Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. SiteSensor migration
[MSR] Feature request: For Each action on arrays/groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Error: Command timeout
G
at _ClientAPI._commandTimeout (http://192.168.1.100:8111/client/ClientAPI.js:807:179 Seeing this randomly when returning to open browser tab after being away awhile. Once, maybe twice a day. "What did you do to trigger it?" Literally nothing, just walked away and returned and there it was. Actions taken in reasonably close proximity to this particular instance of it popping up: I'd restarted the MSR container in Portainer. I'll try to grab some logs here shortly.
Multi-System Reactor
Issue with MSR UI becoming unresponsive
S
I'm having an issue with MSR's UI being very unresponsive. It started happening a couple days ago and I didn't make any changes that would have caused this except adding some meross lan devices in HA. When I go into an entity action and use the search functionality, it usually will start filtering and then get to a place after a few letters are entered where it will take 30 seconds or more (sometimes minutes) for the UI to show what I am typing. During this time MSR ui is completely unresponsive. I've tried multiple browsers and multiple computers. HA and MSR are both deployed in docker. I have run HTOP on the host and when the problem happens there are no CPU/Memory spikes at all. From a functionality standpoint MSR is working perfectly. This seems to be an UI issue only. Do i need to ditch Docker and run MSR on a Proxmox VM? I have both stand alone Docker and Proxmox environments. I dont mind doing that I just want to be able to use the UI again... Installation method Home Assistant Container Core 2025.7.3 Frontend 20250702.3 nothing crazy in the logs except some openweather map stuff that doesn't make any sense as it is working fine in MSR Any help would be greatly appreciated Reactor latest-25328-b2ed1365 app 25328 configuration from /var/reactor/config NODE_PATH /opt/reactor:/opt/reactor/node_modules [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.843Z <app:null> Reactor build latest-25328-b2ed1365 starting on v24.11.1 /usr/local/bin/node [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.844Z <app:null> Process ID 1 user/group 0/0; docker; platform linux/x64 #161-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jul 22 14:25:40 UTC 2025; locale (undefined) [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.844Z <app:null> Basedir /opt/reactor; data in /var/reactor/storage [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.844Z <app:null> NODE_PATH=/opt/reactor:/opt/reactor/node_modules [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.865Z <app:null> Resolved timezone=America/New_York, environment TZ=America/New_York; offset minutes from UTC=-300 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.867Z <default:null> Module i18n v25141 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.867Z <app:null> Configured locale (undefined); selected locale(s) en-US.UTF-8 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.879Z <app:null> Loaded locale en-US for en-US [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.879Z <app:null> Local date/time using configured timezone and locale formatting is "11/30/2025, 3:01:53 PM" [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.889Z <Structure:null> Module Structure v25326 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.890Z <Capabilities:null> Module Capabilities v24312 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.904Z <Plugin:null> Module Plugin v25141 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.923Z <Timer:null> Module Timer v25279 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.924Z <TimerBroker:null> Module TimerBroker v25314 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.927Z <Entity:null> Module Entity v25251 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.929Z <Controller:null> Module Controller v25253 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.930Z <AlertManager:null> Module AlertManager v25318 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.937Z <default:null> Module Ruleset v25283 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.937Z <default:null> Module Rulesets v25141 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.942Z <GlobalExpression:null> Module GlobalExpression v25258 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.953Z <Predicate:null> Module Predicate v25328 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.956Z <Rule:null> Module Rule v25323 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.958Z <GlobalReaction:null> Module GlobalReaction v25292 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.959Z <Engine:null> Module Engine v25325 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.964Z <httpapi:null> Module httpapi v25328 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.972Z <wsapi:null> Module wsapi v25328 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.994Z <TaskQueue:null> Module TaskQueue 24138 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:53.994Z <VeraController:null> Module VeraController v25141 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:01:54.179Z <HassController:null> Module HassController v25325 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:02:13.797Z <OWMWeatherController:null> Module OWMWeatherController v25268 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:02:13.800Z <SystemController:null> Module SystemController v25323 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:02:13.807Z <MQTTController:null> Module MQTTController v22092 [latest-25328]2025-11-30T20:02:20.630Z <OWMWeatherController:CRIT> FetchError: request to https://api.openweathermap.org/data/2.5/weather?lat=xxxxxxxxxx&lon=-xxxxxxxxx&appid=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&units=standard&_r=1xxxxxxxxxxxxxxfailed, reason: [-] FetchError: request to https://api.openweathermap.org/data/2.5/weather?lat=xxxxxxxxxxx&lon=-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&appid=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&units=standard&_r=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxfailed, reason: at ClientRequest.<anonymous> (/opt/reactor/node_modules/node-fetch/lib/index.js:1501:11) at ClientRequest.emit (node:events:508:28) at ClientRequest.emit (node:domain:489:12) at emitErrorEvent (node:_http_client:108:11) at TLSSocket.socketErrorListener (node:_http_client:575:5) at TLSSocket.emit (node:events:508:28) at TLSSocket.emit (node:domain:489:12) at emitErrorNT (node:internal/streams/destroy:170:8) at emitErrorCloseNT (node:internal/streams/destroy:129:3) at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:89:21
Multi-System Reactor
Date/time condition
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Device log?
G
@toggledbits is there a log that will show me what rule is turning on a specific device? I've got a switch that has been kicking on at 2200 ET for several nights now and the reactor.log doesn't have a thing in it that I can see on a device level (it being more rules-based).
Multi-System Reactor
Midnight crossing not working in date/time condition (build 25325)
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
toggledbitsT
This post does not apply to users of Intel/AMD-based systems. If you are using a Reactor image tagged latest-amd64 or stable-amd64, then this post does not apply to you. It also does not apply to bare-metal installs; it's for users of docker images on ARM-based systems only (principally Raspberry Pi hosts, but could be others). After January 15, 2026, I will no longer produce the aarch64-tagged docker image for Reactor. The ARM images will be arm64 for 64-bit operating systems, and armv7l for 32-bit operating systems. For those of you running a container from the aarch64 image today, this will be a relatively simple change: you just need to switch the image used for your docker container to a differently-tagged image. If you are using docker-compose, then this is a relatively simple matter of changing the image line in your docker-compose.yaml file and then stopping (docker-compose down) and restarting (docker-compose up -d) your Reactor daemon. But there's a catch... not all of you can safely just switch from the aarch64 image to the arm64 image. And, you can't just trust the output of uname -m, for example, because this exposes the CPU architecture, but not the word size of the OS running on that CPU. For Raspberry Pi systems, the transition to 64-bit operating systems was long (starting in 2016) and not always obvious — although there was a first "official" 64-bit OS for RPis in 2020, it did not become a default recommendation in the Raspberry Pi Imager until 2021, and then that was only the default for Pi 3/4 systems with >4GB RAM; it was 2022 before it was universally recommended for all 64-bit CPUs regardless of RAM size. Depending on when you first imaged your RPi system and what default you may have been offered/chosen, you could today easily have a 64-bit CPU Raspberry Pi running a 32-bit version of the operating system. Upgrades along the way would not change this; changing it to fully 64-bit requires a full reimage of the system. To establish if your OS is 64- or 32-bit, log in to your Pi and run: sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH. If the response is arm64 or aarch64, then you are running a 64-bit OS and you should use the arm64-tagged image. If it's anything else, you are running a 32-bit OS, and you should use the armv7l-tagged image. pi@rpi4-1:~ $ sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH armhf pi@rpi4-1:~ $ uname -m aarch64 pi@rpi4-1:~ $ In the example above, the uname command reports that the CPU is 64-bit architecture (aarch64), which is true for the host on which I ran these commands, but the DEB_HOST_ARCH value is armhf, indicating a 32-bit operating system. This system has to use the armv7l-tagged image. Other systems will have their own ways of determining the word size of the running OS. Since the majority of Reactor users running ARM systems are on Raspberry Pis, I am able to supply the above instructions, but if you happen to have a different ARM system, you'll need to do some web searching to figure out how to expose that information. Or, you can just try the arm64 image, and if it doesn't start up, try the armv7l image. Remember to always back up your system before making any changes. For everyone, please make this change as soon as possible, and if you have any trouble finding a working image, please (1) go back to the current aarch64 image; and (2) let me know in this thread along with as much detail about your host system as you can offer (including the output of the dpkg-architecture command mentioned above).
Multi-System Reactor
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

SiteSensor migration

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
22 Posts 4 Posters 2.5k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G gwp1

    This is a very timely thread as I'm starting to explore how to migrate two Site Sensors (one pulls weather data from Ambient API, the other pulls weather data from OpenWxMap API) to feed my HVAC needs.

    Disclaimer: I have near zero KB regarding expressions let along how they work in MSR. I'll be watching this thread closely.

    tunnusT Offline
    tunnusT Offline
    tunnus
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    @gwp1 you are probably better off with this post than what's here, but feel free to follow also this discussion 🙂

    Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

      If g_temp_var is not changing, changes is never going to fire. But g_UplinkResponse is changing.

      Edit: to try to clarify more, it's a chicken and egg problem. g_temp_var will not be updated until it is referenced by a running rule, but the rule only runs when g_temp_var is changed. So without something external causing g_temp_var to change, the rule will never run and call for g_temp_var to be updated. If you check g_UplinkResponse for changes, but use g_temp_var everywhere else in the rule, you should get the behavior you are looking for, because g_UplinkResponse is changed externally by another rule on an interval, so that will stimulate the run of the rule to evaluate everything else needed.

      tunnusT Offline
      tunnusT Offline
      tunnus
      wrote on last edited by
      #7

      @toggledbits okay, now I have this test rule set up:

      Screenshot 2021-09-12 at 2.31.02.png

      Situation remains the same, global expression(s) is not changing 😞

      Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbits
        wrote on last edited by toggledbits
        #8

        I can't tell from the timestamps, but given that they're similar, did the value actually change? No hit if the value doesn't actually change.

        By the way, how are you determining if there was a change or not? I mean, how do you know it's not changing. Does something happen when the conditions are met (is there a Reaction that does something?)?

        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

        tunnusT 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

          I can't tell from the timestamps, but given that they're similar, did the value actually change? No hit if the value doesn't actually change.

          By the way, how are you determining if there was a change or not? I mean, how do you know it's not changing. Does something happen when the conditions are met (is there a Reaction that does something?)?

          tunnusT Offline
          tunnusT Offline
          tunnus
          wrote on last edited by
          #9

          @toggledbits I know it's supposed to be something else as I can monitor the same values via a couple of different means (an app for instance).

          But as I wrote before, if I use local expressions, values are as they should be:

          Screenshot 2021-09-12 at 3.02.34.png

          Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT

          toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • tunnusT tunnus

            @toggledbits I know it's supposed to be something else as I can monitor the same values via a couple of different means (an app for instance).

            But as I wrote before, if I use local expressions, values are as they should be:

            Screenshot 2021-09-12 at 3.02.34.png

            toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbits
            wrote on last edited by toggledbits
            #10

            @tunnus Well, I'm not getting a clear picture here from the little bits and pieces you're posting, so I set up a little test environment of my own where I have an HTTP request run, set a global variable, and have a rule with a condition that goes true when the global changes with a reaction that sends an alert notification that the variable has changed. I get the notification every time I run the HTTP request.

            Here's the rule:

            b897854e-0377-4d07-8f98-9be318276661-image.png

            And the variables:

            a5d579cb-3480-43fb-b94e-f81f4089a461-image.png 212872b0-6d58-44d7-ac06-2ead76c78192-image.png

            Here's the reaction I can run manually to make a request and store the result in the global variable. The API function I'm calling returns a timestamp (with milliseconds), so every request is pretty much guaranteed to give me a different response from the last.

            5de7eca4-b637-4764-8de3-662dee90061e-image.png

            This seems to model what you're telling me you want to do, and it works fine.

            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

            tunnusT wmarcolinW 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

              @tunnus Well, I'm not getting a clear picture here from the little bits and pieces you're posting, so I set up a little test environment of my own where I have an HTTP request run, set a global variable, and have a rule with a condition that goes true when the global changes with a reaction that sends an alert notification that the variable has changed. I get the notification every time I run the HTTP request.

              Here's the rule:

              b897854e-0377-4d07-8f98-9be318276661-image.png

              And the variables:

              a5d579cb-3480-43fb-b94e-f81f4089a461-image.png 212872b0-6d58-44d7-ac06-2ead76c78192-image.png

              Here's the reaction I can run manually to make a request and store the result in the global variable. The API function I'm calling returns a timestamp (with milliseconds), so every request is pretty much guaranteed to give me a different response from the last.

              5de7eca4-b637-4764-8de3-662dee90061e-image.png

              This seems to model what you're telling me you want to do, and it works fine.

              tunnusT Offline
              tunnusT Offline
              tunnus
              wrote on last edited by tunnus
              #11

              @toggledbits sorry, I tried to depict the problem in the first post as well as I could.

              But yes, your test case models my case and now I'm baffled. I'll try to setup my test from a scratch and see what happens...

              EDIT: replicated this case, no change. Local variables work nicely, but global expressions won’t update. Patrick, any logs I could provide to solve this?

              Only difference I could think of (between my and your test setup) is that if response structures (array etc) differ just enough and code handles local & global expressions a bit differently.

              Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbits
                wrote on last edited by
                #12

                The key here is that the response to the HTTP request has to change. If it doesn't, then the changes isn't going to work, and nothing will trigger the rule to evaluate and cause the other global variables to be updated. Remember that changes requires an actual change of the value, not just a fetch of the value and setting it (again) to what's already there... no change, no changes.

                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                tunnusT 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                  The key here is that the response to the HTTP request has to change. If it doesn't, then the changes isn't going to work, and nothing will trigger the rule to evaluate and cause the other global variables to be updated. Remember that changes requires an actual change of the value, not just a fetch of the value and setting it (again) to what's already there... no change, no changes.

                  tunnusT Offline
                  tunnusT Offline
                  tunnus
                  wrote on last edited by tunnus
                  #13

                  @toggledbits what's strange here is that I only change this:

                  Screenshot 2021-09-13 at 12.19.22.png

                  to this:

                  Screenshot 2021-09-13 at 12.14.40.png

                  or vice versa, URL & other settings remain the same, local expression works, changes are immediately detected. And yes, response is really changing.

                  Here's the most current test rule:

                  Screenshot 2021-09-13 at 12.19.55.png

                  (at the time of the screenshot, "-111.0" was the correct value)

                  The only time I get an updated/correct value (for the global expression) is when a global variable/expression is initialized (when it is empty), after that it remains the same.

                  Maybe this problem is unique to my setup.

                  Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • tunnusT Offline
                    tunnusT Offline
                    tunnus
                    wrote on last edited by tunnus
                    #14

                    @LibraSun, @cw-kid & others, could you test if you can replicate this error I'm experiencing?

                    EDIT: I have another rule querying the same API, for a bit different values and that works fine even with global expressions, so reproducing the same error might prove to be difficult...

                    Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                      @tunnus Well, I'm not getting a clear picture here from the little bits and pieces you're posting, so I set up a little test environment of my own where I have an HTTP request run, set a global variable, and have a rule with a condition that goes true when the global changes with a reaction that sends an alert notification that the variable has changed. I get the notification every time I run the HTTP request.

                      Here's the rule:

                      b897854e-0377-4d07-8f98-9be318276661-image.png

                      And the variables:

                      a5d579cb-3480-43fb-b94e-f81f4089a461-image.png 212872b0-6d58-44d7-ac06-2ead76c78192-image.png

                      Here's the reaction I can run manually to make a request and store the result in the global variable. The API function I'm calling returns a timestamp (with milliseconds), so every request is pretty much guaranteed to give me a different response from the last.

                      5de7eca4-b637-4764-8de3-662dee90061e-image.png

                      This seems to model what you're telling me you want to do, and it works fine.

                      wmarcolinW Offline
                      wmarcolinW Offline
                      wmarcolin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #15

                      @toggledbits, in your test proposal, when the HTTP Request fails, an error is generated and thus an Alert is displayed on the dashboard. Since this is an under-control situation, is it possible to inhibit this alert?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toggledbitsT Offline
                        toggledbitsT Offline
                        toggledbits
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #16

                        Depends on how you're doing the implementation. What's the error that's generated?

                        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                        wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                          Depends on how you're doing the implementation. What's the error that's generated?

                          wmarcolinW Offline
                          wmarcolinW Offline
                          wmarcolin
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #17

                          @toggledbits I am referring to this error alert, generated when I interrupt the internet access, automatically the HTTP GET will fail, which is expected and I will give the necessary treatment. But I would like to not have this alert in the status dashboard, because as I mention it would be an expected problem, I don't need the alert.

                          9e58b432-8e2a-4f54-8f76-d62db5c049ec-image.png

                          Now of course this is no big problem, just exploring more possibilities.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                            @tunnus Well, I'm not getting a clear picture here from the little bits and pieces you're posting, so I set up a little test environment of my own where I have an HTTP request run, set a global variable, and have a rule with a condition that goes true when the global changes with a reaction that sends an alert notification that the variable has changed. I get the notification every time I run the HTTP request.

                            Here's the rule:

                            b897854e-0377-4d07-8f98-9be318276661-image.png

                            And the variables:

                            a5d579cb-3480-43fb-b94e-f81f4089a461-image.png 212872b0-6d58-44d7-ac06-2ead76c78192-image.png

                            Here's the reaction I can run manually to make a request and store the result in the global variable. The API function I'm calling returns a timestamp (with milliseconds), so every request is pretty much guaranteed to give me a different response from the last.

                            5de7eca4-b637-4764-8de3-662dee90061e-image.png

                            This seems to model what you're telling me you want to do, and it works fine.

                            tunnusT Offline
                            tunnusT Offline
                            tunnus
                            wrote on last edited by tunnus
                            #18

                            @toggledbits if you'd be willing to troubleshoot this issue further, I could provide you the whole response to this http request? But where is that response stored on the filesystem?

                            What seems to happen is that if my global expression/variable is empty, fresh data is initially stored to that, but subsequent queries are "ignored", data is not replaced.

                            In the log I can see new/fresh values, but for some reason this new data is not used:

                            2021-10-01T14:04:00.321Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:997> Rule#rule-ktc09w2v._evaluate() trigger state now false (was false)
                            2021-10-01T14:04:00.323Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:999> Rule#rule-ktc09w2v._evaluate() constraints state true
                            2021-10-01T14:04:00.325Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:1008> Rule#rule-ktc09w2v rule state now false, changed no
                            2021-10-01T14:04:00.548Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 reaction Nibe uplink SiteSensor<SET> step 0 HTTP request to https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items?tags=nibe2vera&recursive=false succeeded (200 OK)
                            2021-10-01T14:04:00.552Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1547> Engine#1 response type application/json
                            2021-10-01T14:04:00.556Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1169> Engine#1 global set variable g_UplinkTest = (object) [ { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Control_HotWaterBoost", "state": "0", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": false, "options": [  ] }, "commandDescription": { "commandOptions": [ { "command": "0", "label": "Off" }, { "command": "1", "label": "3h" }, { "command": "2", "label": "6h" }, { "command": "3", "label": "12h" }, { "command": "4", "label": "One time" } ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Control_HotWaterBoost", "label": "Hot water boost", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Status_DegreeMinutes", "state": "-54.3", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Status_DegreeMinutes", "label": "Degree Minutes", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Ventilation_FanSpeed", "state": "72.0", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Ventilation_FanSpeed", "label": "Fan Speed", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Addition_Blocked", "state": "ON", "stateDescription": { "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Switch", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Addition_Blocked", "label": "Blocked", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_CprInfoEp14_CurrentComprFrequency", "state": "20.0 Hz", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number:Frequency", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_CprInfoEp14_CurrentComprFrequency", "label": "Compr. Frequency", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Status_OutdoorTemp", "state": "10.9 °C", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number:Temperature", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Status_OutdoorTemp", "label": "Outdoor Temp.", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Status_AlarmInfo", "state": "NULL", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%s", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "String", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Status_AlarmInfo", "label": "Alarm Info", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Status_HotWaterTop", "state": "46.3 °C", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number:Temperature", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Status_HotWaterTop", "label": "Hot Water Top", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] } ]
                            2021-10-01T14:04:02.173Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1367> _process_reaction_queue() wake-up!
                            2021-10-01T14:04:02.200Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1328> _process_reaction_queue() running task 1179 { "tid": 1179, "id": "rule-kt9u8aur:S", "rule": "rule-kt9u8aur", "__reaction": [RuleReaction#rule-kt9u8aur:S], "next_step": 2, "status": 0, "ts": 1633097040135, "parent": --null--, "__resolve": --function--, "__reject": --function--, "__promise": [object Promise], "attempts": 1 }
                            2021-10-01T14:04:02.201Z <Engine:NOTICE> Resuming reaction Nibe uplink SiteSensor<SET> (rule-kt9u8aur:S) from step 2
                            2021-10-01T14:04:02.204Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1537> Engine#1 request header accept: application/json
                            2021-10-01T14:04:02.205Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1539> Engine#1 reaction rule-kt9u8aur:S step 2 request url https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items?tags=nibe2vera2&recursive=false data { "method": "GET", "timeout": 15000, "size": 8192, "agent": [object Object], "headers": [object Headers] }
                            2021-10-01T14:04:02.208Z <Engine:INFO> Nibe uplink SiteSensor<SET> all actions completed.
                            2021-10-01T14:04:02.209Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1332> _process_reaction_queue() task returned, new status -1; task 1179
                            2021-10-01T14:04:02.212Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1367> _process_reaction_queue ending with 0 in queue; none delayed/ready; waiting
                            

                            (and then it continues with another http request in the same reaction, 2 s delay in between)

                            Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT

                            toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • tunnusT tunnus

                              @toggledbits if you'd be willing to troubleshoot this issue further, I could provide you the whole response to this http request? But where is that response stored on the filesystem?

                              What seems to happen is that if my global expression/variable is empty, fresh data is initially stored to that, but subsequent queries are "ignored", data is not replaced.

                              In the log I can see new/fresh values, but for some reason this new data is not used:

                              2021-10-01T14:04:00.321Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:997> Rule#rule-ktc09w2v._evaluate() trigger state now false (was false)
                              2021-10-01T14:04:00.323Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:999> Rule#rule-ktc09w2v._evaluate() constraints state true
                              2021-10-01T14:04:00.325Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:1008> Rule#rule-ktc09w2v rule state now false, changed no
                              2021-10-01T14:04:00.548Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 reaction Nibe uplink SiteSensor<SET> step 0 HTTP request to https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items?tags=nibe2vera&recursive=false succeeded (200 OK)
                              2021-10-01T14:04:00.552Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1547> Engine#1 response type application/json
                              2021-10-01T14:04:00.556Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1169> Engine#1 global set variable g_UplinkTest = (object) [ { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Control_HotWaterBoost", "state": "0", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": false, "options": [  ] }, "commandDescription": { "commandOptions": [ { "command": "0", "label": "Off" }, { "command": "1", "label": "3h" }, { "command": "2", "label": "6h" }, { "command": "3", "label": "12h" }, { "command": "4", "label": "One time" } ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Control_HotWaterBoost", "label": "Hot water boost", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Status_DegreeMinutes", "state": "-54.3", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Status_DegreeMinutes", "label": "Degree Minutes", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Ventilation_FanSpeed", "state": "72.0", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Ventilation_FanSpeed", "label": "Fan Speed", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Addition_Blocked", "state": "ON", "stateDescription": { "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Switch", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Addition_Blocked", "label": "Blocked", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_CprInfoEp14_CurrentComprFrequency", "state": "20.0 Hz", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number:Frequency", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_CprInfoEp14_CurrentComprFrequency", "label": "Compr. Frequency", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Status_OutdoorTemp", "state": "10.9 °C", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number:Temperature", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Status_OutdoorTemp", "label": "Outdoor Temp.", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Status_AlarmInfo", "state": "NULL", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%s", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "String", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Status_AlarmInfo", "label": "Alarm Info", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Status_HotWaterTop", "state": "46.3 °C", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number:Temperature", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Status_HotWaterTop", "label": "Hot Water Top", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] } ]
                              2021-10-01T14:04:02.173Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1367> _process_reaction_queue() wake-up!
                              2021-10-01T14:04:02.200Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1328> _process_reaction_queue() running task 1179 { "tid": 1179, "id": "rule-kt9u8aur:S", "rule": "rule-kt9u8aur", "__reaction": [RuleReaction#rule-kt9u8aur:S], "next_step": 2, "status": 0, "ts": 1633097040135, "parent": --null--, "__resolve": --function--, "__reject": --function--, "__promise": [object Promise], "attempts": 1 }
                              2021-10-01T14:04:02.201Z <Engine:NOTICE> Resuming reaction Nibe uplink SiteSensor<SET> (rule-kt9u8aur:S) from step 2
                              2021-10-01T14:04:02.204Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1537> Engine#1 request header accept: application/json
                              2021-10-01T14:04:02.205Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1539> Engine#1 reaction rule-kt9u8aur:S step 2 request url https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items?tags=nibe2vera2&recursive=false data { "method": "GET", "timeout": 15000, "size": 8192, "agent": [object Object], "headers": [object Headers] }
                              2021-10-01T14:04:02.208Z <Engine:INFO> Nibe uplink SiteSensor<SET> all actions completed.
                              2021-10-01T14:04:02.209Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1332> _process_reaction_queue() task returned, new status -1; task 1179
                              2021-10-01T14:04:02.212Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1367> _process_reaction_queue ending with 0 in queue; none delayed/ready; waiting
                              

                              (and then it continues with another http request in the same reaction, 2 s delay in between)

                              toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbits
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #19

                              @tunnus said in SiteSensor migration:

                              What seems to happen is that if my global expression/variable is empty, fresh data is initially stored to that, but subsequent queries are "ignored", data is not replaced.
                              In the log I can see new/fresh values, but for some reason this new data is not used

                              You're going to have to describe this in more detail.

                              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                              tunnusT 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                @tunnus said in SiteSensor migration:

                                What seems to happen is that if my global expression/variable is empty, fresh data is initially stored to that, but subsequent queries are "ignored", data is not replaced.
                                In the log I can see new/fresh values, but for some reason this new data is not used

                                You're going to have to describe this in more detail.

                                tunnusT Offline
                                tunnusT Offline
                                tunnus
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #20

                                @toggledbits I'll PM you relevant logs

                                Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • toggledbitsT Offline
                                  toggledbitsT Offline
                                  toggledbits
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #21

                                  Make sure you test with 21275 first.

                                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                  tunnusT 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                    Make sure you test with 21275 first.

                                    tunnusT Offline
                                    tunnusT Offline
                                    tunnus
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #22

                                    @toggledbits will do

                                    Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    Recent Topics

                                    • Home Assistant Connect ZWA-2 & ZBT-2
                                      tunnusT
                                      tunnus
                                      3
                                      9
                                      281

                                    • [MSR] Feature request: For Each action on arrays/groups
                                      therealdbT
                                      therealdb
                                      0
                                      7
                                      93

                                    • [Solved] Error: Command timeout
                                      toggledbitsT
                                      toggledbits
                                      0
                                      10
                                      329

                                    • Issue with MSR UI becoming unresponsive
                                      S
                                      sethlampman
                                      0
                                      7
                                      133

                                    • Date/time condition
                                      tunnusT
                                      tunnus
                                      0
                                      3
                                      107

                                    • Is there a way to turn this section (image in post) off?
                                      toggledbitsT
                                      toggledbits
                                      0
                                      1
                                      78

                                    • Device log?
                                      toggledbitsT
                                      toggledbits
                                      0
                                      2
                                      102

                                    • Midnight crossing not working in date/time condition (build 25325)
                                      tunnusT
                                      tunnus
                                      0
                                      3
                                      128

                                    • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                                      toggledbitsT
                                      toggledbits
                                      5
                                      131
                                      75.9k

                                    • [Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
                                      CrilleC
                                      Crille
                                      0
                                      5
                                      343

                                    • Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
                                      G
                                      gwp1
                                      0
                                      6
                                      328
                                    Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                    Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                                    • Login

                                    • Don't have an account? Register

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular
                                    • Unsolved