Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. [Reactor] [Dev] Clarifications/Docs for refreshCapabilities and Entity action implementations return types
MSR with reverse proxy
tunnusT
I'm trying to use MSR via reserve proxy in Synology DSM, but MSR page does not load https://<public ip>:30000/reactor/en-US/ At the same time logging page loads normally https://<public ip>:30000/api/v1/log I thought maybe authentication was messing it up, but there was no deny entries in the log, and also disabling authentication did not make any difference. For this use case VPN is not an option (that works, but as said not an option for this particular use case). Any ideas what could cause this? MSR build latest-26242-28d69aa8, Chrome browser
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Native fan capabilty
therealdbT
Nothing more to add. I see we have hvac_blower, but, anyway, maybe a native fan on the same assumptions of the fan from HASS could be reasonable. I have a couple of them. ie, this is from ESPHome via HASS. x_hass.domain="fan" x_hass.entity_id="fan.kitchen_seashell_hood_ventilation_fan" x_hass.floor_id=null x_hass.services=["fan","esphome"] x_hass.source="esphome" x_hass.state="off" x_hass_attr.friendly_name="Seashell Hood Ventilation Fan" x_hass_attr.percentage=50 x_hass_attr.percentage_step=25 x_hass_attr.preset_mode="" x_hass_attr.preset_modes=[] x_hass_attr.supported_features=49 Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Rule do not fire
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Rule condition shows TRUE in UI but Rule never transitions to SET — survives full restart
N
Build: latest-26221-b25bb3e3, Docker on Synology. Hi, I have a Rule whose Trigger/Constraints reference other Rules via Rule State ... is TRUE. At some point it stops firing. Expanding the rule's condition tree in the UI shows every Trigger and Constraint condition green/TRUE — confirmed live by walking into the room and watching Motion go true in real time. Rule History shows no new SET, just old reset entries. Tried, on the same rule, same evening: recreating the trigger conditions with fresh IDs, recreating the constraint conditions with fresh IDs (flat and wrapped in a new Group — wrapping in a Group produced one SET, but it didn't reproduce on repeat attempts with the same structure), and finally a full container restart with a verified-correct saved rule. Still no SET, even with a fresh live motion event right after the restart. Separately, I found that this rule (and its 10 per-room clones) share identical internal condition/group IDs with each other — leftover from a batch clone done months ago, never regenerated. Not sure if that's related, since fixing the IDs didn't reliably fix the symptom either. Has anyone seen a Rule State condition show TRUE in the UI without the Rule ever producing a SET, surviving a clean restart? Thanks in advance
Multi-System Reactor
DynamicGroupController and attributes
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits I'm back to trying to optimize a couple of things based on dynamic group. First of all, I think I found a typo in the doc: primary_attribute: "binary_sensor.state" primary_attribute_value: | d = false; each id in members: d = getEntity(id)?.attributes?.power_switch?.state or d, d I think the correct code snippet is d = false, All that said, my use case for dynamic groups is to group 3 different climate devices, so I could easily command them at the same time. Commands are good, but sometimes I want to check if any of the devices are on, and that's easily done with a similar snippet as the one you have in the docs. But this is limited to the primary attribute, while I want to have any of the attributes in the group to be driven by a similar logic (while all are null in the group). ie, access hvac_control.mode and see if any of the unit is set to cool, or heat. Is that possible, without re-defining an expression in each of my rules? Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Unofficial thread for compatibility
tunnusT
As there are statements about compatibility for home assistant versions in MSR new version announcements (e.g. "HassController: Bless Hass to 2025.7.3"), I thought it would be good idea to track other controllers as well. As an example, I can confirm that build "latest-25208-c53e8513" works with Hubitat Elevation C-8 platform version 2.4.2.134 using Maker API. Updates: (the latest versions first in the list) OK: build "latest-25264-2fbe9217" with Hubitat C-8 platform v. 2.4.3.123
Multi-System Reactor
Ooops - Deleted Reactor Ex Machina II
R
I accidentally deleted Reactor Ex Machina II (REM II) from my Reactor rules. I tried to recover it by deleting the .json and .dval in the Rules subdirectory and then recreating it from Togglebits original posting, but that did not work. Does anyone know how to recover REM ll ?
Multi-System Reactor
Bail out of failed reaction?
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
CrilleC
Edit: Solved in latest-26221. Bare-metal latest-26193 I have this group: "OKforLarm": name: OK för Larm select: - include_controller: vera - include_capability: door_sensor filter_expression: entity.attributes.door_sensor.state It contains the entities I expect but behaves a bit odd. When I open vera>device_10097 the entity attribute door_sensor.state changes to true but it won't show up as member in the group, when I also open vera>device_10095 they both shows as members and when I close vera>device_10095 it disappear from the group but when I close vera>device_10097 it lingers in the group until I restart Reactor.
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade Issues
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Question regarding "in" vs "contains" vs contents of the string
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Logon screen timeout
G
Noticing since 170 that the lock screen doesn't switch to the logon prompt but, rather, stays on the active UI until such time as you go to click something within it. Then it jumps to the login screen. Brave browser Brave 1.92.139 (Official Build) (arm64) Chromium: 150.0.7871.114
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Copy&past of actions and/or drag&drop between set/reset
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits One thing that bothers me while doing work on new systems/new features, is that I cannot copy&paste actions, and I cannot drag&drop between set and resets. #1 is for when I want to copy an action between different rules opened in two separate browser windows, while #2 is when I just need to flip a bunch of actions in the reset, or move some logic back and forth. Both will be appreciated, but I understand the technical challenges. Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade advice - upgrade from aarch64 to ARM64 image
T
I'm currently on version 26011. I understand that the aarch64 image is no longer supported. So, I therefore need to update to the ARM64 image. Can anyone possibly suggest how I update my docker compose.yaml file (see below). Ideally I'd like to keep my existing reactions etc. rather than start from scratch. # Multi-System Reactor template docker-compose.yml (version 22160) # # Change the lines indicated by "DO"... # services: reactor: container_name: reactor environment: # DO change the TZ: line to set your local time zone. # See valid TZ list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tz_database_time_zones TZ: GB # # DO NOT change this path. Your directory location is in "source" below. REACTOR_DATA_PREFIX: /var/reactor # DO change the image below to the one you are using (e.g. armv7l or aarch64 for RPi 4) image: toggledbits/reactor:latest-aarch64 restart: "always" expose: - 8111 ports: - 8111:8111 volumes: # DO change the /home/username/reactor below to the directory you created for # your local data; DO NOT change the /var/reactor part - /home/pi/docker/reactor:/var/reactor - /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro tmpfs: /tmp
Multi-System Reactor
Alexa for MSR, any interest?
MikeReadingtonM
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Telegram notification broke with latest update
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Phantom device, “INFO” appears
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

[Reactor] [Dev] Clarifications/Docs for refreshCapabilities and Entity action implementations return types

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
5 Posts 2 Posters 1.4k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • therealdbT Offline
    therealdbT Offline
    therealdb
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi @toggledbits

    I'd like to update my controllers with these new features, but I'm struggling to find any guidance in the docs - and in general to understand the context.

    Could you please elaborate more? Thanks.

    --
    On a mission to automate everything.

    My MS Reactor contrib
    My Luup Plug-ins

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by toggledbits
      #2

      refreshCapabilities()/refreshCapability)

      These methods may be called when you detect a change in the Reactor configuration or mapping implementations. It is up to your Controller class to determine how to do that. When a change is detected (more on that at the end of this post), calling refreshCapabilities() will re-apply the capabilities already extended to the target Entity and sync the attribute dictionary. Entities maintain local copies of capability definitions because an entity can tweak a capability to reflect it's actual abilities/data.

      Let's say for example that I add an attribute called ramp_rate to the system dimming capability. None of the entities that have this capability already assigned would automatically inherit ramp_rate when you upgrade Reactor. To get it, you'd have to use one of the refresh...() methods.

      Action Responses

      Returning a response from an action implementation is as straightforward as resolve()-ing the Promise that an action implementation is required to return with an argument containing the data for the response. If you are defining the action for a capability of yours, you add response: true to the action definition for the capability, so that the UI presents the field to allow the user to specify where the response should be stored.


      Detecting Changes -- When to Call refresh...()

      Many of the built-in Controller classes use extensive implementation maps to convert data from the related hub/source into attributes, and to provide implementations for actions. These Controllers have large and complex xxx_capabilities and xxx_devices files containing this data. When the Controller class is loaded, these data files are read, and later the individual Controller instances then use the loaded data.

      From time to time, device support will change for one of these Controllers, so the map files change to reflect that. This is usually accompanied by a change in the version and revision values in the file headers. Reactor's system-wide capabilities are defined in a similar way, and have similar version and revision values.

      The built-in Controllers look at these version and revision numbers and compare them to stored data in an entity instance. If they are not identical, the Controller will call refreshCapabilities() on the entity.

      In some cases, like MQTTController, where configuration/implementation of an entity is derived from multiple templates in user configuration rather than system files, handling/requiring a version and revision for each template would add complexity for the user and be really tedious to deal with, so a slightly different approach is used. After all the includes are processed by the referenced templates and a full template has been assembled for the entity, it is hashed using util.hash(). The first time an entity is configured (detected by a hash value not being present on the entity), the hash value is stored on the entity. Thereafter, the new hash derived at Controller startup is compared to the hash stored on the entity, and if they differ, the entity is refreshed and the new hash stored on the entity. In this way, the hash on the entity always reflects the latest configuration/templates, and if they change, that is quickly detected and the changes applied.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • therealdbT Offline
        therealdbT Offline
        therealdb
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Thanks for the response.

        Regarding response: true, I got the point. I'll try to build an OpenAIController based on this and release it in the next couple of days.

        Correct me if I'm wrong, but if I don't have files with local mapping, but I always reload entities and their capabilities, I don't need to use refres*?
        See this for reference:

        reactor-opensprinkler/OpenSprinklerController.js at bad489313199ebcbba2aa7d308dfc4d9bdb078e3 · dbochicchio/reactor-opensprinkler

        reactor-opensprinkler/OpenSprinklerController.js at bad489313199ebcbba2aa7d308dfc4d9bdb078e3 · dbochicchio/reactor-opensprinkler

        OpenSprinkler controller for Reactor - Multi-Hub Automation - dbochicchio/reactor-opensprinkler

        Thanks!

        --
        On a mission to automate everything.

        My MS Reactor contrib
        My Luup Plug-ins

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by toggledbits
          #4

          Because the entities are saved in persistent storage with their states, and the capability definitions are stored (cloned to) the entities when extended, you still need to refresh.

          At line 666 (!) of your mapDevice() function, where you are extending capabilities if given, you can use the extendCapabilities() method to extend an array of capabilities (eliminating your loop there that does pretty much the same thing). You could then add a test to see if there is a change to the version of your Controller class or the system capabilities, for example, and refresh based on that:

                      // capabilities
                      if (capabilities) {
                          this.log.debug(5, "%1 [%2] adding capabilities: %3", this, id, capabilities);
                          e.extendCapabilities( capabilities );
                         
                          // Check controller and system capabilities versions for changes
                          const vinfo = { ...Capabilities.getSysInfo(), controller: VERSION };
                          const hash = util.hash( JSON.stringify(vinfo) );
                          if ( e._hash !== hash ) {
                              e.refreshCapabilities();
                              e._hash = hash;
                          }
                      }
          

          You might also consider a mechanism to have it do the check only once per run/startup of the Controller instance, the first time it looks at the entity, rather than every time this method is called with capabilities.

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          therealdbT 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

            Because the entities are saved in persistent storage with their states, and the capability definitions are stored (cloned to) the entities when extended, you still need to refresh.

            At line 666 (!) of your mapDevice() function, where you are extending capabilities if given, you can use the extendCapabilities() method to extend an array of capabilities (eliminating your loop there that does pretty much the same thing). You could then add a test to see if there is a change to the version of your Controller class or the system capabilities, for example, and refresh based on that:

                        // capabilities
                        if (capabilities) {
                            this.log.debug(5, "%1 [%2] adding capabilities: %3", this, id, capabilities);
                            e.extendCapabilities( capabilities );
                           
                            // Check controller and system capabilities versions for changes
                            const vinfo = { ...Capabilities.getSysInfo(), controller: VERSION };
                            const hash = util.hash( JSON.stringify(vinfo) );
                            if ( e._hash !== hash ) {
                                e.refreshCapabilities();
                                e._hash = hash;
                            }
                        }
            

            You might also consider a mechanism to have it do the check only once per run/startup of the Controller instance, the first time it looks at the entity, rather than every time this method is called with capabilities.

            therealdbT Offline
            therealdbT Offline
            therealdb
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @toggledbits thanks for the help. I will eventually improve this code and apply capabilities only if the device is somewhat new/changed or at startup. OpenSprinklerController is peculiar, but I think I could manage to achieve this result.

            This code is shared among my controllers, I've modified them to better handle updates. Thanks!

            --
            On a mission to automate everything.

            My MS Reactor contrib
            My Luup Plug-ins

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits unlocked this topic on
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            Recent Topics

            • MSR with reverse proxy
              toggledbitsT
              toggledbits
              0
              2
              18

            • [MSR] Native fan capabilty
              therealdbT
              therealdb
              1
              3
              129

            • [MSR] Rule do not fire
              therealdbT
              therealdb
              0
              4
              157

            • Rule condition shows TRUE in UI but Rule never transitions to SET — survives full restart
              N
              noelab
              0
              8
              230

            • DynamicGroupController and attributes
              toggledbitsT
              toggledbits
              1
              9
              324

            • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
              toggledbitsT
              toggledbits
              5
              149
              139.7k

            • Unofficial thread for compatibility
              tunnusT
              tunnus
              2
              2
              759

            • Ooops - Deleted Reactor Ex Machina II
              toggledbitsT
              toggledbits
              0
              2
              103

            • Bail out of failed reaction?
              T
              tamorgen
              0
              3
              175

            • Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
              T
              tamorgen
              0
              7
              401

            • [Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
              CrilleC
              Crille
              0
              5
              288

            • Upgrade Issues
              T
              tbully
              0
              9
              429
            Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
            Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • Unsolved