Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Vera Run LUA Missing
MSR with reverse proxy
tunnusT
I'm trying to use MSR via reserve proxy in Synology DSM, but MSR page does not load https://<public ip>:30000/reactor/en-US/ At the same time logging page loads normally https://<public ip>:30000/api/v1/log I thought maybe authentication was messing it up, but there was no deny entries in the log, and also disabling authentication did not make any difference. For this use case VPN is not an option (that works, but as said not an option for this particular use case). Any ideas what could cause this? MSR build latest-26242-28d69aa8, Chrome browser
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Native fan capabilty
therealdbT
Nothing more to add. I see we have hvac_blower, but, anyway, maybe a native fan on the same assumptions of the fan from HASS could be reasonable. I have a couple of them. ie, this is from ESPHome via HASS. x_hass.domain="fan" x_hass.entity_id="fan.kitchen_seashell_hood_ventilation_fan" x_hass.floor_id=null x_hass.services=["fan","esphome"] x_hass.source="esphome" x_hass.state="off" x_hass_attr.friendly_name="Seashell Hood Ventilation Fan" x_hass_attr.percentage=50 x_hass_attr.percentage_step=25 x_hass_attr.preset_mode="" x_hass_attr.preset_modes=[] x_hass_attr.supported_features=49 Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Rule do not fire
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Rule condition shows TRUE in UI but Rule never transitions to SET — survives full restart
N
Build: latest-26221-b25bb3e3, Docker on Synology. Hi, I have a Rule whose Trigger/Constraints reference other Rules via Rule State ... is TRUE. At some point it stops firing. Expanding the rule's condition tree in the UI shows every Trigger and Constraint condition green/TRUE — confirmed live by walking into the room and watching Motion go true in real time. Rule History shows no new SET, just old reset entries. Tried, on the same rule, same evening: recreating the trigger conditions with fresh IDs, recreating the constraint conditions with fresh IDs (flat and wrapped in a new Group — wrapping in a Group produced one SET, but it didn't reproduce on repeat attempts with the same structure), and finally a full container restart with a verified-correct saved rule. Still no SET, even with a fresh live motion event right after the restart. Separately, I found that this rule (and its 10 per-room clones) share identical internal condition/group IDs with each other — leftover from a batch clone done months ago, never regenerated. Not sure if that's related, since fixing the IDs didn't reliably fix the symptom either. Has anyone seen a Rule State condition show TRUE in the UI without the Rule ever producing a SET, surviving a clean restart? Thanks in advance
Multi-System Reactor
DynamicGroupController and attributes
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits I'm back to trying to optimize a couple of things based on dynamic group. First of all, I think I found a typo in the doc: primary_attribute: "binary_sensor.state" primary_attribute_value: | d = false; each id in members: d = getEntity(id)?.attributes?.power_switch?.state or d, d I think the correct code snippet is d = false, All that said, my use case for dynamic groups is to group 3 different climate devices, so I could easily command them at the same time. Commands are good, but sometimes I want to check if any of the devices are on, and that's easily done with a similar snippet as the one you have in the docs. But this is limited to the primary attribute, while I want to have any of the attributes in the group to be driven by a similar logic (while all are null in the group). ie, access hvac_control.mode and see if any of the unit is set to cool, or heat. Is that possible, without re-defining an expression in each of my rules? Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Unofficial thread for compatibility
tunnusT
As there are statements about compatibility for home assistant versions in MSR new version announcements (e.g. "HassController: Bless Hass to 2025.7.3"), I thought it would be good idea to track other controllers as well. As an example, I can confirm that build "latest-25208-c53e8513" works with Hubitat Elevation C-8 platform version 2.4.2.134 using Maker API. Updates: (the latest versions first in the list) OK: build "latest-25264-2fbe9217" with Hubitat C-8 platform v. 2.4.3.123
Multi-System Reactor
Ooops - Deleted Reactor Ex Machina II
R
I accidentally deleted Reactor Ex Machina II (REM II) from my Reactor rules. I tried to recover it by deleting the .json and .dval in the Rules subdirectory and then recreating it from Togglebits original posting, but that did not work. Does anyone know how to recover REM ll ?
Multi-System Reactor
Bail out of failed reaction?
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
CrilleC
Edit: Solved in latest-26221. Bare-metal latest-26193 I have this group: "OKforLarm": name: OK för Larm select: - include_controller: vera - include_capability: door_sensor filter_expression: entity.attributes.door_sensor.state It contains the entities I expect but behaves a bit odd. When I open vera>device_10097 the entity attribute door_sensor.state changes to true but it won't show up as member in the group, when I also open vera>device_10095 they both shows as members and when I close vera>device_10095 it disappear from the group but when I close vera>device_10097 it lingers in the group until I restart Reactor.
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade Issues
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Question regarding "in" vs "contains" vs contents of the string
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Logon screen timeout
G
Noticing since 170 that the lock screen doesn't switch to the logon prompt but, rather, stays on the active UI until such time as you go to click something within it. Then it jumps to the login screen. Brave browser Brave 1.92.139 (Official Build) (arm64) Chromium: 150.0.7871.114
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Copy&past of actions and/or drag&drop between set/reset
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits One thing that bothers me while doing work on new systems/new features, is that I cannot copy&paste actions, and I cannot drag&drop between set and resets. #1 is for when I want to copy an action between different rules opened in two separate browser windows, while #2 is when I just need to flip a bunch of actions in the reset, or move some logic back and forth. Both will be appreciated, but I understand the technical challenges. Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade advice - upgrade from aarch64 to ARM64 image
T
I'm currently on version 26011. I understand that the aarch64 image is no longer supported. So, I therefore need to update to the ARM64 image. Can anyone possibly suggest how I update my docker compose.yaml file (see below). Ideally I'd like to keep my existing reactions etc. rather than start from scratch. # Multi-System Reactor template docker-compose.yml (version 22160) # # Change the lines indicated by "DO"... # services: reactor: container_name: reactor environment: # DO change the TZ: line to set your local time zone. # See valid TZ list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tz_database_time_zones TZ: GB # # DO NOT change this path. Your directory location is in "source" below. REACTOR_DATA_PREFIX: /var/reactor # DO change the image below to the one you are using (e.g. armv7l or aarch64 for RPi 4) image: toggledbits/reactor:latest-aarch64 restart: "always" expose: - 8111 ports: - 8111:8111 volumes: # DO change the /home/username/reactor below to the directory you created for # your local data; DO NOT change the /var/reactor part - /home/pi/docker/reactor:/var/reactor - /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro tmpfs: /tmp
Multi-System Reactor
Alexa for MSR, any interest?
MikeReadingtonM
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Telegram notification broke with latest update
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Phantom device, “INFO” appears
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Vera Run LUA Missing

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
10 Posts 3 Posters 2.3k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cw-kidC Offline
    cw-kidC Offline
    cw-kid
    wrote on last edited by cw-kid
    #1

    Don't think my LUA code is running anymore:

    ba492b8f-e1ec-4ba3-b9af-56e78de9505d-image.png

    Has something changed?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • cw-kidC Offline
      cw-kidC Offline
      cw-kid
      wrote on last edited by cw-kid
      #2

      I can select x_vera_sys.runlua OK on my Vera Edge controller.

      32d4a92e-2f6e-4d26-b3cc-4c65533558a2-image.png

      However on my Vera Plus controller I see as in the above screen shot.

      Maybe I broke something when I tried to rename the Vera Plus controller the other day ?

      I also added the Vera Edge as a second controller the other day, so maybe related to that?

      b225df85-1c12-448a-a62f-fdb254fea576-image.png

      CrilleC 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • cw-kidC cw-kid

        I can select x_vera_sys.runlua OK on my Vera Edge controller.

        32d4a92e-2f6e-4d26-b3cc-4c65533558a2-image.png

        However on my Vera Plus controller I see as in the above screen shot.

        Maybe I broke something when I tried to rename the Vera Plus controller the other day ?

        I also added the Vera Edge as a second controller the other day, so maybe related to that?

        b225df85-1c12-448a-a62f-fdb254fea576-image.png

        CrilleC Online
        CrilleC Online
        Crille
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @cw-kid Are you using this to run an existing scene on Vera?

        cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • CrilleC Crille

          @cw-kid Are you using this to run an existing scene on Vera?

          cw-kidC Offline
          cw-kidC Offline
          cw-kid
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @crille

          Yes in this example I am using some LUA code to randomly run various existing scenes on the Vera.

          I also have other MSR rules that either reference LUA code directly in that box in the Reaction or call LUA code stored in the VeraScenes.lua file on the Vera.

          All the MSR rules that were using runlua are now all saying "missing".

          CrilleC 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • cw-kidC cw-kid

            @crille

            Yes in this example I am using some LUA code to randomly run various existing scenes on the Vera.

            I also have other MSR rules that either reference LUA code directly in that box in the Reaction or call LUA code stored in the VeraScenes.lua file on the Vera.

            All the MSR rules that were using runlua are now all saying "missing".

            CrilleC Online
            CrilleC Online
            Crille
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @cw-kid Ah, ok. I missed the random part and wondered why you didn’t just selected the scene in the entity list 🙂
            I agree, something looks broken and unfortunately I have no solution for you.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • cw-kidC Offline
              cw-kidC Offline
              cw-kid
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Yeah I have some scenes in Vera that will just set my Fibaro RGBW module / garden lights to different colours.

              This LUA code will randomly run one of those Vera scenes. And the MSR rule pulses every 15 minutes, so the colour of the LED strip will change randomly every 15 minutes etc.

              I think I will remove the "lab" Vera Edge controller from MSR and just have my production Vera Plus controller connected again on its own.

              See if that fixes this "missing" runlua function.

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • cw-kidC Offline
                cw-kidC Offline
                cw-kid
                wrote on last edited by cw-kid
                #7

                I've removed the second Vera Edge from the reactor.yaml file and restarted MSR and the x_vera_sys.runlua is now back again and working for my production Vera Plus (first controller).

                So this appears to be a bug.

                Logged:

                https://reactor.toggledbits.com/mantisbt/view.php?id=155

                toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • cw-kidC cw-kid

                  I've removed the second Vera Edge from the reactor.yaml file and restarted MSR and the x_vera_sys.runlua is now back again and working for my production Vera Plus (first controller).

                  So this appears to be a bug.

                  Logged:

                  https://reactor.toggledbits.com/mantisbt/view.php?id=155

                  toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbits
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @cw-kid Found it, will have it fixed.

                  Did I ever bother to ask why you just don't run the scene entity using its native run action?

                  8c8387a4-ba38-4b52-9b07-ecaebc7f0fc5-image.png

                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                  cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                    @cw-kid Found it, will have it fixed.

                    Did I ever bother to ask why you just don't run the scene entity using its native run action?

                    8c8387a4-ba38-4b52-9b07-ecaebc7f0fc5-image.png

                    cw-kidC Offline
                    cw-kidC Offline
                    cw-kid
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    @toggledbits said in Vera Run LUA Missing:

                    Did I ever bother to ask why you just don't run the scene entity using its native run action?

                    I am aware I can call Vera scenes directly using the scene entity and I do have some other rules that do that.

                    However for this particular rule as I already explained I am running this LUA code to have various Vera scenes run randomly.

                    local scenes = {"172", "173", "174", "175", "176", "271", "272"}
                    local tmp_random_number = math.random(1,7)
                    local  scene_id_to_launch = scenes[tmp_random_number]
                    luup.call_action("urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:HomeAutomationGateway1", "RunScene", {SceneNum = scene_id_to_launch}, 0)
                    
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • cw-kidC Offline
                      cw-kidC Offline
                      cw-kid
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Appears to be fixed in version 21090. I can now see and select x_vera_sys.runlua on both Vera controllers.

                      Thanks

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      Recent Topics

                      • MSR with reverse proxy
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        0
                        4
                        58

                      • [MSR] Native fan capabilty
                        therealdbT
                        therealdb
                        1
                        3
                        140

                      • [MSR] Rule do not fire
                        therealdbT
                        therealdb
                        0
                        4
                        165

                      • Rule condition shows TRUE in UI but Rule never transitions to SET — survives full restart
                        N
                        noelab
                        0
                        8
                        243

                      • DynamicGroupController and attributes
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        1
                        9
                        339

                      • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        5
                        149
                        140.2k

                      • Unofficial thread for compatibility
                        tunnusT
                        tunnus
                        2
                        2
                        762

                      • Ooops - Deleted Reactor Ex Machina II
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        0
                        2
                        111

                      • Bail out of failed reaction?
                        T
                        tamorgen
                        0
                        3
                        183

                      • Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
                        T
                        tamorgen
                        0
                        7
                        414

                      • [Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
                        CrilleC
                        Crille
                        0
                        5
                        291

                      • Upgrade Issues
                        T
                        tbully
                        0
                        9
                        452
                      Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                      Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Unsolved