Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Entities issue 2 bridged vera units?
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] reactor-mqtt-contrib package for additional MQTT templates
therealdbT
I'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only). Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package: https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go. I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them. The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression. Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests
Multi-System Reactor
HA 2025.9.4 Supported Yet?
CatmanV2C
Tangentially did I miss 2025.9.4 getting blessed in MSR? I've been holding off Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Rule Set UI bug - RESOLVED
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Copy&Paste of Rules
therealdbT
I don't know if I'm the only one, but managing more than one Reactor installs, the need to have some sort of copy&paste for rules has grown on me. While I understand the technical challenges, I'm wondering if a "god mode" where I could copy the raw JSON rule and paste it into another rule could be an advanced, flag only feature that could benefit power users. I know I can copy the JSON file and proceed, but I must stop Reactor and when doing maintenance, it's more clicks to do. Just an idea
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Help with scene controller cycling logic
therealdbT
I’ve added a couple of Shelly Wave i4 as scene controllers and I’m planning to add more, since I can just use standard buttons instead of battery-powered scene controllers, which also looks better aesthetically. That said, I’m struggling to figure out how to write a simple rule that cycles between states every time I press a button. Example: Light 1 ON → OFF, then Light 2 ON → OFF. The part I can’t get right is handling the case where Light 1 or Light 2 might already be ON independently of the rule. Maybe it’s just too much sun and relaxation clouding my brain, but any hint would be appreciated.
Multi-System Reactor
Stop the MSR by an external switch on Hubitat.
wmarcolinW
Use case: When performing home maintenance, such as air conditioning, I want all rules involving air conditioning to be disabled. To do this, to day, I have a virtual switch that I placed within all rules involving air conditioning, meaning that if I turn it off, none of them work. Then another situation: the water pump system and garden irrigation, another switch. In short, I had to create several virtual switches in Hubitat to disable rules in MSR. Unfortunately, however, I was unable to cover all scenarios, so I wondered if it would be possible for MSR to support a virtual MSR switch, which, when configured in the reactor settings, would function as a general on/off switch for MSR. If it is configured and turned off, the entire rules and actions in MSR stops working, except for the status change reading process, specifically for this switch, which, when turned on, would restart the MSR. Would it be possible to do something like this? Any recommendations from the experts?
Multi-System Reactor
Expose MSR entities
CatmanV2C
Probably a really dumb question. Currently I am using the owntracks_sensor for tracking phones being in region in MSR and it works great. Digging around with Home Assistant and toying with some dashboards, is there any way of exposing that sensor to HA trivially? I could set MSR to trip a virtual switch in OpenLuup which can then be exposed to HA (with all my other Vera devices) but that feels a bit in-elegant if I can do it directly. Any thoughts? Apologies if the ask is not clear/ TIA C
Multi-System Reactor
Comment in Globa Expressions
Tom_DT
I have several Global Expressions that are set by a rule so the definition area is blank. I'd like to add a comment in this area that explains what is setting the value. Commenting in this area breaks the remote setting. Any way to document what is setting the GE?
Multi-System Reactor

Entities issue 2 bridged vera units?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
9 Posts 2 Posters 975 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MikeReadingtonM Offline
    MikeReadingtonM Offline
    MikeReadington
    wrote on last edited by MikeReadington
    #1

    Hi Everyone,

    First post here, so hello everyone.

    I had time today, so I figured I would get MSR up and running on my Synology Docker. Thanks to the discussions between Patrick and Libra, I had no issues with installation or configuration. I added the stand-alone test controller VeraTest to MSR, and it pulled all the entities on that controller without issue. After some poking around, I decided to add the VeraShop controller to MSR, and it only shows the following under entities.

    house mode
    Reactor System
    user (User Names)
    Vera System
    VeraShop (reactor ID)

    I thought that was odd because VeraTest worked fine.

    When I switch to the VeraHouse or VeraTest controllers, all of the expected entities on that controller show up in MSR. When I switch back to VeraShop again, no entities other than what I listed above show up.

    There are only two differences I can come up with between all three controllers.

    1. VeraTest and VeraHouse are Vera Plus units, and the VeraShop unit is a Vera Secure.
    2. VeraHouse is bridged to VeraShop to allow all of the devices on VeraHouse to show up on VeraShop.

    Any ideas? I try to work through things myself, but I am stuck short of breaking the bridged system apart. I can certainly do that, but the units are still running my property, so it's the last resort.

    Thanks again,
    Mike

    Edit: Clarification on switching controllers. I am not adding multiple controller, I am shutting down the container, editing the config file, and then starting the container to switch to the different controllers.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • toggledbitsT Away
      toggledbitsT Away
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I have no idea how the bridge works or how it represents devices from other systems. What shows in Reactor is any device that is reported in a user_data request in the devices heading. If bridged devices are there, they should appear. If they are elsewhere, then they would not be expected to appear.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      MikeReadingtonM 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

        I have no idea how the bridge works or how it represents devices from other systems. What shows in Reactor is any device that is reported in a user_data request in the devices heading. If bridged devices are there, they should appear. If they are elsewhere, then they would not be expected to appear.

        MikeReadingtonM Offline
        MikeReadingtonM Offline
        MikeReadington
        wrote on last edited by MikeReadington
        #3

        I cleared the log and did a restart with a configuration file for each of the Veras. I can see where the error is, but I do not know what it means. I did not want to start a report on Mantis and add something that is not really a bug.

        All bridging does is bring in the devices from the bridged unit into the "master unit?" to allow cross-Vera interaction. If you were looking at a "master unit?" Vera UI that has been bridged to another unit will see all of the devices from the bridged unit in the master's device list. That allows a user to interact across the units as if all the devices were paired locally to the master unit. While doing this is not exactly the norm, I don't think it's out of the range of what you would find within the Vera community. Larger homes or multiple buildings are usually the main reason people do/did this.

        The way I see it is that MSR completely removes the need for bridging since all of the logic can be centrally located. While writing this, it occurs to me that I will have to break this all down and start clean anyway since most of my current Reactor logic interacts with devices brought in through bridging. <sigh>

        Attached is what I see in the Reactor logs for VeraShop with the error and VeraHouse with no error. If the error is somehow tied to the bridging, maybe this post will help someone that has the same issue in the future.

        Thanks,
        Mike

        Screen Shot 2021-03-15 at 1.45.43 PM.pngScreen Shot 2021-03-15 at 1.45.12 PM.png

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT Away
          toggledbitsT Away
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Can you run the following request against the VeraShop system (put its IP address where indicated below) and either post the response on a PR or email it to me (address in my profile)?

          http://vera-ip-address:3480/data_request?id=user_data&output_format=json
          

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • MikeReadingtonM Offline
            MikeReadingtonM Offline
            MikeReadington
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            I replied to an email you sent me with the output.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • toggledbitsT Away
              toggledbitsT Away
              toggledbits
              wrote on last edited by toggledbits
              #6

              OK. The issue causing an error on VeraShop is that system is supplying a string containing JSON data instead of an actual array. I wonder if it's stuff being copied from the other system that it neglected to unpack? A related part of the structure that would normally accompany that array is also missing entirely, so I suspect it's all a bug in the bridging. I'll detect the anomaly and move on without the normal processing of that data (all related to geofences, by the way). I suspect it would make the Reactor for Vera plugin choke as well for the same reasons. After you update to today's build (later), you should get your devices on Shop.

              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

              MikeReadingtonM 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                OK. The issue causing an error on VeraShop is that system is supplying a string containing JSON data instead of an actual array. I wonder if it's stuff being copied from the other system that it neglected to unpack? A related part of the structure that would normally accompany that array is also missing entirely, so I suspect it's all a bug in the bridging. I'll detect the anomaly and move on without the normal processing of that data (all related to geofences, by the way). I suspect it would make the Reactor for Vera plugin choke as well for the same reasons. After you update to today's build (later), you should get your devices on Shop.

                MikeReadingtonM Offline
                MikeReadingtonM Offline
                MikeReadington
                wrote on last edited by MikeReadington
                #7

                Thanks Patrick,

                I did not have any issues with Reactor on my Vera in the ways I have been using it. The bridged devices do show up in Reactor, and they can both trigger conditions and react to actions. I don't know what you saw for geofence, but the only thing I use for location is amg0's find my iPhone.

                I will let you know what I see when I update, but for me, it's clear the most efficient route forward is to start fresh and replace the bridging with MSR.

                Thanks again, and I will keep an eye out for the docker container.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • MikeReadingtonM Offline
                  MikeReadingtonM Offline
                  MikeReadington
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Hi Patrick,

                  20174 fixed the issue. I now see the entities from both controllers while connected to the master controller.

                  Thank you!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT Away
                    toggledbitsT Away
                    toggledbits
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Awesome.

                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    Recent Topics

                    • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      5
                      127
                      72.0k

                    • There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
                      akbooerA
                      akbooer
                      1
                      2
                      28

                    • Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
                      CrilleC
                      Crille
                      0
                      6
                      40

                    • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
                      CatmanV2C
                      CatmanV2
                      0
                      9
                      86

                    • Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      0
                      17
                      172

                    • Shelly Wall Display XL
                      akbooerA
                      akbooer
                      2
                      9
                      632

                    • [Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      0
                      26
                      263

                    • [Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
                      CrilleC
                      Crille
                      0
                      12
                      298

                    • No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      0
                      2
                      66

                    • Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      0
                      2
                      96

                    • Do you Matter?
                      akbooerA
                      akbooer
                      0
                      5
                      380

                    • [Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      0
                      95
                      9.5k
                    Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                    Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • Unsolved