Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Can MSR be connected to more than one Vera controller?
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
DynamicGroupController updating members issue
CrilleC
Bare-metal latest-26193 I have this group: "OKforLarm": name: OK för Larm select: - include_controller: vera - include_capability: door_sensor filter_expression: entity.attributes.door_sensor.state It contains the entities I expect but behaves a bit odd. When I open vera>device_10097 the entity attribute door_sensor.state changes to true but it won't show up as member in the group, when I also open vera>device_10095 they both shows as members and when I close vera>device_10095 it disappear from the group but when I close vera>device_10097 it lingers in the group until I restart Reactor.
Multi-System Reactor
DynamicGroupController and attributes
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits I'm back to trying to optimize a couple of things based on dynamic group. First of all, I think I found a typo in the doc: primary_attribute: "binary_sensor.state" primary_attribute_value: | d = false; each id in members: d = getEntity(id)?.attributes?.power_switch?.state or d, d I think the correct code snippet is d = false, All that said, my use case for dynamic groups is to group 3 different climate devices, so I could easily command them at the same time. Commands are good, but sometimes I want to check if any of the devices are on, and that's easily done with a similar snippet as the one you have in the docs. But this is limited to the primary attribute, while I want to have any of the attributes in the group to be driven by a similar logic (while all are null in the group). ie, access hvac_control.mode and see if any of the unit is set to cool, or heat. Is that possible, without re-defining an expression in each of my rules? Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade Issues
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Question regarding "in" vs "contains" vs contents of the string
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Logon screen timeout
G
Noticing since 170 that the lock screen doesn't switch to the logon prompt but, rather, stays on the active UI until such time as you go to click something within it. Then it jumps to the login screen. Brave browser Brave 1.92.139 (Official Build) (arm64) Chromium: 150.0.7871.114
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Copy&past of actions and/or drag&drop between set/reset
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits One thing that bothers me while doing work on new systems/new features, is that I cannot copy&paste actions, and I cannot drag&drop between set and resets. #1 is for when I want to copy an action between different rules opened in two separate browser windows, while #2 is when I just need to flip a bunch of actions in the reset, or move some logic back and forth. Both will be appreciated, but I understand the technical challenges. Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade advice - upgrade from aarch64 to ARM64 image
T
I'm currently on version 26011. I understand that the aarch64 image is no longer supported. So, I therefore need to update to the ARM64 image. Can anyone possibly suggest how I update my docker compose.yaml file (see below). Ideally I'd like to keep my existing reactions etc. rather than start from scratch. # Multi-System Reactor template docker-compose.yml (version 22160) # # Change the lines indicated by "DO"... # services: reactor: container_name: reactor environment: # DO change the TZ: line to set your local time zone. # See valid TZ list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tz_database_time_zones TZ: GB # # DO NOT change this path. Your directory location is in "source" below. REACTOR_DATA_PREFIX: /var/reactor # DO change the image below to the one you are using (e.g. armv7l or aarch64 for RPi 4) image: toggledbits/reactor:latest-aarch64 restart: "always" expose: - 8111 ports: - 8111:8111 volumes: # DO change the /home/username/reactor below to the directory you created for # your local data; DO NOT change the /var/reactor part - /home/pi/docker/reactor:/var/reactor - /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro tmpfs: /tmp
Multi-System Reactor
Alexa for MSR, any interest?
MikeReadingtonM
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Telegram notification broke with latest update
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Phantom device, “INFO” appears
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Mode Status NULL
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] HTTP query failing after version 26177
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Question about the find function
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Answered] OK to remove old json files?
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Deprecation Announcement: 32-bit ARM *docker* images
toggledbitsT
If you are using the armv7l docker image, the OpenJS Foundation that publishes node is no longer producing 32-bit builds as of v24. That means the last supported LTS version of node for armv7l is v22, which will go End-of-Life in May 2027. Therefore, the Reactor armv7l image is now deprecated and will only be produced until node v22 goes EOL, and I will not publish armv7l images beyond that date. If you are running an RPi 3 or earlier with Reactor, you are on this image, and will need to upgrade hardware to a 64-bit model and use the arm64 image. If you need help getting it done, ask in this category.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] build 26150 - engine not starting
G
@toggledbits I pulled the image (well, Watchtower did) and within minutes the whole system went offline. The log looks like it ends with 26143. [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-mkahsmgf/26qq82mw-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lqyfljfi/22f8on0t-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lsb61rw8/24oenqi2-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lrh58he0/rule-lrh58he0:S-1c00gfib-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lrh58he0/1c00dylr-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lrh58he0/1nam9w5u-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-miuh2qqi/22ls4lql-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-kwc6rmci/rule-kwc6rmci:S-1vj8sdfc-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-kwc6rmci/rule-kwc6rmci:S-1qanz01x-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/24lq19p6-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-mk0o8iox/23oy468y-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-miscg2h3/rule-miscg2h3:S-22gmbq1c-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-kxgrfjke/238p0old-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-m7ccsso5/re-m7ccsso5-1r0myjxa-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/19nl9wq2-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/rule-ladyja6a:S-yl3xk9t-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/rule-ladyja6a:S-yl3vv5m-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-ln7j2nqp/re-ln7j2nqp-22mx9lzd-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-ln7j2nqp/22mx87c8-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-licneppy/1mzwe7ht-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ml3194ih/25jqt1j4-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-kxgrg7kf/227hshak-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-reactorexmachina/13ua1p95-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-reactorexmachina/13uagam7-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-grpvl9oypg/rule-grpvl9oypg:R-134x4cbv-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-grpvl9oypg/rule-grpvl9oypg:R-134x2fyl-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-lscjrws1/238p5c22-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lbwr0jvq/1xkczf03-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <Structure:NOTICE> Structure Structure#1 stopped [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <app:NOTICE> Closing APIs... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <wsapi:NOTICE> wsapi: closing... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <wsapi:NOTICE> wsapi: disconnecting from "192.168.1.23#82" (1001 service closing) [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.548Z <httpapi:NOTICE> HTTP API closing... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.549Z <wsapi:NOTICE> wsapi: server closed [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.549Z <httpapi:INFO> HTTP server closed. [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.549Z <app:NOTICE> Stopping timers... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.551Z <app:null> Shutdown complete, process ID 1 [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.551Z <app:null> Closing logs... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.551Z <default:null> Closing log I can SSH to the VM. Alas, I do not have the previous image for 26143 as I'm a little too quick sometimes on housekeeping.
Multi-System Reactor
http request action & digest auth
tunnusT
I’m using the HTTP Request action in MSR and need to authenticate against an endpoint that uses HTTP Digest authentication. Now that endpoint was changed to use SHA-256 in digest auth, so I would like to know if MSR supports it, or is it limited to MD5-based digest auth?
Multi-System Reactor

Can MSR be connected to more than one Vera controller?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
8 Posts 4 Posters 1.5k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cw-kidC Offline
    cw-kidC Offline
    cw-kid
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Can I also connect it to my second Vera hub ?

    Do I just make another Vera controller section in the reactor.yaml file etc?

    Thanks

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I have one MSR instance running on a Raspberry Pi 4B 2GB connected to three Veras (two Plus's and an Edge), openLuup, Hubitat C7, and Hass.

      Have at it! And you are spot-on: just copy the configuration section to another, change the ID and source, and you should be good to go.

      Someday, we'll have to figure out what the practical limits are on the number of HA controllers connected, but there is no enforced limit in the code either by architecture or implementation.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • LibraSunL Offline
        LibraSunL Offline
        LibraSun
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        The more I think about it, the more I view things like the Apilio API as a potential "controller" or "service" that MSR could hook into.

        Granted, MSR itself serves many of the same functions as Apilio, in the traditional "if this then that" sense, but one is local and the other cloud-based. I could see them working together to connect a host of far-flung HA components.

        Any thoughts?

        MatohlM cw-kidC 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • LibraSunL LibraSun

          The more I think about it, the more I view things like the Apilio API as a potential "controller" or "service" that MSR could hook into.

          Granted, MSR itself serves many of the same functions as Apilio, in the traditional "if this then that" sense, but one is local and the other cloud-based. I could see them working together to connect a host of far-flung HA components.

          Any thoughts?

          MatohlM Offline
          MatohlM Offline
          Matohl
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @librasun I hope that this will not be high on the priority list, since it is a paid cloud service. We need to get our local services MSR and HASS etc. working as intended. There are still some basic functionalities to iron out. I have started to realize in my Vera-MSR-HASS home it is starting to get quite complicated to know how I should use it in the most effective way since entities and rules now are starting to get spread out.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • LibraSunL Offline
            LibraSunL Offline
            LibraSun
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Agreed. I just like to dream (out loud, lol). I find that if I don't put all my thoughts down here in the Forum, they will fester until I blurt them out somewhere else less appropriate. 😉

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • MatohlM Offline
              MatohlM Offline
              Matohl
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              🙂 I don't exclude your thought though. 😉

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • LibraSunL LibraSun

                The more I think about it, the more I view things like the Apilio API as a potential "controller" or "service" that MSR could hook into.

                Granted, MSR itself serves many of the same functions as Apilio, in the traditional "if this then that" sense, but one is local and the other cloud-based. I could see them working together to connect a host of far-flung HA components.

                Any thoughts?

                cw-kidC Offline
                cw-kidC Offline
                cw-kid
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                @librasun

                Not heard of this Apilio thing before.

                So its like IFTTT for connecting unrelated HA devices and services ?

                LibraSunL 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cw-kidC cw-kid

                  @librasun

                  Not heard of this Apilio thing before.

                  So its like IFTTT for connecting unrelated HA devices and services ?

                  LibraSunL Offline
                  LibraSunL Offline
                  LibraSun
                  wrote on last edited by LibraSun
                  #8

                  @cw-kid said in Can MSR be connected to more than one Vera controller?:

                  @librasun

                  Not heard of this Apilio thing before.

                  So its like IFTTT for connecting unrelated HA devices and services ?

                  Yes. They have provisions for logic flow, variable storage (and computation), triggers, etc. It's an IFTTT competitor in the same way Stringify once was. Apilio lets you interface with Tuya, LG, IFTTT (which interoperates rather deeply with Apilio), Webhooks, SmartThings, all the big guns.

                  It's a paid service but cheap, under $1/mo. for a middle tier account.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  Recent Topics

                  • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                    toggledbitsT
                    toggledbits
                    5
                    148
                    128.4k

                  • DynamicGroupController updating members issue
                    toggledbitsT
                    toggledbits
                    0
                    4
                    16

                  • DynamicGroupController and attributes
                    therealdbT
                    therealdb
                    1
                    5
                    69

                  • Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
                    toggledbitsT
                    toggledbits
                    0
                    5
                    90

                  • Upgrade Issues
                    T
                    tbully
                    0
                    9
                    207

                  • [SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
                    toggledbitsT
                    toggledbits
                    0
                    10
                    216

                  • [SOLVED] Question regarding "in" vs "contains" vs contents of the string
                    G
                    gwp1
                    0
                    5
                    105

                  • openLuup console disappeared - 500 - Internal Server Error
                    A
                    a-lurker
                    0
                    2
                    158

                  • Logon screen timeout
                    G
                    gwp1
                    0
                    5
                    186

                  • [MSR] Copy&past of actions and/or drag&drop between set/reset
                    toggledbitsT
                    toggledbits
                    0
                    9
                    336

                  • Upgrade advice - upgrade from aarch64 to ARM64 image
                    toggledbitsT
                    toggledbits
                    0
                    4
                    198
                  Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                  Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • Unsolved