Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Rule for devices battery level ?
Can you run MSR on Home Assistant OS ?
cw-kidC
Looking at using Home Assistant for the first time, either on a Home Assistant Green, their own hardware or buying a cheap second hand mini PC. Sounds like Home Assistant OS is linux based using Docker for HA etc. Would I also be able to install things like MSR as well on their OS ? On the same box? Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
cw-kidC
Hello I haven't updated my installation of MSR in a very long time. Its a bare metal Linux install currently on version 24366-3de60836 I see the latest version is now latest-26011-c621bbc7 I assume I cannot just jump from a very old version to the latest version? Or can I? Thanks
Multi-System Reactor
This trigger no longer working - complaining about the operator needing changing
cw-kidC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Self test
CatmanV2C
Having been messing around with some stuff I worked a way to self trigger some tests that I wanted to do on the HA <> MSR integration This got me wondering if there's an entity that changes state / is exposed when a configured controller goes off line? I can't see one but thought it might be hidden or something? Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
tunnusT
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration: users: # This section defines your valid users. admin: ******* groups: # This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application # and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to # more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here. admin_group: users: - admin applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications guests: users: "*" applications: - dashboard api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin_group allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: true session: timeout: 7200 # (seconds) rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true # If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged. log_acls: true # If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged. debug_acls: true My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
Multi-System Reactor
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request 2?
CatmanV2C
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks. Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option? No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Rule for devices battery level ?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
43 Posts 6 Posters 8.5k Views 7 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cw-kidC Offline
    cw-kidC Offline
    cw-kid
    wrote on last edited by cw-kid
    #4

    Its working I think, I set up the expressions as Global ones.

    And my rules trigger is Expression value > battery_low_names > is NOT Null

    88f00746-2387-45d9-b197-3029e1cf93a7-image.png

    As a test I have used the MSR internal Alert in the rules reaction

    651065f5-98a1-4751-bc8e-ccf60f895bb7-image.png

    But I don't think I can insert ${{ battery_low_names }} in to a HTTP request for either Telegram messenger or TTS to Google Home speaker via Node-Red etc.

    IanI 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • cw-kidC cw-kid

      Its working I think, I set up the expressions as Global ones.

      And my rules trigger is Expression value > battery_low_names > is NOT Null

      88f00746-2387-45d9-b197-3029e1cf93a7-image.png

      As a test I have used the MSR internal Alert in the rules reaction

      651065f5-98a1-4751-bc8e-ccf60f895bb7-image.png

      But I don't think I can insert ${{ battery_low_names }} in to a HTTP request for either Telegram messenger or TTS to Google Home speaker via Node-Red etc.

      IanI Offline
      IanI Offline
      Ian
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      @cw-kid

      This works for me - having previously set up the accounts at CallMeBot.

      0a99cf60-e93a-4b35-b498-3c47af3ce7e1-image.png

      The Request URL is: http://api.callmebot.com/text.php?source=web&user=@username&text=${{message}}

      It just sends a text that is the content of message.

      94c071ad-21c5-4511-b185-9daa855d422b-image.png

      cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • IanI Ian

        @cw-kid

        This works for me - having previously set up the accounts at CallMeBot.

        0a99cf60-e93a-4b35-b498-3c47af3ce7e1-image.png

        The Request URL is: http://api.callmebot.com/text.php?source=web&user=@username&text=${{message}}

        It just sends a text that is the content of message.

        94c071ad-21c5-4511-b185-9daa855d422b-image.png

        cw-kidC Offline
        cw-kidC Offline
        cw-kid
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        @ian

        Ian many thanks that is actually working for both of my HTTP requests.

        So now the Google Home Speakers says "Check Battery Level of X device name" and the Telegram text message also works stating the same.

        Cheers

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • cw-kidC Offline
          cw-kidC Offline
          cw-kid
          wrote on last edited by cw-kid
          #7

          I seem to have a problem with my trigger however

          905686d6-d0dc-4f28-ae27-37fb5b167683-image.png

          Its triggering the reaction when I don't want it to do so.

          I need to make the value of the expression "battery_low_names" null when no devices are below the battery level of 10% etc.

          I've tried adding in a ? in to the expression but it doesn't seem to be working

          join( each id in battery_low_list: getEntity(id)?.name, ', ')
          

          EDIT:

          This seems to work instead adding "? id: null" to the end of the expression.

          join( each id in battery_low_list: getEntity(id).name, ', ') ? id: null
          

          6f03c823-ba5f-4ea4-b794-313bdfe2f7b9-image.png

          EDIT 2:

          Maybe it doesn't work because now its not putting in the devices name in the expression value

          8ff5e855-5f1d-470f-8ca7-d4542728abf5-image.png

          EDIT 3:

          I then tried changing the trigger altogether to this, but it doesn't work and becomes true anyway.

          7ac8c487-52db-4907-b06c-99ccc293f6f7-image.png

          Likewise with this one:

          f9835abb-2cec-4b65-ab01-58acea857711-image.png

          Maybe there is a bug? All of these are going true and running the reaction when I expect them not to do that

          a3821660-9193-4725-845f-ea83766162a0-image.png

          IanI 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cw-kidC cw-kid

            I seem to have a problem with my trigger however

            905686d6-d0dc-4f28-ae27-37fb5b167683-image.png

            Its triggering the reaction when I don't want it to do so.

            I need to make the value of the expression "battery_low_names" null when no devices are below the battery level of 10% etc.

            I've tried adding in a ? in to the expression but it doesn't seem to be working

            join( each id in battery_low_list: getEntity(id)?.name, ', ')
            

            EDIT:

            This seems to work instead adding "? id: null" to the end of the expression.

            join( each id in battery_low_list: getEntity(id).name, ', ') ? id: null
            

            6f03c823-ba5f-4ea4-b794-313bdfe2f7b9-image.png

            EDIT 2:

            Maybe it doesn't work because now its not putting in the devices name in the expression value

            8ff5e855-5f1d-470f-8ca7-d4542728abf5-image.png

            EDIT 3:

            I then tried changing the trigger altogether to this, but it doesn't work and becomes true anyway.

            7ac8c487-52db-4907-b06c-99ccc293f6f7-image.png

            Likewise with this one:

            f9835abb-2cec-4b65-ab01-58acea857711-image.png

            Maybe there is a bug? All of these are going true and running the reaction when I expect them not to do that

            a3821660-9193-4725-845f-ea83766162a0-image.png

            IanI Offline
            IanI Offline
            Ian
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            @cw-kid

            I'm using this.

            7a996464-1926-424b-800c-7358045bc946-image.png

            This goes true when battery_low_names is populated with the names of the devices with low battery levels.

            cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • IanI Ian

              @cw-kid

              I'm using this.

              7a996464-1926-424b-800c-7358045bc946-image.png

              This goes true when battery_low_names is populated with the names of the devices with low battery levels.

              cw-kidC Offline
              cw-kidC Offline
              cw-kid
              wrote on last edited by cw-kid
              #9

              @ian

              That works !

              Easy when you know how..

              The trigger is now going false when no devices are in the battery_low_names expression results.

              b398a767-2130-47b6-bca1-bdcd3346f965-image.png

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                @cw-kid One of my to-do list tasks for expressions is to be able to create a list of devices that match a test. Until that comes, you can just build your own array of battery-operated devices like this (lets call this battery_device_list) :

                35882eb5-310f-41b1-a95e-eaf52dbc0bb8-image.png

                Then, you can reduce that list to all of the devices that have battery < 10%:

                c108f634-1ad1-4156-9e47-777c98c9d69b-image.png

                That leaves you with an array of the entities that have low battery. Use another expression to convert that into a comma-separated list of entity names:

                30ca5615-71c3-431e-b83f-d0aeff6144e4-image.png

                Your rule just checks to see if that battery_low_names (a string now) expression is not empty, and runs whatever notifications you want to run if it is not. You can include the battery_low_names variable in the text of your email or other notification, too.

                1bfd5d0f-1313-4613-ac2b-5731ddf5c594-image.png

                toggledbitsT Online
                toggledbitsT Online
                toggledbits
                wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                #10

                @toggledbits said in Rule for devices battery level ?:

                (a string now) expression is not empty,

                Details.

                Also these can be rule expressions, they do not need to be global.

                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cw-kidC Offline
                  cw-kidC Offline
                  cw-kid
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  Thanks I've changed the expressions to local rule ones instead and its all still working.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • cw-kidC Offline
                    cw-kidC Offline
                    cw-kid
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    How can I make this rule re-trigger ?

                    Say I don't immediate go replace the battery on the device mentioned, can I have the rule run the alerts / notifications each day or week until I have done it and changed the batteries ?

                    Also can the alerts also state what the battery level percentage actually is ?

                    Thanks

                    toggledbitsT IanI 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • cw-kidC cw-kid

                      How can I make this rule re-trigger ?

                      Say I don't immediate go replace the battery on the device mentioned, can I have the rule run the alerts / notifications each day or week until I have done it and changed the batteries ?

                      Also can the alerts also state what the battery level percentage actually is ?

                      Thanks

                      toggledbitsT Online
                      toggledbitsT Online
                      toggledbits
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      @cw-kid said in Rule for devices battery level ?:

                      How can I make this rule re-trigger ?

                      Wrap the condition in a group and put the group in "pulse" output mode with the timing you want.

                      @cw-kid said in Rule for devices battery level ?:

                      Also can the alerts also state what the battery level percentage actually is ?

                      Yes, but I'm going to leave it as an exercise for the reader. Level of difficulty: moderate.

                      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                      cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • cw-kidC cw-kid

                        How can I make this rule re-trigger ?

                        Say I don't immediate go replace the battery on the device mentioned, can I have the rule run the alerts / notifications each day or week until I have done it and changed the batteries ?

                        Also can the alerts also state what the battery level percentage actually is ?

                        Thanks

                        IanI Offline
                        IanI Offline
                        Ian
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        @cw-kid

                        Try this.

                        16c0d434-95ea-453d-b06e-e9a68663fbe5-image.png

                        cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • IanI Ian

                          @cw-kid

                          Try this.

                          16c0d434-95ea-453d-b06e-e9a68663fbe5-image.png

                          cw-kidC Offline
                          cw-kidC Offline
                          cw-kid
                          wrote on last edited by cw-kid
                          #15

                          @ian

                          Thanks Ian that works, my Telegram text message now has the number% at the end of the message now.

                          However this messes up the Google Home TTS announcement sent via node-red, if I have a "%" in the expression. So I had to change it to the word "percent" instead and now the TTS sounds correct when spoken.

                          join( each id in battery_low_list: getEntity(id).name + " " + "at" + " " + int(getEntity(id).attributes.battery_power.level * 100) + " percent", ', ')
                          
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                            @cw-kid said in Rule for devices battery level ?:

                            How can I make this rule re-trigger ?

                            Wrap the condition in a group and put the group in "pulse" output mode with the timing you want.

                            @cw-kid said in Rule for devices battery level ?:

                            Also can the alerts also state what the battery level percentage actually is ?

                            Yes, but I'm going to leave it as an exercise for the reader. Level of difficulty: moderate.

                            cw-kidC Offline
                            cw-kidC Offline
                            cw-kid
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #16

                            @toggledbits said in Rule for devices battery level ?:

                            Wrap the condition in a group and put the group in "pulse" output mode with the timing you want.

                            Like this?

                            146e1b92-875d-4a6e-8619-e555c355fbce-image.png

                            5eed7d9c-43ab-4a1e-8505-c0679f0ce401-image.png

                            Seems to be working and the alerts are repeating every 60 seconds now. I will just set this to 24hrs I think.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                              @cw-kid One of my to-do list tasks for expressions is to be able to create a list of devices that match a test. Until that comes, you can just build your own array of battery-operated devices like this (lets call this battery_device_list) :

                              35882eb5-310f-41b1-a95e-eaf52dbc0bb8-image.png

                              Then, you can reduce that list to all of the devices that have battery < 10%:

                              c108f634-1ad1-4156-9e47-777c98c9d69b-image.png

                              That leaves you with an array of the entities that have low battery. Use another expression to convert that into a comma-separated list of entity names:

                              30ca5615-71c3-431e-b83f-d0aeff6144e4-image.png

                              Your rule just checks to see if that battery_low_names (a string now) expression is not empty, and runs whatever notifications you want to run if it is not. You can include the battery_low_names variable in the text of your email or other notification, too.

                              1bfd5d0f-1313-4613-ac2b-5731ddf5c594-image.png

                              CrilleC Offline
                              CrilleC Offline
                              Crille
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #17

                              @toggledbits said in Rule for devices battery level ?:

                              One of my to-do list tasks for expressions is to be able to create a list of devices that match a test.

                              This is very useful, is it released yet or still on the to-do list?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • toggledbitsT Online
                                toggledbitsT Online
                                toggledbits
                                wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                                #18

                                Still on the to-do list, but I think I'm close to figuring out what I want it to do. These things get harder with time: the more people use them, the more etched in stone they become, so making a "first guess" and completely changing things later isn't really something I want to do a lot of. If I can get something good on the first try, that's the way...

                                Here's what I'm thinking...

                                First, the matchEntities() function would quickly narrow down the set, in a manner similar to the filters on the Entities page and the Entity Picker:

                                    living_room_sensors = matchEntities( { controller: 'vera', capability: [ 'binary_sensor', 'value_sensor'' ], group: 'Living Room' } )
                                

                                This would return an array of entities. From here, you could use an each statement to further filter any deep refinements. This expression would take the above array of sensors in the Living Room and pick out those that are battery powered and have battery level under 50%:

                                    low_battery_living_room = each e in living_room_sensors: e.attributes.battery_power?.level <= 0.5 ? e : null
                                

                                I'm liking this approach because the function could do the bulk reduction of potential hundreds of entities down to a manageable list, and then the final filtering of the list can be done with expressions for maximum flexibility.

                                Any thoughts about that?

                                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                CrilleC 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                  Still on the to-do list, but I think I'm close to figuring out what I want it to do. These things get harder with time: the more people use them, the more etched in stone they become, so making a "first guess" and completely changing things later isn't really something I want to do a lot of. If I can get something good on the first try, that's the way...

                                  Here's what I'm thinking...

                                  First, the matchEntities() function would quickly narrow down the set, in a manner similar to the filters on the Entities page and the Entity Picker:

                                      living_room_sensors = matchEntities( { controller: 'vera', capability: [ 'binary_sensor', 'value_sensor'' ], group: 'Living Room' } )
                                  

                                  This would return an array of entities. From here, you could use an each statement to further filter any deep refinements. This expression would take the above array of sensors in the Living Room and pick out those that are battery powered and have battery level under 50%:

                                      low_battery_living_room = each e in living_room_sensors: e.attributes.battery_power?.level <= 0.5 ? e : null
                                  

                                  I'm liking this approach because the function could do the bulk reduction of potential hundreds of entities down to a manageable list, and then the final filtering of the list can be done with expressions for maximum flexibility.

                                  Any thoughts about that?

                                  CrilleC Offline
                                  CrilleC Offline
                                  Crille
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #19

                                  @toggledbits That would do it for me, is the matchEntities() function already available in Expressions? I get no error but no matter what I do the Expression always returns an empty array.
                                  I'd expect this to contain at least something:

                                  matchEntities( { controller: 'vera', capability: 'humidity_sensor' } )
                                  
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • toggledbitsT Online
                                    toggledbitsT Online
                                    toggledbits
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #20

                                    No, it's not yet available.

                                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                    CrilleC tunnusT 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • CrilleC Offline
                                      CrilleC Offline
                                      Crille
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #21

                                      Ah, that explains a lot 🙂 I like the idea, it seems very flexible.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                        No, it's not yet available.

                                        CrilleC Offline
                                        CrilleC Offline
                                        Crille
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #22

                                        @toggledbits Thanks, the new matchEntities() is brilliant. Now we can have dynamic arrays of devices.

                                        toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • CrilleC Crille

                                          @toggledbits Thanks, the new matchEntities() is brilliant. Now we can have dynamic arrays of devices.

                                          toggledbitsT Online
                                          toggledbitsT Online
                                          toggledbits
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #23

                                          @crille said in Rule for devices battery level ?:

                                          Now we can have dynamic arrays of devices.

                                          Tell me about that...

                                          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                          CrilleC 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Recent Topics

                                          • Can you run MSR on Home Assistant OS ?
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            5
                                            44

                                          • HA and AI
                                            therealdbT
                                            therealdb
                                            0
                                            4
                                            126

                                          • How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            26
                                            329

                                          • This trigger no longer working - complaining about the operator needing changing
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            18
                                            78

                                          • Self test
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            3
                                            102

                                          • Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            2
                                            117

                                          • VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
                                            S
                                            SweetGenius
                                            1
                                            1
                                            81

                                          • Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            3
                                            1
                                            78

                                          • Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
                                            G
                                            gwp1
                                            0
                                            1
                                            91

                                          • [Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
                                            CrilleC
                                            Crille
                                            0
                                            4
                                            191

                                          • [Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
                                            therealdbT
                                            therealdb
                                            0
                                            3
                                            176

                                          • Possible feature request 2?
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            3
                                            151
                                          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                          Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Unsolved