Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Need Testers
Set reaction triggering wrong z-wave device
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Can you run MSR on Home Assistant OS ?
cw-kidC
Looking at using Home Assistant for the first time, either on a Home Assistant Green, their own hardware or buying a cheap second hand mini PC. Sounds like Home Assistant OS is linux based using Docker for HA etc. Would I also be able to install things like MSR as well on their OS ? On the same box? Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
cw-kidC
Hello I haven't updated my installation of MSR in a very long time. Its a bare metal Linux install currently on version 24366-3de60836 I see the latest version is now latest-26011-c621bbc7 I assume I cannot just jump from a very old version to the latest version? Or can I? Thanks
Multi-System Reactor
This trigger no longer working - complaining about the operator needing changing
cw-kidC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Self test
CatmanV2C
Having been messing around with some stuff I worked a way to self trigger some tests that I wanted to do on the HA <> MSR integration This got me wondering if there's an entity that changes state / is exposed when a configured controller goes off line? I can't see one but thought it might be hidden or something? Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
tunnusT
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration: users: # This section defines your valid users. admin: ******* groups: # This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application # and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to # more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here. admin_group: users: - admin applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications guests: users: "*" applications: - dashboard api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin_group allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: true session: timeout: 7200 # (seconds) rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true # If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged. log_acls: true # If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged. debug_acls: true My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
Multi-System Reactor
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request 2?
CatmanV2C
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks. Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option? No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor

Need Testers

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
78 Posts 8 Posters 25.4k Views 8 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • toggledbitsT Offline
    toggledbitsT Offline
    toggledbits
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I need a handful of victims volunteers to help test previews of the next build of Reactor. A long-standing request was for "a simple login mechanism," but in practice, adding user authentication and competent access control turned out to be a pretty big project with a lot of big changes on both server and client sides. It's a bit more than I'm comfortable testing myself and springing out to everyone at once, so I'd like to work with a small group to put it through "sea trials."

    Major changes/features include:

    • User authentication with hashed password storage;
    • User group configuration with application restriction (admin, dashboard, API);
    • Detailed control over API access, with user- and token-based authentication/authorization;
    • Improvements to the HTTPS service;
    • Improvements to UI coordination with the core for Rules and Reactions.

    If this sounds like something you'd like to help with, drop me a reply here in this thread or privately.

    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

    G MikeReadingtonM therealdbT N 4 Replies Last reply
    1
    • PablaP Offline
      PablaP Offline
      Pabla
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      PM'd you but I am in! 🙂

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

        I need a handful of victims volunteers to help test previews of the next build of Reactor. A long-standing request was for "a simple login mechanism," but in practice, adding user authentication and competent access control turned out to be a pretty big project with a lot of big changes on both server and client sides. It's a bit more than I'm comfortable testing myself and springing out to everyone at once, so I'd like to work with a small group to put it through "sea trials."

        Major changes/features include:

        • User authentication with hashed password storage;
        • User group configuration with application restriction (admin, dashboard, API);
        • Detailed control over API access, with user- and token-based authentication/authorization;
        • Improvements to the HTTPS service;
        • Improvements to UI coordination with the core for Rules and Reactions.

        If this sounds like something you'd like to help with, drop me a reply here in this thread or privately.

        G Offline
        G Offline
        gwp1
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @toggledbits ✋

        *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
        *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

        *HAOS
        Core 2026.1.1
        w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
        FW: v1.1
        SDK: v7.23.1

        *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
        MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
        MQTTController: 25139
        ZWave Controller: 25139

        1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

          I need a handful of victims volunteers to help test previews of the next build of Reactor. A long-standing request was for "a simple login mechanism," but in practice, adding user authentication and competent access control turned out to be a pretty big project with a lot of big changes on both server and client sides. It's a bit more than I'm comfortable testing myself and springing out to everyone at once, so I'd like to work with a small group to put it through "sea trials."

          Major changes/features include:

          • User authentication with hashed password storage;
          • User group configuration with application restriction (admin, dashboard, API);
          • Detailed control over API access, with user- and token-based authentication/authorization;
          • Improvements to the HTTPS service;
          • Improvements to UI coordination with the core for Rules and Reactions.

          If this sounds like something you'd like to help with, drop me a reply here in this thread or privately.

          MikeReadingtonM Offline
          MikeReadingtonM Offline
          MikeReadington
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @toggledbits

          Willing to help however I can.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

            I need a handful of victims volunteers to help test previews of the next build of Reactor. A long-standing request was for "a simple login mechanism," but in practice, adding user authentication and competent access control turned out to be a pretty big project with a lot of big changes on both server and client sides. It's a bit more than I'm comfortable testing myself and springing out to everyone at once, so I'd like to work with a small group to put it through "sea trials."

            Major changes/features include:

            • User authentication with hashed password storage;
            • User group configuration with application restriction (admin, dashboard, API);
            • Detailed control over API access, with user- and token-based authentication/authorization;
            • Improvements to the HTTPS service;
            • Improvements to UI coordination with the core for Rules and Reactions.

            If this sounds like something you'd like to help with, drop me a reply here in this thread or privately.

            therealdbT Offline
            therealdbT Offline
            therealdb
            wrote on last edited by therealdb
            #5

            @toggledbits busy weeks, but count me in.

            --
            On a mission to automate everything.

            My MS Reactor contrib
            My Luup Plug-ins

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

              I need a handful of victims volunteers to help test previews of the next build of Reactor. A long-standing request was for "a simple login mechanism," but in practice, adding user authentication and competent access control turned out to be a pretty big project with a lot of big changes on both server and client sides. It's a bit more than I'm comfortable testing myself and springing out to everyone at once, so I'd like to work with a small group to put it through "sea trials."

              Major changes/features include:

              • User authentication with hashed password storage;
              • User group configuration with application restriction (admin, dashboard, API);
              • Detailed control over API access, with user- and token-based authentication/authorization;
              • Improvements to the HTTPS service;
              • Improvements to UI coordination with the core for Rules and Reactions.

              If this sounds like something you'd like to help with, drop me a reply here in this thread or privately.

              N Offline
              N Offline
              noelab
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @toggledbits happy to help!

              I'm running Reactor>Docker>Synology NAS

              -Reactor (Multi-hub) 25082-3c348de6
              -Docker on Synology NAS
              -Ezlo firmware version 2.0.59.2471.8
              -HASS Docker 2025.2.5
              -ZWaveJSUI 10.1.3
              -Update 30/03/2025

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • T Offline
                T Offline
                tamorgen
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Would like to help. PM you as well

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • tunnusT Offline
                  tunnusT Offline
                  tunnus
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @toggledbits I'm in

                  Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT & ZWA-2

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbits
                    wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                    #9

                    OK. A build with user authentication is now up on the download server (and dockerhub for docker users). The branch for this test is called userauth (as opposed to latest).

                    Bare-metal users will have the easiest time installing, because you just need to download the userauth package instead of the latest package, and then install/update as usual.

                    Docker users will likely find it harder to make this switch. If you are using docker-compose, you can just change the image name in your config file from latest to userauth; then update (docker-compose pull) and start. But for NAS users and those not using docker-compose, you will need to rebuild your container. You can keep your configs and storage data; just make sure your new container points to the same directory where all that's stored (everything in the container configuration should be the same). See the installation instructions for reference, and look at/capture the settings of your current container before you launch into rebuilding it with the new image.

                    To configure access control, see the documentation.

                    If you run into any showstoppers, just rename your users.yaml file to something else (e.g. Xusers.yaml or users.yaml-disabled and restart Reactor, and that will disable access control. Otherwise, this release is identical to 24115, and you can switch between the two without problems.

                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                      OK. A build with user authentication is now up on the download server (and dockerhub for docker users). The branch for this test is called userauth (as opposed to latest).

                      Bare-metal users will have the easiest time installing, because you just need to download the userauth package instead of the latest package, and then install/update as usual.

                      Docker users will likely find it harder to make this switch. If you are using docker-compose, you can just change the image name in your config file from latest to userauth; then update (docker-compose pull) and start. But for NAS users and those not using docker-compose, you will need to rebuild your container. You can keep your configs and storage data; just make sure your new container points to the same directory where all that's stored (everything in the container configuration should be the same). See the installation instructions for reference, and look at/capture the settings of your current container before you launch into rebuilding it with the new image.

                      To configure access control, see the documentation.

                      If you run into any showstoppers, just rename your users.yaml file to something else (e.g. Xusers.yaml or users.yaml-disabled and restart Reactor, and that will disable access control. Otherwise, this release is identical to 24115, and you can switch between the two without problems.

                      G Offline
                      G Offline
                      gwp1
                      wrote on last edited by gwp1
                      #10

                      @toggledbits am getting Not Found at http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:8111/reactor/en-US/login.html

                      Steps taken:

                      • Installed 24115
                      • Received alert to later build and realized I sorted in the wrong direction at \download - resorted, installed 24117
                      • Copied user.yaml-dist to \config
                      • Cleared browser cache
                      • Restarted Reactor - nada change other than version to userauth-24117-9f164e8f
                      • Renamed user.yaml-dist to user.yaml in \config
                      • Cleared browser cache
                      • Restarted Reactor
                      • Not Found at http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:8111/reactor/en-US/login.html
                      • Confirmed version running is userauth-24117-9f164e8f

                      I know it's something simple I missed - others would have caught this sooner if it were on MSRs side.

                      EDIT: Ok, a weird thing: my API calls via Reactions out to two different wx systems returned null until I rolled back to latest-24115-55b591da

                      *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                      *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                      *HAOS
                      Core 2026.1.1
                      w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                      FW: v1.1
                      SDK: v7.23.1

                      *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                      MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                      MQTTController: 25139
                      ZWave Controller: 25139

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toggledbitsT Offline
                        toggledbitsT Offline
                        toggledbits
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Did you turn on HTTPS? What's your baseurl and use_tls settings look like?

                        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                        G 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • T Offline
                          T Offline
                          tamorgen
                          wrote on last edited by tamorgen
                          #12

                          @toggledbits, I'm having a similar issue as @gwp1 but mine is one step more complicated. I am using cloudflare add on on Home Assistant (on a separate server) for access to my server remotely, which serves the SSL connection, so even if the page is http, it'll serve it up as https. What would I need to do in order to make this work in my situation?

                          Edit: For clarification on my question I did create a reactor.crt and reactor.key file, switched the base url and added the lines to the reactor.yaml file. I am also getting the Not Found error, running 24117. The more complicated step will involve Cloudflare, but it may just be as simple as getting the local setup done first.

                          Edit 2: Okay, Cloudflare isn't an issue. I read what was said about renaming the users.yaml file to something else, and once I did that, the Not Found error went way. I just can't get the login page to serve up. My https connection is working fine.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • T Offline
                            T Offline
                            tamorgen
                            wrote on last edited by tamorgen
                            #13

                            Looking in the logs, looks like the login.html page is missing from the path.

                            [tmorgenthaler@galactica logs]$ cat reactor.log | grep login
                            [userauth-24117]2024-04-28T01:26:47.692Z <httpapi:ERR> [HTTPAPI]#1 request for /reactor/en-US/login.html failed: [Error] ENOENT: no such file or directory, open '/home/tmorgenthaler/reactor/reactorui/login.html' [-]
                            [userauth-24117]2024-04-28T01:26:50.733Z <httpapi:ERR> [HTTPAPI]#1 request for /reactor/en-US/login.html failed: [Error] ENOENT: no such file or directory, open '/home/tmorgenthaler/reactor/reactorui/login.html' [-]
                            
                            [tmorgenthaler@galactica reactorui]$ pwd
                            /home/tmorgenthaler/reactor/reactorui
                            [tmorgenthaler@galactica reactorui]$ ls -al
                            total 32
                            drwxr-xr-x  4 tmorgenthaler tmorgenthaler  4096 Apr 26 11:28 .
                            drwxr-xr-x 16 tmorgenthaler tmorgenthaler  4096 Apr 26 11:29 ..
                            drwxr-xr-x  2 tmorgenthaler tmorgenthaler  4096 Apr 24 17:42 img
                            -rw-r--r--  1 tmorgenthaler tmorgenthaler 12290 Dec  8  2022 index.html
                            drwxr-xr-x  4 tmorgenthaler tmorgenthaler  4096 Apr 26 11:28 lib
                            
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • T Offline
                              T Offline
                              tamorgen
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              I looked in the tar.gz file on my desktop, and I'm not seeing the login.html in the reactorui directory. That seems the to be the source of the issue.

                              image.png

                              toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • T Offline
                                T Offline
                                tamorgen
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                @toggledbits,
                                So something is also going on with running reactions with the autoversion. They are hanging and not running. Immediately after restarting, the reactions run, however, within a few minutes, those reactions are hanging.

                                Screenshot 2024-04-28 at 5.42.09 AM.png

                                I even tried manually going into one of the rules (a simple rule for turning on a light) and ran the reaction, and it's not working.

                                I reverted back to the "lastest" release, and the automations are working again.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • T tamorgen

                                  I looked in the tar.gz file on my desktop, and I'm not seeing the login.html in the reactorui directory. That seems the to be the source of the issue.

                                  image.png

                                  toggledbitsT Offline
                                  toggledbitsT Offline
                                  toggledbits
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  @tamorgen said in Need Testers:

                                  I'm not seeing the login.html in the reactorui directory

                                  Oy. OK. Fresh build is now up.

                                  @tamorgen said in Need Testers:

                                  those reactions are hanging.

                                  I'm running this in my house, not seeing any issues. The engine is the same for 24115 and userauth; they are completely in sync except for the required elements to support user authentication, which has nothing to do with reaction. Still, anything is possible, but I wouldn't be able to discern much without the usual rules still applying: when things aren't going as expected, look at the logs... follow the posting guidelines...

                                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                  T 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                    @tamorgen said in Need Testers:

                                    I'm not seeing the login.html in the reactorui directory

                                    Oy. OK. Fresh build is now up.

                                    @tamorgen said in Need Testers:

                                    those reactions are hanging.

                                    I'm running this in my house, not seeing any issues. The engine is the same for 24115 and userauth; they are completely in sync except for the required elements to support user authentication, which has nothing to do with reaction. Still, anything is possible, but I wouldn't be able to discern much without the usual rules still applying: when things aren't going as expected, look at the logs... follow the posting guidelines...

                                    T Offline
                                    T Offline
                                    tamorgen
                                    wrote on last edited by tamorgen
                                    #17

                                    @toggledbits,
                                    Thanks for the updated version. I'll test it this evening after work.

                                    I was only able to provide limited diagnostic information this morning before I headed to work. Reverting to 24115 latest version fixed the immediate issue of reactions not functioning, so everything would function normally while I was gone for the day.

                                    If the reactions continue to hang with the revised version, I'll provide more detailed information and logs this evening.

                                    T 1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • toggledbitsT Offline
                                      toggledbitsT Offline
                                      toggledbits
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      @therealdb the fixed build I just put up (to include the missing HTML file) also includes a potential fix for VirtualEntityController to preserve attributes across upgrades. Let's see how it works out.

                                      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                      therealdbT 1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                        Did you turn on HTTPS? What's your baseurl and use_tls settings look like?

                                        G Offline
                                        G Offline
                                        gwp1
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        @toggledbits I have not done that yet. One step at a time 🙂 The Not found issue has been resolved with your latest build and Access Control is WAE. The Reactions issue I noted has also not reappeared.

                                        I have noticed that the TOOLS>Restart Reactor button does not work and I see nothing in the logs whatsoever even after "elevator button-ing" it (press press press press press press press).

                                        *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                                        *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                                        *HAOS
                                        Core 2026.1.1
                                        w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                                        FW: v1.1
                                        SDK: v7.23.1

                                        *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                                        MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                                        MQTTController: 25139
                                        ZWave Controller: 25139

                                        toggledbitsT G 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • G gwp1

                                          @toggledbits I have not done that yet. One step at a time 🙂 The Not found issue has been resolved with your latest build and Access Control is WAE. The Reactions issue I noted has also not reappeared.

                                          I have noticed that the TOOLS>Restart Reactor button does not work and I see nothing in the logs whatsoever even after "elevator button-ing" it (press press press press press press press).

                                          toggledbitsT Offline
                                          toggledbitsT Offline
                                          toggledbits
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          @gwp1 said in Need Testers:

                                          I have noticed that the TOOLS>Restart Reactor button does not work

                                          Make sure you've done a hard refresh on the browser to ensure that it has loaded all the latest files for the UI.

                                          Failing that, hit F12 (usually) in your browser to open a Developer window, and then hit the Restart button and see if anything gets logged on the browser side.

                                          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                          G 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Recent Topics

                                          • Set reaction triggering wrong z-wave device
                                            T
                                            tamorgen
                                            0
                                            17
                                            80

                                          • Can you run MSR on Home Assistant OS ?
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            12
                                            135

                                          • RPi Alternative: Orange Pi 4 LTS (3GB RAM/16GB eMMC)
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            2
                                            1.7k

                                          • RPi Alternative: Orange Pi Zero 2 (1GB)
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            2
                                            3
                                            3.5k

                                          • RPi Alternative: Libre Computer AML-S905X-CC "Le Potato" (2GB RAM)
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            5
                                            6
                                            3.1k

                                          • HA and AI
                                            therealdbT
                                            therealdb
                                            0
                                            4
                                            143

                                          • How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            26
                                            419

                                          • This trigger no longer working - complaining about the operator needing changing
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            18
                                            166

                                          • Self test
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            3
                                            114

                                          • Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            2
                                            127

                                          • VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
                                            S
                                            SweetGenius
                                            1
                                            1
                                            92

                                          • Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            3
                                            1
                                            84
                                          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                          Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Unsolved