Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. [Solved] Logic review: Arm for xmas season lighting
[Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
CrilleC
Edit: Solved in latest-26221. Bare-metal latest-26193 I have this group: "OKforLarm": name: OK för Larm select: - include_controller: vera - include_capability: door_sensor filter_expression: entity.attributes.door_sensor.state It contains the entities I expect but behaves a bit odd. When I open vera>device_10097 the entity attribute door_sensor.state changes to true but it won't show up as member in the group, when I also open vera>device_10095 they both shows as members and when I close vera>device_10095 it disappear from the group but when I close vera>device_10097 it lingers in the group until I restart Reactor.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
DynamicGroupController and attributes
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits I'm back to trying to optimize a couple of things based on dynamic group. First of all, I think I found a typo in the doc: primary_attribute: "binary_sensor.state" primary_attribute_value: | d = false; each id in members: d = getEntity(id)?.attributes?.power_switch?.state or d, d I think the correct code snippet is d = false, All that said, my use case for dynamic groups is to group 3 different climate devices, so I could easily command them at the same time. Commands are good, but sometimes I want to check if any of the devices are on, and that's easily done with a similar snippet as the one you have in the docs. But this is limited to the primary attribute, while I want to have any of the attributes in the group to be driven by a similar logic (while all are null in the group). ie, access hvac_control.mode and see if any of the unit is set to cool, or heat. Is that possible, without re-defining an expression in each of my rules? Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade Issues
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Question regarding "in" vs "contains" vs contents of the string
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Logon screen timeout
G
Noticing since 170 that the lock screen doesn't switch to the logon prompt but, rather, stays on the active UI until such time as you go to click something within it. Then it jumps to the login screen. Brave browser Brave 1.92.139 (Official Build) (arm64) Chromium: 150.0.7871.114
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Copy&past of actions and/or drag&drop between set/reset
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits One thing that bothers me while doing work on new systems/new features, is that I cannot copy&paste actions, and I cannot drag&drop between set and resets. #1 is for when I want to copy an action between different rules opened in two separate browser windows, while #2 is when I just need to flip a bunch of actions in the reset, or move some logic back and forth. Both will be appreciated, but I understand the technical challenges. Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade advice - upgrade from aarch64 to ARM64 image
T
I'm currently on version 26011. I understand that the aarch64 image is no longer supported. So, I therefore need to update to the ARM64 image. Can anyone possibly suggest how I update my docker compose.yaml file (see below). Ideally I'd like to keep my existing reactions etc. rather than start from scratch. # Multi-System Reactor template docker-compose.yml (version 22160) # # Change the lines indicated by "DO"... # services: reactor: container_name: reactor environment: # DO change the TZ: line to set your local time zone. # See valid TZ list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tz_database_time_zones TZ: GB # # DO NOT change this path. Your directory location is in "source" below. REACTOR_DATA_PREFIX: /var/reactor # DO change the image below to the one you are using (e.g. armv7l or aarch64 for RPi 4) image: toggledbits/reactor:latest-aarch64 restart: "always" expose: - 8111 ports: - 8111:8111 volumes: # DO change the /home/username/reactor below to the directory you created for # your local data; DO NOT change the /var/reactor part - /home/pi/docker/reactor:/var/reactor - /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro tmpfs: /tmp
Multi-System Reactor
Alexa for MSR, any interest?
MikeReadingtonM
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Telegram notification broke with latest update
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Phantom device, “INFO” appears
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Mode Status NULL
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] HTTP query failing after version 26177
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Question about the find function
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Answered] OK to remove old json files?
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Deprecation Announcement: 32-bit ARM *docker* images
toggledbitsT
If you are using the armv7l docker image, the OpenJS Foundation that publishes node is no longer producing 32-bit builds as of v24. That means the last supported LTS version of node for armv7l is v22, which will go End-of-Life in May 2027. Therefore, the Reactor armv7l image is now deprecated and will only be produced until node v22 goes EOL, and I will not publish armv7l images beyond that date. If you are running an RPi 3 or earlier with Reactor, you are on this image, and will need to upgrade hardware to a 64-bit model and use the arm64 image. If you need help getting it done, ask in this category.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] build 26150 - engine not starting
G
@toggledbits I pulled the image (well, Watchtower did) and within minutes the whole system went offline. The log looks like it ends with 26143. [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-mkahsmgf/26qq82mw-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lqyfljfi/22f8on0t-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lsb61rw8/24oenqi2-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lrh58he0/rule-lrh58he0:S-1c00gfib-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lrh58he0/1c00dylr-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lrh58he0/1nam9w5u-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-miuh2qqi/22ls4lql-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-kwc6rmci/rule-kwc6rmci:S-1vj8sdfc-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-kwc6rmci/rule-kwc6rmci:S-1qanz01x-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/24lq19p6-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-mk0o8iox/23oy468y-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-miscg2h3/rule-miscg2h3:S-22gmbq1c-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-kxgrfjke/238p0old-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-m7ccsso5/re-m7ccsso5-1r0myjxa-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/19nl9wq2-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/rule-ladyja6a:S-yl3xk9t-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/rule-ladyja6a:S-yl3vv5m-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-ln7j2nqp/re-ln7j2nqp-22mx9lzd-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-ln7j2nqp/22mx87c8-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-licneppy/1mzwe7ht-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ml3194ih/25jqt1j4-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-kxgrg7kf/227hshak-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-reactorexmachina/13ua1p95-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-reactorexmachina/13uagam7-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-grpvl9oypg/rule-grpvl9oypg:R-134x4cbv-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-grpvl9oypg/rule-grpvl9oypg:R-134x2fyl-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-lscjrws1/238p5c22-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lbwr0jvq/1xkczf03-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <Structure:NOTICE> Structure Structure#1 stopped [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <app:NOTICE> Closing APIs... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <wsapi:NOTICE> wsapi: closing... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <wsapi:NOTICE> wsapi: disconnecting from "192.168.1.23#82" (1001 service closing) [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.548Z <httpapi:NOTICE> HTTP API closing... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.549Z <wsapi:NOTICE> wsapi: server closed [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.549Z <httpapi:INFO> HTTP server closed. [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.549Z <app:NOTICE> Stopping timers... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.551Z <app:null> Shutdown complete, process ID 1 [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.551Z <app:null> Closing logs... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.551Z <default:null> Closing log I can SSH to the VM. Alas, I do not have the previous image for 26143 as I'm a little too quick sometimes on housekeeping.
Multi-System Reactor
http request action & digest auth
tunnusT
I’m using the HTTP Request action in MSR and need to authenticate against an endpoint that uses HTTP Digest authentication. Now that endpoint was changed to use SHA-256 in digest auth, so I would like to know if MSR supports it, or is it limited to MD5-based digest auth?
Multi-System Reactor

[Solved] Logic review: Arm for xmas season lighting

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
10 Posts 3 Posters 1.5k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    gwp1
    wrote on last edited by gwp1
    #1

    I brought this over from Reactor for Vera back in the day. It's worked flawlessly, arming the lights for the xmas season which the various lighting rulesets point to. First night is the Friday after Thanksgiving and the last night is 01/07 as it covers the Russian Orthodox holiday.

    This year, it stopped running at exactly midnight on 01/01.

    ed10a6bd-2904-496d-91d2-19684f353ccd-image.png

    Anything stand out in my logic that I've missed?

    *Hubitat C-7 2.5.1.142
    *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

    *HAOS
    Core 2026.7.4
    w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
    FW: v1.1
    SDK: v7.23.1

    *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
    MSR: latest-26193-8dd8f854
    MQTTController: 25139
    ZWave Controller: 25139

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • G gwp1

      I brought this over from Reactor for Vera back in the day. It's worked flawlessly, arming the lights for the xmas season which the various lighting rulesets point to. First night is the Friday after Thanksgiving and the last night is 01/07 as it covers the Russian Orthodox holiday.

      This year, it stopped running at exactly midnight on 01/01.

      ed10a6bd-2904-496d-91d2-19684f353ccd-image.png

      Anything stand out in my logic that I've missed?

      A Offline
      A Offline
      Alan_F
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      @gwp1

      I played around with the from/to specific dates and it looks like you have two choices...

      Option 1: break it into two rules connected with an OR... rule 1: "After Nov 1st any year" and rule 2: "before Jan 7th any year". Or

      Option 2: add specific years... "From Nov 1st 2021 to January 7th 2022" works as you want it to.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • G Offline
        G Offline
        gwp1
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Given the fact that it stopped running at exactly 01/01 midnight makes me wonder if there's a difference between MSR and RFV that isn't handling the crossover between years. Random guess - as I noted, this worked flawlessly (mostly because @toggledbits helped me thru the logic in RFV as I was very new to it) and was simply imported into MSR from Vera.

        *Hubitat C-7 2.5.1.142
        *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

        *HAOS
        Core 2026.7.4
        w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
        FW: v1.1
        SDK: v7.23.1

        *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
        MSR: latest-26193-8dd8f854
        MQTTController: 25139
        ZWave Controller: 25139

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by toggledbits
          #4

          It's a bug in MSR. One extra check missing from the implementation on MSR. MSR and RFV necessarily implement the date comparisons very differently (although the valid expectation is that there should be no difference in the result). I thought I had all the edges tested, but I guess I missed a case. I opened PR 0000287 for it. I'll have it fixed later today. Still working on a requested item that I want to get out as well.

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          G 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

            It's a bug in MSR. One extra check missing from the implementation on MSR. MSR and RFV necessarily implement the date comparisons very differently (although the valid expectation is that there should be no difference in the result). I thought I had all the edges tested, but I guess I missed a case. I opened PR 0000287 for it. I'll have it fixed later today. Still working on a requested item that I want to get out as well.

            G Offline
            G Offline
            gwp1
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @toggledbits Thank you for leaving my sanity intact on this first day of the shiny new year lol

            You also forced a test of the "Arm For" logic for non-holiday lighting as there'd been no non-holiday window of time since I'd corrected/updated it. So... #win?

            *Hubitat C-7 2.5.1.142
            *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

            *HAOS
            Core 2026.7.4
            w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
            FW: v1.1
            SDK: v7.23.1

            *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
            MSR: latest-26193-8dd8f854
            MQTTController: 25139
            ZWave Controller: 25139

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

              It's a bug in MSR. One extra check missing from the implementation on MSR. MSR and RFV necessarily implement the date comparisons very differently (although the valid expectation is that there should be no difference in the result). I thought I had all the edges tested, but I guess I missed a case. I opened PR 0000287 for it. I'll have it fixed later today. Still working on a requested item that I want to get out as well.

              G Offline
              G Offline
              gwp1
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @toggledbits Loaded up - see what happens tonight!

              *Hubitat C-7 2.5.1.142
              *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

              *HAOS
              Core 2026.7.4
              w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
              FW: v1.1
              SDK: v7.23.1

              *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
              MSR: latest-26193-8dd8f854
              MQTTController: 25139
              ZWave Controller: 25139

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbits
                wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                #7

                Nothing will change at the rule level, because you have a latched condition that is no longer latched driving an AND group all the way to the top.

                The only way to change it would be to set the "test time" back to the fourth Thursday in November 2021 to get the latched condition latched again, and then remove the test time to resume normal operation. If you want to try that, here's how, but before you do, understand that I don't know what other automations you have and how they are set up, and what effect the test time may have on those other automations. Again, it's home automation, not nuclear launch codes, so I suspect the worst will be some lights coming on when you don't expect, etc.

                1. Find the engine section of your Reactor.yaml file. If you don't have one, add it with the same indent level as baseurl as shown below:

                   baseurl: http://something:8111
                   engine:
                     enabled: true
                  
                2. Indented two spaces from the engine: line (i.e. the same as enabled), add a line test_time: "2021-11-25T08:00:00+hhmm" and where I have put +hhmm put your current timezone offset from GMT. Note also that I've shown 08:00:00 for the time, but you can use any time of day that you think will have the least side-effects with other rules.

                   engine:
                     enabled: true
                     test_time: "2021-11-25T08:00:00+hhmm"
                  
                3. Restart Reactor. The latched condition should go true and the rule should SET. You've basically time-warped the system backwards.

                4. After that's done, remove or comment out (with a '#') the test_time line, and restart Reactor again.

                5. Observe that the rule refreshes and should remain SET, with the latched group true and that last date/time condition (11/1 to 1/7) also still true (green).

                Also remember that I don't know what other rules that you have that may depend on this rule, so if there are date/time or sunrise/sunset rules that work in concert with this rule, they may not trigger unless the test time happens to also meet those rules. Just focus your attention on this one rule.

                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                G 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                  Nothing will change at the rule level, because you have a latched condition that is no longer latched driving an AND group all the way to the top.

                  The only way to change it would be to set the "test time" back to the fourth Thursday in November 2021 to get the latched condition latched again, and then remove the test time to resume normal operation. If you want to try that, here's how, but before you do, understand that I don't know what other automations you have and how they are set up, and what effect the test time may have on those other automations. Again, it's home automation, not nuclear launch codes, so I suspect the worst will be some lights coming on when you don't expect, etc.

                  1. Find the engine section of your Reactor.yaml file. If you don't have one, add it with the same indent level as baseurl as shown below:

                     baseurl: http://something:8111
                     engine:
                       enabled: true
                    
                  2. Indented two spaces from the engine: line (i.e. the same as enabled), add a line test_time: "2021-11-25T08:00:00+hhmm" and where I have put +hhmm put your current timezone offset from GMT. Note also that I've shown 08:00:00 for the time, but you can use any time of day that you think will have the least side-effects with other rules.

                     engine:
                       enabled: true
                       test_time: "2021-11-25T08:00:00+hhmm"
                    
                  3. Restart Reactor. The latched condition should go true and the rule should SET. You've basically time-warped the system backwards.

                  4. After that's done, remove or comment out (with a '#') the test_time line, and restart Reactor again.

                  5. Observe that the rule refreshes and should remain SET, with the latched group true and that last date/time condition (11/1 to 1/7) also still true (green).

                  Also remember that I don't know what other rules that you have that may depend on this rule, so if there are date/time or sunrise/sunset rules that work in concert with this rule, they may not trigger unless the test time happens to also meet those rules. Just focus your attention on this one rule.

                  G Offline
                  G Offline
                  gwp1
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @toggledbits Seems like it has worked...

                  770af663-e77d-467e-bd38-cc511041d779-image.png

                  I also had a yellow warning about the system being in "test_time, not reality". But the true test came when I commented out the test_time line in reactor.yaml and restarted MSR and all the holiday lights came on.

                  The Russian Orthodox will have their Christmas lol

                  Thanks very much for this tool/tip - definitely will keep this around. And thank you for the really prompt fix on the bug, sir. I joke about the lights but it really wouldn't have ended the world if my lights were done for the season.

                  *Hubitat C-7 2.5.1.142
                  *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                  *HAOS
                  Core 2026.7.4
                  w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                  FW: v1.1
                  SDK: v7.23.1

                  *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                  MSR: latest-26193-8dd8f854
                  MQTTController: 25139
                  ZWave Controller: 25139

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbits
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Apologies for interfering with tradition and observance! 🙂 I'm glad the test trick worked out, and indeed, it can be very handy. I'll make a note to add that to the Troubleshooting section of the docs as well.

                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                      Apologies for interfering with tradition and observance! 🙂 I'm glad the test trick worked out, and indeed, it can be very handy. I'll make a note to add that to the Troubleshooting section of the docs as well.

                      G Offline
                      G Offline
                      gwp1
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @toggledbits Just confirmation that this all did do what it was to do: I was still in my office and watched the xmas lights do their thing!

                      *Hubitat C-7 2.5.1.142
                      *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                      *HAOS
                      Core 2026.7.4
                      w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                      FW: v1.1
                      SDK: v7.23.1

                      *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                      MSR: latest-26193-8dd8f854
                      MQTTController: 25139
                      ZWave Controller: 25139

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      Recent Topics

                      • [Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
                        CrilleC
                        Crille
                        0
                        5
                        70

                      • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        5
                        148
                        129.0k

                      • DynamicGroupController and attributes
                        therealdbT
                        therealdb
                        1
                        5
                        88

                      • Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        0
                        5
                        111

                      • Upgrade Issues
                        T
                        tbully
                        0
                        9
                        219

                      • [SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        0
                        10
                        232

                      • [SOLVED] Question regarding "in" vs "contains" vs contents of the string
                        G
                        gwp1
                        0
                        5
                        117

                      • openLuup console disappeared - 500 - Internal Server Error
                        A
                        a-lurker
                        0
                        2
                        169

                      • Logon screen timeout
                        G
                        gwp1
                        0
                        5
                        190

                      • [MSR] Copy&past of actions and/or drag&drop between set/reset
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        0
                        9
                        354

                      • Upgrade advice - upgrade from aarch64 to ARM64 image
                        toggledbitsT
                        toggledbits
                        0
                        4
                        210
                      Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                      Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Unsolved