Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. CallMeBot new interface?
Date/time condition
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Device log?
G
@toggledbits is there a log that will show me what rule is turning on a specific device? I've got a switch that has been kicking on at 2200 ET for several nights now and the reactor.log doesn't have a thing in it that I can see on a device level (it being more rules-based).
Multi-System Reactor
Midnight crossing not working in date/time condition (build 25325)
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Error: Command timeout
G
at _ClientAPI._commandTimeout (http://192.168.1.100:8111/client/ClientAPI.js:807:179 Seeing this randomly when returning to open browser tab after being away awhile. Once, maybe twice a day. "What did you do to trigger it?" Literally nothing, just walked away and returned and there it was. Actions taken in reasonably close proximity to this particular instance of it popping up: I'd restarted the MSR container in Portainer. I'll try to grab some logs here shortly.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
toggledbitsT
This post does not apply to users of Intel/AMD-based systems. If you are using a Reactor image tagged latest-amd64 or stable-amd64, then this post does not apply to you. It also does not apply to bare-metal installs; it's for users of docker images on ARM-based systems only (principally Raspberry Pi hosts, but could be others). After January 15, 2026, I will no longer produce the aarch64-tagged docker image for Reactor. The ARM images will be arm64 for 64-bit operating systems, and armv7l for 32-bit operating systems. For those of you running a container from the aarch64 image today, this will be a relatively simple change: you just need to switch the image used for your docker container to a differently-tagged image. If you are using docker-compose, then this is a relatively simple matter of changing the image line in your docker-compose.yaml file and then stopping (docker-compose down) and restarting (docker-compose up -d) your Reactor daemon. But there's a catch... not all of you can safely just switch from the aarch64 image to the arm64 image. And, you can't just trust the output of uname -m, for example, because this exposes the CPU architecture, but not the word size of the OS running on that CPU. For Raspberry Pi systems, the transition to 64-bit operating systems was long (starting in 2016) and not always obvious — although there was a first "official" 64-bit OS for RPis in 2020, it did not become a default recommendation in the Raspberry Pi Imager until 2021, and then that was only the default for Pi 3/4 systems with >4GB RAM; it was 2022 before it was universally recommended for all 64-bit CPUs regardless of RAM size. Depending on when you first imaged your RPi system and what default you may have been offered/chosen, you could today easily have a 64-bit CPU Raspberry Pi running a 32-bit version of the operating system. Upgrades along the way would not change this; changing it to fully 64-bit requires a full reimage of the system. To establish if your OS is 64- or 32-bit, log in to your Pi and run: sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH. If the response is arm64 or aarch64, then you are running a 64-bit OS and you should use the arm64-tagged image. If it's anything else, you are running a 32-bit OS, and you should use the armv7l-tagged image. pi@rpi4-1:~ $ sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH armhf pi@rpi4-1:~ $ uname -m aarch64 pi@rpi4-1:~ $ In the example above, the uname command reports that the CPU is 64-bit architecture (aarch64), which is true for the host on which I ran these commands, but the DEB_HOST_ARCH value is armhf, indicating a 32-bit operating system. This system has to use the armv7l-tagged image. Other systems will have their own ways of determining the word size of the running OS. Since the majority of Reactor users running ARM systems are on Raspberry Pis, I am able to supply the above instructions, but if you happen to have a different ARM system, you'll need to do some web searching to figure out how to expose that information. Or, you can just try the arm64 image, and if it doesn't start up, try the armv7l image. Remember to always back up your system before making any changes. For everyone, please make this change as soon as possible, and if you have any trouble finding a working image, please (1) go back to the current aarch64 image; and (2) let me know in this thread along with as much detail about your host system as you can offer (including the output of the dpkg-architecture command mentioned above).
Multi-System Reactor
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor

CallMeBot new interface?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
11 Posts 2 Posters 1.9k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • wmarcolinW Offline
    wmarcolinW Offline
    wmarcolin
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi @toggledbits

    Apparently, there have been some changes to the CallMeBot interface, as the service recently stopped working for me. I've tried several configurations, and none of the ones below are working.

      # CallMeBot
      CallMeBot:
        profiles:
          default:
            # description - A friendly description of this profile (for menus)
            description: Default Profile New
            #
            # api_url - Access URL for CallMeBot API being used
            api_url: http://api.callmebot.com/start.php
            #
            # api_key - (if needed) API key (use for Facebook API, WhatsApp API, etc.).
            #           If the API you are using does not require it, leave it
            #           commented out or blank.
            api_key: "177xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxTGk"
            #
            # source - (if needed) Source field for some APIs. If yours does not require
            #          it, leave it commented out or blank.
            #source: "source-value"
            #
            # phone - (if needed) Phone field for some APIs. If yours does not require
            #         it, leave it commented out or blank.
            phone: "+5xxxxxxxx33"
            #
            # user - (if needed) User field for some APIs. If yours does not require
            #        it, leave it commented out or blank.
            #user: "@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"
            #
            # lang - (optional) Language/voice; default "en-US-Standard-C".
            #        See CallMeBot docs for possible values.
            lang: "en-US-Standard-C"
            #
            # rpt - (optional) Number of times to repeat message; default: 1.
            rpt: 2
    

    I have already tested using the phone or the user.

    Looking at the action log, I see that it starts, runs and finishes without any problems.

    [latest-23302]2023-11-05T14:35:54.106Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "teste<SET>" (rule-lolk0nlj:S)
    [latest-23302]2023-11-05T14:35:54.108Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction teste<SET> (rule-lolk0nlj:S)
    [latest-23302]2023-11-05T14:35:54.111Z <Engine:INFO> teste<SET> all actions completed.
    

    When testing directly on the site, I see that it no longer uses API, and I haven't even found where to generate the API KEY.

    http://api.callmebot.com/start.php?source=web&user=+5xxxxxxxx33&text=Teste callmebot pelo numero novo&lang=en-US-Standard-C
    

    Please, can you advise me on what I should do to solve the problem?

    Thanks.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Online
      toggledbitsT Online
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      What's your target messaging client? That's important, since CallMeBot can contact several and the API URL and parameters are different for each.

      The CallMeBot web site has instructions for each client. That will tell you the correct URL and parameters to use.

      I only use Telegram, and I just tested both Text and Voice with Telegram and it works fine.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

        What's your target messaging client? That's important, since CallMeBot can contact several and the API URL and parameters are different for each.

        The CallMeBot web site has instructions for each client. That will tell you the correct URL and parameters to use.

        I only use Telegram, and I just tested both Text and Voice with Telegram and it works fine.

        wmarcolinW Offline
        wmarcolinW Offline
        wmarcolin
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @toggledbits hi!

        I used CallMeBot normally until I changed my phone number, and then I looked up where to generate the new API KEY, and I couldn't find it. So I chose to use the phone number only, and it didn't work. If I execute the command via HTTP on the MSR, it works perfectly. Strange as I said, there is no error message in the logs.

        Now you mention voice in Telegram, I didn't know about that. Do you have any recommended material or examples of how to use it?

        Thank you.

        toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • wmarcolinW wmarcolin

          @toggledbits hi!

          I used CallMeBot normally until I changed my phone number, and then I looked up where to generate the new API KEY, and I couldn't find it. So I chose to use the phone number only, and it didn't work. If I execute the command via HTTP on the MSR, it works perfectly. Strange as I said, there is no error message in the logs.

          Now you mention voice in Telegram, I didn't know about that. Do you have any recommended material or examples of how to use it?

          Thank you.

          toggledbitsT Online
          toggledbitsT Online
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by toggledbits
          #4

          @wmarcolin Here's my profile for using Telegram Voice API with the CallMeBot notifier in Reactor:

            CallMeBot:
              profiles:
                default:
                  # default profile details redacted, not important here
                telegram_voice:
                  api_url: http://api.callmebot.com/start.php
                  user: "@username"
          

          Here's my action:

          4db4afa4-5309-4b7b-a1e2-ae38be49752e-image.png

          If you read their documentation (recommended), it says you need to authorize your user to receive messages that way (same is true of text, and I imagine, most other modes now, which may be your real problem). There's a link in the instructions to grant that authorization.

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

            @wmarcolin Here's my profile for using Telegram Voice API with the CallMeBot notifier in Reactor:

              CallMeBot:
                profiles:
                  default:
                    # default profile details redacted, not important here
                  telegram_voice:
                    api_url: http://api.callmebot.com/start.php
                    user: "@username"
            

            Here's my action:

            4db4afa4-5309-4b7b-a1e2-ae38be49752e-image.png

            If you read their documentation (recommended), it says you need to authorize your user to receive messages that way (same is true of text, and I imagine, most other modes now, which may be your real problem). There's a link in the instructions to grant that authorization.

            wmarcolinW Offline
            wmarcolinW Offline
            wmarcolin
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @toggledbits

            I still can't understand what's going on, in theory I'm following everything that the manual says, but for some reason when I change the phone number, @username no longer works, test calling http directly or even the CallMeBot test site doesn't work.

            However, if I use the phone number, test it by calling the CallMeBot test site, or use this routine in MSR, it works perfectly.

            b0b5b925-a38f-4889-bffb-84f74890886f-image.png

            Direct nagigator:

            http://api.callmebot.com/start.php?source=web&user=+507XXXXXXXX&text=teste pela api&lang=en-US-Standard-B
            

            The MSR configuration is the one you mentioned, which I have below, but instead of user I have phone

              # CallMeBot
              CallMeBot:
                profiles:
                  default:
                    # description - A friendly description of this profile (for menus)
                    description: Default Profile
                    #
                    # api_url - Access URL for CallMeBot API being used
                    api_url: http://api.callmebot.com/start.php
                    #
                    # phone - (if needed) Phone field for some APIs. If yours does not require
                    #         it, leave it commented out or blank.
                    phone: "+507XXXXXXXX"
            

            And in this situation it doesn't work.

            As I mentioned by user, there's something blocking it from working, no matter if it's through the CallMeBot website, direct http or MSR. In the case of using a phone number, it works via the CallMeBot website, it works via http calling directly in the browser or via the routine I put in the MSR. However, using MSR Notification with the above configuration doesn't work.

            Could @toggledbits check if the call is in this structure?

            http://api.callmebot.com/start.php?source=web&user=<+phone>&text=<text>&lang=en-US-Standard-B
            

            Another rare occurrence is that no logs are being generated in reactor.log.

            Thanks.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT Online
              toggledbitsT Online
              toggledbits
              wrote on last edited by toggledbits
              #6

              Add this to your logging.yaml file and restart Reactor. Then test and see what URL is being generated/queried.

              logging: # don't include this line, it's just for indenting reference
                NotifyCallMeBot:
                  level: 5
              

              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

              wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • wmarcolinW Offline
                wmarcolinW Offline
                wmarcolin
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Hi @toggledbits

                First, thank you for your guidance, and see below for the log I've obtained.

                [latest-23302]2023-11-15T14:27:47.501Z <NotifyCallMeBot:5:NotifyCallMeBot.js:108> [NotifyCallMeBot]NotifyCallMeBot requesting http://api.callmebot.com/start.php?text=novo%20teste%20para%20numero%20do%20telefone&phone=%2B507xxxxxx33&lang=en-US-Standard-C
                [latest-23302]2023-11-15T14:27:48.125Z <NotifyCallMeBot:5:NotifyCallMeBot.js:117> [NotifyCallMeBot]NotifyCallMeBot success 200 OK
                

                If I compare the calls made in MSR with the ones I make directly, there are small differences. The point is that the MSR one isn't working and the direct one is.

                MSR NOTIFY CALLMEBOT

                http://api.callmebot.com/start.php?text=NEW%20TEST%20NOTIFY&phone=%2B507xxxxxx33&lang=en-US-Standard-C
                

                DIRECT SITE

                http://api.callmebot.com/start.php?source=web&user=+507xxxxxx33&text=NEW%20TEST%20NOTIFY&lang=en-US-Standard-C
                
                

                What I'm checking is that if I configure the phone in this way:

                    phone: +507xxxxxx33
                

                the call appears like this - no + in front the number

                   &phone=507xxxxxx33&
                

                if I configure it like this

                    phone: "+507xxxxxx33"
                

                the call looks like this - between hasps - I have the %2B

                   &phone=%2B507xxxxxx33&
                

                When I use the direct browser call

                http://api.callmebot.com/start.php?text=NEW%20TEST%20NOTIFY%205&source=web&phone=%2B507xxxxxx33&lang=en-US-Standard-C&rpt=2
                

                Back

                943b60a8-0eef-4f83-97fa-9fb1c094c234-image.png

                Than I change phone to user and add +, work:

                http://api.callmebot.com/start.php?text=NEW%20TEST%20NOTIFY%205&source=web&user=+507xxxxxx33&lang=en-US-Standard-C&rpt=2
                

                What I don't understand is that in all the tests, the log always comes back successful.

                [latest-23302]2023-11-15T14:57:42.938Z <NotifyCallMeBot:5:NotifyCallMeBot.js:117> [NotifyCallMeBot]NotifyCallMeBot success 200 OK
                

                At the end of the day, if I try to use my @wilxxxxxin username, the call is linked to my old phone, even though I've already changed it on Telegram. In this case, I've already sent a mail to CallMeBot support with no reply for over a week.

                Using the phone, which is authorized, the direct call works in the browser or using HTTP in MSR, if I use the Notify feature it doesn't work.

                And what bothers me the most is that I understand that anyone who places a call in a browser with my phone number will be made, because there is no API KEY to limit use.

                Well, if you have any more ideas to help me, I'd appreciate it.

                toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • wmarcolinW wmarcolin

                  Hi @toggledbits

                  First, thank you for your guidance, and see below for the log I've obtained.

                  [latest-23302]2023-11-15T14:27:47.501Z <NotifyCallMeBot:5:NotifyCallMeBot.js:108> [NotifyCallMeBot]NotifyCallMeBot requesting http://api.callmebot.com/start.php?text=novo%20teste%20para%20numero%20do%20telefone&phone=%2B507xxxxxx33&lang=en-US-Standard-C
                  [latest-23302]2023-11-15T14:27:48.125Z <NotifyCallMeBot:5:NotifyCallMeBot.js:117> [NotifyCallMeBot]NotifyCallMeBot success 200 OK
                  

                  If I compare the calls made in MSR with the ones I make directly, there are small differences. The point is that the MSR one isn't working and the direct one is.

                  MSR NOTIFY CALLMEBOT

                  http://api.callmebot.com/start.php?text=NEW%20TEST%20NOTIFY&phone=%2B507xxxxxx33&lang=en-US-Standard-C
                  

                  DIRECT SITE

                  http://api.callmebot.com/start.php?source=web&user=+507xxxxxx33&text=NEW%20TEST%20NOTIFY&lang=en-US-Standard-C
                  
                  

                  What I'm checking is that if I configure the phone in this way:

                      phone: +507xxxxxx33
                  

                  the call appears like this - no + in front the number

                     &phone=507xxxxxx33&
                  

                  if I configure it like this

                      phone: "+507xxxxxx33"
                  

                  the call looks like this - between hasps - I have the %2B

                     &phone=%2B507xxxxxx33&
                  

                  When I use the direct browser call

                  http://api.callmebot.com/start.php?text=NEW%20TEST%20NOTIFY%205&source=web&phone=%2B507xxxxxx33&lang=en-US-Standard-C&rpt=2
                  

                  Back

                  943b60a8-0eef-4f83-97fa-9fb1c094c234-image.png

                  Than I change phone to user and add +, work:

                  http://api.callmebot.com/start.php?text=NEW%20TEST%20NOTIFY%205&source=web&user=+507xxxxxx33&lang=en-US-Standard-C&rpt=2
                  

                  What I don't understand is that in all the tests, the log always comes back successful.

                  [latest-23302]2023-11-15T14:57:42.938Z <NotifyCallMeBot:5:NotifyCallMeBot.js:117> [NotifyCallMeBot]NotifyCallMeBot success 200 OK
                  

                  At the end of the day, if I try to use my @wilxxxxxin username, the call is linked to my old phone, even though I've already changed it on Telegram. In this case, I've already sent a mail to CallMeBot support with no reply for over a week.

                  Using the phone, which is authorized, the direct call works in the browser or using HTTP in MSR, if I use the Notify feature it doesn't work.

                  And what bothers me the most is that I understand that anyone who places a call in a browser with my phone number will be made, because there is no API KEY to limit use.

                  Well, if you have any more ideas to help me, I'd appreciate it.

                  toggledbitsT Online
                  toggledbitsT Online
                  toggledbits
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @wmarcolin said in CallMeBot new interface?:

                  MSR NOTIFY CALLMEBOT

                  http://api.callmebot.com/start.php?text=NEW TEST NOTIFY&phone=%2B507xxxxxx33&lang=en-

                  This is showing that you haven't configured the user field, which it seems you must do or the call will not work. Your direct site version of the URL shows a user field and is working. The error message you get back is telling you as much, and yet you seem focused on the phone field.

                  The difference in the phone field between the first two calls is probably not relevant, as the + must be URL-encoded when making the request to the server, and + encodes as %2B. Reactor is showing the final encoded URL, and the web interface is likely not. If the plus is left un-encoded, it actually reads as a space character to the server (URL encoding translates spaces to either + or %20); I'm sure it's not meant to be a space, but a literal plus, and as such, it must be %2B when finally sent to the server.

                  What I don't understand is that in all the tests, the log always comes back successful.

                  "Successful" means that the server was connected and the request made, and the server did not respond with an error. While the content of the response may or may not indicate an error, what matters is the server's response code. Their server hands back a 200 (OK status) but the content of the response body is an error message, and that's a defect of their server (which I'm not going to address). They should return a 400-series error if the parameters of the request are incorrect, but they don't.

                  And what bothers me the most is that I understand that anyone who places a call in a browser with my phone number will be made, because there is no API KEY to limit use.

                  This is another big defect in the changes they've made recently, and a good reason not to use this interface. It's alarming, in fact. Honestly, I'm not spending a lot more time on it, because it doesn't seem to be in wide use, you've found a structure that works, and there's a workaround available (making the call using an HTTP Request action).

                  Really, with their recent changes, the NotifyCallMeBot interface is little more than a pass-through HTTP request that is actually made more difficult by the interface trying to "simplify" handling of the parameters as configuration, especially in their evolving API. I may deprecate this interface, for all these reasons.

                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • wmarcolinW Offline
                    wmarcolinW Offline
                    wmarcolin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Thank you very much for your explanation. I've tried several ways to configure the phone number or user, without success, but as you say, I think this tool should really be abandoned.

                    I understand that it's good, because we often don't pay attention to messages, and a phone call is much more useful.

                    But this change to making calls without an API KEY is really bad, and your decision is totally reasonable.

                    Thanks.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                      Add this to your logging.yaml file and restart Reactor. Then test and see what URL is being generated/queried.

                      logging: # don't include this line, it's just for indenting reference
                        NotifyCallMeBot:
                          level: 5
                      
                      wmarcolinW Offline
                      wmarcolinW Offline
                      wmarcolin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Hi @toggledbits

                      Sorry for using this post, but by giving this instruction, you helped me a lot to find the error.

                      Is there a way to configure logging.yaml to generate specific files for event types? For example, a file to store only logs that are ERR, another file to have Rule:INFO, or Rule:NOTICE?

                      I don't want to do without the general file, but if I could create some especially to only show ERR, it could make it easier to maintain the system on a recurring basis.

                      Any recommendations?

                      Thanks.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toggledbitsT Online
                        toggledbitsT Online
                        toggledbits
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Yeah, would have preferred a new thread for this question.

                        See the Troubleshooting section of the manual.

                        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        Recent Topics

                        • Home Assistant Connect ZWA-2 & ZBT-2
                          G
                          gwp1
                          1
                          2
                          21

                        • Date/time condition
                          tunnusT
                          tunnus
                          0
                          3
                          51

                        • Is there a way to turn this section (image in post) off?
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          1
                          51

                        • Device log?
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          2
                          86

                        • Midnight crossing not working in date/time condition (build 25325)
                          tunnusT
                          tunnus
                          0
                          3
                          92

                        • Error: Command timeout
                          G
                          gwp1
                          0
                          6
                          204

                        • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          5
                          131
                          75.5k

                        • [Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
                          CrilleC
                          Crille
                          0
                          5
                          295

                        • Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
                          G
                          gwp1
                          0
                          6
                          304

                        • Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          1
                          1
                          107

                        • Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
                          M
                          mgvra
                          1
                          3
                          217
                        Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                        Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Unsolved