Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. [CONFIRMED] Upcoming HubitatController z-wave polling feature
Errors after updating to MQTTController build 25139
tunnusT
I'm running MSR build 25139 on Docker, using MQTT controller 24293, and everything working as expected. But if I try to upgrade to MQTTController build 25139, I'm getting the following errors on MSR UI: An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa auto heating off" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute value_sensor.god Last 11:20:37 An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa auto heating off" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute temperature_sensor.green Last 11:20:37 An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa filter pump auto off" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute temperature_sensor.red Last 11:20:37 An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa filter pump auto run" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute value_sensor.pump Last 11:20:37 An Entity Attribute condition in "Lay-Z-Spa watchdog" (Terrace) failed because the referenced entity "Lay-Z-Spa States" (mqtt>layzspa_states) does not have attribute value_sensor.status Last 11:20:37 My MQTT configuration (local_mqtt_devices.yaml) for the related entity is: layzspa_message: type: ValueSensor capabilities: ["temperature_sensor", "value_sensor", "power_sensor"] primary_attribute: power_sensor.value events: "layzspa/message": "power_sensor.value": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.PWR )' expr: "float(payload.PWR)" "value_sensor.air": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.AIR )' expr: "float(payload.AIR)" "value_sensor.pump": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.FLT )' expr: "float(payload.FLT)" "value_sensor.god": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.GOD )' expr: "float(payload.GOD)" "value_sensor.lock": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.LCK )' expr: "float(payload.LCK)" "value_sensor.unit": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.UNT )' expr: "float(payload.UNT)" "value_sensor.error": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.ERR )' expr: "float(payload.ERR)" "temperature_sensor.green": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.GRN )' expr: "float(payload.GRN)" "temperature_sensor.red": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.RED )' expr: "float(payload.RED)" "temperature_sensor.target": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.TGT )' expr: "float(payload.TGT)" "temperature_sensor.value": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.TMP )' expr: "float(payload.TMP)" "temperature_sensor.virtual": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.VTM )' expr: "round(float(payload.VTM), 1)" "temperature_sensor.ambient": json_payload: true if_expr: '! isnull( payload?.AMB )' expr: "float(payload.AMB)" "layzspa/Status": "value_sensor.status": if_expr: '! isnull( payload )' expr: "payload" "layzspa/button": "value_sensor.button": if_expr: '! isnull( payload )' expr: "payload" and in reactor.yaml I have: "layzspa_states": name: "Lay-Z-Spa States" friendly_name: 'Lay-Z-Spa States' include: layzspa_message I realize my MQTT configuration might be a bit unorthodox, but could there still be something unintentional in the latest MQTTController build? If needed, I can provide detailed logs.
Multi-System Reactor
🎉 My very first MSR controller: OpenSprinkler
therealdbT
Since today is my birthday - and I still pretend to be unconventional - I'm giving away a present to this wonderful community and I'm releasing my first OpenSprinkler controller for MSR. It was real fun to code it - and while it's still WIP, it seems to work OK for me. It's polling-based at the moment, but I'll add support for updates via MQTT very soon (it's already partially coded). Get it at (install is similar to MQTTController and such): https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-opensprinkler Feel free to try it. It's beta software, but it's stable. I'll update it weekly until all the tasks from my todo list are empty. Since I've learnt a lot from this controller, I'll explore new controllers soon.
Multi-System Reactor
Set Reaction > Script Action
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Advice reqeusted to migrate MSR from Bare Metal to Container
T
Good day all, I'm in the process of trying to shut down my 10 year old Linux home server that served many purposes, but primarily it's what I used for my NAS/Plex Media server. I migrated the NAS aspect of the server in November of last year to a true NAS solution (Ubiquti UNAS Pro), which is rack mount and much more efficient than my old tower, which it's only side benefit was heating my home office during the winter. Unfortunately it also means heating my home office during the summer, which were about to be in full swing. I have two things running on this 10 year old server at this point. MSR and pi-hole. I'm running Plex Media Server on Fedora Workstation in Podman on mini PC, which is much more energy efficient than my old tower. My next step is to migrate MSR. I know there are images of MSR out there, and creating it is well documented. I'm going to be using Podman instead of Docker for various reasons, but they work very similar. What I don't know, is what I need to do to migrate my existing Bare Metal installation over to a container. Has anyone done this? Any advice?
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Can´t restart or upgrade/deploy MSR
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Limit HA Entity in MSR
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Organizing/ structuring rule sets and rules
R
Hi guys, Just wondering how you guys organize your rule sets and rules. I wish I had an extra layer to have some more granularity, but my feature request was not popular. Maybe there are better ways to organize my rule sets. I use the rule sets now primarily for rooms. So a rule set per room. But maybe grouping by functionality works better. Any examples/ suggestions would be appreciated.
Multi-System Reactor
Moving MSR from a QNAP container to RP 5 - some issues
Tom_DT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Widget deletion does not work and landing page (status) is empy
M
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Need help reducing false positive notifications
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Deleting widgets
tunnusT
Hopefully a trivial question, but how do you delete widgets in a status page? Using build 22266
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT configuration question
tunnusT
I have the following yaml configuration in local_mqtt_devices file x_mqtt_device: set_speed: arguments: speed: type: str topic: "command/%friendly_name%" payload: type: json expr: '{ "fan": parameters.speed }' While this works fine, I'm wondering how this could be changed to "fixed" parameters, as in this case "fan" only accepts "A", "Q" or a numeric value of 1-5?
Multi-System Reactor
System Configuration Check - time is offset
F
Hi! I get this message when I'm on the status tab: System Configuration Check The time on this system and on the Reactor host are significantly different. This may be due to incorrect system configuration on either or both. Please check the configuration of both systems. The host reports 2025-04-01T15:29:29.252Z; browser reports 2025-04-01T15:29:40.528Z; difference 11.276 seconds. I have MSR installed as a docker on my Home Assistant Blue / Hardkernel ODROID-N2/N2+. MSR version is latest-25082-3c348de6. HA versions are: Core 2025.3.4 Supervisor 2025.03.4 Operating System 15.1 I have restarted HA as well as MSR multiple times. This message didn´t show two weeks ago. Don´t know if it have anything to do with the latest MSR version. Do anyone know what I can try? Thanks in advance! Let's Be Careful Out There (Hill Street reference...) /Fanan
Multi-System Reactor
Programmatically capture HTTP Request action status code or error
therealdbT
I have a very strange situation, where if InfluxDB restarts, other containers may fail when restarting at the same time (under not easy to understand circumstances), and InfluxDB remains unreachable (and these containers crashes). I need to reboot these containers in an exact order, after rebooting InfluxDB. While I understand what's going on, I need a way to reliable determine that InfluxDB is not reachable and these containers are not reachable, in order to identify this situation and manually check what's going on - and, maybe, in the future, automatically restart them if needed. So, I was looking at HTTP Request action, but I need to capture the HTTP response code, instead of the response (becase if ping is OK, InfluxDB will reply with a 204), and, potentially, a way to programmatically detect that it's failing to get the response. While I could write a custom HTTP controller for this or a custom HTTP virtual device, I was wondering if this is somewhat on you roadmap @toggledbits Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
ZwaveJSUI - RGBWW BULB - Warm/Cold White interfered with RGB settings - Bulb doesn't change color if in WarmWhite state.
N
Hi , I'm on -Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-25067-62e21a2d -Docker on Synology NAS -ZWaveJSUI 9.31.0.6c80945 Problem with ZwaveJSUI: When I try to change color to a bulb RGBWW, it doesn't change to the RGB color and the bulb remains warm or cold white. I tryed with Zipato RGBW Bulb V2 RGBWE2, Hank Bulb HKZW-RGB01, Aentec 6 A-ZWA002, so seems that it happens with all RGBWW bulb with reactor/zwavejsui. I'm using from reator the entity action: "rgb_color.set" and "rgb_color.set_rgb". After I send the reactor command, It changes in zwavejsui the rgb settings but doesn't put the white channel to "0", so the prevalent channel remains warm/cold White and the bulb doesn't change into the rgb color. This is the status of the bulb in zwavejsui after "rgb_color.set" (235,33,33,) and the bulb is still warmWhite. x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor={"warmWhite":204,"coldWhite":0,"red":235,"green":33,"blue":33} The "cold white" and "warm white" settings interfer with the rgb color settings. Reactor can change bulb colors with rgb_color set — (value, ui8, 0x000000 to 0xffffff) or rgb_color set_rgb — (red, green, blue, all ui1, 0 to 255) but if warm or cold white are not to "0", zwavejsui doesn't change them and I can't find a way to change into rgb or from rgb back to warm white. So if I use from reactor: rgb_color set_rgb — (235,33,33) in zwavejsui I have x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_targetColor={"red":235,"green":33,"blue":33} 14/03/2025, 16:43:57 - value updated Arg 0: └─commandClassName: Color Switch └─commandClass: 51 └─property: targetColor └─endpoint: 0 └─newValue └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─prevValue └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─propertyName: targetColor 14/03/2025, 16:43:57 - value updated Arg 0: └─commandClassName: Color Switch └─commandClass: 51 └─property: currentColor └─endpoint: 0 └─newValue └──warmWhite: 204 └──coldWhite: 0 └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─prevValue └──warmWhite: 204 └──coldWhite: 0 └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─propertyName: currentColor In zwavejsui, the bulb changes rgb set but warm White remains to "204" and the bulb remais on warm White channel bacause is prevalent on rgb set. x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_0=204 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_1=0 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_2=235 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_3=33 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_4=33 Is it possible to targetColor also for "warmWhite" and "coldWhite" and have something similar to this? x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_targetColor={"warmWhite":0,"coldWhite":0,"red":235,"green":33,"blue":33} Thanks in advance.
Multi-System Reactor
Problem with simultaneous notifications.
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Problem after upgrading to 25067
R
MSR had been running fine, but I decided to follow the message to upgrade to 25067. Since the upgrade, I have received the message "Controller "<name>" (HubitatController hubitat2) could not be loaded at startup. Its ID is not unique." MSR throws the message on every restart. Has anyone else encountered this problem? I am running MSR on a Raspberry Pi4 connecting to two Hubitat units over an OpenVPN tunnel. One C8 and a C8 Pro. Both are up-to-date. It appears that despite the error message that MSR may be operating properly.
Multi-System Reactor
Global expressions not always evaluated
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Local expression evaluation
V
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

[CONFIRMED] Upcoming HubitatController z-wave polling feature

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
5 Posts 2 Posters 319 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 3 Offline
    3 Offline
    3rdStng
    wrote on last edited by 3rdStng
    #1

    Super excited to see in the upcoming release notes about MSR being able to poll HE z-wave devices. I've attempted to use the native HE poller and in less than an hour after installing it, I was removing it. I only have a small number of devices that give me trouble, but I wanted to verify that I'm pre-building my YAML file correctly.

    poll_frequency: 60000  # poll a device at most every 60000ms (60 seconds)
    poll_entities:
         - id: 110  # Hallway Light
           interval: 300  # 300 seconds = 5 minutes
         - id: 111  # Kitchen Light
           interval: 900  # 900 seconds = 15 minutes
         - id: 112  # Disco Light
         - id: 113  # Ballroom Light
    

    Am I correct in my thoughts? Based on the above snippet, the default polling will be every minute for the Disco and Ballroom lights? But because the Kitchen and Hallway light have a defined interval, they will be polled at those intervals instead? Or does there need to be an "interval:" definition following every id:?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      The Disco Light and Ballroom Light will be polled at the default interval of 10 minutes (600 seconds). You only need to specify an interval if you want something other than this default.

      The poll_frequency is not a default for the polling interval. The poll_frequency instead is the minimum time between device polls that the poller is allowed, to limit its ability to saturate your Z-Wave mesh. At the default frequency of 60000 (milliseconds = 60 seconds = 1 minute), one device per minute will be polled, regardless of how many devices are due to be polled. In effect, the interval becomes the minimum time between polls of a single device, and the actual interval depends on how busy the poller becomes. If you have a large number of devices being polled, or are polled frequently, then it's possible that polling will, at least for some devices, become chronically late. The next device to be polled is always the tardiest (i.e. the one that has been waiting longest), so every one will get polled.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • 3 Offline
        3 Offline
        3rdStng
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Thank you. So if I have 10 devices, all with the interval set at 60 seconds, essentially it will poll one device at minute 1, the second device at minute 2.
        In other words, one device polled per minute, or based on the poll frequency.

        If I'm understanding this correctly, I'm better off upgrading my z-wave to z-wave plus devices and only poll those that are critical, and not upgraded, yet.

        toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • 3 3rdStng

          Thank you. So if I have 10 devices, all with the interval set at 60 seconds, essentially it will poll one device at minute 1, the second device at minute 2.
          In other words, one device polled per minute, or based on the poll frequency.

          If I'm understanding this correctly, I'm better off upgrading my z-wave to z-wave plus devices and only poll those that are critical, and not upgraded, yet.

          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by toggledbits
          #4

          @3rdstng I think that's right. If an automation relies on the crisp response of a device that doesn't have it, polling is a poor solution and the device should be replaced.

          A counter-example from my own home, though... I have a few old switches and dimmers controlling a guest bathroom in our basement, policing that neither the fan nor light are left on unsupervised for hours at a time. It's sufficient (in my view) to poll every 10 minutes, and the time delay of the auto-off automation is OK being delayed that much. As long as the lights aren't on for hours (or days) unoccupied, I'm satisfied.

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          3 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

            @3rdstng I think that's right. If an automation relies on the crisp response of a device that doesn't have it, polling is a poor solution and the device should be replaced.

            A counter-example from my own home, though... I have a few old switches and dimmers controlling a guest bathroom in our basement, policing that neither the fan nor light are left on unsupervised for hours at a time. It's sufficient (in my view) to poll every 10 minutes, and the time delay of the auto-off automation is OK being delayed that much. As long as the lights aren't on for hours (or days) unoccupied, I'm satisfied.

            3 Offline
            3 Offline
            3rdStng
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @toggledbits said in Upcoming HubitatController z-wave polling feature:

            I think that's right

            It is correct. My polling config left the default frequency at 60000ms (1 minute) and I did not include the interval settings on my devices, of which I am polling 3 until I can get around to replacing them. Upon reactor startup, the first device in the list is polled, one minute later the second device, another minute later, the third device. Seven minutes from there, or ten minutes from the initial poll, device 1 is polled again.

            Thank you @toggledbits for adding this feature.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            Recent Topics

            • Wiring Samotech SM308-S into light fitting
              akbooerA
              akbooer
              0
              2
              30

            • Errors after updating to MQTTController build 25139
              toggledbitsT
              toggledbits
              0
              6
              59

            • 🎉 My very first MSR controller: OpenSprinkler
              therealdbT
              therealdb
              5
              13
              627

            • Set Reaction > Script Action
              toggledbitsT
              toggledbits
              0
              4
              53

            • Advice reqeusted to migrate MSR from Bare Metal to Container
              T
              tamorgen
              0
              5
              91

            • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
              toggledbitsT
              toggledbits
              5
              122
              37.3k

            • Z-Wave Future....
              CatmanV2C
              CatmanV2
              0
              5
              169

            • Can´t restart or upgrade/deploy MSR
              toggledbitsT
              toggledbits
              0
              4
              125

            • [Solved] Limit HA Entity in MSR
              wmarcolinW
              wmarcolin
              0
              7
              247

            • Disaster recovery and virtualisation
              CatmanV2C
              CatmanV2
              0
              5
              693

            • Remote access of Zwave stick from Z-wave server
              CatmanV2C
              CatmanV2
              0
              3
              414
            Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
            Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • Unsolved