Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. sunset/sunrise question in 22251
Device log?
G
@toggledbits is there a log that will show me what rule is turning on a specific device? I've got a switch that has been kicking on at 2200 ET for several nights now and the reactor.log doesn't have a thing in it that I can see on a device level (it being more rules-based).
Multi-System Reactor
Midnight crossing not working in date/time condition (build 25325)
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Error: Command timeout
G
at _ClientAPI._commandTimeout (http://192.168.1.100:8111/client/ClientAPI.js:807:179 Seeing this randomly when returning to open browser tab after being away awhile. Once, maybe twice a day. "What did you do to trigger it?" Literally nothing, just walked away and returned and there it was. Actions taken in reasonably close proximity to this particular instance of it popping up: I'd restarted the MSR container in Portainer. I'll try to grab some logs here shortly.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
toggledbitsT
This post does not apply to users of Intel/AMD-based systems. If you are using a Reactor image tagged latest-amd64 or stable-amd64, then this post does not apply to you. It also does not apply to bare-metal installs; it's for users of docker images on ARM-based systems only (principally Raspberry Pi hosts, but could be others). After January 15, 2026, I will no longer produce the aarch64-tagged docker image for Reactor. The ARM images will be arm64 for 64-bit operating systems, and armv7l for 32-bit operating systems. For those of you running a container from the aarch64 image today, this will be a relatively simple change: you just need to switch the image used for your docker container to a differently-tagged image. If you are using docker-compose, then this is a relatively simple matter of changing the image line in your docker-compose.yaml file and then stopping (docker-compose down) and restarting (docker-compose up -d) your Reactor daemon. But there's a catch... not all of you can safely just switch from the aarch64 image to the arm64 image. And, you can't just trust the output of uname -m, for example, because this exposes the CPU architecture, but not the word size of the OS running on that CPU. For Raspberry Pi systems, the transition to 64-bit operating systems was long (starting in 2016) and not always obvious — although there was a first "official" 64-bit OS for RPis in 2020, it did not become a default recommendation in the Raspberry Pi Imager until 2021, and then that was only the default for Pi 3/4 systems with >4GB RAM; it was 2022 before it was universally recommended for all 64-bit CPUs regardless of RAM size. Depending on when you first imaged your RPi system and what default you may have been offered/chosen, you could today easily have a 64-bit CPU Raspberry Pi running a 32-bit version of the operating system. Upgrades along the way would not change this; changing it to fully 64-bit requires a full reimage of the system. To establish if your OS is 64- or 32-bit, log in to your Pi and run: sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH. If the response is arm64 or aarch64, then you are running a 64-bit OS and you should use the arm64-tagged image. If it's anything else, you are running a 32-bit OS, and you should use the armv7l-tagged image. pi@rpi4-1:~ $ sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH armhf pi@rpi4-1:~ $ uname -m aarch64 pi@rpi4-1:~ $ In the example above, the uname command reports that the CPU is 64-bit architecture (aarch64), which is true for the host on which I ran these commands, but the DEB_HOST_ARCH value is armhf, indicating a 32-bit operating system. This system has to use the armv7l-tagged image. Other systems will have their own ways of determining the word size of the running OS. Since the majority of Reactor users running ARM systems are on Raspberry Pis, I am able to supply the above instructions, but if you happen to have a different ARM system, you'll need to do some web searching to figure out how to expose that information. Or, you can just try the arm64 image, and if it doesn't start up, try the armv7l image. Remember to always back up your system before making any changes. For everyone, please make this change as soon as possible, and if you have any trouble finding a working image, please (1) go back to the current aarch64 image; and (2) let me know in this thread along with as much detail about your host system as you can offer (including the output of the dpkg-architecture command mentioned above).
Multi-System Reactor
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

sunset/sunrise question in 22251

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
11 Posts 2 Posters 815 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    gwp1
    wrote on last edited by gwp1
    #1

    Been fighting with my Day/Evening/Night modes of late. Thought I had them working just right but after deploying 22251 yesterday evening something "happened." (Note, I've been holding off on reporting what I think is a bug using the sunrise/sunset settings in rules wherein they won't hold a setting until I destroy and recreate that criteria a second time.)

    My rulesets:

    1ceeb3f8-4549-409b-82dc-99da5b9f4aef-image.png

    ccb90573-a0f7-4d9e-9ccf-2ed74c4d63ec-image.png

    I had to one-eyed add the mode restrictions at midnight after being awakened from a sound sleep.

    I'm trying to keep my rules slim/trim after finding many duplicate/conflicting rulesets during a review over the past few days.

    For Days, I should be present, it should start at 0630 ET each weekday, 0730 ET each weekend day (as sunrise often comes after those times.) No concerns about crossing the "midnight divide" with day.

    For Evenings, I should be present, it should start at sunset and end at sunrise (note: that sunrise thing won't ever happen as one goes to bed at SOME point and invokes night) but I do have the logic in there so the system doesn't switch to day or just get lost at midnight if I'm up late.

    Any thoughts on how to make this cleaner but not be awakened at midnight? lol

    *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.158
    *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

    *HASS 2025.11.1
    w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
    FW: v1.1
    SDK: v7.23.1

    *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
    MSR: latest-25323-d340b7d9
    MQTTController: 25139
    ZWave Controller: 25139

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by toggledbits
      #2

      In your Day rule, you have "before sunset" as a condition. That means the test will be true from midnight to sunset, false from sunset to midnight, and then go back to true at midnight, every day. Is that consistent with your intentions? IMO, Day isn't day until after sunrise (i.e. the period between midnight and sunrise isn't Day, it's part of Night to my thinking).

      Oh, and in Evening, your two conditions "after sunset" OR "before sunrise" can be written as a single condition "between sunset and sunrise".

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      G 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

        In your Day rule, you have "before sunset" as a condition. That means the test will be true from midnight to sunset, false from sunset to midnight, and then go back to true at midnight, every day. Is that consistent with your intentions? IMO, Day isn't day until after sunrise (i.e. the period between midnight and sunrise isn't Day, it's part of Night to my thinking).

        Oh, and in Evening, your two conditions "after sunset" OR "before sunrise" can be written as a single condition "between sunset and sunrise".

        G Offline
        G Offline
        gwp1
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @toggledbits For Days the issue is that sunrise often comes after alarm times. Would "after sunrise" or "when alarm times is true" better address?

        Re Evenings, I wasn't sure with the midnight crossover that the "between" would address the needs.

        *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.158
        *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

        *HASS 2025.11.1
        w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
        FW: v1.1
        SDK: v7.23.1

        *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
        MSR: latest-25323-d340b7d9
        MQTTController: 25139
        ZWave Controller: 25139

        toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • G gwp1

          @toggledbits For Days the issue is that sunrise often comes after alarm times. Would "after sunrise" or "when alarm times is true" better address?

          Re Evenings, I wasn't sure with the midnight crossover that the "between" would address the needs.

          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @gwp1 said in sunset/sunrise question in 22251:

          For Days the issue is that sunrise often comes after alarm times. Would "after sunrise" or "when alarm times is true" better address?

          I can't really answer this, not knowing enough about your rules and how Alarm Times works. I'll leave it to your experimentation, I just wanted to point out that there's a significant number of hours that may not comport with your intentions.

          @gwp1 said in sunset/sunrise question in 22251:

          Re Evenings, I wasn't sure with the midnight crossover that the "between" would address the needs.

          Very important feature that it handles midnight crossing correctly on all time conditions.

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          G 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

            @gwp1 said in sunset/sunrise question in 22251:

            For Days the issue is that sunrise often comes after alarm times. Would "after sunrise" or "when alarm times is true" better address?

            I can't really answer this, not knowing enough about your rules and how Alarm Times works. I'll leave it to your experimentation, I just wanted to point out that there's a significant number of hours that may not comport with your intentions.

            @gwp1 said in sunset/sunrise question in 22251:

            Re Evenings, I wasn't sure with the midnight crossover that the "between" would address the needs.

            Very important feature that it handles midnight crossing correctly on all time conditions.

            G Offline
            G Offline
            gwp1
            wrote on last edited by gwp1
            #5

            @toggledbits Ok, this has surfaced the potential bug I referenced in my OP.

            I'm attempting to edit the Evening ruleset to change to "between sunset and sunrise". I add the trigger:

            f76a4cf3-e4f6-44e5-a789-ae1bbc8af895-image.png

            I click save and exit

            989272a0-82d7-4649-b2d2-0b6cd0020371-image.png

            Rule shows as SET

            747c65be-40ba-4841-89cc-fb5f640e6b4f-image.png

            The trigger has changed to "from sunrise to sunset"

            c84953eb-6df0-41d2-9413-973c372d75f7-image.png

            And now my system is fighting over Day vs Evening.

            EDIT:
            Further, editing the trigger does not prompt for save - it's as though the change in the trigger isn't seen.

            c1f417a4-5caa-44be-9ffa-1573d7d09a81-image.png

            12afa669-34ed-4f82-b76f-837f18966755-image.png

            Further testing... adding a new trigger of "after sunset" and clicking save switches to "after sunrise".

            *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.158
            *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

            *HASS 2025.11.1
            w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
            FW: v1.1
            SDK: v7.23.1

            *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
            MSR: latest-25323-d340b7d9
            MQTTController: 25139
            ZWave Controller: 25139

            G 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • G gwp1

              @toggledbits Ok, this has surfaced the potential bug I referenced in my OP.

              I'm attempting to edit the Evening ruleset to change to "between sunset and sunrise". I add the trigger:

              f76a4cf3-e4f6-44e5-a789-ae1bbc8af895-image.png

              I click save and exit

              989272a0-82d7-4649-b2d2-0b6cd0020371-image.png

              Rule shows as SET

              747c65be-40ba-4841-89cc-fb5f640e6b4f-image.png

              The trigger has changed to "from sunrise to sunset"

              c84953eb-6df0-41d2-9413-973c372d75f7-image.png

              And now my system is fighting over Day vs Evening.

              EDIT:
              Further, editing the trigger does not prompt for save - it's as though the change in the trigger isn't seen.

              c1f417a4-5caa-44be-9ffa-1573d7d09a81-image.png

              12afa669-34ed-4f82-b76f-837f18966755-image.png

              Further testing... adding a new trigger of "after sunset" and clicking save switches to "after sunrise".

              G Offline
              G Offline
              gwp1
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Opened a bug on this issue.

              *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.158
              *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

              *HASS 2025.11.1
              w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
              FW: v1.1
              SDK: v7.23.1

              *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
              MSR: latest-25323-d340b7d9
              MQTTController: 25139
              ZWave Controller: 25139

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbits
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                OK. I would have liked to see a bit more concise description in that OP (e.g. "sunrise/sunset selections not saving when edited"), but found and fixed. Another thing you might have observed is when you changed those menus to sunset first and sunrise second, you didn't get the green bar on the left of the condition, indicating that it had been changed.

                I'll do a build later today with the fix. In the meanwhile, you can work around it by changing the sunrise/sunset start and end to what you want, then edit the offset to something and then re-edit and put it back to 0 (or whatever you want). You should get a green bar on the left side of the condition when you do that.

                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                G 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                  OK. I would have liked to see a bit more concise description in that OP (e.g. "sunrise/sunset selections not saving when edited"), but found and fixed. Another thing you might have observed is when you changed those menus to sunset first and sunrise second, you didn't get the green bar on the left of the condition, indicating that it had been changed.

                  I'll do a build later today with the fix. In the meanwhile, you can work around it by changing the sunrise/sunset start and end to what you want, then edit the offset to something and then re-edit and put it back to 0 (or whatever you want). You should get a green bar on the left side of the condition when you do that.

                  G Offline
                  G Offline
                  gwp1
                  wrote on last edited by gwp1
                  #8

                  @toggledbits My screenshots were a step-by-step thru the issue. "I click save and exit "does show that there is no green bar next to the edited trigger.

                  *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.158
                  *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                  *HASS 2025.11.1
                  w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                  FW: v1.1
                  SDK: v7.23.1

                  *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                  MSR: latest-25323-d340b7d9
                  MQTTController: 25139
                  ZWave Controller: 25139

                  G 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbits
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Yes, I could see that. I was referring to the OP, which you also made reference to. Fixed now. Build coming later.

                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • G gwp1

                      @toggledbits My screenshots were a step-by-step thru the issue. "I click save and exit "does show that there is no green bar next to the edited trigger.

                      G Offline
                      G Offline
                      gwp1
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Can confirm that adding a new trigger and changing to 1 minute after for each end of it is a successful workaround.

                      b951322c-265b-47d6-8a61-fa59dced6a89-image.png

                      *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.158
                      *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                      *HASS 2025.11.1
                      w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                      FW: v1.1
                      SDK: v7.23.1

                      *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                      MSR: latest-25323-d340b7d9
                      MQTTController: 25139
                      ZWave Controller: 25139

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                        Yes, I could see that. I was referring to the OP, which you also made reference to. Fixed now. Build coming later.

                        G Offline
                        G Offline
                        gwp1
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        @toggledbits I wasn't sure at the time of the OP post that it was a legit bug and not just... me.

                        🙂

                        *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.158
                        *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                        *HASS 2025.11.1
                        w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                        FW: v1.1
                        SDK: v7.23.1

                        *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                        MSR: latest-25323-d340b7d9
                        MQTTController: 25139
                        ZWave Controller: 25139

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        Recent Topics

                        • Is there a way to turn this section (image in post) off?
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          1
                          19

                        • Device log?
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          2
                          44

                        • Midnight crossing not working in date/time condition (build 25325)
                          tunnusT
                          tunnus
                          0
                          3
                          46

                        • Error: Command timeout
                          G
                          gwp1
                          0
                          6
                          136

                        • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          5
                          131
                          75.0k

                        • [Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
                          CrilleC
                          Crille
                          0
                          5
                          218

                        • Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
                          G
                          gwp1
                          0
                          6
                          246

                        • Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          1
                          1
                          91

                        • Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
                          M
                          mgvra
                          1
                          3
                          190

                        • Script action and custom timers
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          4
                          205

                        • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
                          CatmanV2C
                          CatmanV2
                          0
                          12
                          523

                        • There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
                          akbooerA
                          akbooer
                          1
                          2
                          156
                        Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                        Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Unsolved