Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. [SOLVED] MQTT Controller Not Toggling Sonoff Basic Correctly on Raspberry Pi 4B - Bare Metal (without Docker)
This trigger no longer working - complaining about the operator needing changing
cw-kidC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
cw-kidC
Hello I haven't updated my installation of MSR in a very long time. Its a bare metal Linux install currently on version 24366-3de60836 I see the latest version is now latest-26011-c621bbc7 I assume I cannot just jump from a very old version to the latest version? Or can I? Thanks
Multi-System Reactor
Can you run MSR on Home Assistant OS ?
cw-kidC
Looking at using Home Assistant for the first time, either on a Home Assistant Green, their own hardware or buying a cheap second hand mini PC. Sounds like Home Assistant OS is linux based using Docker for HA etc. Would I also be able to install things like MSR as well on their OS ? On the same box? Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Self test
CatmanV2C
Having been messing around with some stuff I worked a way to self trigger some tests that I wanted to do on the HA <> MSR integration This got me wondering if there's an entity that changes state / is exposed when a configured controller goes off line? I can't see one but thought it might be hidden or something? Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
tunnusT
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration: users: # This section defines your valid users. admin: ******* groups: # This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application # and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to # more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here. admin_group: users: - admin applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications guests: users: "*" applications: - dashboard api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin_group allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: true session: timeout: 7200 # (seconds) rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true # If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged. log_acls: true # If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged. debug_acls: true My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
Multi-System Reactor
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request 2?
CatmanV2C
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks. Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option? No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

[SOLVED] MQTT Controller Not Toggling Sonoff Basic Correctly on Raspberry Pi 4B - Bare Metal (without Docker)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
4 Posts 2 Posters 558 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    jsimmo
    wrote on last edited by jsimmo
    #1

    MSR is currently running the latest-21342

    I thought I would give MQTT controller a try for one of the many Sonoff devices I have in my home. My aim is to remove the HTTP Switch app in my Vera Plus and control all my devices from MSR using the MQTT controller.

    I have carried out the following steps:
    Flashed a new Sonoff Basic with Tasmota, configured it for MQTT and enabled it.
    Installed MQTT Controller on MSR and added the basic configuration in the reactor.yaml file and re-started reactor.
    The device is discovered in entities and when clicking on the attributes power_switch.on, power-switch.off, power-switch.set everything works just fine.
    The problem I have is with toggle. This always works to toggle the device ON but when toggled again does not turn it OFF.

    I've attached my reactor.yaml file and the template which it uses. Hopefully someone can shed some light on why it won't toggle OFF.

    Thanks

    5bba049f-3534-4ec3-8832-9ae042e1c807-ControllerConfig.JPG

    f23e0a8f-5728-4d03-ac5e-9f5769d78405-Template.JPG

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by toggledbits
      #2

      That sounds like it's not updating the status, which would be how it knows how to toggle. The unit "0" is pretty suspicious. I've only seen non-zero for this, or nothing at all, in which case you should specify unit: ""

      Also the username and password fields aren't correctly placed in your screen shot. Better to use copy/paste of the actual text, and use the fenced code block formatting for it. And no need to post the template, if it's the standard template from the mqtt_devices data file (and I'm assuming you didn't make a copy of it and post it into reactor.yaml, which is unnecessary).

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J Offline
        J Offline
        jsimmo
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Thanks very much. I specified it as you described and toggle works just fine now.

        I'll change the username and password and no, the template was not copied to the reactor.yaml file.

        I started out by following the docs (see below) on how to set it up but got a bit confused. It gives an example of setting up a Shelly, but then says to use the tasmota_generic_relay template. This is how I ended up with the 0 (from channel 0).

        Anyway all good now. Thanks again for the very quick reply. Looking forward to experimenting with MQTT and Tasmota to see if I can get improved reliability from my Sonoff devices.

        Easy Device Configuration - Using Existing Template
        As an example, let's say we have a Shelly1 configured with the topic shelly1_43DFD2 that is configured to operate as a single relay to operate a stairway light. To create an entity for this device, we can use the tasmota_generic_relay template. The template supports multiple relays, but since only one relay is configured in Tasmota, the published topics from the node will have a "unit number" (identifying which relay if more than one), so we'll specify no unit number by giving it an empty string:

        ...other stuff
        config: "mqtt://127.0.0.1:1883/"
        entities:
        shelly1_stairway:
        name: "Stairway Light"
        topic: shelly1_43DFD2
        uses_template: shelly_relay
        channel: 0

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          I'll get after those docs... you're not the first to be bitten.

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          Recent Topics

          • This trigger no longer working - complaining about the operator needing changing
            cw-kidC
            cw-kid
            0
            17
            16

          • How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
            cw-kidC
            cw-kid
            0
            17
            224

          • Can you run MSR on Home Assistant OS ?
            therealdbT
            therealdb
            0
            2
            12

          • HA and AI
            PablaP
            Pabla
            0
            2
            98

          • Self test
            CatmanV2C
            CatmanV2
            0
            3
            86

          • Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
            toggledbitsT
            toggledbits
            0
            2
            111

          • VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
            S
            SweetGenius
            1
            1
            79

          • Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
            toggledbitsT
            toggledbits
            3
            1
            74

          • Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
            G
            gwp1
            0
            1
            91

          • [Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
            CrilleC
            Crille
            0
            4
            184

          • [Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
            therealdbT
            therealdb
            0
            3
            174

          • Possible feature request 2?
            CatmanV2C
            CatmanV2
            0
            3
            147
          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
          Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • Unsolved