Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. [RESOLVED] How quickly should logs rotate?
How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
cw-kidC
Hello I haven't updated my installation of MSR in a very long time. Its a bare metal Linux install currently on version 24366-3de60836 I see the latest version is now latest-26011-c621bbc7 I assume I cannot just jump from a very old version to the latest version? Or can I? Thanks
Multi-System Reactor
Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
tunnusT
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration: users: # This section defines your valid users. admin: ******* groups: # This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application # and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to # more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here. admin_group: users: - admin applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications guests: users: "*" applications: - dashboard api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin_group allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: true session: timeout: 7200 # (seconds) rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true # If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged. log_acls: true # If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged. debug_acls: true My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
Multi-System Reactor
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request 2?
CatmanV2C
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks. Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option? No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reset a delay
CatmanV2C
I'm sure this has been asked, and answered, but damned if I can figure it out Use case: I have a rear garden with lights. A door from the kitchen into the garden and a door from the garage. Currently if I open the kitchen door the lights come on (yay) and a 3 minute delay starts. After 3 minutes, no matter what else happens, the lights go off (Boo! But also yay!) What I would like is for the 3 minute delay until the lights go off to start from the latest door open event. That is, if I'm going from kitchen to garage, and back again, the lights stay on until there's three minutes of no activity. I've tried 'hacking' with a virtual switch, but can't seem to stop the delay. Any pointers? TIA C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Loading Screen Safari
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Constraints states visually do not match actual
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

[RESOLVED] How quickly should logs rotate?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
13 Posts 3 Posters 1.5k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 3 Offline
    3 Offline
    3rdStng
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    Lowering these two down to a 4 do not appear to have any change on the speed of the log rotation

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • CrilleC Offline
      CrilleC Offline
      Crille
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      Did you restart Reactor after changing the levels?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • CrilleC Crille

        What does the rest of the config look like in logging.yaml. Any level above 4?

        3 Offline
        3 Offline
        3rdStng
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        @Crille Yes

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • CrilleC Offline
          CrilleC Offline
          Crille
          wrote on last edited by Crille
          #7

          OK, any hints in the log? Anything other than Rule:INFO? If not, do you have a lot of rules triggered by frequent entity updates? I've moved my most frequent entities triggering rules to global expressions resulting in true/false, and used the expression as trigger instead to lower log entries of rule evaluation every 5-10 seconds so my 5, 2MB kept logs, span from late morning to early evening. 9, 3MB in 45 minutes doesn't seem normal to me.
          I have all my loglevels at 4.

          Edit: "doesn't seem normal to me."
          If the devices triggering the rules are extremely chatty, the amount of logging is of course "normal".

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • 3 Offline
            3 Offline
            3rdStng
            wrote on last edited by 3rdStng
            #8

            It does appear to mostly be related to rules that have to do with my Life360 presence sensors.

            Correction to my log level comment above. Changing the rules and engine to 4 did slow things down a bit. I saved that changed and restarted my docker at 7:43 AM. I'm just shy of 2 hours now to fill/rotate all 9 logs.

            8dc3f4f2-fed1-4190-8ca0-621319c679e2-image.png

            3 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • 3 3rdStng

              It does appear to mostly be related to rules that have to do with my Life360 presence sensors.

              Correction to my log level comment above. Changing the rules and engine to 4 did slow things down a bit. I saved that changed and restarted my docker at 7:43 AM. I'm just shy of 2 hours now to fill/rotate all 9 logs.

              8dc3f4f2-fed1-4190-8ca0-621319c679e2-image.png

              3 Offline
              3 Offline
              3rdStng
              wrote on last edited by 3rdStng
              #9

              If I am understanding your global expressions correctly. Are you saying you moved your rule triggers to an expression and then changed the trigger to be the value of the expression?

              Original rule checking presence:
              34669be2-3f5d-427c-bb86-3c0d038ebd78-image.png

              Now as a global expression:
              1a1cad53-bbf2-4226-8482-4d71f7c5b155-image.png

              With an updated trigger:
              cedde33e-4ce2-4139-8a24-24b3a42d7046-image.png

              When Life360 updates, won't it force the expression to revalidate its value? Are these not logged?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • CrilleC Offline
                CrilleC Offline
                Crille
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                Yes, that's how I do it. The expressions are evaluated every time the Life360 updates but if the result of the expression doesn't change, the rule will not trigger an evaluation. Evaluation of global expressions is not logged, at least not at level 4.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • 3 Offline
                  3 Offline
                  3rdStng
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  Thank you. I changed all my rules that had a presence sensor written in them. As well as a few other rules that have an app that phones home every minute. Just restarted MSR for good measure and can see a different. I'm over 30 minutes right now between .log and .log.1.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbits
                    wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                    #12

                    Note that you can also set the logging level for rules to level 3, and it would eliminate all of the log entries for when evaluations are being triggered and what is triggering them.

                    Another option is to set the log level for specific rules to a lower (quieter) value. You need to know the rule ID, which is displayed when you open the rule detail panel on the Rule Sets page (click the right-pointing arrow next to the rule name to open the panel; the ID is at the bottom of the panel).

                      Rule:  # log level for all rules
                        level: 4
                      # Override default Rule log level for a specific rule
                      "Rule#rule-la04ghp7":  # note quotes must be used here
                        level: 3
                    

                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                    3 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                      Note that you can also set the logging level for rules to level 3, and it would eliminate all of the log entries for when evaluations are being triggered and what is triggering them.

                      Another option is to set the log level for specific rules to a lower (quieter) value. You need to know the rule ID, which is displayed when you open the rule detail panel on the Rule Sets page (click the right-pointing arrow next to the rule name to open the panel; the ID is at the bottom of the panel).

                        Rule:  # log level for all rules
                          level: 4
                        # Override default Rule log level for a specific rule
                        "Rule#rule-la04ghp7":  # note quotes must be used here
                          level: 3
                      
                      3 Offline
                      3 Offline
                      3rdStng
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      @toggledbits Awesome. Thank you.

                      I know you know, but for others, the rule ID is also noted in the logs. Makes it easier to copy and paste without having to look up the ID within the GUI.
                      f5fc7a07-2b33-4574-b3ec-d2dca45c70f6-image.png

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      Recent Topics

                      • HA and AI
                        CatmanV2C
                        CatmanV2
                        0
                        1
                        31

                      • How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
                        CatmanV2C
                        CatmanV2
                        0
                        6
                        93

                      • Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        0
                        2
                        90

                      • VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
                        S
                        SweetGenius
                        1
                        1
                        62

                      • Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        3
                        1
                        58

                      • Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
                        G
                        gwp1
                        0
                        1
                        77

                      • [Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
                        CrilleC
                        Crille
                        0
                        4
                        142

                      • [Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
                        therealdbT
                        therealdb
                        0
                        3
                        145

                      • Possible feature request 2?
                        CatmanV2C
                        CatmanV2
                        0
                        3
                        119

                      • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        5
                        133
                        82.1k

                      • Genuinely impressed with Zigbee and HA / Reactor
                        CatmanV2C
                        CatmanV2
                        1
                        9
                        423

                      • Copying a global reaction
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        0
                        3
                        145
                      Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                      Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Unsolved