Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. [SOLVED] Active rules re-set upon docker restart
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
tunnusT
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration: users: # This section defines your valid users. admin: ******* groups: # This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application # and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to # more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here. admin_group: users: - admin applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications guests: users: "*" applications: - dashboard api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin_group allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: true session: timeout: 7200 # (seconds) rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true # If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged. log_acls: true # If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged. debug_acls: true My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
Multi-System Reactor
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request 2?
CatmanV2C
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks. Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option? No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reset a delay
CatmanV2C
I'm sure this has been asked, and answered, but damned if I can figure it out Use case: I have a rear garden with lights. A door from the kitchen into the garden and a door from the garage. Currently if I open the kitchen door the lights come on (yay) and a 3 minute delay starts. After 3 minutes, no matter what else happens, the lights go off (Boo! But also yay!) What I would like is for the 3 minute delay until the lights go off to start from the latest door open event. That is, if I'm going from kitchen to garage, and back again, the lights stay on until there's three minutes of no activity. I've tried 'hacking' with a virtual switch, but can't seem to stop the delay. Any pointers? TIA C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Loading Screen Safari
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Constraints states visually do not match actual
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Feature request: For Each action on arrays/groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

[SOLVED] Active rules re-set upon docker restart

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
7 Posts 2 Posters 814 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 3 Offline
    3 Offline
    3rdStng
    wrote on last edited by 3rdStng
    #1

    Sorry for the long post.

    A couple of versions back I started noticing some of my lights would start to turn off and then immediately come back on when ever I would restart my docker. I've been migrating all my devices off Vera and into HE, (moved my final device last night), so I've been restarting the docker a lot recently.

    Without knowing what the exact issue is, the best thing I can think of is some sort of race condition upon the start up. I have LED's on the back of my monitor and a lamp on my desk. I have a rule using a lux level reading. If the light level is low, or it's after sunset, the LED's and lamp turn on. Upon my docker starting up, the lights will start to dim down as if the Reset Action was triggered. Then a second later they would brighten back up. Yesterday, I noticed that my roller shades were closed when they shouldn't be. Upon looking at the rule, 2 of the 3 triggers were met and the unmet trigger was a time span between midnight and 4 AM. (The below image is as of right now. At the time, it was after astronomical dusk.) Thinking a little more about this. Is the time of the docker off until it syncs with the host? Perhaps it is being set to midnight, or something else, as the docker is being started?

    902b202d-83d2-48cd-8573-aa520eed95f2-image.png

    For a more recent test. I changed my LUX level to something that force the lights on. Stopped my docker and nothing happened. As I restarted it, the lights dimmed and brightened back up a second or two after I started the docker. However my roller shade was still open. Making me think this has something to do with time?

    461dabae-bbef-4d97-957c-d7576458b64c-image.png

    EDIT: This may be related to having a Mode trigger within the rule? If I remove the Mode trigger, the lights to not dim down and up, and the SET since time does not update. In the below screenshot, the SET time is 3:32 for the Office - Lamp rule. I restarted my docker at 3:34, as noted with the Office - Monitor LEDs rule. Only my Monitor LEDs dimmed down and back up.

    Perhaps why I didn't start seeing this until recently was that many of my rules had both a Vera Home Mode and Hubitat Home Mode. This doesn't explain the roller shade being closed though.

    One final test, I changed the Office - Monitor LEDs rule to == "Home" instead of "home", both with and without the Ignore Case option checked. Both restarts caused the LEDs to dim down and back up. So the case in the rule isn't the issue.

    4c1e471c-c5aa-4128-a95c-ad8a1b389d71-image.png

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Good sleuthing on the house mode. I have a suspicion on what that might be, so I'm building now with a fix on my hunch. Let's see if that does it.

      Remember, please include your platform (you said docker, but didn't say Synology, Pi, etc., and you may have told me yesterday and every other day this week but I speak to so many people I can't remember such things), and of course, always give your Reactor version number.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • 3 Offline
        3 Offline
        3rdStng
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Oops. So Sorry. I run my docker containers on my unRAID server. It has a GUI front end that does all the docker pull commands and run config parameters. It's basically a Linux server, as they all are. I don't recall where it started, if it truly is due to only have my HE house mode defined. I can add in a Vera Home mode to my rule tomorrow and test.
        MSR version is latest-21306-f17d2eb. But I started noticing it at least 2 releases ago.

        toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • 3 3rdStng

          Oops. So Sorry. I run my docker containers on my unRAID server. It has a GUI front end that does all the docker pull commands and run config parameters. It's basically a Linux server, as they all are. I don't recall where it started, if it truly is due to only have my HE house mode defined. I can add in a Vera Home mode to my rule tomorrow and test.
          MSR version is latest-21306-f17d2eb. But I started noticing it at least 2 releases ago.

          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @3rdstng Try 21307?

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          3 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

            @3rdstng Try 21307?

            3 Offline
            3 Offline
            3rdStng
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @toggledbits said in Active rules re-set upon docker restart:

            @3rdstng Try 21307?

            Just did. My tests were:

            Included both Vera and HE Mode in my rule. (Lights dimmed and restored.)
            Just Vera Mode. (Lights did not change.)
            Just HE Mode. Just to be sure the issue was still there. (Lights dimmed.)
            Updated to 21307-1746e27
            Just HE Mode. (Lights did not dim.)

            Looks like you nailed it. Thank you!

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbits
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Whew! Lucky guess.

              The problem was a "race condition." On the startup of the (pre-21307) HubitatController, it would first query Maker API for the list of devices, set up all the device-related entities, and then launch separate asynchronous queries for HSM and system mode.

              The problem was that the report of the controller being ready came as soon as the HSM and mode queries were made, not after they were completed. So, it was possible for the HubitatController to report "online and ready" before HSM state and system mode were actually ready.

              When the Engine sees all controllers ready, it does a startup evaluation of the rules. At this point, it was possible for the evaluation of the rule containing your mode test condition to run, and if the mode query hadn't yet completed, HubitatController's entity for the mode would be null. Some number of milliseconds later, when the mode query completed, the mode entity would be updated, the rule would be notified of the change, and would update the state. So the mode actually did go through a state transition, it was just from whatever state through null and back to the original state.

              Since you reported it as a startup issue, it was reasonable to assume the above. The fix for such a "race" condition (two processes trying to finish first) is to simply synchronize them, which is what I did for the fix for 21307.

              And we're on our way...

              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • 3 Offline
                3 Offline
                3rdStng
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                WOW! Thank you for the great explanation and I'm glad it was an easy one for you. I'm betting that the condition doesn't exist with Vera because...well...it's like a sloth. (And I don't think I can get banned here for saying that.)

                My final step to be able to pull the plug out on my Vera Plus is a Dashboard. Preferably with an API capability to blank the screen when my mode is <> Home. For now I have a few virtual devices on the Vera that is acting like a bridge for my Imperihome to keep limping along.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                Recent Topics

                • VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
                  S
                  SweetGenius
                  0
                  1
                  13

                • Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
                  tunnusT
                  tunnus
                  0
                  1
                  15

                • Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  0
                  1
                  15

                • Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
                  G
                  gwp1
                  0
                  1
                  51

                • [Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
                  CrilleC
                  Crille
                  0
                  4
                  65

                • [Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
                  therealdbT
                  therealdb
                  0
                  3
                  85

                • Possible feature request 2?
                  CatmanV2C
                  CatmanV2
                  0
                  3
                  70

                • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  5
                  133
                  79.9k

                • Genuinely impressed with Zigbee and HA / Reactor
                  CatmanV2C
                  CatmanV2
                  1
                  9
                  372

                • Copying a global reaction
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  0
                  3
                  112

                • [HowTo] Using HABridge with Reactor
                  CatmanV2C
                  CatmanV2
                  0
                  9
                  442

                • [Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  0
                  4
                  163
                Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • Unsolved