Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Multi-System Reactor Developer Preview AVAILABLE
Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
toggledbitsT
This post does not apply to users of Intel/AMD-based systems. If you are using a Reactor image tagged latest-amd64 or stable-amd64, then this post does not apply to you. It also does not apply to bare-metal installs; it's for users of docker images on ARM-based systems only (principally Raspberry Pi hosts, but could be others). After January 15, 2026, I will no longer produce the aarch64-tagged docker image for Reactor. The ARM images will be arm64 for 64-bit operating systems, and armv7l for 32-bit operating systems. For those of you running a container from the aarch64 image today, this will be a relatively simple change: you just need to switch the image used for your docker container to a differently-tagged image. If you are using docker-compose, then this is a relatively simple matter of changing the image line in your docker-compose.yaml file and then stopping (docker-compose down) and restarting (docker-compose up -d) your Reactor daemon. But there's a catch... not all of you can safely just switch from the aarch64 image to the arm64 image. And, you can't just trust the output of uname -m, for example, because this exposes the CPU architecture, but not the word size of the OS running on that CPU. For Raspberry Pi systems, the transition to 64-bit operating systems was long (starting in 2016) and not always obvious — although there was a first "official" 64-bit OS for RPis in 2020, it did not become a default recommendation in the Raspberry Pi Imager until 2021, and then that was only the default for Pi 3/4 systems with >4GB RAM; it was 2022 before it was universally recommended for all 64-bit CPUs regardless of RAM size. Depending on when you first imaged your RPi system and what default you may have been offered/chosen, you could today easily have a 64-bit CPU Raspberry Pi running a 32-bit version of the operating system. Upgrades along the way would not change this; changing it to fully 64-bit requires a full reimage of the system. To establish if your OS is 64- or 32-bit, log in to your Pi and run: sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH. If the response is arm64 or aarch64, then you are running a 64-bit OS and you should use the arm64-tagged image. If it's anything else, you are running a 32-bit OS, and you should use the armv7l-tagged image. pi@rpi4-1:~ $ sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH armhf pi@rpi4-1:~ $ uname -m aarch64 pi@rpi4-1:~ $ In the example above, the uname command reports that the CPU is 64-bit architecture (aarch64), which is true for the host on which I ran these commands, but the DEB_HOST_ARCH value is armhf, indicating a 32-bit operating system. This system has to use the armv7l-tagged image. Other systems will have their own ways of determining the word size of the running OS. Since the majority of Reactor users running ARM systems are on Raspberry Pis, I am able to supply the above instructions, but if you happen to have a different ARM system, you'll need to do some web searching to figure out how to expose that information. Or, you can just try the arm64 image, and if it doesn't start up, try the armv7l image. Remember to always back up your system before making any changes. For everyone, please make this change as soon as possible, and if you have any trouble finding a working image, please (1) go back to the current aarch64 image; and (2) let me know in this thread along with as much detail about your host system as you can offer (including the output of the dpkg-architecture command mentioned above).
Multi-System Reactor
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] reactor-mqtt-contrib package for additional MQTT templates
therealdbT
I'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only). Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package: https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go. I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them. The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression. Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests
Multi-System Reactor
HA 2025.9.4 Supported Yet?
CatmanV2C
Tangentially did I miss 2025.9.4 getting blessed in MSR? I've been holding off Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Rule Set UI bug - RESOLVED
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Copy&Paste of Rules
therealdbT
I don't know if I'm the only one, but managing more than one Reactor installs, the need to have some sort of copy&paste for rules has grown on me. While I understand the technical challenges, I'm wondering if a "god mode" where I could copy the raw JSON rule and paste it into another rule could be an advanced, flag only feature that could benefit power users. I know I can copy the JSON file and proceed, but I must stop Reactor and when doing maintenance, it's more clicks to do. Just an idea
Multi-System Reactor

Multi-System Reactor Developer Preview AVAILABLE

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
124 Posts 12 Posters 49.7k Views 14 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

    If it's not closed closed, you should be able to add a note without changing its status. That's why I've been leaving things "resolved" for at least a full day after the build the bug is fixed in. Mantis is new to me, too, so I'm still learning as well.

    cw-kidC Offline
    cw-kidC Offline
    cw-kid
    wrote on last edited by
    #72

    @toggledbits said in Multi-System Reactor Developer Preview AVAILABLE:

    That's why I've been leaving things "resolved"

    I can't leave a new note or comment on a PR that is currently resolved. For example this one here

    To leave a note I have to press the Reopen button.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by
      #73

      OK. Well, if it's good news, leave it closed; if it's needs work yet, go ahead and re-open.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbits
        wrote on last edited by toggledbits
        #74

        Build 21062

        Fixed:

        • 0000078 - Fix dimming.set on Hass
        • 0000077 - Support input_boolean on Hass
        • 0000076 - Support GC100 plugin on Vera
        • 0000050 - Thermostat support tweaks for Hass

        Other work:

        • Cleanup of RGB light model for Hass, added HS(L) model, support effects;
        • Support ZWave device capability zwave_device, for Vera and Hass (Hubitat TBD)
        • Documentation work

        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K Offline
          K Offline
          kfxo
          wrote on last edited by
          #75

          Another good release. Confirming that 0000078 and 0000077 are tested and working on my system.

          1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbits
            wrote on last edited by
            #76

            Build 21063

            • 0000081: Implement RunLua action (on system entity for each VeraController instance)
            • 0000080: Fix a problem running Vera scenes
            • 0000075: Limit time delays to 24 hours (a multi-day delay on a schedule, specifically >24 days, could overflow JavaScript's 32-bit signed integer millisecond timers)

            Other work:

            • Fixed an issue with "changes" operator restoring configured values too literally (was inserting word "null" rather than blank/empty string)
            • Progress on getting "set variable" action working. It's pretty much working for global expressions/variables. Still working on rule-based variables. PR 5 remains open.
            • A lot of "linting". The old-school software-types will know what I mean.

            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

            1 Reply Last reply
            3
            • cw-kidC Offline
              cw-kidC Offline
              cw-kid
              wrote on last edited by cw-kid
              #77

              Can confirm #80 and #81 and "issue with "changes" operator" are all working OK.

              I've very nearly moved all my PLEG conditions / actions over to MSR.

              I am waiting to be able to use an Expression value in a rule, for my "Master" dimmer virtual devices.

              And for the Scene Activation stuff being exposed, for Fibaro Dimmer 2 modules for double / triple click events.

              Also need to figure out how to setup a motion activated light rule.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbits
                wrote on last edited by
                #78

                I'm getting close on expressions. 21063 has working Set Variable for global expressions. Rule-based expressions is going to require some fairly large changes to the way evaluation of rules is done (not in the evaluation itself, but how they are scheduled). I could have pulled that off yesterday but it was getting late and the changes are not without risk, so I decided to defer. Once the configuration works, and Set Variable works, then I'll need to integrate the substitution capability into reaction arguments, etc. So still a couple of days, I think. That's PR#5 if you want to track it.

                Scene activation is going to be tricky because Vera doesn't expose enough information over user_data or status requests. Doable, for sure, but it will need to be done slightly differently from the way you do it on Vera. It's the same thing openLuup runs into with scene controllers and sl_ prefixed state variables. I don't see a PR for that capability, though. Go ahead and open one.

                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbits
                  wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                  #79

                  Build 21064

                  • 0000082 - Support for ZWave scene controllers (system capability and Vera)

                  Other work:

                  Much time spent today getting Set Variable action update and running. Docs still need updates. The new substition syntax is ${{variable-name-or-expression}}

                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbits
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #80

                    Just realized that one of the changes for variable substitution was causing an issue on some actions. I've respun the release and put it up. If you downloaded before 22:35 US Eastern, please re-download and install.

                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • toggledbitsT Offline
                      toggledbitsT Offline
                      toggledbits
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #81

                      Build 21065

                      No PRs fixed today.

                      Work continued on expressions, and although I think I could mark PR #5 resolved, I'm going to leave it pending any reports related to them. I suspect there will be some discussion needed, at least, because they operate somewhat differently from Reactor for Vera/openLuup.

                      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toggledbitsT Offline
                        toggledbitsT Offline
                        toggledbits
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #82

                        Build 21067

                        No PRs fixed today.

                        Ongoing work on expressions in the UI, and a number of other cleanups in the UI, for Rule editing in particular. Expression substitution using ${{...}} should be work in Reactions. Still working on conditions, so don't expect any success there yet.

                        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • toggledbitsT Offline
                          toggledbitsT Offline
                          toggledbits
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #83

                          Build 21068

                          • 0000089 - Entity action substitution values don't update after first run
                          • 0000090 - Expression not saving when modified
                          • 0000091 - Expression UI issues
                          • 0000092 - Expression UI issues

                          Expressions in conditions are still not available. I've chased UI issues most of the day today.

                          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          3
                          • toggledbitsT Offline
                            toggledbitsT Offline
                            toggledbits
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #84

                            Build 21069

                            • 0000095: Fix annoying change of attribute when changing device selection
                            • 0000096: value_sensor.value now allows any data type
                            • 0000098: global expressions recreated with same name remember old values of prior expression

                            Lots of organizational and administrative work today as well.

                            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbits
                              wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                              #85

                              Build 21072

                              • 0000108: Editing an extended attribute after having a system attribute selected applies validation rules of system attribute
                              • 0000107: Improve button consistency between rules and reactions
                              • 0000104: Error when attempting to recreate variable used in rule
                              • 0000095: Also fix in Reactions (reselect of action if device changes)
                              • 0000100: Make sl_CentralSceneAttr available for Vera

                              The x_vera_state capability is gone, and has been replaced with x_vera_svc_XXXX capabilities, wherein XXXX is the service ID on the Vera device. This slows startup, as additional queries must be made of every Vera device at initialization; the user_data query does not provide sufficient information. The Hubitat and Hass controllers also model this behavior. It's very tidy on Hubitat and Hass, I'm happy to say (and there is no performance penalty on these platforms).

                              The bad news (Vera users): If you are using x_vera_state attributes in your rules, you will need to edit them and choose the newer capability. Good news: this model will probably never change.

                              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • toggledbitsT Offline
                                toggledbitsT Offline
                                toggledbits
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #86

                                Build 21073:

                                • 0000110: Problem with formatting and reselection of Interval conditions in "relative to condition TRUE". Good time to mention that this mode is now DEPRECATED. This functionality was long ago replaced in Reactor for Vera by pulse output mode, but I didn't deprecate the feature in RFV at the time; should have. It is deprecated now in MSR.

                                Ongoing UI work, including exporting of group to new Rule, and importing of Rule to group.

                                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • toggledbitsT Offline
                                  toggledbitsT Offline
                                  toggledbits
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #87

                                  Build 21074

                                  • 0000110 - Interval condition not restoring related condition (option) correctly on edit
                                  • 0000111 - Hass identified service not available (androidtv)
                                  • 0000112 - Expression error
                                  • 0000113 - Bridged Vera systems shows no devices (corrupt geofencing data)
                                  • No PR - Fix precedence issue with lexpjs "each" and "first" statements

                                  This version is also ready for testing under systemd on RPi (I've been running it that way all day). I will publish more on that later; I'm being called to the dinner table.

                                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • toggledbitsT Offline
                                    toggledbitsT Offline
                                    toggledbits
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #88

                                    Build 21075:

                                    • 0000114: Fix loss of condition options on device change
                                    • 0000115: Add restart button to Tools page
                                    • No PR: Update lexpjs to fix && and || return values.

                                    Continuing work on UI cleanups are in the fore these days. Also work getting the HTTP API squared away sufficiently that I can port my automated test tool and start writing new test scripts.

                                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • toggledbitsT Offline
                                      toggledbitsT Offline
                                      toggledbits
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #89

                                      Build 21076:

                                      • 0000122 - Pushover notifications fail (dup/same cause as 119)
                                      • 0000121 - "in" operator malfunction (Conditions)
                                      • 0000120 - getEntity() fails to find entity when using name
                                      • 0000119 - SMTP Notifications fail
                                      • 0000106 - Include ID in entities list of expression builder
                                      • 0000063 - Reorganize entity list in triggers and constraints

                                      PRs 63 and 106 are addressed by a long-planned change finally implemented which I call the "Entity Picker". It operates similar to the Entities tab at the top leve of the UI, providing filters for source controller, group and capability. It also provides a name search that filters as you type. And, it remembers the last set of filters, so when you bring it up, your last search is intact. This has been deployed in all locations where entity selection was previously done with a drop-down menu.

                                      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      2
                                      • toggledbitsT Offline
                                        toggledbitsT Offline
                                        toggledbits
                                        wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                                        #90

                                        Build 21077:

                                        • 0000123: Rename of rule sometimes doesn't stick
                                        • 0000124: Request action URL check doesn't allow variable substitution

                                        Notification now supports (hopefully) CallMeBot. The dist-config contains an updated notifications.yaml with a section for CMB. It looks like this:

                                        notification:
                                          # other method configurations not shown
                                        
                                          # CallMeBot
                                          CallMeBot:
                                            profiles:
                                              default:
                                                # api_url - Access URL for CallMeBot API being used
                                                api_url: http://api.callmebot.com/start.php
                                                #
                                                # api_key - (if needed) API key (use for Facebook API, WhatsApp API, etc.).
                                                #           If the API you are using does not require it, leave it
                                                #           commented out or blank.
                                                #api_key: "place api key here"
                                                #
                                                # source - (if needed) Source field for some APIs. If yours does not require
                                                #          it, leave it commented out or blank.
                                                #source: "source-value"
                                                #
                                                # phone - (if needed) Phone field for some APIs. If yours does not require
                                                #         it, leave it commented out or blank.
                                                #phone: "phone-number"
                                                #
                                                # user - (if needed) User field for some APIs. If yours does not require
                                                #        it, leave it commented out or blank.
                                                #user: "username"
                                                #
                                                # lang - (optional) Language/voice; default "en-US-Standard-C".
                                                #        See CallMeBot docs for possible values.
                                                #lang: "en-US-Standard-C"
                                                #
                                                # rpt - (optional) Number of times to repeat message; default: 1.
                                                #rpt: 1
                                        

                                        If you run into an issue, logs will help here.

                                        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • toggledbitsT Offline
                                          toggledbitsT Offline
                                          toggledbits
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #91

                                          Build 21078:

                                          • 0000122: Prowl notifications not working
                                          • 0000125: Add name search to Entities list (like Entity Picker)
                                          • 0000129: Exit after creating rule leaves empty rule
                                          • 0000130: Improve "last value" display for expressions

                                          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Recent Topics

                                          • Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
                                            G
                                            gwp1
                                            0
                                            6
                                            42

                                          • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            5
                                            129
                                            73.3k

                                          • Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            1
                                            1
                                            36

                                          • Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
                                            M
                                            mgvra
                                            1
                                            3
                                            103

                                          • Script action and custom timers
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            4
                                            117

                                          • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            12
                                            321

                                          • There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
                                            akbooerA
                                            akbooer
                                            1
                                            2
                                            104

                                          • Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
                                            CrilleC
                                            Crille
                                            0
                                            6
                                            130

                                          • Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            17
                                            383

                                          • Shelly Wall Display XL
                                            akbooerA
                                            akbooer
                                            2
                                            9
                                            751

                                          • [Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            26
                                            695

                                          • [Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
                                            CrilleC
                                            Crille
                                            0
                                            12
                                            440
                                          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                          Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Unsolved