Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. [RESOLVED] How quickly should logs rotate?
[Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
toggledbitsT
This post does not apply to users of Intel/AMD-based systems. If you are using a Reactor image tagged latest-amd64 or stable-amd64, then this post does not apply to you. It also does not apply to bare-metal installs; it's for users of docker images on ARM-based systems only (principally Raspberry Pi hosts, but could be others). After January 15, 2026, I will no longer produce the aarch64-tagged docker image for Reactor. The ARM images will be arm64 for 64-bit operating systems, and armv7l for 32-bit operating systems. For those of you running a container from the aarch64 image today, this will be a relatively simple change: you just need to switch the image used for your docker container to a differently-tagged image. If you are using docker-compose, then this is a relatively simple matter of changing the image line in your docker-compose.yaml file and then stopping (docker-compose down) and restarting (docker-compose up -d) your Reactor daemon. But there's a catch... not all of you can safely just switch from the aarch64 image to the arm64 image. And, you can't just trust the output of uname -m, for example, because this exposes the CPU architecture, but not the word size of the OS running on that CPU. For Raspberry Pi systems, the transition to 64-bit operating systems was long (starting in 2016) and not always obvious — although there was a first "official" 64-bit OS for RPis in 2020, it did not become a default recommendation in the Raspberry Pi Imager until 2021, and then that was only the default for Pi 3/4 systems with >4GB RAM; it was 2022 before it was universally recommended for all 64-bit CPUs regardless of RAM size. Depending on when you first imaged your RPi system and what default you may have been offered/chosen, you could today easily have a 64-bit CPU Raspberry Pi running a 32-bit version of the operating system. Upgrades along the way would not change this; changing it to fully 64-bit requires a full reimage of the system. To establish if your OS is 64- or 32-bit, log in to your Pi and run: sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH. If the response is arm64 or aarch64, then you are running a 64-bit OS and you should use the arm64-tagged image. If it's anything else, you are running a 32-bit OS, and you should use the armv7l-tagged image. pi@rpi4-1:~ $ sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH armhf pi@rpi4-1:~ $ uname -m aarch64 pi@rpi4-1:~ $ In the example above, the uname command reports that the CPU is 64-bit architecture (aarch64), which is true for the host on which I ran these commands, but the DEB_HOST_ARCH value is armhf, indicating a 32-bit operating system. This system has to use the armv7l-tagged image. Other systems will have their own ways of determining the word size of the running OS. Since the majority of Reactor users running ARM systems are on Raspberry Pis, I am able to supply the above instructions, but if you happen to have a different ARM system, you'll need to do some web searching to figure out how to expose that information. Or, you can just try the arm64 image, and if it doesn't start up, try the armv7l image. Remember to always back up your system before making any changes. For everyone, please make this change as soon as possible, and if you have any trouble finding a working image, please (1) go back to the current aarch64 image; and (2) let me know in this thread along with as much detail about your host system as you can offer (including the output of the dpkg-architecture command mentioned above).
Multi-System Reactor
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] reactor-mqtt-contrib package for additional MQTT templates
therealdbT
I'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only). Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package: https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go. I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them. The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression. Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests
Multi-System Reactor
HA 2025.9.4 Supported Yet?
CatmanV2C
Tangentially did I miss 2025.9.4 getting blessed in MSR? I've been holding off Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Rule Set UI bug - RESOLVED
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

[RESOLVED] How quickly should logs rotate?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
13 Posts 3 Posters 1.2k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CrilleC Offline
    CrilleC Offline
    Crille
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    What does the rest of the config look like in logging.yaml. Any level above 4?

    3 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • 3 Offline
      3 Offline
      3rdStng
      wrote on last edited by 3rdStng
      #3

      My Rule and Engine levels are at 5. But I've never touched them personally. Maybe these are inherited from a build long ago? Should these be a 4?

      ---
      logging:
        default:
          level: 4
          streams:
            - type: console
              level: 0
            - type: file
              name: "reactor.log"
              maxsize: 3  # megabytes max size
              keep: 9     # copies of old logs
              #
              # capture_console: if true, (most) console output will be captured to
              #                  this stream (if you have multiple streams, this
              #                  feature can only be used by ONE of them). If you
              #                  turn this on (true), set the "console" type stream
              #                  (above) log level to 0 to avoid duplicate logging
              #                  entries. The default is false, console not captured.
              #capture_console: true
        app:
          level: 4
        httpapi:
          level: 4
        httpproxy:
          level: 4
        wsapi:
          level: 4
        Structure:
          level: 4
        Controller:
          level: 4
        OWMWeatherController:
          level: 4
        VeraController:
          level: 4
        HubitatController:
          level: 4
        HassController:
          level: 4
        Rule:
          level: 5
        Engine:
          level: 5
      
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • 3 Offline
        3 Offline
        3rdStng
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        Lowering these two down to a 4 do not appear to have any change on the speed of the log rotation

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • CrilleC Offline
          CrilleC Offline
          Crille
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          Did you restart Reactor after changing the levels?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • CrilleC Crille

            What does the rest of the config look like in logging.yaml. Any level above 4?

            3 Offline
            3 Offline
            3rdStng
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            @Crille Yes

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • CrilleC Offline
              CrilleC Offline
              Crille
              wrote on last edited by Crille
              #7

              OK, any hints in the log? Anything other than Rule:INFO? If not, do you have a lot of rules triggered by frequent entity updates? I've moved my most frequent entities triggering rules to global expressions resulting in true/false, and used the expression as trigger instead to lower log entries of rule evaluation every 5-10 seconds so my 5, 2MB kept logs, span from late morning to early evening. 9, 3MB in 45 minutes doesn't seem normal to me.
              I have all my loglevels at 4.

              Edit: "doesn't seem normal to me."
              If the devices triggering the rules are extremely chatty, the amount of logging is of course "normal".

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • 3 Offline
                3 Offline
                3rdStng
                wrote on last edited by 3rdStng
                #8

                It does appear to mostly be related to rules that have to do with my Life360 presence sensors.

                Correction to my log level comment above. Changing the rules and engine to 4 did slow things down a bit. I saved that changed and restarted my docker at 7:43 AM. I'm just shy of 2 hours now to fill/rotate all 9 logs.

                8dc3f4f2-fed1-4190-8ca0-621319c679e2-image.png

                3 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • 3 3rdStng

                  It does appear to mostly be related to rules that have to do with my Life360 presence sensors.

                  Correction to my log level comment above. Changing the rules and engine to 4 did slow things down a bit. I saved that changed and restarted my docker at 7:43 AM. I'm just shy of 2 hours now to fill/rotate all 9 logs.

                  8dc3f4f2-fed1-4190-8ca0-621319c679e2-image.png

                  3 Offline
                  3 Offline
                  3rdStng
                  wrote on last edited by 3rdStng
                  #9

                  If I am understanding your global expressions correctly. Are you saying you moved your rule triggers to an expression and then changed the trigger to be the value of the expression?

                  Original rule checking presence:
                  34669be2-3f5d-427c-bb86-3c0d038ebd78-image.png

                  Now as a global expression:
                  1a1cad53-bbf2-4226-8482-4d71f7c5b155-image.png

                  With an updated trigger:
                  cedde33e-4ce2-4139-8a24-24b3a42d7046-image.png

                  When Life360 updates, won't it force the expression to revalidate its value? Are these not logged?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • CrilleC Offline
                    CrilleC Offline
                    Crille
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    Yes, that's how I do it. The expressions are evaluated every time the Life360 updates but if the result of the expression doesn't change, the rule will not trigger an evaluation. Evaluation of global expressions is not logged, at least not at level 4.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • 3 Offline
                      3 Offline
                      3rdStng
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      Thank you. I changed all my rules that had a presence sensor written in them. As well as a few other rules that have an app that phones home every minute. Just restarted MSR for good measure and can see a different. I'm over 30 minutes right now between .log and .log.1.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • toggledbitsT Offline
                        toggledbitsT Offline
                        toggledbits
                        wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                        #12

                        Note that you can also set the logging level for rules to level 3, and it would eliminate all of the log entries for when evaluations are being triggered and what is triggering them.

                        Another option is to set the log level for specific rules to a lower (quieter) value. You need to know the rule ID, which is displayed when you open the rule detail panel on the Rule Sets page (click the right-pointing arrow next to the rule name to open the panel; the ID is at the bottom of the panel).

                          Rule:  # log level for all rules
                            level: 4
                          # Override default Rule log level for a specific rule
                          "Rule#rule-la04ghp7":  # note quotes must be used here
                            level: 3
                        

                        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                        3 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                          Note that you can also set the logging level for rules to level 3, and it would eliminate all of the log entries for when evaluations are being triggered and what is triggering them.

                          Another option is to set the log level for specific rules to a lower (quieter) value. You need to know the rule ID, which is displayed when you open the rule detail panel on the Rule Sets page (click the right-pointing arrow next to the rule name to open the panel; the ID is at the bottom of the panel).

                            Rule:  # log level for all rules
                              level: 4
                            # Override default Rule log level for a specific rule
                            "Rule#rule-la04ghp7":  # note quotes must be used here
                              level: 3
                          
                          3 Offline
                          3 Offline
                          3rdStng
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          @toggledbits Awesome. Thank you.

                          I know you know, but for others, the rule ID is also noted in the logs. Makes it easier to copy and paste without having to look up the ID within the GUI.
                          f5fc7a07-2b33-4574-b3ec-d2dca45c70f6-image.png

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          Recent Topics

                          • [Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
                            CrilleC
                            Crille
                            0
                            5
                            99

                          • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                            toggledbitsT
                            toggledbits
                            5
                            130
                            74.0k

                          • Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
                            G
                            gwp1
                            0
                            6
                            120

                          • Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
                            toggledbitsT
                            toggledbits
                            1
                            1
                            61

                          • Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
                            M
                            mgvra
                            1
                            3
                            148

                          • Script action and custom timers
                            toggledbitsT
                            toggledbits
                            0
                            4
                            158

                          • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
                            CatmanV2C
                            CatmanV2
                            0
                            12
                            438

                          • There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
                            akbooerA
                            akbooer
                            1
                            2
                            126

                          • Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
                            CrilleC
                            Crille
                            0
                            6
                            180

                          • Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
                            toggledbitsT
                            toggledbits
                            0
                            17
                            523

                          • Shelly Wall Display XL
                            akbooerA
                            akbooer
                            2
                            9
                            835

                          • [Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
                            toggledbitsT
                            toggledbits
                            0
                            26
                            950
                          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                          Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Unsolved