Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Import Vera Rules in Docker Containers?
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] reactor-mqtt-contrib package for additional MQTT templates
therealdbT
I'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only). Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package: https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go. I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them. The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression. Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests
Multi-System Reactor
HA 2025.9.4 Supported Yet?
CatmanV2C
Tangentially did I miss 2025.9.4 getting blessed in MSR? I've been holding off Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Rule Set UI bug - RESOLVED
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Copy&Paste of Rules
therealdbT
I don't know if I'm the only one, but managing more than one Reactor installs, the need to have some sort of copy&paste for rules has grown on me. While I understand the technical challenges, I'm wondering if a "god mode" where I could copy the raw JSON rule and paste it into another rule could be an advanced, flag only feature that could benefit power users. I know I can copy the JSON file and proceed, but I must stop Reactor and when doing maintenance, it's more clicks to do. Just an idea
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Help with scene controller cycling logic
therealdbT
I’ve added a couple of Shelly Wave i4 as scene controllers and I’m planning to add more, since I can just use standard buttons instead of battery-powered scene controllers, which also looks better aesthetically. That said, I’m struggling to figure out how to write a simple rule that cycles between states every time I press a button. Example: Light 1 ON → OFF, then Light 2 ON → OFF. The part I can’t get right is handling the case where Light 1 or Light 2 might already be ON independently of the rule. Maybe it’s just too much sun and relaxation clouding my brain, but any hint would be appreciated.
Multi-System Reactor
Stop the MSR by an external switch on Hubitat.
wmarcolinW
Use case: When performing home maintenance, such as air conditioning, I want all rules involving air conditioning to be disabled. To do this, to day, I have a virtual switch that I placed within all rules involving air conditioning, meaning that if I turn it off, none of them work. Then another situation: the water pump system and garden irrigation, another switch. In short, I had to create several virtual switches in Hubitat to disable rules in MSR. Unfortunately, however, I was unable to cover all scenarios, so I wondered if it would be possible for MSR to support a virtual MSR switch, which, when configured in the reactor settings, would function as a general on/off switch for MSR. If it is configured and turned off, the entire rules and actions in MSR stops working, except for the status change reading process, specifically for this switch, which, when turned on, would restart the MSR. Would it be possible to do something like this? Any recommendations from the experts?
Multi-System Reactor
Expose MSR entities
CatmanV2C
Probably a really dumb question. Currently I am using the owntracks_sensor for tracking phones being in region in MSR and it works great. Digging around with Home Assistant and toying with some dashboards, is there any way of exposing that sensor to HA trivially? I could set MSR to trip a virtual switch in OpenLuup which can then be exposed to HA (with all my other Vera devices) but that feels a bit in-elegant if I can do it directly. Any thoughts? Apologies if the ask is not clear/ TIA C
Multi-System Reactor
Comment in Globa Expressions
Tom_DT
I have several Global Expressions that are set by a rule so the definition area is blank. I'd like to add a comment in this area that explains what is setting the value. Commenting in this area breaks the remote setting. Any way to document what is setting the GE?
Multi-System Reactor

Import Vera Rules in Docker Containers?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
12 Posts 5 Posters 1.5k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 3 3rdStng

    @librasun said in How To: Send TCP packet in Reaction:

    Did MSR running on Docker ever gain the ability to do the R4V import?

    Yes, question mark?.?.?. I migrated my R4V into MSR and I'm running on a docker within my unRAID server. There were little hiccups and import issues that have since been fixed. But I successfully took my R4V backup file and imported it in. Probably back in late August.

    LibraSunL Offline
    LibraSunL Offline
    LibraSun
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    @3rdstng said in How To: Send TCP packet in Reaction:

    took my R4V backup file and imported it in

    I would have loved to do the same, but with Docker running on a Synology NAS, I recall there being some [command line or required packages] limitation that made the import impossible.

    That's why I laboriously re-created all of my old R4V reactions, which turned out to be the best way to learn Reactor for me!! 🙂

    I was just eager to hear that [uncertain] limitation had been circumvented during the intervening year or so.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Away
      toggledbitsT Away
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by toggledbits
      #4

      Here's a way to do it, with credit to @whyfseeguy for the approach.

      It's always a good idea to back up your Reactor data directory before doing anything like this.

      You can start a shell running in the Reactor docker container, and run the importer from inside the container:

      1. Copy your Reactor for Vera backup file into your Reactor (MSR) data directory. This is the directory you have mapped to the container's /var/reactor when setting MSR up (it's the parent of your storage and config directories.

      2. Make sure your Reactor docker container is running.

      3. Open a shell in the Reactor container. This must be done from the system command line:

         docker exec -it reactor /bin/sh
        
      4. Now change directory to the container's Reactor directory:

         cd /opt/reactor
        
      5. Create a symbolic link:

         ln -sf /var/reactor/storage .
        
      6. Now run the importer:

         node tools/import_reactor_backup.js /var/reactor/<name of your backup file> <controller-id>
        

        In the above command, the <controller-id> is the ID assigned to the VeraController in your reactor.yaml configuration file. The distribution default version of this file includes a sample configuration with the ID vera, so it should be easy to find and confirm.

      7. Exit the container's shell with the simple command: exit

      If anything goes horribly wrong (i.e. you get a hard error), let me know and I'll try to help you fix it. Also, for anyone who finds this procedure altogether too daunting, I'm happy to run the import for you and send you a ZIP file — contact me via DM for this request.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • LibraSunL Offline
        LibraSunL Offline
        LibraSun
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        I feel I ought to know what <controller-id> comes from, in the instructions above, but nothing pops into my head.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT Away
          toggledbitsT Away
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          I'll amend that. <controller-id> is the ID you gave the controller in your reactor.yaml file. The distribution default version of the file includes one with the ID vera, and I don't think most people would ever change it (they certainly must if they are adding multiple Veras to their configuration — each must have a unique ID).

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          tunnusT 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

            I'll amend that. <controller-id> is the ID you gave the controller in your reactor.yaml file. The distribution default version of the file includes one with the ID vera, and I don't think most people would ever change it (they certainly must if they are adding multiple Veras to their configuration — each must have a unique ID).

            tunnusT Offline
            tunnusT Offline
            tunnus
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            @toggledbits can’t resist saying that for most of us even a single Vera is too much 😅

            Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • toggledbitsT Away
              toggledbitsT Away
              toggledbits
              wrote on last edited by toggledbits
              #8

              Just wait until you have a house full of little eZLO trinkets, as one big messh...

              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • 3 Offline
                3 Offline
                3rdStng
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                I retired one of my two VeraPlus units. It was satisfying to press the reset button 6 times to factory reset it. Does anyone want it? I wouldn't expect to get very much for it on eBay, so you cover the shipping costs and it's yours.

                B 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • LibraSunL Offline
                  LibraSunL Offline
                  LibraSun
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  There is (edit: WAS) a guy on the ezlo Forums who said he was looking for a Vera unit to replace his Plus. I'll drum up the link to his post: Nope, it vanished, along with the Message I sent him on that Forum. Wonder if he got booted for talking about equipment failure, lol.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • 3 3rdStng

                    I retired one of my two VeraPlus units. It was satisfying to press the reset button 6 times to factory reset it. Does anyone want it? I wouldn't expect to get very much for it on eBay, so you cover the shipping costs and it's yours.

                    B Offline
                    B Offline
                    Buxton
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    @3rdstng Ha! if you're in the US, I'll take it. I still have a veralite running in my garage that could do with an upgrade.

                    3 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • B Buxton

                      @3rdstng Ha! if you're in the US, I'll take it. I still have a veralite running in my garage that could do with an upgrade.

                      3 Offline
                      3 Offline
                      3rdStng
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      @buxton said in Import Vera Rules in Docker Containers?:

                      @3rdstng Ha! if you're in the US, I'll take it. I still have a veralite running in my garage that could do with an upgrade.

                      I am in So Cal. I'll DM you.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                      • toggledbitsT toggledbits referenced this topic on
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      Recent Topics

                      • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        5
                        127
                        72.0k

                      • There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
                        akbooerA
                        akbooer
                        1
                        2
                        28

                      • Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
                        CrilleC
                        Crille
                        0
                        6
                        40

                      • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
                        CatmanV2C
                        CatmanV2
                        0
                        9
                        86

                      • Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        0
                        17
                        172

                      • Shelly Wall Display XL
                        akbooerA
                        akbooer
                        2
                        9
                        632

                      • [Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        0
                        26
                        263

                      • [Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
                        CrilleC
                        Crille
                        0
                        12
                        298

                      • No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        0
                        2
                        66

                      • Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        0
                        2
                        96

                      • Do you Matter?
                        akbooerA
                        akbooer
                        0
                        5
                        380

                      • [Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        0
                        95
                        9.5k
                      Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                      Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Unsolved