Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Deprecated Features
[MSR] Native fan capabilty
therealdbT
Nothing more to add. I see we have hvac_blower, but, anyway, maybe a native fan on the same assumptions of the fan from HASS could be reasonable. I have a couple of them. ie, this is from ESPHome via HASS. x_hass.domain="fan" x_hass.entity_id="fan.kitchen_seashell_hood_ventilation_fan" x_hass.floor_id=null x_hass.services=["fan","esphome"] x_hass.source="esphome" x_hass.state="off" x_hass_attr.friendly_name="Seashell Hood Ventilation Fan" x_hass_attr.percentage=50 x_hass_attr.percentage_step=25 x_hass_attr.preset_mode="" x_hass_attr.preset_modes=[] x_hass_attr.supported_features=49 Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Rule do not fire
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Rule condition shows TRUE in UI but Rule never transitions to SET — survives full restart
N
Build: latest-26221-b25bb3e3, Docker on Synology. Hi, I have a Rule whose Trigger/Constraints reference other Rules via Rule State ... is TRUE. At some point it stops firing. Expanding the rule's condition tree in the UI shows every Trigger and Constraint condition green/TRUE — confirmed live by walking into the room and watching Motion go true in real time. Rule History shows no new SET, just old reset entries. Tried, on the same rule, same evening: recreating the trigger conditions with fresh IDs, recreating the constraint conditions with fresh IDs (flat and wrapped in a new Group — wrapping in a Group produced one SET, but it didn't reproduce on repeat attempts with the same structure), and finally a full container restart with a verified-correct saved rule. Still no SET, even with a fresh live motion event right after the restart. Separately, I found that this rule (and its 10 per-room clones) share identical internal condition/group IDs with each other — leftover from a batch clone done months ago, never regenerated. Not sure if that's related, since fixing the IDs didn't reliably fix the symptom either. Has anyone seen a Rule State condition show TRUE in the UI without the Rule ever producing a SET, surviving a clean restart? Thanks in advance
Multi-System Reactor
DynamicGroupController and attributes
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits I'm back to trying to optimize a couple of things based on dynamic group. First of all, I think I found a typo in the doc: primary_attribute: "binary_sensor.state" primary_attribute_value: | d = false; each id in members: d = getEntity(id)?.attributes?.power_switch?.state or d, d I think the correct code snippet is d = false, All that said, my use case for dynamic groups is to group 3 different climate devices, so I could easily command them at the same time. Commands are good, but sometimes I want to check if any of the devices are on, and that's easily done with a similar snippet as the one you have in the docs. But this is limited to the primary attribute, while I want to have any of the attributes in the group to be driven by a similar logic (while all are null in the group). ie, access hvac_control.mode and see if any of the unit is set to cool, or heat. Is that possible, without re-defining an expression in each of my rules? Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Unofficial thread for compatibility
tunnusT
As there are statements about compatibility for home assistant versions in MSR new version announcements (e.g. "HassController: Bless Hass to 2025.7.3"), I thought it would be good idea to track other controllers as well. As an example, I can confirm that build "latest-25208-c53e8513" works with Hubitat Elevation C-8 platform version 2.4.2.134 using Maker API. Updates: (the latest versions first in the list) OK: build "latest-25264-2fbe9217" with Hubitat C-8 platform v. 2.4.3.123
Multi-System Reactor
Ooops - Deleted Reactor Ex Machina II
R
I accidentally deleted Reactor Ex Machina II (REM II) from my Reactor rules. I tried to recover it by deleting the .json and .dval in the Rules subdirectory and then recreating it from Togglebits original posting, but that did not work. Does anyone know how to recover REM ll ?
Multi-System Reactor
Bail out of failed reaction?
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
CrilleC
Edit: Solved in latest-26221. Bare-metal latest-26193 I have this group: "OKforLarm": name: OK för Larm select: - include_controller: vera - include_capability: door_sensor filter_expression: entity.attributes.door_sensor.state It contains the entities I expect but behaves a bit odd. When I open vera>device_10097 the entity attribute door_sensor.state changes to true but it won't show up as member in the group, when I also open vera>device_10095 they both shows as members and when I close vera>device_10095 it disappear from the group but when I close vera>device_10097 it lingers in the group until I restart Reactor.
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade Issues
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Question regarding "in" vs "contains" vs contents of the string
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Logon screen timeout
G
Noticing since 170 that the lock screen doesn't switch to the logon prompt but, rather, stays on the active UI until such time as you go to click something within it. Then it jumps to the login screen. Brave browser Brave 1.92.139 (Official Build) (arm64) Chromium: 150.0.7871.114
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Copy&past of actions and/or drag&drop between set/reset
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits One thing that bothers me while doing work on new systems/new features, is that I cannot copy&paste actions, and I cannot drag&drop between set and resets. #1 is for when I want to copy an action between different rules opened in two separate browser windows, while #2 is when I just need to flip a bunch of actions in the reset, or move some logic back and forth. Both will be appreciated, but I understand the technical challenges. Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade advice - upgrade from aarch64 to ARM64 image
T
I'm currently on version 26011. I understand that the aarch64 image is no longer supported. So, I therefore need to update to the ARM64 image. Can anyone possibly suggest how I update my docker compose.yaml file (see below). Ideally I'd like to keep my existing reactions etc. rather than start from scratch. # Multi-System Reactor template docker-compose.yml (version 22160) # # Change the lines indicated by "DO"... # services: reactor: container_name: reactor environment: # DO change the TZ: line to set your local time zone. # See valid TZ list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tz_database_time_zones TZ: GB # # DO NOT change this path. Your directory location is in "source" below. REACTOR_DATA_PREFIX: /var/reactor # DO change the image below to the one you are using (e.g. armv7l or aarch64 for RPi 4) image: toggledbits/reactor:latest-aarch64 restart: "always" expose: - 8111 ports: - 8111:8111 volumes: # DO change the /home/username/reactor below to the directory you created for # your local data; DO NOT change the /var/reactor part - /home/pi/docker/reactor:/var/reactor - /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro tmpfs: /tmp
Multi-System Reactor
Alexa for MSR, any interest?
MikeReadingtonM
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Telegram notification broke with latest update
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Phantom device, “INFO” appears
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Mode Status NULL
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Deprecated Features

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
13 Posts 3 Posters 2.5k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • toggledbitsT Offline
    toggledbitsT Offline
    toggledbits
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    Hmmm.... there is no lookup() function in LuaXP or Reactor for Vera. Array member access syntax is the same for both Reactor for Vera (LuaXP) and MSR (lexpjs): array[ index ].

    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • LibraSunL Offline
      LibraSunL Offline
      LibraSun
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      Wow, you're right. I think Daylight Savings Time brain fog had me thinking of Google Sheets formulae, lol! Probably meant CHOOSE( ) for picking indexed item from a list.

      Delete!!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbits
        wrote on last edited by toggledbits
        #5

        Ah, yes, OK... that's very different in lexpjs/MSR: first item in array-of-objects with match-expression

        rain=[ { date: 1234, rainfall: 10 }, { date: 4567, rainfall: 11 } ], 
        first entry in rain with entry.rainfall > 10
        

        would return { date: 4567, rainfall: 11 }

        Another possibility would be each entry in rain: entry.rainfall > 10 ? entry : null which would return an array of all matching entries.

        Clarification:

        each ... in ...: ... is an iterator; it loops over each member of the given object, performing the given expression; an array of result values is constructed, but nulls are not put in the array.

        first ... in ... with ... is a search; it works similar to each but stops at the first thing where the expression result is "truthy" (boolean true or can be coerced to that).

        Both work on arrays or objects/dictionaries.

        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • LibraSunL Offline
          LibraSunL Offline
          LibraSun
          wrote on last edited by LibraSun
          #6

          UPDATE: The advice shown below is NOT required as of Build 21074+ of MSR.

          In furtherance of the first..in..with construct, let me forewarn users that the non-optional boolean-expression may require parentheses. For example, working off the following object (defined in Expressions):

          houseModes := {home:{hm:1,ac:"home"},away:{hm:2,ac:"away"},sleep:{hm:3,ac:"sleep"},smart1:{hm:4,ac:"smart1"}}
          

          you would look up the first element matching a value of 1 in key 'hm' using:

          first mode in houseModes with (mode.hm == 1)   // trailing boolean grouped
          // returns array or object
          

          Without this encapsulation, the entire statement may be evaluated as a boolean, resulting in a trival always-false condition:

          first mode in houseModes with mode.hm == 1   // boolean ungrouped
          // always returns boolean value of FALSE (since null !== 1)
          

          Likewise, if you wish to reference a nested key within the resulting object, another outer set of parentheses would be required, as follows:

          (first mode in houseModes with (mode.hm == 1)).ac 
          // returns "home"
          

          which, in turn, is functionally equivalent to:

          first mode in houseModes with (mode.hm == 1) ? mode.ac : "no match"
          // returns "home" since 1st object matched expression
          

          This latter formulation is likely preferred since it handles null situations more gracefully:

          first mode in houseModes with (mode.hm == 5) ? mode.ac : "no match"
          // returns "no match" (string) since test yielded (null)
          

          (edited)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbits
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            I'm not getting this example. Maybe shows the value for hM as well, so we can see what's being tested?

            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • LibraSunL Offline
              LibraSunL Offline
              LibraSun
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              I just amended the example above for clarity.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbits
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                I see. That's just a precedence issue, confirmed. I can fix that easily.

                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                  Since the project is evolving, there will always be something somewhere that is being deprecated, so I thought it might be handy to have a list. I'll try to keep this post up-to-date:

                  • The list() function in expressions; remains for portability from Reactor for Vera. Replacement is [ item, item, ... ] syntax (direct array declaration).
                  • The Interval condition in relative to condition TRUE mode. On Reactor for Vera, this functionality has long been supplanted by the pulse output mode (under Condition Options). But, I neglected to formally deprecate that feature in Reactor for Vera (so far; I will for 3.9). It is officially deprecated in MSR, and remains only for portability of rules imported from Reactor.

                  Note: all deprecated features will be removed from a future release, so the intent is that this list motivates action on your part to replace any use of the deprecated feature with its replacement. The date at which any function is finally removed will be published once scheduled; if no date is posted, the feature is deprecated, but will remain and a date will be planned later.

                  K Offline
                  K Offline
                  kfxo
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  @toggledbits Should prob add Reset Latch. From the Manual:

                  "Reactor for Vera offered a variety of ways to unlatch a condition, but this was often abused and caused more problems and confusion than it was worth. MSR only unlatches conditions under the conditions described above, and the Reset Latch action is not available."

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • LibraSunL Offline
                    LibraSunL Offline
                    LibraSun
                    wrote on last edited by LibraSun
                    #11

                    NOTE TO @toggledbits the official docs (e.g. http://[MSR_IP]/docs/Expressions-%26-Variables/#expression-language-syntax) reference FIRST .. OF .. WITH (instead of IN), leaving me scratching my head as to which is the correct syntax.
                    EDIT: The correct keyword is 'in', not 'of'.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • toggledbitsT Offline
                      toggledbitsT Offline
                      toggledbits
                      wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                      #12

                      Fixed in 21307 docs. Could/should have been in Mantis?

                      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                      LibraSunL 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                        Fixed in 21307 docs. Could/should have been in Mantis?

                        LibraSunL Offline
                        LibraSunL Offline
                        LibraSun
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        @toggledbits said in Deprecated Features:

                        Fixed in 21307 docs. Could/should have been in Mantis?

                        Technically yes, it was among the very 1st three things I reported to you, but as "notes" in Github rather than Mantis (which wasn't yet on my radar at the time). Thanks!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        Recent Topics

                        • [MSR] Native fan capabilty
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          1
                          2
                          56

                        • [MSR] Rule do not fire
                          therealdbT
                          therealdb
                          0
                          4
                          104

                        • Rule condition shows TRUE in UI but Rule never transitions to SET — survives full restart
                          N
                          noelab
                          0
                          8
                          180

                        • DynamicGroupController and attributes
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          1
                          9
                          297

                        • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          5
                          149
                          138.3k

                        • Unofficial thread for compatibility
                          tunnusT
                          tunnus
                          2
                          2
                          738

                        • Ooops - Deleted Reactor Ex Machina II
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          2
                          89

                        • Bail out of failed reaction?
                          T
                          tamorgen
                          0
                          3
                          148

                        • Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
                          T
                          tamorgen
                          0
                          7
                          372

                        • [Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
                          CrilleC
                          Crille
                          0
                          5
                          263

                        • Upgrade Issues
                          T
                          tbully
                          0
                          9
                          402

                        • [SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          10
                          514
                        Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                        Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Unsolved