Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Rule for devices battery level ?
Device log?
G
@toggledbits is there a log that will show me what rule is turning on a specific device? I've got a switch that has been kicking on at 2200 ET for several nights now and the reactor.log doesn't have a thing in it that I can see on a device level (it being more rules-based).
Multi-System Reactor
Midnight crossing not working in date/time condition (build 25325)
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Error: Command timeout
G
at _ClientAPI._commandTimeout (http://192.168.1.100:8111/client/ClientAPI.js:807:179 Seeing this randomly when returning to open browser tab after being away awhile. Once, maybe twice a day. "What did you do to trigger it?" Literally nothing, just walked away and returned and there it was. Actions taken in reasonably close proximity to this particular instance of it popping up: I'd restarted the MSR container in Portainer. I'll try to grab some logs here shortly.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
toggledbitsT
This post does not apply to users of Intel/AMD-based systems. If you are using a Reactor image tagged latest-amd64 or stable-amd64, then this post does not apply to you. It also does not apply to bare-metal installs; it's for users of docker images on ARM-based systems only (principally Raspberry Pi hosts, but could be others). After January 15, 2026, I will no longer produce the aarch64-tagged docker image for Reactor. The ARM images will be arm64 for 64-bit operating systems, and armv7l for 32-bit operating systems. For those of you running a container from the aarch64 image today, this will be a relatively simple change: you just need to switch the image used for your docker container to a differently-tagged image. If you are using docker-compose, then this is a relatively simple matter of changing the image line in your docker-compose.yaml file and then stopping (docker-compose down) and restarting (docker-compose up -d) your Reactor daemon. But there's a catch... not all of you can safely just switch from the aarch64 image to the arm64 image. And, you can't just trust the output of uname -m, for example, because this exposes the CPU architecture, but not the word size of the OS running on that CPU. For Raspberry Pi systems, the transition to 64-bit operating systems was long (starting in 2016) and not always obvious — although there was a first "official" 64-bit OS for RPis in 2020, it did not become a default recommendation in the Raspberry Pi Imager until 2021, and then that was only the default for Pi 3/4 systems with >4GB RAM; it was 2022 before it was universally recommended for all 64-bit CPUs regardless of RAM size. Depending on when you first imaged your RPi system and what default you may have been offered/chosen, you could today easily have a 64-bit CPU Raspberry Pi running a 32-bit version of the operating system. Upgrades along the way would not change this; changing it to fully 64-bit requires a full reimage of the system. To establish if your OS is 64- or 32-bit, log in to your Pi and run: sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH. If the response is arm64 or aarch64, then you are running a 64-bit OS and you should use the arm64-tagged image. If it's anything else, you are running a 32-bit OS, and you should use the armv7l-tagged image. pi@rpi4-1:~ $ sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH armhf pi@rpi4-1:~ $ uname -m aarch64 pi@rpi4-1:~ $ In the example above, the uname command reports that the CPU is 64-bit architecture (aarch64), which is true for the host on which I ran these commands, but the DEB_HOST_ARCH value is armhf, indicating a 32-bit operating system. This system has to use the armv7l-tagged image. Other systems will have their own ways of determining the word size of the running OS. Since the majority of Reactor users running ARM systems are on Raspberry Pis, I am able to supply the above instructions, but if you happen to have a different ARM system, you'll need to do some web searching to figure out how to expose that information. Or, you can just try the arm64 image, and if it doesn't start up, try the armv7l image. Remember to always back up your system before making any changes. For everyone, please make this change as soon as possible, and if you have any trouble finding a working image, please (1) go back to the current aarch64 image; and (2) let me know in this thread along with as much detail about your host system as you can offer (including the output of the dpkg-architecture command mentioned above).
Multi-System Reactor
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Rule for devices battery level ?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
43 Posts 6 Posters 7.6k Views 7 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cw-kidC cw-kid

    Its working I think, I set up the expressions as Global ones.

    And my rules trigger is Expression value > battery_low_names > is NOT Null

    88f00746-2387-45d9-b197-3029e1cf93a7-image.png

    As a test I have used the MSR internal Alert in the rules reaction

    651065f5-98a1-4751-bc8e-ccf60f895bb7-image.png

    But I don't think I can insert ${{ battery_low_names }} in to a HTTP request for either Telegram messenger or TTS to Google Home speaker via Node-Red etc.

    IanI Offline
    IanI Offline
    Ian
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    @cw-kid

    This works for me - having previously set up the accounts at CallMeBot.

    0a99cf60-e93a-4b35-b498-3c47af3ce7e1-image.png

    The Request URL is: http://api.callmebot.com/text.php?source=web&user=@username&text=${{message}}

    It just sends a text that is the content of message.

    94c071ad-21c5-4511-b185-9daa855d422b-image.png

    cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • IanI Ian

      @cw-kid

      This works for me - having previously set up the accounts at CallMeBot.

      0a99cf60-e93a-4b35-b498-3c47af3ce7e1-image.png

      The Request URL is: http://api.callmebot.com/text.php?source=web&user=@username&text=${{message}}

      It just sends a text that is the content of message.

      94c071ad-21c5-4511-b185-9daa855d422b-image.png

      cw-kidC Offline
      cw-kidC Offline
      cw-kid
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      @ian

      Ian many thanks that is actually working for both of my HTTP requests.

      So now the Google Home Speakers says "Check Battery Level of X device name" and the Telegram text message also works stating the same.

      Cheers

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • cw-kidC Offline
        cw-kidC Offline
        cw-kid
        wrote on last edited by cw-kid
        #7

        I seem to have a problem with my trigger however

        905686d6-d0dc-4f28-ae27-37fb5b167683-image.png

        Its triggering the reaction when I don't want it to do so.

        I need to make the value of the expression "battery_low_names" null when no devices are below the battery level of 10% etc.

        I've tried adding in a ? in to the expression but it doesn't seem to be working

        join( each id in battery_low_list: getEntity(id)?.name, ', ')
        

        EDIT:

        This seems to work instead adding "? id: null" to the end of the expression.

        join( each id in battery_low_list: getEntity(id).name, ', ') ? id: null
        

        6f03c823-ba5f-4ea4-b794-313bdfe2f7b9-image.png

        EDIT 2:

        Maybe it doesn't work because now its not putting in the devices name in the expression value

        8ff5e855-5f1d-470f-8ca7-d4542728abf5-image.png

        EDIT 3:

        I then tried changing the trigger altogether to this, but it doesn't work and becomes true anyway.

        7ac8c487-52db-4907-b06c-99ccc293f6f7-image.png

        Likewise with this one:

        f9835abb-2cec-4b65-ab01-58acea857711-image.png

        Maybe there is a bug? All of these are going true and running the reaction when I expect them not to do that

        a3821660-9193-4725-845f-ea83766162a0-image.png

        IanI 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • cw-kidC cw-kid

          I seem to have a problem with my trigger however

          905686d6-d0dc-4f28-ae27-37fb5b167683-image.png

          Its triggering the reaction when I don't want it to do so.

          I need to make the value of the expression "battery_low_names" null when no devices are below the battery level of 10% etc.

          I've tried adding in a ? in to the expression but it doesn't seem to be working

          join( each id in battery_low_list: getEntity(id)?.name, ', ')
          

          EDIT:

          This seems to work instead adding "? id: null" to the end of the expression.

          join( each id in battery_low_list: getEntity(id).name, ', ') ? id: null
          

          6f03c823-ba5f-4ea4-b794-313bdfe2f7b9-image.png

          EDIT 2:

          Maybe it doesn't work because now its not putting in the devices name in the expression value

          8ff5e855-5f1d-470f-8ca7-d4542728abf5-image.png

          EDIT 3:

          I then tried changing the trigger altogether to this, but it doesn't work and becomes true anyway.

          7ac8c487-52db-4907-b06c-99ccc293f6f7-image.png

          Likewise with this one:

          f9835abb-2cec-4b65-ab01-58acea857711-image.png

          Maybe there is a bug? All of these are going true and running the reaction when I expect them not to do that

          a3821660-9193-4725-845f-ea83766162a0-image.png

          IanI Offline
          IanI Offline
          Ian
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          @cw-kid

          I'm using this.

          7a996464-1926-424b-800c-7358045bc946-image.png

          This goes true when battery_low_names is populated with the names of the devices with low battery levels.

          cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • IanI Ian

            @cw-kid

            I'm using this.

            7a996464-1926-424b-800c-7358045bc946-image.png

            This goes true when battery_low_names is populated with the names of the devices with low battery levels.

            cw-kidC Offline
            cw-kidC Offline
            cw-kid
            wrote on last edited by cw-kid
            #9

            @ian

            That works !

            Easy when you know how..

            The trigger is now going false when no devices are in the battery_low_names expression results.

            b398a767-2130-47b6-bca1-bdcd3346f965-image.png

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

              @cw-kid One of my to-do list tasks for expressions is to be able to create a list of devices that match a test. Until that comes, you can just build your own array of battery-operated devices like this (lets call this battery_device_list) :

              35882eb5-310f-41b1-a95e-eaf52dbc0bb8-image.png

              Then, you can reduce that list to all of the devices that have battery < 10%:

              c108f634-1ad1-4156-9e47-777c98c9d69b-image.png

              That leaves you with an array of the entities that have low battery. Use another expression to convert that into a comma-separated list of entity names:

              30ca5615-71c3-431e-b83f-d0aeff6144e4-image.png

              Your rule just checks to see if that battery_low_names (a string now) expression is not empty, and runs whatever notifications you want to run if it is not. You can include the battery_low_names variable in the text of your email or other notification, too.

              1bfd5d0f-1313-4613-ac2b-5731ddf5c594-image.png

              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbits
              wrote on last edited by toggledbits
              #10

              @toggledbits said in Rule for devices battery level ?:

              (a string now) expression is not empty,

              Details.

              Also these can be rule expressions, they do not need to be global.

              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cw-kidC Offline
                cw-kidC Offline
                cw-kid
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                Thanks I've changed the expressions to local rule ones instead and its all still working.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • cw-kidC Offline
                  cw-kidC Offline
                  cw-kid
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  How can I make this rule re-trigger ?

                  Say I don't immediate go replace the battery on the device mentioned, can I have the rule run the alerts / notifications each day or week until I have done it and changed the batteries ?

                  Also can the alerts also state what the battery level percentage actually is ?

                  Thanks

                  toggledbitsT IanI 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • cw-kidC cw-kid

                    How can I make this rule re-trigger ?

                    Say I don't immediate go replace the battery on the device mentioned, can I have the rule run the alerts / notifications each day or week until I have done it and changed the batteries ?

                    Also can the alerts also state what the battery level percentage actually is ?

                    Thanks

                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbits
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    @cw-kid said in Rule for devices battery level ?:

                    How can I make this rule re-trigger ?

                    Wrap the condition in a group and put the group in "pulse" output mode with the timing you want.

                    @cw-kid said in Rule for devices battery level ?:

                    Also can the alerts also state what the battery level percentage actually is ?

                    Yes, but I'm going to leave it as an exercise for the reader. Level of difficulty: moderate.

                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                    cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • cw-kidC cw-kid

                      How can I make this rule re-trigger ?

                      Say I don't immediate go replace the battery on the device mentioned, can I have the rule run the alerts / notifications each day or week until I have done it and changed the batteries ?

                      Also can the alerts also state what the battery level percentage actually is ?

                      Thanks

                      IanI Offline
                      IanI Offline
                      Ian
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      @cw-kid

                      Try this.

                      16c0d434-95ea-453d-b06e-e9a68663fbe5-image.png

                      cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • IanI Ian

                        @cw-kid

                        Try this.

                        16c0d434-95ea-453d-b06e-e9a68663fbe5-image.png

                        cw-kidC Offline
                        cw-kidC Offline
                        cw-kid
                        wrote on last edited by cw-kid
                        #15

                        @ian

                        Thanks Ian that works, my Telegram text message now has the number% at the end of the message now.

                        However this messes up the Google Home TTS announcement sent via node-red, if I have a "%" in the expression. So I had to change it to the word "percent" instead and now the TTS sounds correct when spoken.

                        join( each id in battery_low_list: getEntity(id).name + " " + "at" + " " + int(getEntity(id).attributes.battery_power.level * 100) + " percent", ', ')
                        
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                          @cw-kid said in Rule for devices battery level ?:

                          How can I make this rule re-trigger ?

                          Wrap the condition in a group and put the group in "pulse" output mode with the timing you want.

                          @cw-kid said in Rule for devices battery level ?:

                          Also can the alerts also state what the battery level percentage actually is ?

                          Yes, but I'm going to leave it as an exercise for the reader. Level of difficulty: moderate.

                          cw-kidC Offline
                          cw-kidC Offline
                          cw-kid
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #16

                          @toggledbits said in Rule for devices battery level ?:

                          Wrap the condition in a group and put the group in "pulse" output mode with the timing you want.

                          Like this?

                          146e1b92-875d-4a6e-8619-e555c355fbce-image.png

                          5eed7d9c-43ab-4a1e-8505-c0679f0ce401-image.png

                          Seems to be working and the alerts are repeating every 60 seconds now. I will just set this to 24hrs I think.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                            @cw-kid One of my to-do list tasks for expressions is to be able to create a list of devices that match a test. Until that comes, you can just build your own array of battery-operated devices like this (lets call this battery_device_list) :

                            35882eb5-310f-41b1-a95e-eaf52dbc0bb8-image.png

                            Then, you can reduce that list to all of the devices that have battery < 10%:

                            c108f634-1ad1-4156-9e47-777c98c9d69b-image.png

                            That leaves you with an array of the entities that have low battery. Use another expression to convert that into a comma-separated list of entity names:

                            30ca5615-71c3-431e-b83f-d0aeff6144e4-image.png

                            Your rule just checks to see if that battery_low_names (a string now) expression is not empty, and runs whatever notifications you want to run if it is not. You can include the battery_low_names variable in the text of your email or other notification, too.

                            1bfd5d0f-1313-4613-ac2b-5731ddf5c594-image.png

                            CrilleC Online
                            CrilleC Online
                            Crille
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #17

                            @toggledbits said in Rule for devices battery level ?:

                            One of my to-do list tasks for expressions is to be able to create a list of devices that match a test.

                            This is very useful, is it released yet or still on the to-do list?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbits
                              wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                              #18

                              Still on the to-do list, but I think I'm close to figuring out what I want it to do. These things get harder with time: the more people use them, the more etched in stone they become, so making a "first guess" and completely changing things later isn't really something I want to do a lot of. If I can get something good on the first try, that's the way...

                              Here's what I'm thinking...

                              First, the matchEntities() function would quickly narrow down the set, in a manner similar to the filters on the Entities page and the Entity Picker:

                                  living_room_sensors = matchEntities( { controller: 'vera', capability: [ 'binary_sensor', 'value_sensor'' ], group: 'Living Room' } )
                              

                              This would return an array of entities. From here, you could use an each statement to further filter any deep refinements. This expression would take the above array of sensors in the Living Room and pick out those that are battery powered and have battery level under 50%:

                                  low_battery_living_room = each e in living_room_sensors: e.attributes.battery_power?.level <= 0.5 ? e : null
                              

                              I'm liking this approach because the function could do the bulk reduction of potential hundreds of entities down to a manageable list, and then the final filtering of the list can be done with expressions for maximum flexibility.

                              Any thoughts about that?

                              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                              CrilleC 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                Still on the to-do list, but I think I'm close to figuring out what I want it to do. These things get harder with time: the more people use them, the more etched in stone they become, so making a "first guess" and completely changing things later isn't really something I want to do a lot of. If I can get something good on the first try, that's the way...

                                Here's what I'm thinking...

                                First, the matchEntities() function would quickly narrow down the set, in a manner similar to the filters on the Entities page and the Entity Picker:

                                    living_room_sensors = matchEntities( { controller: 'vera', capability: [ 'binary_sensor', 'value_sensor'' ], group: 'Living Room' } )
                                

                                This would return an array of entities. From here, you could use an each statement to further filter any deep refinements. This expression would take the above array of sensors in the Living Room and pick out those that are battery powered and have battery level under 50%:

                                    low_battery_living_room = each e in living_room_sensors: e.attributes.battery_power?.level <= 0.5 ? e : null
                                

                                I'm liking this approach because the function could do the bulk reduction of potential hundreds of entities down to a manageable list, and then the final filtering of the list can be done with expressions for maximum flexibility.

                                Any thoughts about that?

                                CrilleC Online
                                CrilleC Online
                                Crille
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #19

                                @toggledbits That would do it for me, is the matchEntities() function already available in Expressions? I get no error but no matter what I do the Expression always returns an empty array.
                                I'd expect this to contain at least something:

                                matchEntities( { controller: 'vera', capability: 'humidity_sensor' } )
                                
                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • toggledbitsT Offline
                                  toggledbitsT Offline
                                  toggledbits
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #20

                                  No, it's not yet available.

                                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                  CrilleC tunnusT 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • CrilleC Online
                                    CrilleC Online
                                    Crille
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #21

                                    Ah, that explains a lot 🙂 I like the idea, it seems very flexible.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                      No, it's not yet available.

                                      CrilleC Online
                                      CrilleC Online
                                      Crille
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #22

                                      @toggledbits Thanks, the new matchEntities() is brilliant. Now we can have dynamic arrays of devices.

                                      toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • CrilleC Crille

                                        @toggledbits Thanks, the new matchEntities() is brilliant. Now we can have dynamic arrays of devices.

                                        toggledbitsT Offline
                                        toggledbitsT Offline
                                        toggledbits
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #23

                                        @crille said in Rule for devices battery level ?:

                                        Now we can have dynamic arrays of devices.

                                        Tell me about that...

                                        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                        CrilleC 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                          @crille said in Rule for devices battery level ?:

                                          Now we can have dynamic arrays of devices.

                                          Tell me about that...

                                          CrilleC Online
                                          CrilleC Online
                                          Crille
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #24

                                          @toggledbits Inspired by this topic I created a rule with similar expressions to monitor/notify x_ezlo_device.reachable for all my Ezlo devices. Instead of managing a static array, like the battery_device_list in this topic, the expression matchEntities( {capability: 'x_ezlo_device'} ) generates a list of devices that is dynamically updated if devices are added or removed from the controller.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Recent Topics

                                          • Is there a way to turn this section (image in post) off?
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            1
                                            20

                                          • Device log?
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            2
                                            44

                                          • Midnight crossing not working in date/time condition (build 25325)
                                            tunnusT
                                            tunnus
                                            0
                                            3
                                            46

                                          • Error: Command timeout
                                            G
                                            gwp1
                                            0
                                            6
                                            139

                                          • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            5
                                            131
                                            75.0k

                                          • [Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
                                            CrilleC
                                            Crille
                                            0
                                            5
                                            222

                                          • Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
                                            G
                                            gwp1
                                            0
                                            6
                                            246

                                          • Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            1
                                            1
                                            91

                                          • Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
                                            M
                                            mgvra
                                            1
                                            3
                                            190

                                          • Script action and custom timers
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            4
                                            205

                                          • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            12
                                            524

                                          • There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
                                            akbooerA
                                            akbooer
                                            1
                                            2
                                            156
                                          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                          Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Unsolved