Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. [Solved] 22337 ignoring "not between"?
Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
tunnusT
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration: users: # This section defines your valid users. admin: ******* groups: # This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application # and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to # more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here. admin_group: users: - admin applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications guests: users: "*" applications: - dashboard api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin_group allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: true session: timeout: 7200 # (seconds) rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true # If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged. log_acls: true # If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged. debug_acls: true My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
Multi-System Reactor
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request 2?
CatmanV2C
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks. Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option? No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reset a delay
CatmanV2C
I'm sure this has been asked, and answered, but damned if I can figure it out Use case: I have a rear garden with lights. A door from the kitchen into the garden and a door from the garage. Currently if I open the kitchen door the lights come on (yay) and a 3 minute delay starts. After 3 minutes, no matter what else happens, the lights go off (Boo! But also yay!) What I would like is for the 3 minute delay until the lights go off to start from the latest door open event. That is, if I'm going from kitchen to garage, and back again, the lights stay on until there's three minutes of no activity. I've tried 'hacking' with a virtual switch, but can't seem to stop the delay. Any pointers? TIA C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Loading Screen Safari
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Constraints states visually do not match actual
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Feature request: For Each action on arrays/groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

[Solved] 22337 ignoring "not between"?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
9 Posts 2 Posters 769 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    gwp1
    wrote on last edited by gwp1
    #1

    This is an old, well-established rule. It controls the ceiling fan in the LR. I don't want the fan running between the hours of 19:00 and 23:55 each evening so I have this condition:

    66427999-2bf7-4deb-9f13-96806489750d-image.png

    It's part of the larger:
    397a1bf8-5c6b-4a4c-aee9-b7cfc2999ad0-image.png

    If you look closely at the timebox rule you'll see it's set to not between and the time is definitely "between".

    Is it me or is MSR ignoring the NOT in not between?

    *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
    *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

    *HAOS
    Core 2026.1.1
    w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
    FW: v1.1
    SDK: v7.23.1

    *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
    MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
    MQTTController: 25139
    ZWave Controller: 25139

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by toggledbits
      #2

      The condition time shown is 10:58:00PM. That is between 7:00pm and 11:55pm, so between would be true, and not between would be false, which it is (the condition result is false).

      What am I missing?

      Edit: if you're trying to figure out why the fan is running, it's because the Heating group is true... it's an OR between Cooling and Heating, so either being true will make the trigger overall true. The date comparison isn't even part of the logic for Heating. If the date comparison applies to both heating and cooling, it's in the wrong place, wrong logic.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      G 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

        The condition time shown is 10:58:00PM. That is between 7:00pm and 11:55pm, so between would be true, and not between would be false, which it is (the condition result is false).

        What am I missing?

        Edit: if you're trying to figure out why the fan is running, it's because the Heating group is true... it's an OR between Cooling and Heating, so either being true will make the trigger overall true. The date comparison isn't even part of the logic for Heating. If the date comparison applies to both heating and cooling, it's in the wrong place, wrong logic.

        G Offline
        G Offline
        gwp1
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @toggledbits The not between should fail the rule because the time IS between and the fan should NOT be operating.

        I'm using not between essentially as "except during these times".

        *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
        *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

        *HAOS
        Core 2026.1.1
        w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
        FW: v1.1
        SDK: v7.23.1

        *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
        MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
        MQTTController: 25139
        ZWave Controller: 25139

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Did you see my edit on my original reply?

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          G 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

            Did you see my edit on my original reply?

            G Offline
            G Offline
            gwp1
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @toggledbits Just now, after I hit submit - reviewing.

            *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
            *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

            *HAOS
            Core 2026.1.1
            w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
            FW: v1.1
            SDK: v7.23.1

            *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
            MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
            MQTTController: 25139
            ZWave Controller: 25139

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

              Did you see my edit on my original reply?

              G Offline
              G Offline
              gwp1
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @toggledbits well, shahzbaht as a famous Orkan used to say.

              This must have been wrong over a year ago and sat there dormant because of warmer seasons. Crazy timing, just after I updated to the latest release.

              Changed or to and at the topmost level and the fan has, indeed, stopped.

              I posted hoping an extra set of eyes would see... something... and you did. Thank you for your rapid response and infinite patience, Patrick.

              *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
              *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

              *HAOS
              Core 2026.1.1
              w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
              FW: v1.1
              SDK: v7.23.1

              *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
              MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
              MQTTController: 25139
              ZWave Controller: 25139

              toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • G gwp1

                @toggledbits well, shahzbaht as a famous Orkan used to say.

                This must have been wrong over a year ago and sat there dormant because of warmer seasons. Crazy timing, just after I updated to the latest release.

                Changed or to and at the topmost level and the fan has, indeed, stopped.

                I posted hoping an extra set of eyes would see... something... and you did. Thank you for your rapid response and infinite patience, Patrick.

                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbits
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                @gwp1 Just changing to AND at the top level probably isn't right, either, I think, as that would require both Heating and Cooling to be true at the same instant... can they? Should they? If not, that date condition needs to moved to the top level and the rest restructured accordingly.

                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                G 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                  @gwp1 Just changing to AND at the top level probably isn't right, either, I think, as that would require both Heating and Cooling to be true at the same instant... can they? Should they? If not, that date condition needs to moved to the top level and the rest restructured accordingly.

                  G Offline
                  G Offline
                  gwp1
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @toggledbits Thanks for surfacing that. I fell asleep mulling this last night. Based on my Comments within the ruleset it looks like I'd originally intended for this timebox to only impact Cooling, at which point everything is actually WAI.

                  I am going to need to adjust this if I want the timebox to impact BOTH Heating and Cooling, you're right.

                  *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                  *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                  *HAOS
                  Core 2026.1.1
                  w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                  FW: v1.1
                  SDK: v7.23.1

                  *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                  MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                  MQTTController: 25139
                  ZWave Controller: 25139

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                    @gwp1 Just changing to AND at the top level probably isn't right, either, I think, as that would require both Heating and Cooling to be true at the same instant... can they? Should they? If not, that date condition needs to moved to the top level and the rest restructured accordingly.

                    G Offline
                    G Offline
                    gwp1
                    wrote on last edited by gwp1
                    #9

                    @toggledbits

                    This seems more appropriate. The timebox AND the OR group for Heating vs Cooling with the individual Heating and Cooling groups nested within.

                    f9a1a1ce-99a4-4b90-b325-7b916c0f357b-image.png

                    Edited with the updated version.

                    *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                    *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                    *HAOS
                    Core 2026.1.1
                    w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                    FW: v1.1
                    SDK: v7.23.1

                    *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                    MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                    MQTTController: 25139
                    ZWave Controller: 25139

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    Recent Topics

                    • Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      0
                      2
                      49

                    • VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
                      S
                      SweetGenius
                      1
                      1
                      39

                    • Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      2
                      1
                      33

                    • Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
                      G
                      gwp1
                      0
                      1
                      64

                    • [Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
                      CrilleC
                      Crille
                      0
                      4
                      98

                    • [Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
                      therealdbT
                      therealdb
                      0
                      3
                      113

                    • Possible feature request 2?
                      CatmanV2C
                      CatmanV2
                      0
                      3
                      83

                    • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      5
                      133
                      80.1k

                    • Genuinely impressed with Zigbee and HA / Reactor
                      CatmanV2C
                      CatmanV2
                      1
                      9
                      396

                    • Copying a global reaction
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      0
                      3
                      119

                    • [HowTo] Using HABridge with Reactor
                      CatmanV2C
                      CatmanV2
                      0
                      9
                      457

                    • [Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      0
                      4
                      176
                    Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                    Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • Unsolved