Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Set Reaction > Script Action
DynamicGroupController and attributes
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits I'm back to trying to optimize a couple of things based on dynamic group. First of all, I think I found a typo in the doc: primary_attribute: "binary_sensor.state" primary_attribute_value: | d = false; each id in members: d = getEntity(id)?.attributes?.power_switch?.state or d, d I think the correct code snippet is d = false, All that said, my use case for dynamic groups is to group 3 different climate devices, so I could easily command them at the same time. Commands are good, but sometimes I want to check if any of the devices are on, and that's easily done with a similar snippet as the one you have in the docs. But this is limited to the primary attribute, while I want to have any of the attributes in the group to be driven by a similar logic (while all are null in the group). ie, access hvac_control.mode and see if any of the unit is set to cool, or heat. Is that possible, without re-defining an expression in each of my rules? Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Bail out of failed reaction?
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
CrilleC
Edit: Solved in latest-26221. Bare-metal latest-26193 I have this group: "OKforLarm": name: OK för Larm select: - include_controller: vera - include_capability: door_sensor filter_expression: entity.attributes.door_sensor.state It contains the entities I expect but behaves a bit odd. When I open vera>device_10097 the entity attribute door_sensor.state changes to true but it won't show up as member in the group, when I also open vera>device_10095 they both shows as members and when I close vera>device_10095 it disappear from the group but when I close vera>device_10097 it lingers in the group until I restart Reactor.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade Issues
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Question regarding "in" vs "contains" vs contents of the string
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Logon screen timeout
G
Noticing since 170 that the lock screen doesn't switch to the logon prompt but, rather, stays on the active UI until such time as you go to click something within it. Then it jumps to the login screen. Brave browser Brave 1.92.139 (Official Build) (arm64) Chromium: 150.0.7871.114
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Copy&past of actions and/or drag&drop between set/reset
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits One thing that bothers me while doing work on new systems/new features, is that I cannot copy&paste actions, and I cannot drag&drop between set and resets. #1 is for when I want to copy an action between different rules opened in two separate browser windows, while #2 is when I just need to flip a bunch of actions in the reset, or move some logic back and forth. Both will be appreciated, but I understand the technical challenges. Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade advice - upgrade from aarch64 to ARM64 image
T
I'm currently on version 26011. I understand that the aarch64 image is no longer supported. So, I therefore need to update to the ARM64 image. Can anyone possibly suggest how I update my docker compose.yaml file (see below). Ideally I'd like to keep my existing reactions etc. rather than start from scratch. # Multi-System Reactor template docker-compose.yml (version 22160) # # Change the lines indicated by "DO"... # services: reactor: container_name: reactor environment: # DO change the TZ: line to set your local time zone. # See valid TZ list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tz_database_time_zones TZ: GB # # DO NOT change this path. Your directory location is in "source" below. REACTOR_DATA_PREFIX: /var/reactor # DO change the image below to the one you are using (e.g. armv7l or aarch64 for RPi 4) image: toggledbits/reactor:latest-aarch64 restart: "always" expose: - 8111 ports: - 8111:8111 volumes: # DO change the /home/username/reactor below to the directory you created for # your local data; DO NOT change the /var/reactor part - /home/pi/docker/reactor:/var/reactor - /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro tmpfs: /tmp
Multi-System Reactor
Alexa for MSR, any interest?
MikeReadingtonM
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Telegram notification broke with latest update
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Phantom device, “INFO” appears
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Mode Status NULL
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] HTTP query failing after version 26177
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Question about the find function
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Answered] OK to remove old json files?
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Deprecation Announcement: 32-bit ARM *docker* images
toggledbitsT
If you are using the armv7l docker image, the OpenJS Foundation that publishes node is no longer producing 32-bit builds as of v24. That means the last supported LTS version of node for armv7l is v22, which will go End-of-Life in May 2027. Therefore, the Reactor armv7l image is now deprecated and will only be produced until node v22 goes EOL, and I will not publish armv7l images beyond that date. If you are running an RPi 3 or earlier with Reactor, you are on this image, and will need to upgrade hardware to a 64-bit model and use the arm64 image. If you need help getting it done, ask in this category.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] build 26150 - engine not starting
G
@toggledbits I pulled the image (well, Watchtower did) and within minutes the whole system went offline. The log looks like it ends with 26143. [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-mkahsmgf/26qq82mw-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lqyfljfi/22f8on0t-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lsb61rw8/24oenqi2-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lrh58he0/rule-lrh58he0:S-1c00gfib-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lrh58he0/1c00dylr-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lrh58he0/1nam9w5u-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-miuh2qqi/22ls4lql-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-kwc6rmci/rule-kwc6rmci:S-1vj8sdfc-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-kwc6rmci/rule-kwc6rmci:S-1qanz01x-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/24lq19p6-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-mk0o8iox/23oy468y-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-miscg2h3/rule-miscg2h3:S-22gmbq1c-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-kxgrfjke/238p0old-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-m7ccsso5/re-m7ccsso5-1r0myjxa-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/19nl9wq2-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/rule-ladyja6a:S-yl3xk9t-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/rule-ladyja6a:S-yl3vv5m-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-ln7j2nqp/re-ln7j2nqp-22mx9lzd-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-ln7j2nqp/22mx87c8-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-licneppy/1mzwe7ht-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ml3194ih/25jqt1j4-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-kxgrg7kf/227hshak-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-reactorexmachina/13ua1p95-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-reactorexmachina/13uagam7-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-grpvl9oypg/rule-grpvl9oypg:R-134x4cbv-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-grpvl9oypg/rule-grpvl9oypg:R-134x2fyl-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-lscjrws1/238p5c22-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lbwr0jvq/1xkczf03-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <Structure:NOTICE> Structure Structure#1 stopped [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <app:NOTICE> Closing APIs... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <wsapi:NOTICE> wsapi: closing... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <wsapi:NOTICE> wsapi: disconnecting from "192.168.1.23#82" (1001 service closing) [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.548Z <httpapi:NOTICE> HTTP API closing... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.549Z <wsapi:NOTICE> wsapi: server closed [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.549Z <httpapi:INFO> HTTP server closed. [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.549Z <app:NOTICE> Stopping timers... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.551Z <app:null> Shutdown complete, process ID 1 [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.551Z <app:null> Closing logs... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.551Z <default:null> Closing log I can SSH to the VM. Alas, I do not have the previous image for 26143 as I'm a little too quick sometimes on housekeeping.
Multi-System Reactor

Set Reaction > Script Action

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
11 Posts 4 Posters 3.3k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CrilleC Offline
    CrilleC Offline
    Crille
    wrote on last edited by Crille
    #2

    If you already have them i a dynamic group you could perform power_switch.on on that group as an Entity action. Or if the devices should do different actions on/dimming etc, you could create a Global Reaction that does what you specify and simply run that as Set Reaction.

    Edit: I confused Script action with Shell command and have not tried Script action but my guess would be performAction(entity_id, action, args) if you really want to do it in a script rather than directly on the group Entity.

    wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • CrilleC Crille

      If you already have them i a dynamic group you could perform power_switch.on on that group as an Entity action. Or if the devices should do different actions on/dimming etc, you could create a Global Reaction that does what you specify and simply run that as Set Reaction.

      Edit: I confused Script action with Shell command and have not tried Script action but my guess would be performAction(entity_id, action, args) if you really want to do it in a script rather than directly on the group Entity.

      wmarcolinW Offline
      wmarcolinW Offline
      wmarcolin
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      @Crille

      Thank you for your comment, but I need this to be executed by an action already within the routines I program in Reactor.

      So using it within the configuration would not help me.

      The selection of devices is indeed within the Dynamic Group, which is perfect, but I was wondering if I could do something like a script, which would require a routine like the one I have today, where I send a list of devices to be turned on, even if they are already on, so I don't have to create a group to analyze the status of each one.

      I want to do something smarter.

      Anyway, thank you, and let's see if we have any other recommendations.

      toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • wmarcolinW wmarcolin

        @Crille

        Thank you for your comment, but I need this to be executed by an action already within the routines I program in Reactor.

        So using it within the configuration would not help me.

        The selection of devices is indeed within the Dynamic Group, which is perfect, but I was wondering if I could do something like a script, which would require a routine like the one I have today, where I send a list of devices to be turned on, even if they are already on, so I don't have to create a group to analyze the status of each one.

        I want to do something smarter.

        Anyway, thank you, and let's see if we have any other recommendations.

        toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbits
        wrote on last edited by toggledbits
        #4

        @wmarcolin said in Set Reaction > Script Action:

        Thank you for your comment, but I need this to be executed by an action already within the routines I program in Reactor.

        @crille is spot on. That's exactly what his suggestion does. Here's a trivial example of what he's saying:

        20d61d39-a97d-42a0-b863-3957f7bbf438-image.png

        In this case, I'm not using the contents of a dynamic group, I'm just building a list on the fly using matchEntities(), but the effect is the same. At midnight every night, this rule turns all things that have the power_switch capability off.

        If your listed switches are in a group, either created using DynamicGroupController, or an expression of some grouping the underlying controller has (Vera and Hubitat have groups and Reactor expresses those as group entities you can use), then you can easily modify this example.

        And in fact, you don't even need to do that, because Reactor understands how to do actions on groups, so you can just do one action on the group entity (in a regular Entity Action or by calling performAction() in a Script Action) and Reactor will perform that action on all members of the group (so, you don't even need the each expression construction).

        3be9e0e4-2184-490f-974b-b2c089bdeab8-image.png

        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

        wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

          @wmarcolin said in Set Reaction > Script Action:

          Thank you for your comment, but I need this to be executed by an action already within the routines I program in Reactor.

          @crille is spot on. That's exactly what his suggestion does. Here's a trivial example of what he's saying:

          20d61d39-a97d-42a0-b863-3957f7bbf438-image.png

          In this case, I'm not using the contents of a dynamic group, I'm just building a list on the fly using matchEntities(), but the effect is the same. At midnight every night, this rule turns all things that have the power_switch capability off.

          If your listed switches are in a group, either created using DynamicGroupController, or an expression of some grouping the underlying controller has (Vera and Hubitat have groups and Reactor expresses those as group entities you can use), then you can easily modify this example.

          And in fact, you don't even need to do that, because Reactor understands how to do actions on groups, so you can just do one action on the group entity (in a regular Entity Action or by calling performAction() in a Script Action) and Reactor will perform that action on all members of the group (so, you don't even need the each expression construction).

          3be9e0e4-2184-490f-974b-b2c089bdeab8-image.png

          wmarcolinW Offline
          wmarcolinW Offline
          wmarcolin
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          @toggledbits

          fe8bb433-b91b-4260-9864-7f3d6074778c-Untitled.jpg

          I don't know what other words to use to describe Reactor! If I had read the entire manual, I wouldn't have posted about Group Action. Now that I've read everything that DynamicGroupController can do, it's impressive.

          I was definitely one of the enthusiasts when this was implemented, and now with this option to take actions, it's wonderful. It's going to simplify a lot of rules for me.

          Thank you very much @t. Every day I'm surprised by the things that can be done in Reactor.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • therealdbT Offline
            therealdbT Offline
            therealdb
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            I use script action a lot with arrays of devices defined in a variable. Very handy for when you want to do it without messing with config files.

            --
            On a mission to automate everything.

            My MS Reactor contrib
            My Luup Plug-ins

            wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • therealdbT therealdb

              I use script action a lot with arrays of devices defined in a variable. Very handy for when you want to do it without messing with config files.

              wmarcolinW Offline
              wmarcolinW Offline
              wmarcolin
              wrote on last edited by wmarcolin
              #7

              @therealdb

              This feature is really fantastic. I'm changing a lot of rules for it.

              Now you could help me with this one. I need to know if the button is stuck, i.e., if it hasn't returned to zero, and force a refresh.

              The selection rule is already correct, but now I can't understand how to define the Group Action to apply x_hubitatRefresh.refresh.

                      "dgc_PushableButton_N0":
                        name: DGC PushableButton Not 0
                        select:
                          - include_capability:
                            - x_hubitat_PushableButton
                          - exclude_entity:
                            - "hubitatC8>2672"  # Alarm Sirene
                            - "hubitatC8>2100"  # Remote Adriane
                            - "hubitatC8>420"   # Remote Quad
                        group_actions: x_hubitat_Refresh
                        filter_expression: >
                          entity.attributes.x_hubitat_PushableButton.pushed != 0 and
                          entity.attributes.x_hubitat_PushableButton.pushed != null
              
              

              Could you help me with your experience?

              This is what I want to change.

              6bc1ff1f-4403-4906-b947-f11916b2ab16-image.png

              Only apply refresh, to the button selected by the DynamicGroup.

              Or in this case is Script that I need to create?

              Thanks.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbits
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                Just send the refresh command to the group.

                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                  Just send the refresh command to the group.

                  wmarcolinW Offline
                  wmarcolinW Offline
                  wmarcolin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  @toggledbits

                  Sorry, I don't understand, it doesn't work the way it's written below.

                  c78b3851-56c0-4d7e-873d-9935042d9555-image.png

                  What information do I have to assign to grup_actions, or is it something else?

                  Thanks
                  Wilson

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbits
                    wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                    #10

                    I apologize... yes, because that group is fully dynamic (its contents are determined by filter expressions), the range of its actions cannot be determined at startup, so in this instance, you will have to use a Script Action:

                    each id in getEntity("groups>dgc_PushableButton_N0").attributes.sys_group.members: 
                      performAction( id, "x_hubitat_Refresh.refresh", {} )
                    

                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                    wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                      I apologize... yes, because that group is fully dynamic (its contents are determined by filter expressions), the range of its actions cannot be determined at startup, so in this instance, you will have to use a Script Action:

                      each id in getEntity("groups>dgc_PushableButton_N0").attributes.sys_group.members: 
                        performAction( id, "x_hubitat_Refresh.refresh", {} )
                      
                      wmarcolinW Offline
                      wmarcolinW Offline
                      wmarcolin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      @toggledbits said in Set Reaction > Script Action:

                      each id in getEntity("groups>dgc_PushableButton_N0").attributes.sys_group.members:
                      performAction( id, "x_hubitat_Refresh.refresh", {} )

                      EXCELLENT, IT WORKED!!! Thank you very much.

                      I was already working on this script, based on the example at the beginning of this discussion, but I was using performOnEntity.

                      each id in getEntity('groups>dgc_PushableButton_N0').attributes.sys_group.members: performOnEntity(id, 'x_hubitat_Refresh.refresh')
                      

                      Thank you very much for your help. Another lesson learned, and I am already putting more optimizations into practice.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      Recent Topics

                      • DynamicGroupController and attributes
                        therealdbT
                        therealdb
                        1
                        8
                        169

                      • Bail out of failed reaction?
                        T
                        tamorgen
                        0
                        3
                        57

                      • Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
                        T
                        tamorgen
                        0
                        7
                        274

                      • [Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
                        CrilleC
                        Crille
                        0
                        5
                        195

                      • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        5
                        148
                        132.0k

                      • Upgrade Issues
                        T
                        tbully
                        0
                        9
                        301

                      • [SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        0
                        10
                        395

                      • [SOLVED] Question regarding "in" vs "contains" vs contents of the string
                        G
                        gwp1
                        0
                        5
                        198

                      • openLuup console disappeared - 500 - Internal Server Error
                        A
                        a-lurker
                        0
                        2
                        212

                      • Logon screen timeout
                        G
                        gwp1
                        0
                        5
                        217

                      • [MSR] Copy&past of actions and/or drag&drop between set/reset
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        0
                        9
                        432

                      • Upgrade advice - upgrade from aarch64 to ARM64 image
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        0
                        4
                        244
                      Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                      Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Unsolved