Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. [Solved] MSR doesn't like January?
[MSR] Native fan capabilty
therealdbT
Nothing more to add. I see we have hvac_blower, but, anyway, maybe a native fan on the same assumptions of the fan from HASS could be reasonable. I have a couple of them. ie, this is from ESPHome via HASS. x_hass.domain="fan" x_hass.entity_id="fan.kitchen_seashell_hood_ventilation_fan" x_hass.floor_id=null x_hass.services=["fan","esphome"] x_hass.source="esphome" x_hass.state="off" x_hass_attr.friendly_name="Seashell Hood Ventilation Fan" x_hass_attr.percentage=50 x_hass_attr.percentage_step=25 x_hass_attr.preset_mode="" x_hass_attr.preset_modes=[] x_hass_attr.supported_features=49 Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Rule do not fire
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Rule condition shows TRUE in UI but Rule never transitions to SET — survives full restart
N
Build: latest-26221-b25bb3e3, Docker on Synology. Hi, I have a Rule whose Trigger/Constraints reference other Rules via Rule State ... is TRUE. At some point it stops firing. Expanding the rule's condition tree in the UI shows every Trigger and Constraint condition green/TRUE — confirmed live by walking into the room and watching Motion go true in real time. Rule History shows no new SET, just old reset entries. Tried, on the same rule, same evening: recreating the trigger conditions with fresh IDs, recreating the constraint conditions with fresh IDs (flat and wrapped in a new Group — wrapping in a Group produced one SET, but it didn't reproduce on repeat attempts with the same structure), and finally a full container restart with a verified-correct saved rule. Still no SET, even with a fresh live motion event right after the restart. Separately, I found that this rule (and its 10 per-room clones) share identical internal condition/group IDs with each other — leftover from a batch clone done months ago, never regenerated. Not sure if that's related, since fixing the IDs didn't reliably fix the symptom either. Has anyone seen a Rule State condition show TRUE in the UI without the Rule ever producing a SET, surviving a clean restart? Thanks in advance
Multi-System Reactor
DynamicGroupController and attributes
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits I'm back to trying to optimize a couple of things based on dynamic group. First of all, I think I found a typo in the doc: primary_attribute: "binary_sensor.state" primary_attribute_value: | d = false; each id in members: d = getEntity(id)?.attributes?.power_switch?.state or d, d I think the correct code snippet is d = false, All that said, my use case for dynamic groups is to group 3 different climate devices, so I could easily command them at the same time. Commands are good, but sometimes I want to check if any of the devices are on, and that's easily done with a similar snippet as the one you have in the docs. But this is limited to the primary attribute, while I want to have any of the attributes in the group to be driven by a similar logic (while all are null in the group). ie, access hvac_control.mode and see if any of the unit is set to cool, or heat. Is that possible, without re-defining an expression in each of my rules? Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Unofficial thread for compatibility
tunnusT
As there are statements about compatibility for home assistant versions in MSR new version announcements (e.g. "HassController: Bless Hass to 2025.7.3"), I thought it would be good idea to track other controllers as well. As an example, I can confirm that build "latest-25208-c53e8513" works with Hubitat Elevation C-8 platform version 2.4.2.134 using Maker API. Updates: (the latest versions first in the list) OK: build "latest-25264-2fbe9217" with Hubitat C-8 platform v. 2.4.3.123
Multi-System Reactor
Ooops - Deleted Reactor Ex Machina II
R
I accidentally deleted Reactor Ex Machina II (REM II) from my Reactor rules. I tried to recover it by deleting the .json and .dval in the Rules subdirectory and then recreating it from Togglebits original posting, but that did not work. Does anyone know how to recover REM ll ?
Multi-System Reactor
Bail out of failed reaction?
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
CrilleC
Edit: Solved in latest-26221. Bare-metal latest-26193 I have this group: "OKforLarm": name: OK för Larm select: - include_controller: vera - include_capability: door_sensor filter_expression: entity.attributes.door_sensor.state It contains the entities I expect but behaves a bit odd. When I open vera>device_10097 the entity attribute door_sensor.state changes to true but it won't show up as member in the group, when I also open vera>device_10095 they both shows as members and when I close vera>device_10095 it disappear from the group but when I close vera>device_10097 it lingers in the group until I restart Reactor.
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade Issues
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Question regarding "in" vs "contains" vs contents of the string
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Logon screen timeout
G
Noticing since 170 that the lock screen doesn't switch to the logon prompt but, rather, stays on the active UI until such time as you go to click something within it. Then it jumps to the login screen. Brave browser Brave 1.92.139 (Official Build) (arm64) Chromium: 150.0.7871.114
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Copy&past of actions and/or drag&drop between set/reset
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits One thing that bothers me while doing work on new systems/new features, is that I cannot copy&paste actions, and I cannot drag&drop between set and resets. #1 is for when I want to copy an action between different rules opened in two separate browser windows, while #2 is when I just need to flip a bunch of actions in the reset, or move some logic back and forth. Both will be appreciated, but I understand the technical challenges. Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade advice - upgrade from aarch64 to ARM64 image
T
I'm currently on version 26011. I understand that the aarch64 image is no longer supported. So, I therefore need to update to the ARM64 image. Can anyone possibly suggest how I update my docker compose.yaml file (see below). Ideally I'd like to keep my existing reactions etc. rather than start from scratch. # Multi-System Reactor template docker-compose.yml (version 22160) # # Change the lines indicated by "DO"... # services: reactor: container_name: reactor environment: # DO change the TZ: line to set your local time zone. # See valid TZ list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tz_database_time_zones TZ: GB # # DO NOT change this path. Your directory location is in "source" below. REACTOR_DATA_PREFIX: /var/reactor # DO change the image below to the one you are using (e.g. armv7l or aarch64 for RPi 4) image: toggledbits/reactor:latest-aarch64 restart: "always" expose: - 8111 ports: - 8111:8111 volumes: # DO change the /home/username/reactor below to the directory you created for # your local data; DO NOT change the /var/reactor part - /home/pi/docker/reactor:/var/reactor - /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro tmpfs: /tmp
Multi-System Reactor
Alexa for MSR, any interest?
MikeReadingtonM
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Telegram notification broke with latest update
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Phantom device, “INFO” appears
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Mode Status NULL
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

[Solved] MSR doesn't like January?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
9 Posts 2 Posters 1.4k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 3 Offline
    3 Offline
    3rdStng
    wrote on last edited by 3rdStng
    #1

    I've been trying to track down what is causing this Date/Time issue. I'm getting closer and figured I would post something to start the topic/hunt. I wrote a rule based on my kids school schedule. The ultimate concept was to turn the lights on and whatnot based on if they had school or not, and if the school day was a late start or regular start schedule. It took me a few times and tweaks to get what I think is accurate and going to work. Along the way I noticed that sometimes a defined month would revert back to (every month) instead of the month I had defined. I think this has something to do with going into next year, but like I said, I'm still trying to get a RCA. What it appears like in my screenshots is that I only see the issues for some, not all, months that have Jan (1) defined.

    In my images below, the overview shows all the Jan months and in the next image down shows (every month) where a Jan should be. But not ALL the Jan's were reverted. And I have seen this on a Dec every once in a while too.

    Overview (no errors).jpg Edit (errors).jpg

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by toggledbits
      #2

      Yes, I see this. Will be fixed for a latest build later today.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • 3 Offline
        3 Offline
        3rdStng
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Awesome. Thank you.
        What are your thoughts on making your docker images available based on versions? I/E: Adding a few more tags. Right now you have Generic-1.0 and Latest. I would like to switch to the latest to get the build later today, but I may want to not get the next few releases. Just curious if that is an option.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by toggledbits
          #4

          You can just not install (pull) them?

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • 3 Offline
            3 Offline
            3rdStng
            wrote on last edited by 3rdStng
            #5

            I'll be honest, I'm not a docker expert. To my knowledge my Docker (running on unRAID) uses the tags to pull down the image. My repository is defined as: "toggledbits/reactor:1.0.0-generic-amd64". I don't believe I can define it as: "toggledbits/reactor:latest:21219" to only pull down that build, unless there was a label/tag that you define to point at that image.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbits
              wrote on last edited by toggledbits
              #6

              Once the container is built, it will use the image it was built from, unless you pull a newer image and build a new container from it. The assumption is that the container is modifying its copy of the image, so any changes it may make, one would want those to be available across restarts of the container going forward.

              Pulling a new image for an upgrade requires you to delete the existing container and (correctly) reapply all the original settings on the new container (like bind mounts). Many prefer to use docker-compose, where those settings are encapsulated into a JSON file and the container built from them when directed. But you can also just keep a copy of the necessary command line(s) as a script. I do this with Home Assistant. When I'm made aware of an update, I run my script that stops my Hass docker container, removes it, pulls the current latest build, then starts the new container, building from the new image. Applied to MSR, that might look like this:

              #!/bin/sh
              
              docker pull toggledbits/reactor:latest-generic-amd64
              docker stop reactor
              docker rm reactor
              docker run --init -d \
                      --name reactor \
                      --restart=unless-stopped \
                      -e "TZ=America/New_York" \
                      -v /home/patrick/Documents/reactor:/var/reactor \
                      -v /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro \
                      toggledbits/reactor:latest-generic-amd64
              

              Note: if your current container name is not reactor, you will need to stop and remove the container yourself the first time. After that, the script specifies that the container be named reactor.

              I will probably introduce a stable branch at some point as well.

              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • 3 Offline
                3 Offline
                3rdStng
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Yeah. That's the same process that the unRAID docker does, just with a GUI front end. Pull, Stop, Remove, Run, and then it deletes the previous image. I'll just have to get over my OCD when I see the message "apply update" and only update if I want/need to. Until you create that stable branch.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbits
                  wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                  #8

                  OK. Build 21221 is up with the rule editor fix for date/time January.

                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                  3 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                    OK. Build 21221 is up with the rule editor fix for date/time January.

                    3 Offline
                    3 Offline
                    3rdStng
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    @toggledbits said in MSR doesn't like January?:

                    OK. Build 21221 is up with the rule editor fix for date/time January.

                    Thank you. I can confirm that the (every month) no longer appears when I edit the rule.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    Recent Topics

                    • [MSR] Native fan capabilty
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      1
                      2
                      81

                    • [MSR] Rule do not fire
                      therealdbT
                      therealdb
                      0
                      4
                      121

                    • Rule condition shows TRUE in UI but Rule never transitions to SET — survives full restart
                      N
                      noelab
                      0
                      8
                      195

                    • DynamicGroupController and attributes
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      1
                      9
                      303

                    • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      5
                      149
                      138.8k

                    • Unofficial thread for compatibility
                      tunnusT
                      tunnus
                      2
                      2
                      740

                    • Ooops - Deleted Reactor Ex Machina II
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      0
                      2
                      91

                    • Bail out of failed reaction?
                      T
                      tamorgen
                      0
                      3
                      154

                    • Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
                      T
                      tamorgen
                      0
                      7
                      379

                    • [Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
                      CrilleC
                      Crille
                      0
                      5
                      271

                    • Upgrade Issues
                      T
                      tbully
                      0
                      9
                      409

                    • [SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      0
                      10
                      527
                    Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                    Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • Unsolved