you have any other mechanism for starting Reactor at boot (e.g. modified .profile or bashrc files), then those will need to be removed/disabled.

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            Matteburk
            wrote on last edited by
            #41

            ok... what does that line do?

            got this
            pi@raspberrypi:~ $ sudo systemctl enable reactor
            Created symlink /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/reactor.service \u2192 /etc/systemd/system/reactor.service.
            pi@raspberrypi:~ $

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

              That's better. OK, no more command line. Do this as well:

                  sudo systemctl enable reactor
              

              This will tell systemd to start Reactor at boot (which you should then test). If you have any other mechanism for starting Reactor at boot (e.g. modified .profile or bashrc files), then those will need to be removed/disabled.

              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbits
              wrote on last edited by
              #42

              @toggledbits said in Updated to latest MSR 21243 and no entities are being executed I Hubitat:

              This will tell systemd to start Reactor at boot (which you should then test). If you have any other mechanism for starting Reactor at boot (e.g. modified .profile or bashrc files), then those will need to be removed/disabled.

              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

              M 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                @toggledbits said in Updated to latest MSR 21243 and no entities are being executed I Hubitat:

                This will tell systemd to start Reactor at boot (which you should then test). If you have any other mechanism for starting Reactor at boot (e.g. modified .profile or bashrc files), then those will need to be removed/disabled.

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Matteburk
                wrote on last edited by
                #43

                @toggledbits
                ok.... I cut the power and restarted the pie and msr got up by it self!!

                Coool!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbits
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #44

                  Noice! OK. You're on your way! NOW we're finished! 🙂

                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                    Noice! OK. You're on your way! NOW we're finished! 🙂

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Matteburk
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #45

                    @toggledbits

                    Big thanx again Patrick!
                    Keep up the good work!!

                    Now bedtime in Sweden!

                    /Mattias

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • tunnusT tunnus

                      @matteburk could check this post, although you probably have some other issue

                      tunnusT Offline
                      tunnusT Offline
                      tunnus
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #46

                      @tunnus said in Updated to latest MSR 21243 and no entities are being executed I Hubitat:

                      @matteburk could check this post, although you probably have some other issue

                      Well, it turned out you had the same issue

                      Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • G Offline
                        G Offline
                        gwp1
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #47

                        May I say to you all - thank you!

                        I undertook the mini-project of migrating MSR from SD card to SSD. Full transparency, I'm not a Linux guy in any way/shape/form so there was a good deal of feeling my way thru the dark. Once I got it moved and running (honestly, on the first try!) I wanted the next logical step of start/restart at boot. Was really fumbling until I found this thread - it was better than any tutorial I'd been using.

                        Success is mine: on the SSD and with everything starting at boot like desired.

                        Thanks @Matteburk for making mistakes similar to mine and to @toggledbits for his INFINITE patience and guidance. (The app -p thing was actually a question I had after seeing an earlier screenshot in the thread and having removed it only to meet failure nose-to-nose.)

                        *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.158
                        *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                        *HASS 2025.11.1
                        w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                        FW: v1.1
                        SDK: v7.23.1

                        *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                        MSR: latest-25323-d340b7d9
                        MQTTController: 25139
                        ZWave Controller: 25139

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        Recent Topics

                        • Is there a way to turn this section (image in post) off?
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          1
                          36

                        • Device log?
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          2
                          62

                        • Midnight crossing not working in date/time condition (build 25325)
                          tunnusT
                          tunnus
                          0
                          3
                          60

                        • Error: Command timeout
                          G
                          gwp1
                          0
                          6
                          152

                        • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          5
                          131
                          75.1k

                        • [Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
                          CrilleC
                          Crille
                          0
                          5
                          246

                        • Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
                          G
                          gwp1
                          0
                          6
                          264

                        • Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          1
                          1
                          98

                        • Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
                          M
                          mgvra
                          1
                          3
                          198

                        • Script action and custom timers
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          4
                          212

                        • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
                          CatmanV2C
                          CatmanV2
                          0
                          12
                          538
                        Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                        Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Unsolved