Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Contact Sensor Opened > 1 minute ago how ?
Rule condition shows TRUE in UI but Rule never transitions to SET — survives full restart
N
Build: latest-26221-b25bb3e3, Docker on Synology. Hi, I have a Rule whose Trigger/Constraints reference other Rules via Rule State ... is TRUE. At some point it stops firing. Expanding the rule's condition tree in the UI shows every Trigger and Constraint condition green/TRUE — confirmed live by walking into the room and watching Motion go true in real time. Rule History shows no new SET, just old reset entries. Tried, on the same rule, same evening: recreating the trigger conditions with fresh IDs, recreating the constraint conditions with fresh IDs (flat and wrapped in a new Group — wrapping in a Group produced one SET, but it didn't reproduce on repeat attempts with the same structure), and finally a full container restart with a verified-correct saved rule. Still no SET, even with a fresh live motion event right after the restart. Separately, I found that this rule (and its 10 per-room clones) share identical internal condition/group IDs with each other — leftover from a batch clone done months ago, never regenerated. Not sure if that's related, since fixing the IDs didn't reliably fix the symptom either. Has anyone seen a Rule State condition show TRUE in the UI without the Rule ever producing a SET, surviving a clean restart? Thanks in advance
Multi-System Reactor
DynamicGroupController and attributes
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits I'm back to trying to optimize a couple of things based on dynamic group. First of all, I think I found a typo in the doc: primary_attribute: "binary_sensor.state" primary_attribute_value: | d = false; each id in members: d = getEntity(id)?.attributes?.power_switch?.state or d, d I think the correct code snippet is d = false, All that said, my use case for dynamic groups is to group 3 different climate devices, so I could easily command them at the same time. Commands are good, but sometimes I want to check if any of the devices are on, and that's easily done with a similar snippet as the one you have in the docs. But this is limited to the primary attribute, while I want to have any of the attributes in the group to be driven by a similar logic (while all are null in the group). ie, access hvac_control.mode and see if any of the unit is set to cool, or heat. Is that possible, without re-defining an expression in each of my rules? Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Unofficial thread for compatibility
tunnusT
As there are statements about compatibility for home assistant versions in MSR new version announcements (e.g. "HassController: Bless Hass to 2025.7.3"), I thought it would be good idea to track other controllers as well. As an example, I can confirm that build "latest-25208-c53e8513" works with Hubitat Elevation C-8 platform version 2.4.2.134 using Maker API. Updates: (the latest versions first in the list) OK: build "latest-25264-2fbe9217" with Hubitat C-8 platform v. 2.4.3.123
Multi-System Reactor
Ooops - Deleted Reactor Ex Machina II
R
I accidentally deleted Reactor Ex Machina II (REM II) from my Reactor rules. I tried to recover it by deleting the .json and .dval in the Rules subdirectory and then recreating it from Togglebits original posting, but that did not work. Does anyone know how to recover REM ll ?
Multi-System Reactor
Bail out of failed reaction?
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
CrilleC
Edit: Solved in latest-26221. Bare-metal latest-26193 I have this group: "OKforLarm": name: OK för Larm select: - include_controller: vera - include_capability: door_sensor filter_expression: entity.attributes.door_sensor.state It contains the entities I expect but behaves a bit odd. When I open vera>device_10097 the entity attribute door_sensor.state changes to true but it won't show up as member in the group, when I also open vera>device_10095 they both shows as members and when I close vera>device_10095 it disappear from the group but when I close vera>device_10097 it lingers in the group until I restart Reactor.
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade Issues
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Question regarding "in" vs "contains" vs contents of the string
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Logon screen timeout
G
Noticing since 170 that the lock screen doesn't switch to the logon prompt but, rather, stays on the active UI until such time as you go to click something within it. Then it jumps to the login screen. Brave browser Brave 1.92.139 (Official Build) (arm64) Chromium: 150.0.7871.114
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Copy&past of actions and/or drag&drop between set/reset
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits One thing that bothers me while doing work on new systems/new features, is that I cannot copy&paste actions, and I cannot drag&drop between set and resets. #1 is for when I want to copy an action between different rules opened in two separate browser windows, while #2 is when I just need to flip a bunch of actions in the reset, or move some logic back and forth. Both will be appreciated, but I understand the technical challenges. Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade advice - upgrade from aarch64 to ARM64 image
T
I'm currently on version 26011. I understand that the aarch64 image is no longer supported. So, I therefore need to update to the ARM64 image. Can anyone possibly suggest how I update my docker compose.yaml file (see below). Ideally I'd like to keep my existing reactions etc. rather than start from scratch. # Multi-System Reactor template docker-compose.yml (version 22160) # # Change the lines indicated by "DO"... # services: reactor: container_name: reactor environment: # DO change the TZ: line to set your local time zone. # See valid TZ list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tz_database_time_zones TZ: GB # # DO NOT change this path. Your directory location is in "source" below. REACTOR_DATA_PREFIX: /var/reactor # DO change the image below to the one you are using (e.g. armv7l or aarch64 for RPi 4) image: toggledbits/reactor:latest-aarch64 restart: "always" expose: - 8111 ports: - 8111:8111 volumes: # DO change the /home/username/reactor below to the directory you created for # your local data; DO NOT change the /var/reactor part - /home/pi/docker/reactor:/var/reactor - /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro tmpfs: /tmp
Multi-System Reactor
Alexa for MSR, any interest?
MikeReadingtonM
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Telegram notification broke with latest update
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Phantom device, “INFO” appears
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Mode Status NULL
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] HTTP query failing after version 26177
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Question about the find function
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Contact Sensor Opened > 1 minute ago how ?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
10 Posts 3 Posters 2.5k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cw-kidC Offline
    cw-kidC Offline
    cw-kid
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi

    I'm stuck migrating one of my PLEG conditions.

    tFrontDoorOpened;NOW>1:00

    Which means the trigger "Front Door Opened" happened more than 1 minute ago.

    How do I do this in MSR ? An expression I assume ?

    I want to use it as part of a Constraint.

    Any help please.

    Thanks.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ElcidE Offline
      ElcidE Offline
      Elcid
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      If you use sustain for 60 seconds, then the sensor would need to be tripped for a minute before going true.

      cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ElcidE Elcid

        If you use sustain for 60 seconds, then the sensor would need to be tripped for a minute before going true.

        cw-kidC Offline
        cw-kidC Offline
        cw-kid
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @elcid

        I'm not sure that will work for what I am trying to setup.

        In fact I don't think I can even replicate the set of conditions I had setup in PLEG for this same rule.

        Let me back up and start again, as I am sure there will be a better way of doing this.

        Doorbell Camera Motion detected is the trigger for this rule.

        The actions "Set Reaction" is to do some TTS and bring up the camera feed on some tablets / TVs etc.

        The conditions "Constraints" I only want this rule to run its actions, If the front door hasn't been recently opened or closed for that matter.

        e.g. when I come back in to the house and open / close the door to get in, I don't want this rule to run.

        But if I am already in the house and its someone else outside mooching about near the doorbell cam, then I do want the rule to run its actions.

        toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • cw-kidC cw-kid

          @elcid

          I'm not sure that will work for what I am trying to setup.

          In fact I don't think I can even replicate the set of conditions I had setup in PLEG for this same rule.

          Let me back up and start again, as I am sure there will be a better way of doing this.

          Doorbell Camera Motion detected is the trigger for this rule.

          The actions "Set Reaction" is to do some TTS and bring up the camera feed on some tablets / TVs etc.

          The conditions "Constraints" I only want this rule to run its actions, If the front door hasn't been recently opened or closed for that matter.

          e.g. when I come back in to the house and open / close the door to get in, I don't want this rule to run.

          But if I am already in the house and its someone else outside mooching about near the doorbell cam, then I do want the rule to run its actions.

          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by toggledbits
          #4

          @cw-kid Try this:

          60049cbf-261c-47aa-8bc5-6f53a96b2be7-image.png

          Ignore my device names. They should be at least close enough to express the relationships.

          The trigger is the motion sensor. Easy enough.

          The constraints have been set to NOT AND, which inverts the output of its logic. The only condition in the constraints is a check to see if the door sensor has changed state, and it delays reset for 60 seconds. When the door changes state to either open or closed, the changes operator will start the 60-second clock and be true that entire period, which means the Constraints will be false (because of the not). When the time expires, the condition will go false, which means the Constraint group is then true, and reactions can run.

          In English: run the reactions when the motions sensor trips and the door hasn't changed state in the last 60 seconds.

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

            @cw-kid Try this:

            60049cbf-261c-47aa-8bc5-6f53a96b2be7-image.png

            Ignore my device names. They should be at least close enough to express the relationships.

            The trigger is the motion sensor. Easy enough.

            The constraints have been set to NOT AND, which inverts the output of its logic. The only condition in the constraints is a check to see if the door sensor has changed state, and it delays reset for 60 seconds. When the door changes state to either open or closed, the changes operator will start the 60-second clock and be true that entire period, which means the Constraints will be false (because of the not). When the time expires, the condition will go false, which means the Constraint group is then true, and reactions can run.

            In English: run the reactions when the motions sensor trips and the door hasn't changed state in the last 60 seconds.

            cw-kidC Offline
            cw-kidC Offline
            cw-kid
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @toggledbits said in Contact Sensor Opened > 1 minute ago how ?:

            In English: run the reactions when the motions sensor trips and the door hasn't changed state in the last 60 seconds.

            Yes that's what I want.

            I will give it a try.

            Thank you.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbits
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              No worries. FYI, watch out for a small UI bug (fixing, of course): if you edit an existing condition with the changes operator in it, it will put "null" in the operands where they were previously blank before, and when you save that, the condition will stop working. Will fix for today's build, but be on the lookout. Just blank those fields back out before saving. You don't care what the change is (open to close or close to open isn't relevant -- it's either).

              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

              cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                No worries. FYI, watch out for a small UI bug (fixing, of course): if you edit an existing condition with the changes operator in it, it will put "null" in the operands where they were previously blank before, and when you save that, the condition will stop working. Will fix for today's build, but be on the lookout. Just blank those fields back out before saving. You don't care what the change is (open to close or close to open isn't relevant -- it's either).

                cw-kidC Offline
                cw-kidC Offline
                cw-kid
                wrote on last edited by cw-kid
                #7

                @toggledbits

                OK this is what I've got. I also added a check for a virtual switch in the constraints, hope that works.

                I haven't tested anything yet.

                af63b444-bc01-49a7-8f82-0b9ab1cdceda-image.png

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbits
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  You don't have the delay reset on, it appears (the three dots would appear yellow if you did).

                  And you're bringing in a group and another device, so that changes the logic. You didn't mention that before, so you need to work it into the logic correctly given that the entire Constraints group is now inverted (false means true and true means false). Have you accounted for that in the test of the switch state? And... why wrapped in a group? Are you going to add more conditions there?

                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • cw-kidC Offline
                    cw-kidC Offline
                    cw-kid
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    I've changed the constraints to this:

                    82240050-fbb2-46b0-ac63-5d3f27950ec4-image.png

                    8518f9b9-d74a-4c91-bd14-c0bb3876b104-image.png

                    I think this is working. If in Vera I trip the front door opened then closed and then trip the doorbell camera motion sensor, the rules reaction is not run as expected.

                    If I wait over the 60 seconds and trip the doorbell camera motion sensor again, then the rules reaction does run as expected.

                    I need to test it actually approaching the front door from outside and really opening / closing it, to then hear if it does the TTS announcement or not, that is in the reaction. I shouldn't hear the TTS if I have just changed the doors state etc.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • cw-kidC Offline
                      cw-kidC Offline
                      cw-kid
                      wrote on last edited by cw-kid
                      #10

                      Another thing that's been annoying, is when my garden lights via a schedule turn on or off in the back garden, the Hikvision IP camera triggers motion being detected as a result.

                      I could maybe use this method to stop that happening and stop MSR running the actions "Set Reaction", by checking that the state of the lights hasn't changed within the last X seconds.

                      Seems to be working, checking if the patio door has changed state in the last 60 seconds OR if the Festoon Lights in the garden have changed state in the last 10 seconds.

                      89079f2a-927a-48cc-9078-dc2b5553a109-image.png

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                      • cw-kidC cw-kid referenced this topic on
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      Recent Topics

                      • Rule condition shows TRUE in UI but Rule never transitions to SET — survives full restart
                        N
                        noelab
                        0
                        8
                        78

                      • DynamicGroupController and attributes
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        1
                        9
                        253

                      • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        5
                        149
                        135.8k

                      • Unofficial thread for compatibility
                        tunnusT
                        tunnus
                        2
                        2
                        715

                      • Ooops - Deleted Reactor Ex Machina II
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        0
                        2
                        65

                      • Bail out of failed reaction?
                        T
                        tamorgen
                        0
                        3
                        110

                      • Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
                        T
                        tamorgen
                        0
                        7
                        335

                      • [Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
                        CrilleC
                        Crille
                        0
                        5
                        243

                      • Upgrade Issues
                        T
                        tbully
                        0
                        9
                        358

                      • [SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        0
                        10
                        474

                      • [SOLVED] Question regarding "in" vs "contains" vs contents of the string
                        G
                        gwp1
                        0
                        5
                        235

                      • openLuup console disappeared - 500 - Internal Server Error
                        A
                        a-lurker
                        0
                        2
                        253
                      Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                      Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Unsolved