-
Hey Patrick, had to switch over my HA VM from VirtualBox to VMware since VirtualBox stopped playing well. Anyways I updated the IP address to the new VM IP and deleted the Long Lived Access Token and created a new one just in case (copy pasted the new token into the config file). Tried rebooting both the HA machine and the MSR one too and MSR is still not connecting. The only thing I have not tried yet is creating another controller entry, but I am worried it may create all new entities for everything forcing me to redo all my logic. Here are some logs:
[latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:17:24.749Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:17:24.749Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:17:24.749Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:18:09.753Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:18:24.761Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:18:24.761Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:18:24.761Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:19:01.083Z <VeraController:INFO> VeraController#vera 0 dead entities older than 86400000s purged [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:19:14.780Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:19:29.785Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:19:29.785Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:19:29.785Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:20:24.791Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:20:39.813Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:20:39.820Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation [latest-22258]2022-09-20T21:20:39.820Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out -
Deleted some entities from HA and added some new ones but MSR is still showing the old ones and not all of the new ones. I restarted MSR and it hasn't changed, is there anyway to manually discover new entities and delete the old ones? Most of the new entities have shown up but a few haven't, however none of the deleted entities were removed from MSR.
I checked the core.entity_registry in HA and none of the entities that are shown in MSR are there.
Edit: I see the delete option under the entities tab in MSR, is that the only way to delete them?
-
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here.
Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed. -
Patrick,
I've just imported a large set of rules from Vera, and I had already played with creating rules in MSR that are mixed throughout the existing Vera rules. Is there any sort of way to "find/replace" in MSR, so I can find all matches to the old rules and replace them with the new ones? -
Patrick,
Yesterday I migrated a large luup Reactor group over from Vera to MSR, following the directions to importing it from Vera in the documentation. One of the odd things in the migration was the conditional rules for House Modes. Many of my rules had conditions such as "House Mode is any of Home, Night, or changes to Away.The way the import did it was changes from 1,3 to null. This importation did not seem to trigger rules correctly.
I was able to fix all the instances by creating multiple triggers in a group:
Entity Attribute: House Mode (vera>housemode) x_vera_housemode.mode contains home
OR Entity Attribute: House Mode (vera>housemode) x_vera_housemode.mode contains nightIs this what you are expecting in importation?
-
Good morning all,
This weekend I've been playing around with Home Assistant as a replacement (long term) for my aging Vera platform. I'm pretty amazed how much more capability it has. On the other hand, the sheer amount of variables it pulls in from devices is massive.In any case, I have added Google Calendar into Home Assistant for things like Federal Holidays and my daughter's school calendar. It connected to them without issue, which I had been having problems with in Vera an GCal3.
I connected MSR to Home Assistant, so I can start using some of the systems I've integrated into Home Assistant in MSR, and continue migrating my luup Reactor rules over to MSR. Now I'm trying to create a rule based on if today is a Federal Holiday or not. Reactor sees the calendar just fine, however, for whatever reason, it's not pulling data for today, but the next event, which in this case is Columbus day, three weeks away. The attribute that is pulling this is x_haas_attr.message.
I tested with my daughter's school calendar, and it did have an entry for today, and none of the other values seemed to be different, such as a "true" or something to tell me there is an entry.
a8478a6e-d8eb-4572-ac84-c94ff012a1ec-image.png
60632486-e80b-4f0f-aed9-dc67113689a4-image.png
ab04cd0f-f849-4e14-be7d-f4c00735da77-image.png
The only thing I've been able to come up with, is there is a start_time attribute, which shows the date as 2022-10-10 00:00:00
1cbe4526-7f63-4329-a088-b331f1d03376-image.png
The only thing I can think of is there might be a way to compare the current system date to that date, but I can't seem to figure that out in MSR.
Has anybody done this? Any suggestions?
-
I started kicking around the VEC last evening, was cut short, and dug in a bit more this morning.
My reactor.yaml:
d3df4d99-aa7f-4b8b-8fb9-5a6c615daad9-image.png
I verified the yaml is good at https://yamlchecker.com/
What I'm seeing in MSR:
0f89ce8e-7abe-4779-baca-43123e030cf4-image.png
87560ded-7dfa-4340-8585-8be58ff22852-image.png
I believe I have followed all steps (standard disclaimers apply).
Anyone else started to tinker with this newness and, if so, what were your results?
-
Having just embarrassed myself to @toggledbits by asserting that the latest release somehow had a bug when in reality it was surfacing underlying issues with my approach to building out my rulesets and automations I wanted to ask the collective for their feedback on how they've designed their rulesets.
For me, I built out a list of Global Reactions that I commonly use. For instance, for mode changes I typically change the mode entity and write that mode to a variable for some future use. When building out a ruleset I just pull in that Global Reaction vs manually recreating the entity list as my ruleset Reaction. Example, for lighting:
270bbe18-9680-491d-81d4-20308a9fe63c-image.png
Each of these contains the appropriate group of lights to turn on/off, etc.
I also have what I've dubbed my "Armed for..." rulesets. These are rulesets that can be referenced as true or false in other rulesets. Example, for my various lighting configurations in and out of the house I have these:
0d9f55d4-5d5d-42e2-a83c-8afa95df08fb-image.png
I think this is resulting in reactions stomping on other reactions creating race conditions that result in things looking like they're working when, in reality, they're one restart away from disaster.
So how are you all designing your superstructure, if you will, at a high level?
-
Maybe more of a cosmetic issue, but certain entities could be hidden from entity actions as you cannot set any meaningful action? See Vera as an example:
Screenshot 2022-09-16 at 15.11.29.png
vera>system is then obviously a different story and should be there
-
Hi @toggledbits,
I have a bridge consuming Vera's variable using the MQTTController in MSR, and I've noticed that after I've updated to the latest version (22257), some variables are not echoed. I've already tried to reboot MSR, with no luck.
These variables are under urn:smarthome-community:serverId:Vacuum
0fe837ed-3a29-4d5d-a06c-445981d44e13-image.png
A trace via MQTT explorer:
cf919028-4f7b-4761-b99a-c3943945704a-image.pngMy config has just exclude_capabilities: [] and it was working OK before the latest build. Even /query command doesn't seem to retrieve all the attributes. The values are retrieved correctly from the Vera controller, and I could use them in MSR, they're just not echoed to the bridge. Thanks!
-
Good morning all,
I"m working on converting my luup Reactor scenes over to MSR, so I can eventually introduce an Ezlo plus into the mix and not loose all the work I've done with Reactor. If nothing else, this should free up some resources on my aging Vera Plus, and maybe speed up some functions. Maybe that's just wishful thinking.In any case, I'm moving move my first Reactor set, which is a set of rules to control the blilnds/window coverings in my home. I have two types of blinds:
iBlinds retrofit motors (IB2.1-ZWx) version from late 2019.
Bali roman shades with factory installed Somfy CSZ1 Z-wave motors.I'm setting up reactions for both types of window coverings. One of the problems I always had in Vera was with iBlinds, I had to do it by luup commands:
luup.call_action("urn:upnp-org:serviceId:Dimming1","SetLoadLevelTarget",{ newLoadlevelTarget="50" },316)The reason for this, is that the open position was 100%, and the close position was 0%. In other words, the blinds were closed one way 100% an closed 100% the other way. I've been informed by iBlinds support that even in Ezlo, they still do it this way, which is different than most other Z-wave controller manufacturers. I'm not sure how the others do it, but some how "open" is right in the middle (50%).
So, in MSR, i can still set the Dimming1.SetLoadLevelTarget to 50, but I also noticed some other commands I haven't seen before in Reactor
3cdeeb89-5986-45bc-8a3b-79067050a22c-image.png
Is there some way in MSR to set that middle value to 50% so I can use cover.open? The command cover.close works as expected, so I'm wondering how I might use that cover.set.
Thanks for any advise.
-
I configured OWM Weather on MSR (latest-22257-dd9b9271), created an account with OWM, generated an API key, put the key in the yaml file, and I’ve waited over a day now. OWM Weather shows as up on the the Controller Status widget.
I’ve tried to create a trigger or constraint to use the data, and nothing is really showing up.
5B8611C1-33D0-4D3C-B507-7383CB81E25A.jpeg
I only have a free subscription with OWM, but I was expecting some data.
Is this expected behavior (i.e., still in development), or do I do more configuration other than the .yaml file?’
I still am able to pull Weather data through Dark Sky in my Vera plus controller, however, I know that will no longer work at some point.
-
Was just looking at the new metadata stuff in Entities for a lamp. I was on the dimming.level attritube and I then changed the dim level of the lamp several times and some how I got all these windows.
I then selected a different attribute color_temperature.value and that window was then shown over the top of all the others.
267e6d0d-7245-4816-ac93-ac83cfda509e-image.png
I don't know how to close these windows down ?
b09fd5f1-fffe-40c2-8ba6-8cffacd1e28b-image.png
Thanks
-
Hey Patrick, similar to R4V it would be nice if we could set the max amount of time a condition pulses. Currently in MSR you can only set it to pulse once or repeat continually until the condition goes false.
I currently have a rule that pings dead devices and occasionally the dead device needs a few pings for it to come back alive but I don't want it to keep pinging forever if the device is actually not functioning.
-
Hi
Anyone else been having issues with the MSR web UI not connecting after a period of time? Or is it just me?
If I reboot the Linux Debian box then MSR starts working again and I can open the web UI and it says connected.
However after sometime I then cannot later connect to the web GUI. It just says connecting all the time.
I also have Node-Red and HA Bridge running on the same box and I can connect to those two fine still.
Thanks
-
Is is possible for MSR to show newly detected ZwaveJS devices in the current alerts windows like Hubitat and HA? New devices show in the Entities but there is not an alert.
-
Hi Patrick,
For as long as I can remember, I have red x's instead of icons in MSR.05f25684-b338-4f69-8d0a-8a482a9fe1a2-image.png
I am running MSR in Docker and am on version 22252. If hosted in the cloud, they could be getting blocked by pihole.
Thanks,
Roger -
TLDR: I'm getting an alert saying I have to edit and re-save a rule containing a HTTP POST request in order to update it, but following the instructions in the alert doesn't seem to fix the issue.
I am receiving this message in the Current Alerts when sending a HTTP POST request.
The action at step 1 of "Send Notification Reaction" (re-I7yq7e15) needs to be edited to update it to the latest stored form. The action will continue, but should be updated as soon as possible, before this form is deprecated and no longer functions. Just make a trivial edit to the "headers" argument and then save the reaction to update it.
Details:
I am using a self-hosted notification system - Gotify. Many of my rules use a HTTP POST action to send a notification through this system. The message contains a JSON body with the title, body, and message priority. It is posted to a URL on my LAN where the Gotify server resides.
When I updated to latest-22252-65e94b36 I started to receive the above error. Since I had the http request in many rules I took the opportunity to simplify things by moving the http request to a Reaction in the Reactions section of MSR. I created two variables to pass the notification content to the Reaction and now send all notifications via the one Reaction. Each rule that needs to send a reaction sets the variable values and then runs the Reaction.
For example, this rule runs if the Kitchen Main leak sensor detects a leak. It sets the variable "g_gotify_token" to a value (this is used as part of the URL when making the HTTP request) and sets "g_gotify"body" to a JSON formatted string. In this case that string is
{ "title":"Water Alert", "message": "Kitchen Main Leak Sensor Tripped", "priority": 8 }Finally, the rule runs the Reaction "Send Notification Reaction"
79fd4034-c611-4173-b4e4-18cf5091b453-image.png
That reaction contains the http request. It uses the variables in the URL and request body fields. The request headers field is static and is set to "Content-Type: application/json"
d75d9305-a5ab-4401-9b75-ea72d08787fa-image.png
I get the same error when I directly call the HTTP request from a rule without using any variables. Either way, the notification goes through successfully. The only issue is the alert being raised in MSR.
I tried editing and re-saving the Reaction, and also tried creating an entirely new reaction. I get the same warning message either way.
footnote: Because I use the same process to send a notification whenever there is an alert raised in MSR, this also created a loop (that thankfully got throttled pretty quickly) where the system was making the http request to send a notification that this alert had been raised, and the action of sending that notification raised the alert again... etc...
Is this just a bug? Am I missing something about the request format that needs to be updated? I checked the manual and this forum for answers, but didn't find anything that looked relevant.
-
I use a number of multistring devices in my vera plus. My 'original' multistring devices work in Reactor i.e.:
9c5203dd-1993-4b5b-aeee-44377c1ee1c5-image.png
42b97524-9428-4222-a3fb-ce4e0009c00b-image.png
However, the new ones I have added do not show the device data sets / parameters (not sure what the correct term is?):
a54ddf29-ea32-47c9-906e-260a25dcb482-image.png
3efa1d0a-5466-4220-93d3-0a67da42a5d0-image.png
Is there something that I am doing wrong?
-
Hi
Is it possible to access the information that the MSR has about the last date and time that a device suffered a change? The information that appears in the Entities area?
dfd353df-15f9-44ef-bda3-8351363ea486-image.png
Use Case: I want to monitor all devices, and those that are not communicating/acting for more than 48 hours, take notice and action
Of course there are some that will not communicate by their nature, such as a water valve, so a list of exceptions would be created.
The principle is almost the same as Hubitat's WatchDog APP, but I want to have my own, and not be dependent on Hubitat's communication or action.
Thanks.
[SOLVED] Active rules re-set upon docker restart
-
Sorry for the long post.
A couple of versions back I started noticing some of my lights would start to turn off and then immediately come back on when ever I would restart my docker. I've been migrating all my devices off Vera and into HE, (moved my final device last night), so I've been restarting the docker a lot recently.
Without knowing what the exact issue is, the best thing I can think of is some sort of race condition upon the start up. I have LED's on the back of my monitor and a lamp on my desk. I have a rule using a lux level reading. If the light level is low, or it's after sunset, the LED's and lamp turn on. Upon my docker starting up, the lights will start to dim down as if the Reset Action was triggered. Then a second later they would brighten back up. Yesterday, I noticed that my roller shades were closed when they shouldn't be. Upon looking at the rule, 2 of the 3 triggers were met and the unmet trigger was a time span between midnight and 4 AM. (The below image is as of right now. At the time, it was after astronomical dusk.) Thinking a little more about this. Is the time of the docker off until it syncs with the host? Perhaps it is being set to midnight, or something else, as the docker is being started?
For a more recent test. I changed my LUX level to something that force the lights on. Stopped my docker and nothing happened. As I restarted it, the lights dimmed and brightened back up a second or two after I started the docker. However my roller shade was still open. Making me think this has something to do with time?
EDIT: This may be related to having a Mode trigger within the rule? If I remove the Mode trigger, the lights to not dim down and up, and the SET since time does not update. In the below screenshot, the SET time is 3:32 for the Office - Lamp rule. I restarted my docker at 3:34, as noted with the Office - Monitor LEDs rule. Only my Monitor LEDs dimmed down and back up.
Perhaps why I didn't start seeing this until recently was that many of my rules had both a Vera Home Mode and Hubitat Home Mode. This doesn't explain the roller shade being closed though.
One final test, I changed the Office - Monitor LEDs rule to == "Home" instead of "home", both with and without the Ignore Case option checked. Both restarts caused the LEDs to dim down and back up. So the case in the rule isn't the issue.
-
Good sleuthing on the house mode. I have a suspicion on what that might be, so I'm building now with a fix on my hunch. Let's see if that does it.
Remember, please include your platform (you said docker, but didn't say Synology, Pi, etc., and you may have told me yesterday and every other day this week but I speak to so many people I can't remember such things), and of course, always give your Reactor version number.
-
Oops. So Sorry. I run my docker containers on my unRAID server. It has a GUI front end that does all the docker pull commands and run config parameters. It's basically a Linux server, as they all are. I don't recall where it started, if it truly is due to only have my HE house mode defined. I can add in a Vera Home mode to my rule tomorrow and test.
MSR version is latest-21306-f17d2eb. But I started noticing it at least 2 releases ago. -
@3rdstng Try 21307?
-
@toggledbits said in Active rules re-set upon docker restart:
@3rdstng Try 21307?
Just did. My tests were:
Included both Vera and HE Mode in my rule. (Lights dimmed and restored.)
Just Vera Mode. (Lights did not change.)
Just HE Mode. Just to be sure the issue was still there. (Lights dimmed.)
Updated to 21307-1746e27
Just HE Mode. (Lights did not dim.)Looks like you nailed it. Thank you!
-
Whew! Lucky guess.
The problem was a "race condition." On the startup of the (pre-21307) HubitatController, it would first query Maker API for the list of devices, set up all the device-related entities, and then launch separate asynchronous queries for HSM and system mode.
The problem was that the report of the controller being ready came as soon as the HSM and mode queries were made, not after they were completed. So, it was possible for the HubitatController to report "online and ready" before HSM state and system mode were actually ready.
When the Engine sees all controllers ready, it does a startup evaluation of the rules. At this point, it was possible for the evaluation of the rule containing your mode test condition to run, and if the mode query hadn't yet completed, HubitatController's entity for the mode would be null. Some number of milliseconds later, when the mode query completed, the mode entity would be updated, the rule would be notified of the change, and would update the state. So the mode actually did go through a state transition, it was just from whatever state through null and back to the original state.
Since you reported it as a startup issue, it was reasonable to assume the above. The fix for such a "race" condition (two processes trying to finish first) is to simply synchronize them, which is what I did for the fix for 21307.
And we're on our way...
-
WOW! Thank you for the great explanation and I'm glad it was an easy one for you. I'm betting that the condition doesn't exist with Vera because...well...it's like a sloth. (And I don't think I can get banned here for saying that.)
My final step to be able to pull the plug out on my Vera Plus is a Dashboard. Preferably with an API capability to blank the screen when my mode is <> Home. For now I have a few virtual devices on the Vera that is acting like a bridge for my Imperihome to keep limping along.
-
Locked by toggledbits