Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. [Solved] 22337 ignoring "not between"?
Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
CrilleC
Edit: Solved in latest-26221. Bare-metal latest-26193 I have this group: "OKforLarm": name: OK för Larm select: - include_controller: vera - include_capability: door_sensor filter_expression: entity.attributes.door_sensor.state It contains the entities I expect but behaves a bit odd. When I open vera>device_10097 the entity attribute door_sensor.state changes to true but it won't show up as member in the group, when I also open vera>device_10095 they both shows as members and when I close vera>device_10095 it disappear from the group but when I close vera>device_10097 it lingers in the group until I restart Reactor.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
DynamicGroupController and attributes
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits I'm back to trying to optimize a couple of things based on dynamic group. First of all, I think I found a typo in the doc: primary_attribute: "binary_sensor.state" primary_attribute_value: | d = false; each id in members: d = getEntity(id)?.attributes?.power_switch?.state or d, d I think the correct code snippet is d = false, All that said, my use case for dynamic groups is to group 3 different climate devices, so I could easily command them at the same time. Commands are good, but sometimes I want to check if any of the devices are on, and that's easily done with a similar snippet as the one you have in the docs. But this is limited to the primary attribute, while I want to have any of the attributes in the group to be driven by a similar logic (while all are null in the group). ie, access hvac_control.mode and see if any of the unit is set to cool, or heat. Is that possible, without re-defining an expression in each of my rules? Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade Issues
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Question regarding "in" vs "contains" vs contents of the string
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Logon screen timeout
G
Noticing since 170 that the lock screen doesn't switch to the logon prompt but, rather, stays on the active UI until such time as you go to click something within it. Then it jumps to the login screen. Brave browser Brave 1.92.139 (Official Build) (arm64) Chromium: 150.0.7871.114
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Copy&past of actions and/or drag&drop between set/reset
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits One thing that bothers me while doing work on new systems/new features, is that I cannot copy&paste actions, and I cannot drag&drop between set and resets. #1 is for when I want to copy an action between different rules opened in two separate browser windows, while #2 is when I just need to flip a bunch of actions in the reset, or move some logic back and forth. Both will be appreciated, but I understand the technical challenges. Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade advice - upgrade from aarch64 to ARM64 image
T
I'm currently on version 26011. I understand that the aarch64 image is no longer supported. So, I therefore need to update to the ARM64 image. Can anyone possibly suggest how I update my docker compose.yaml file (see below). Ideally I'd like to keep my existing reactions etc. rather than start from scratch. # Multi-System Reactor template docker-compose.yml (version 22160) # # Change the lines indicated by "DO"... # services: reactor: container_name: reactor environment: # DO change the TZ: line to set your local time zone. # See valid TZ list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tz_database_time_zones TZ: GB # # DO NOT change this path. Your directory location is in "source" below. REACTOR_DATA_PREFIX: /var/reactor # DO change the image below to the one you are using (e.g. armv7l or aarch64 for RPi 4) image: toggledbits/reactor:latest-aarch64 restart: "always" expose: - 8111 ports: - 8111:8111 volumes: # DO change the /home/username/reactor below to the directory you created for # your local data; DO NOT change the /var/reactor part - /home/pi/docker/reactor:/var/reactor - /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro tmpfs: /tmp
Multi-System Reactor
Alexa for MSR, any interest?
MikeReadingtonM
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Telegram notification broke with latest update
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Phantom device, “INFO” appears
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Mode Status NULL
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] HTTP query failing after version 26177
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Question about the find function
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Answered] OK to remove old json files?
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Deprecation Announcement: 32-bit ARM *docker* images
toggledbitsT
If you are using the armv7l docker image, the OpenJS Foundation that publishes node is no longer producing 32-bit builds as of v24. That means the last supported LTS version of node for armv7l is v22, which will go End-of-Life in May 2027. Therefore, the Reactor armv7l image is now deprecated and will only be produced until node v22 goes EOL, and I will not publish armv7l images beyond that date. If you are running an RPi 3 or earlier with Reactor, you are on this image, and will need to upgrade hardware to a 64-bit model and use the arm64 image. If you need help getting it done, ask in this category.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] build 26150 - engine not starting
G
@toggledbits I pulled the image (well, Watchtower did) and within minutes the whole system went offline. The log looks like it ends with 26143. [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-mkahsmgf/26qq82mw-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lqyfljfi/22f8on0t-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lsb61rw8/24oenqi2-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lrh58he0/rule-lrh58he0:S-1c00gfib-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lrh58he0/1c00dylr-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lrh58he0/1nam9w5u-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-miuh2qqi/22ls4lql-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-kwc6rmci/rule-kwc6rmci:S-1vj8sdfc-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-kwc6rmci/rule-kwc6rmci:S-1qanz01x-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/24lq19p6-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-mk0o8iox/23oy468y-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-miscg2h3/rule-miscg2h3:S-22gmbq1c-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-kxgrfjke/238p0old-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-m7ccsso5/re-m7ccsso5-1r0myjxa-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/19nl9wq2-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/rule-ladyja6a:S-yl3xk9t-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/rule-ladyja6a:S-yl3vv5m-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-ln7j2nqp/re-ln7j2nqp-22mx9lzd-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-ln7j2nqp/22mx87c8-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-licneppy/1mzwe7ht-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ml3194ih/25jqt1j4-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-kxgrg7kf/227hshak-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-reactorexmachina/13ua1p95-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-reactorexmachina/13uagam7-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-grpvl9oypg/rule-grpvl9oypg:R-134x4cbv-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-grpvl9oypg/rule-grpvl9oypg:R-134x2fyl-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-lscjrws1/238p5c22-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lbwr0jvq/1xkczf03-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <Structure:NOTICE> Structure Structure#1 stopped [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <app:NOTICE> Closing APIs... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <wsapi:NOTICE> wsapi: closing... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <wsapi:NOTICE> wsapi: disconnecting from "192.168.1.23#82" (1001 service closing) [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.548Z <httpapi:NOTICE> HTTP API closing... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.549Z <wsapi:NOTICE> wsapi: server closed [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.549Z <httpapi:INFO> HTTP server closed. [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.549Z <app:NOTICE> Stopping timers... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.551Z <app:null> Shutdown complete, process ID 1 [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.551Z <app:null> Closing logs... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.551Z <default:null> Closing log I can SSH to the VM. Alas, I do not have the previous image for 26143 as I'm a little too quick sometimes on housekeeping.
Multi-System Reactor
http request action & digest auth
tunnusT
I’m using the HTTP Request action in MSR and need to authenticate against an endpoint that uses HTTP Digest authentication. Now that endpoint was changed to use SHA-256 in digest auth, so I would like to know if MSR supports it, or is it limited to MD5-based digest auth?
Multi-System Reactor

[Solved] 22337 ignoring "not between"?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
9 Posts 2 Posters 1.3k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    gwp1
    wrote on last edited by gwp1
    #1

    This is an old, well-established rule. It controls the ceiling fan in the LR. I don't want the fan running between the hours of 19:00 and 23:55 each evening so I have this condition:

    66427999-2bf7-4deb-9f13-96806489750d-image.png

    It's part of the larger:
    397a1bf8-5c6b-4a4c-aee9-b7cfc2999ad0-image.png

    If you look closely at the timebox rule you'll see it's set to not between and the time is definitely "between".

    Is it me or is MSR ignoring the NOT in not between?

    *Hubitat C-7 2.5.1.142
    *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

    *HAOS
    Core 2026.7.4
    w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
    FW: v1.1
    SDK: v7.23.1

    *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
    MSR: latest-26193-8dd8f854
    MQTTController: 25139
    ZWave Controller: 25139

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by toggledbits
      #2

      The condition time shown is 10:58:00PM. That is between 7:00pm and 11:55pm, so between would be true, and not between would be false, which it is (the condition result is false).

      What am I missing?

      Edit: if you're trying to figure out why the fan is running, it's because the Heating group is true... it's an OR between Cooling and Heating, so either being true will make the trigger overall true. The date comparison isn't even part of the logic for Heating. If the date comparison applies to both heating and cooling, it's in the wrong place, wrong logic.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      G 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

        The condition time shown is 10:58:00PM. That is between 7:00pm and 11:55pm, so between would be true, and not between would be false, which it is (the condition result is false).

        What am I missing?

        Edit: if you're trying to figure out why the fan is running, it's because the Heating group is true... it's an OR between Cooling and Heating, so either being true will make the trigger overall true. The date comparison isn't even part of the logic for Heating. If the date comparison applies to both heating and cooling, it's in the wrong place, wrong logic.

        G Offline
        G Offline
        gwp1
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @toggledbits The not between should fail the rule because the time IS between and the fan should NOT be operating.

        I'm using not between essentially as "except during these times".

        *Hubitat C-7 2.5.1.142
        *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

        *HAOS
        Core 2026.7.4
        w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
        FW: v1.1
        SDK: v7.23.1

        *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
        MSR: latest-26193-8dd8f854
        MQTTController: 25139
        ZWave Controller: 25139

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Did you see my edit on my original reply?

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          G 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

            Did you see my edit on my original reply?

            G Offline
            G Offline
            gwp1
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @toggledbits Just now, after I hit submit - reviewing.

            *Hubitat C-7 2.5.1.142
            *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

            *HAOS
            Core 2026.7.4
            w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
            FW: v1.1
            SDK: v7.23.1

            *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
            MSR: latest-26193-8dd8f854
            MQTTController: 25139
            ZWave Controller: 25139

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

              Did you see my edit on my original reply?

              G Offline
              G Offline
              gwp1
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @toggledbits well, shahzbaht as a famous Orkan used to say.

              This must have been wrong over a year ago and sat there dormant because of warmer seasons. Crazy timing, just after I updated to the latest release.

              Changed or to and at the topmost level and the fan has, indeed, stopped.

              I posted hoping an extra set of eyes would see... something... and you did. Thank you for your rapid response and infinite patience, Patrick.

              *Hubitat C-7 2.5.1.142
              *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

              *HAOS
              Core 2026.7.4
              w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
              FW: v1.1
              SDK: v7.23.1

              *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
              MSR: latest-26193-8dd8f854
              MQTTController: 25139
              ZWave Controller: 25139

              toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • G gwp1

                @toggledbits well, shahzbaht as a famous Orkan used to say.

                This must have been wrong over a year ago and sat there dormant because of warmer seasons. Crazy timing, just after I updated to the latest release.

                Changed or to and at the topmost level and the fan has, indeed, stopped.

                I posted hoping an extra set of eyes would see... something... and you did. Thank you for your rapid response and infinite patience, Patrick.

                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbits
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                @gwp1 Just changing to AND at the top level probably isn't right, either, I think, as that would require both Heating and Cooling to be true at the same instant... can they? Should they? If not, that date condition needs to moved to the top level and the rest restructured accordingly.

                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                G 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                  @gwp1 Just changing to AND at the top level probably isn't right, either, I think, as that would require both Heating and Cooling to be true at the same instant... can they? Should they? If not, that date condition needs to moved to the top level and the rest restructured accordingly.

                  G Offline
                  G Offline
                  gwp1
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @toggledbits Thanks for surfacing that. I fell asleep mulling this last night. Based on my Comments within the ruleset it looks like I'd originally intended for this timebox to only impact Cooling, at which point everything is actually WAI.

                  I am going to need to adjust this if I want the timebox to impact BOTH Heating and Cooling, you're right.

                  *Hubitat C-7 2.5.1.142
                  *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                  *HAOS
                  Core 2026.7.4
                  w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                  FW: v1.1
                  SDK: v7.23.1

                  *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                  MSR: latest-26193-8dd8f854
                  MQTTController: 25139
                  ZWave Controller: 25139

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                    @gwp1 Just changing to AND at the top level probably isn't right, either, I think, as that would require both Heating and Cooling to be true at the same instant... can they? Should they? If not, that date condition needs to moved to the top level and the rest restructured accordingly.

                    G Offline
                    G Offline
                    gwp1
                    wrote on last edited by gwp1
                    #9

                    @toggledbits

                    This seems more appropriate. The timebox AND the OR group for Heating vs Cooling with the individual Heating and Cooling groups nested within.

                    f9a1a1ce-99a4-4b90-b325-7b916c0f357b-image.png

                    Edited with the updated version.

                    *Hubitat C-7 2.5.1.142
                    *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                    *HAOS
                    Core 2026.7.4
                    w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                    FW: v1.1
                    SDK: v7.23.1

                    *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                    MSR: latest-26193-8dd8f854
                    MQTTController: 25139
                    ZWave Controller: 25139

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    Recent Topics

                    • Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
                      T
                      tamorgen
                      0
                      7
                      226

                    • [Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
                      CrilleC
                      Crille
                      0
                      5
                      161

                    • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      5
                      148
                      131.2k

                    • DynamicGroupController and attributes
                      therealdbT
                      therealdb
                      1
                      5
                      140

                    • Upgrade Issues
                      T
                      tbully
                      0
                      9
                      262

                    • [SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      0
                      10
                      281

                    • [SOLVED] Question regarding "in" vs "contains" vs contents of the string
                      G
                      gwp1
                      0
                      5
                      168

                    • openLuup console disappeared - 500 - Internal Server Error
                      A
                      a-lurker
                      0
                      2
                      194

                    • Logon screen timeout
                      G
                      gwp1
                      0
                      5
                      207

                    • [MSR] Copy&past of actions and/or drag&drop between set/reset
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      0
                      9
                      404

                    • Upgrade advice - upgrade from aarch64 to ARM64 image
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      0
                      4
                      231
                    Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                    Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • Unsolved