Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. MSR feedback post RfV migration
How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
cw-kidC
Hello I haven't updated my installation of MSR in a very long time. Its a bare metal Linux install currently on version 24366-3de60836 I see the latest version is now latest-26011-c621bbc7 I assume I cannot just jump from a very old version to the latest version? Or can I? Thanks
Multi-System Reactor
Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
tunnusT
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration: users: # This section defines your valid users. admin: ******* groups: # This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application # and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to # more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here. admin_group: users: - admin applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications guests: users: "*" applications: - dashboard api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin_group allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: true session: timeout: 7200 # (seconds) rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true # If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged. log_acls: true # If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged. debug_acls: true My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
Multi-System Reactor
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request 2?
CatmanV2C
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks. Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option? No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reset a delay
CatmanV2C
I'm sure this has been asked, and answered, but damned if I can figure it out Use case: I have a rear garden with lights. A door from the kitchen into the garden and a door from the garage. Currently if I open the kitchen door the lights come on (yay) and a 3 minute delay starts. After 3 minutes, no matter what else happens, the lights go off (Boo! But also yay!) What I would like is for the 3 minute delay until the lights go off to start from the latest door open event. That is, if I'm going from kitchen to garage, and back again, the lights stay on until there's three minutes of no activity. I've tried 'hacking' with a virtual switch, but can't seem to stop the delay. Any pointers? TIA C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Loading Screen Safari
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Constraints states visually do not match actual
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

MSR feedback post RfV migration

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
5 Posts 3 Posters 715 Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 3 Offline
    3 Offline
    3rdStng
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I have fully migrated off of RfV and onto MSR. A huge thanks for all your work Rigpapa. Amazing products. RfV and MSR. I officially removed RfV from my Vera controller yesterday. During the migration I was noticing things were getting a little more snappy and a little more stable. But now that RfV is off, I'm noticing a big difference. There was always one motion controller that would not behave for me. If I moved it from that area of the house and next to the controller, it worked flawlessly. I figured that the flakiness I was getting was some ZWave delay or a dead spot in the house. But with the migration all the way to MSR, the motion sensor has not skipped a beat. (Yet) I'll give it a few more days to really test. But I am really happy with the move to MSR.

    So somethings that I noticed along the way and now that I am adjusting and tweaking my rules.

    1. During the import, the house modes would import as a number. I/E: 1,3,4. And the trigger would be set to changes from 1,3,4 to blank. I believe this was already reported, or noted, but the mode doesn't work properly. Any trigger that used a house mode would need to be changed to == and then the 1 to home, or 3 to night, etc. I ended up creating a house mode group if the trigger needed more than one, but less than three modes.
    2. When your Set/Reset Reaction involves a change to the House Mode, the predefined values start with 0 = home, 1 = away. Minor cosmetic difference compared to what Vera actually uses. 1 = Home, 2 = Away, etc.
      (See Img1 for examples of 1 & 2)
    3. When you use the Copy From option in the Reactions, it would be awesome if the list could have a few changes. For one, the Rule Set labeling (grouping) is nearly the same color as the rule name itself. Maybe change the color of the Rule Set name, or a background highlight of that line so you know where the rule sets change? A couple other options, if this would be possible. 1) Put your current Rule Set at the top of the list, then scroll to the rest. For me, I am usually copying my Set Reaction and then changing the On to an Off, or vice versa. Or 2) Cascade them. The initial drop down will only show the Rule Sets, clicking on one would extend that rule set out to the right and show you all the rules. For me, I have a very long list and often scroll past what I'm looking for, or struggle to find it.
      (See Img2 for the Rule Set and Rules being nearly the same color)

    Img 1:
    mode.jpg

    Img 2:
    list.jpg

    All in all though. LOVE MSR and my wheels are already turning on how to do more with it and not cripple my Vera anymore with too many rules. I'm also scared of my Vera Plus's life. Support made a comment to me that they have one or two more firmware updates planned for the unit. Granted the firmware releases are very slow and really far between, but this is making me think that the product could be EOL in the not to distant future. MSR now gives me the option to start migrating to a second controller. Thank you again @toggledbits.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • LibraSunL Offline
      LibraSunL Offline
      LibraSun
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Great feedback! You're not alone in your concern that (a) Vera is EOL, and (b) eZLO may prove to be vaporware in the end (so many bold promises, nothing out of alpha/beta yet). MSR is the much-needed bridge to tide us over and relieve our aging Vera hubs of duty.

      Regarding House Mode in MSR, I see those values as (string) = 'home', 'away', etc. But yes, arrays in MSR are zero-indexed, compared with RfV's old 1-based lists. I never once used the Rule migration tool, so perhaps your feedback was connected with that?

      3 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • LibraSunL LibraSun

        Great feedback! You're not alone in your concern that (a) Vera is EOL, and (b) eZLO may prove to be vaporware in the end (so many bold promises, nothing out of alpha/beta yet). MSR is the much-needed bridge to tide us over and relieve our aging Vera hubs of duty.

        Regarding House Mode in MSR, I see those values as (string) = 'home', 'away', etc. But yes, arrays in MSR are zero-indexed, compared with RfV's old 1-based lists. I never once used the Rule migration tool, so perhaps your feedback was connected with that?

        3 Offline
        3 Offline
        3rdStng
        wrote on last edited by 3rdStng
        #3

        @librasun said in MSR feedback post RfV migration:

        I never once used the Rule migration tool, so perhaps your feedback was connected with that?

        You are correct. My feedback on the values of 1,3,etc in my House Mode example were solely based on the import function.
        I had too many rules in my RfV, so not using the import feature wasn't an option. I migrated everything from PLEG to RfV about 4-6 months ago too. Hence the large number of rules.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @3rdstng said in MSR feedback post RfV migration:

          When your Set/Reset Reaction involves a change to the House Mode, the predefined values start with 0 = home, 1 = away. Minor cosmetic difference compared to what Vera actually uses. 1 = Home, 2 = Away, etc.

          You shouldn't see the index values at all, as @LibraSun alludes to in his comment, but the control you are seeing is a "datalist" control, and the appearance of these is browser-defined. They look very different in Firefox, for example. The inconsistency of these controls and lack of control (!) over what they display (keys or no keys) has led me to open PR 0000244 a couple of days ago, as a task to write my own control that's consistent across platforms. But anyway, as @LibraSun says, the house modes in MSR are text-based, and it translates to the Vera number when as needed when communicating with the hub.

          @3rdstng said in MSR feedback post RfV migration:

          When you use the Copy From option in the Reactions, it would be awesome if the list could have a few changes.

          Can't cascade; that's a limitation of the implementation of the control. But this is a Bootstrap control, not a browser-defined control, so I can poke at it a little and see if I can make it look a bit better.

          @3rdstng said in MSR feedback post RfV migration:

          MSR now gives me the option to start migrating to a second controller.

          That's the idea. My house is now spread across a Vera Plus, Hubitat, and Home Assistant. Each has its strengths and better support for certain devices than the others. The Ezlo interface is also shaping up (although I don't use an eZLO hub for other than testing).

          Thanks for the feedback!

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          3 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

            @3rdstng said in MSR feedback post RfV migration:

            When your Set/Reset Reaction involves a change to the House Mode, the predefined values start with 0 = home, 1 = away. Minor cosmetic difference compared to what Vera actually uses. 1 = Home, 2 = Away, etc.

            You shouldn't see the index values at all, as @LibraSun alludes to in his comment, but the control you are seeing is a "datalist" control, and the appearance of these is browser-defined. They look very different in Firefox, for example. The inconsistency of these controls and lack of control (!) over what they display (keys or no keys) has led me to open PR 0000244 a couple of days ago, as a task to write my own control that's consistent across platforms. But anyway, as @LibraSun says, the house modes in MSR are text-based, and it translates to the Vera number when as needed when communicating with the hub.

            @3rdstng said in MSR feedback post RfV migration:

            When you use the Copy From option in the Reactions, it would be awesome if the list could have a few changes.

            Can't cascade; that's a limitation of the implementation of the control. But this is a Bootstrap control, not a browser-defined control, so I can poke at it a little and see if I can make it look a bit better.

            @3rdstng said in MSR feedback post RfV migration:

            MSR now gives me the option to start migrating to a second controller.

            That's the idea. My house is now spread across a Vera Plus, Hubitat, and Home Assistant. Each has its strengths and better support for certain devices than the others. The Ezlo interface is also shaping up (although I don't use an eZLO hub for other than testing).

            Thanks for the feedback!

            3 Offline
            3 Offline
            3rdStng
            wrote on last edited by 3rdStng
            #5

            @toggledbits said in MSR feedback post RfV migration:

            You shouldn't see the index values at all,

            This is interesting. Now that you mention this, on a different computer over the weekend, I didn't see the 0, 1, 2 values. I only saw Home, Away, etc. Besides being a different computer, I'm pretty sure my version of Chrome between the two is the same. The only other difference between then and now is that I upgraded my MSR from the generic 1.0 21200 build to the latest 21221 build. Chrome is all I have and use. I just tried Edge and IE, because they are there by default. But they both suck and won't display anything except the left most side panel. None of the links work either.

            @toggledbits said in MSR feedback post RfV migration:

            Can't cascade;

            At least maybe shade the Rule Set labels to set them apart. Or add an option at the top of the list, or a new button all together, to Copy From Set / Copy From Reset? Just ideas.
            copy.jpg

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            Recent Topics

            • How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
              cw-kidC
              cw-kid
              0
              1
              12

            • Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
              toggledbitsT
              toggledbits
              0
              2
              60

            • VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
              S
              SweetGenius
              1
              1
              48

            • Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
              toggledbitsT
              toggledbits
              2
              1
              40

            • Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
              G
              gwp1
              0
              1
              68

            • [Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
              CrilleC
              Crille
              0
              4
              107

            • [Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
              therealdbT
              therealdb
              0
              3
              120

            • Possible feature request 2?
              CatmanV2C
              CatmanV2
              0
              3
              90

            • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
              toggledbitsT
              toggledbits
              5
              133
              80.2k

            • Genuinely impressed with Zigbee and HA / Reactor
              CatmanV2C
              CatmanV2
              1
              9
              397

            • Copying a global reaction
              toggledbitsT
              toggledbits
              0
              3
              122

            • [HowTo] Using HABridge with Reactor
              CatmanV2C
              CatmanV2
              0
              9
              460
            Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
            Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • Unsolved