Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. SiteSensor migration
How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
cw-kidC
Hello I haven't updated my installation of MSR in a very long time. Its a bare metal Linux install currently on version 24366-3de60836 I see the latest version is now latest-26011-c621bbc7 I assume I cannot just jump from a very old version to the latest version? Or can I? Thanks
Multi-System Reactor
Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
tunnusT
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration: users: # This section defines your valid users. admin: ******* groups: # This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application # and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to # more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here. admin_group: users: - admin applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications guests: users: "*" applications: - dashboard api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin_group allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: true session: timeout: 7200 # (seconds) rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true # If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged. log_acls: true # If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged. debug_acls: true My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
Multi-System Reactor
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request 2?
CatmanV2C
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks. Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option? No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reset a delay
CatmanV2C
I'm sure this has been asked, and answered, but damned if I can figure it out Use case: I have a rear garden with lights. A door from the kitchen into the garden and a door from the garage. Currently if I open the kitchen door the lights come on (yay) and a 3 minute delay starts. After 3 minutes, no matter what else happens, the lights go off (Boo! But also yay!) What I would like is for the 3 minute delay until the lights go off to start from the latest door open event. That is, if I'm going from kitchen to garage, and back again, the lights stay on until there's three minutes of no activity. I've tried 'hacking' with a virtual switch, but can't seem to stop the delay. Any pointers? TIA C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Loading Screen Safari
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Constraints states visually do not match actual
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

SiteSensor migration

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
22 Posts 4 Posters 2.6k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

    From the docs:

    "Global variables are visible to all rules in the system, and can be referred to by any rule-based variable or any other global variable. Global variables are evaluated when a rule-based variable calls for the value. It is therefore normal and expected that, when looking at the Global Expressions list, no values are changing, unless rule variables that reference those global variables are also being evaluated. For example, a global variable consisting of simply time() will not continuously update and display the current time in the Global Expression list. It will only be updated if a rule asks for it.

    Ref: https://reactor.toggledbits.com/docs/Expressions-%26-Variables/

    tunnusT Offline
    tunnusT Offline
    tunnus
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    @toggledbits yep, I had read that part of the manual, that’s why I have that rule with ”changes”, still those values are not updating?

    Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT & ZWA-2

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by toggledbits
      #4

      If g_temp_var is not changing, changes is never going to fire. But g_UplinkResponse is changing.

      Edit: to try to clarify more, it's a chicken and egg problem. g_temp_var will not be updated until it is referenced by a running rule, but the rule only runs when g_temp_var is changed. So without something external causing g_temp_var to change, the rule will never run and call for g_temp_var to be updated. If you check g_UplinkResponse for changes, but use g_temp_var everywhere else in the rule, you should get the behavior you are looking for, because g_UplinkResponse is changed externally by another rule on an interval, so that will stimulate the run of the rule to evaluate everything else needed.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      tunnusT 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • G Offline
        G Offline
        gwp1
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        This is a very timely thread as I'm starting to explore how to migrate two Site Sensors (one pulls weather data from Ambient API, the other pulls weather data from OpenWxMap API) to feed my HVAC needs.

        Disclaimer: I have near zero KB regarding expressions let along how they work in MSR. I'll be watching this thread closely.

        *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
        *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

        *HAOS
        Core 2026.1.1
        w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
        FW: v1.1
        SDK: v7.23.1

        *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
        MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
        MQTTController: 25139
        ZWave Controller: 25139

        tunnusT 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • G gwp1

          This is a very timely thread as I'm starting to explore how to migrate two Site Sensors (one pulls weather data from Ambient API, the other pulls weather data from OpenWxMap API) to feed my HVAC needs.

          Disclaimer: I have near zero KB regarding expressions let along how they work in MSR. I'll be watching this thread closely.

          tunnusT Offline
          tunnusT Offline
          tunnus
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          @gwp1 you are probably better off with this post than what's here, but feel free to follow also this discussion 🙂

          Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT & ZWA-2

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

            If g_temp_var is not changing, changes is never going to fire. But g_UplinkResponse is changing.

            Edit: to try to clarify more, it's a chicken and egg problem. g_temp_var will not be updated until it is referenced by a running rule, but the rule only runs when g_temp_var is changed. So without something external causing g_temp_var to change, the rule will never run and call for g_temp_var to be updated. If you check g_UplinkResponse for changes, but use g_temp_var everywhere else in the rule, you should get the behavior you are looking for, because g_UplinkResponse is changed externally by another rule on an interval, so that will stimulate the run of the rule to evaluate everything else needed.

            tunnusT Offline
            tunnusT Offline
            tunnus
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            @toggledbits okay, now I have this test rule set up:

            Screenshot 2021-09-12 at 2.31.02.png

            Situation remains the same, global expression(s) is not changing 😞

            Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT & ZWA-2

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbits
              wrote on last edited by toggledbits
              #8

              I can't tell from the timestamps, but given that they're similar, did the value actually change? No hit if the value doesn't actually change.

              By the way, how are you determining if there was a change or not? I mean, how do you know it's not changing. Does something happen when the conditions are met (is there a Reaction that does something?)?

              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

              tunnusT 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                I can't tell from the timestamps, but given that they're similar, did the value actually change? No hit if the value doesn't actually change.

                By the way, how are you determining if there was a change or not? I mean, how do you know it's not changing. Does something happen when the conditions are met (is there a Reaction that does something?)?

                tunnusT Offline
                tunnusT Offline
                tunnus
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                @toggledbits I know it's supposed to be something else as I can monitor the same values via a couple of different means (an app for instance).

                But as I wrote before, if I use local expressions, values are as they should be:

                Screenshot 2021-09-12 at 3.02.34.png

                Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT & ZWA-2

                toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • tunnusT tunnus

                  @toggledbits I know it's supposed to be something else as I can monitor the same values via a couple of different means (an app for instance).

                  But as I wrote before, if I use local expressions, values are as they should be:

                  Screenshot 2021-09-12 at 3.02.34.png

                  toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbits
                  wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                  #10

                  @tunnus Well, I'm not getting a clear picture here from the little bits and pieces you're posting, so I set up a little test environment of my own where I have an HTTP request run, set a global variable, and have a rule with a condition that goes true when the global changes with a reaction that sends an alert notification that the variable has changed. I get the notification every time I run the HTTP request.

                  Here's the rule:

                  b897854e-0377-4d07-8f98-9be318276661-image.png

                  And the variables:

                  a5d579cb-3480-43fb-b94e-f81f4089a461-image.png 212872b0-6d58-44d7-ac06-2ead76c78192-image.png

                  Here's the reaction I can run manually to make a request and store the result in the global variable. The API function I'm calling returns a timestamp (with milliseconds), so every request is pretty much guaranteed to give me a different response from the last.

                  5de7eca4-b637-4764-8de3-662dee90061e-image.png

                  This seems to model what you're telling me you want to do, and it works fine.

                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                  tunnusT wmarcolinW 3 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                    @tunnus Well, I'm not getting a clear picture here from the little bits and pieces you're posting, so I set up a little test environment of my own where I have an HTTP request run, set a global variable, and have a rule with a condition that goes true when the global changes with a reaction that sends an alert notification that the variable has changed. I get the notification every time I run the HTTP request.

                    Here's the rule:

                    b897854e-0377-4d07-8f98-9be318276661-image.png

                    And the variables:

                    a5d579cb-3480-43fb-b94e-f81f4089a461-image.png 212872b0-6d58-44d7-ac06-2ead76c78192-image.png

                    Here's the reaction I can run manually to make a request and store the result in the global variable. The API function I'm calling returns a timestamp (with milliseconds), so every request is pretty much guaranteed to give me a different response from the last.

                    5de7eca4-b637-4764-8de3-662dee90061e-image.png

                    This seems to model what you're telling me you want to do, and it works fine.

                    tunnusT Offline
                    tunnusT Offline
                    tunnus
                    wrote on last edited by tunnus
                    #11

                    @toggledbits sorry, I tried to depict the problem in the first post as well as I could.

                    But yes, your test case models my case and now I'm baffled. I'll try to setup my test from a scratch and see what happens...

                    EDIT: replicated this case, no change. Local variables work nicely, but global expressions won’t update. Patrick, any logs I could provide to solve this?

                    Only difference I could think of (between my and your test setup) is that if response structures (array etc) differ just enough and code handles local & global expressions a bit differently.

                    Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT & ZWA-2

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • toggledbitsT Offline
                      toggledbitsT Offline
                      toggledbits
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      The key here is that the response to the HTTP request has to change. If it doesn't, then the changes isn't going to work, and nothing will trigger the rule to evaluate and cause the other global variables to be updated. Remember that changes requires an actual change of the value, not just a fetch of the value and setting it (again) to what's already there... no change, no changes.

                      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                      tunnusT 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                        The key here is that the response to the HTTP request has to change. If it doesn't, then the changes isn't going to work, and nothing will trigger the rule to evaluate and cause the other global variables to be updated. Remember that changes requires an actual change of the value, not just a fetch of the value and setting it (again) to what's already there... no change, no changes.

                        tunnusT Offline
                        tunnusT Offline
                        tunnus
                        wrote on last edited by tunnus
                        #13

                        @toggledbits what's strange here is that I only change this:

                        Screenshot 2021-09-13 at 12.19.22.png

                        to this:

                        Screenshot 2021-09-13 at 12.14.40.png

                        or vice versa, URL & other settings remain the same, local expression works, changes are immediately detected. And yes, response is really changing.

                        Here's the most current test rule:

                        Screenshot 2021-09-13 at 12.19.55.png

                        (at the time of the screenshot, "-111.0" was the correct value)

                        The only time I get an updated/correct value (for the global expression) is when a global variable/expression is initialized (when it is empty), after that it remains the same.

                        Maybe this problem is unique to my setup.

                        Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT & ZWA-2

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • tunnusT Offline
                          tunnusT Offline
                          tunnus
                          wrote on last edited by tunnus
                          #14

                          @LibraSun, @cw-kid & others, could you test if you can replicate this error I'm experiencing?

                          EDIT: I have another rule querying the same API, for a bit different values and that works fine even with global expressions, so reproducing the same error might prove to be difficult...

                          Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT & ZWA-2

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                            @tunnus Well, I'm not getting a clear picture here from the little bits and pieces you're posting, so I set up a little test environment of my own where I have an HTTP request run, set a global variable, and have a rule with a condition that goes true when the global changes with a reaction that sends an alert notification that the variable has changed. I get the notification every time I run the HTTP request.

                            Here's the rule:

                            b897854e-0377-4d07-8f98-9be318276661-image.png

                            And the variables:

                            a5d579cb-3480-43fb-b94e-f81f4089a461-image.png 212872b0-6d58-44d7-ac06-2ead76c78192-image.png

                            Here's the reaction I can run manually to make a request and store the result in the global variable. The API function I'm calling returns a timestamp (with milliseconds), so every request is pretty much guaranteed to give me a different response from the last.

                            5de7eca4-b637-4764-8de3-662dee90061e-image.png

                            This seems to model what you're telling me you want to do, and it works fine.

                            wmarcolinW Offline
                            wmarcolinW Offline
                            wmarcolin
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            @toggledbits, in your test proposal, when the HTTP Request fails, an error is generated and thus an Alert is displayed on the dashboard. Since this is an under-control situation, is it possible to inhibit this alert?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbits
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              Depends on how you're doing the implementation. What's the error that's generated?

                              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                              wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                Depends on how you're doing the implementation. What's the error that's generated?

                                wmarcolinW Offline
                                wmarcolinW Offline
                                wmarcolin
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #17

                                @toggledbits I am referring to this error alert, generated when I interrupt the internet access, automatically the HTTP GET will fail, which is expected and I will give the necessary treatment. But I would like to not have this alert in the status dashboard, because as I mention it would be an expected problem, I don't need the alert.

                                9e58b432-8e2a-4f54-8f76-d62db5c049ec-image.png

                                Now of course this is no big problem, just exploring more possibilities.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                  @tunnus Well, I'm not getting a clear picture here from the little bits and pieces you're posting, so I set up a little test environment of my own where I have an HTTP request run, set a global variable, and have a rule with a condition that goes true when the global changes with a reaction that sends an alert notification that the variable has changed. I get the notification every time I run the HTTP request.

                                  Here's the rule:

                                  b897854e-0377-4d07-8f98-9be318276661-image.png

                                  And the variables:

                                  a5d579cb-3480-43fb-b94e-f81f4089a461-image.png 212872b0-6d58-44d7-ac06-2ead76c78192-image.png

                                  Here's the reaction I can run manually to make a request and store the result in the global variable. The API function I'm calling returns a timestamp (with milliseconds), so every request is pretty much guaranteed to give me a different response from the last.

                                  5de7eca4-b637-4764-8de3-662dee90061e-image.png

                                  This seems to model what you're telling me you want to do, and it works fine.

                                  tunnusT Offline
                                  tunnusT Offline
                                  tunnus
                                  wrote on last edited by tunnus
                                  #18

                                  @toggledbits if you'd be willing to troubleshoot this issue further, I could provide you the whole response to this http request? But where is that response stored on the filesystem?

                                  What seems to happen is that if my global expression/variable is empty, fresh data is initially stored to that, but subsequent queries are "ignored", data is not replaced.

                                  In the log I can see new/fresh values, but for some reason this new data is not used:

                                  2021-10-01T14:04:00.321Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:997> Rule#rule-ktc09w2v._evaluate() trigger state now false (was false)
                                  2021-10-01T14:04:00.323Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:999> Rule#rule-ktc09w2v._evaluate() constraints state true
                                  2021-10-01T14:04:00.325Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:1008> Rule#rule-ktc09w2v rule state now false, changed no
                                  2021-10-01T14:04:00.548Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 reaction Nibe uplink SiteSensor<SET> step 0 HTTP request to https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items?tags=nibe2vera&recursive=false succeeded (200 OK)
                                  2021-10-01T14:04:00.552Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1547> Engine#1 response type application/json
                                  2021-10-01T14:04:00.556Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1169> Engine#1 global set variable g_UplinkTest = (object) [ { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Control_HotWaterBoost", "state": "0", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": false, "options": [  ] }, "commandDescription": { "commandOptions": [ { "command": "0", "label": "Off" }, { "command": "1", "label": "3h" }, { "command": "2", "label": "6h" }, { "command": "3", "label": "12h" }, { "command": "4", "label": "One time" } ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Control_HotWaterBoost", "label": "Hot water boost", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Status_DegreeMinutes", "state": "-54.3", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Status_DegreeMinutes", "label": "Degree Minutes", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Ventilation_FanSpeed", "state": "72.0", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Ventilation_FanSpeed", "label": "Fan Speed", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Addition_Blocked", "state": "ON", "stateDescription": { "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Switch", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Addition_Blocked", "label": "Blocked", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_CprInfoEp14_CurrentComprFrequency", "state": "20.0 Hz", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number:Frequency", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_CprInfoEp14_CurrentComprFrequency", "label": "Compr. Frequency", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Status_OutdoorTemp", "state": "10.9 °C", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number:Temperature", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Status_OutdoorTemp", "label": "Outdoor Temp.", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Status_AlarmInfo", "state": "NULL", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%s", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "String", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Status_AlarmInfo", "label": "Alarm Info", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Status_HotWaterTop", "state": "46.3 °C", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number:Temperature", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Status_HotWaterTop", "label": "Hot Water Top", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] } ]
                                  2021-10-01T14:04:02.173Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1367> _process_reaction_queue() wake-up!
                                  2021-10-01T14:04:02.200Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1328> _process_reaction_queue() running task 1179 { "tid": 1179, "id": "rule-kt9u8aur:S", "rule": "rule-kt9u8aur", "__reaction": [RuleReaction#rule-kt9u8aur:S], "next_step": 2, "status": 0, "ts": 1633097040135, "parent": --null--, "__resolve": --function--, "__reject": --function--, "__promise": [object Promise], "attempts": 1 }
                                  2021-10-01T14:04:02.201Z <Engine:NOTICE> Resuming reaction Nibe uplink SiteSensor<SET> (rule-kt9u8aur:S) from step 2
                                  2021-10-01T14:04:02.204Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1537> Engine#1 request header accept: application/json
                                  2021-10-01T14:04:02.205Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1539> Engine#1 reaction rule-kt9u8aur:S step 2 request url https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items?tags=nibe2vera2&recursive=false data { "method": "GET", "timeout": 15000, "size": 8192, "agent": [object Object], "headers": [object Headers] }
                                  2021-10-01T14:04:02.208Z <Engine:INFO> Nibe uplink SiteSensor<SET> all actions completed.
                                  2021-10-01T14:04:02.209Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1332> _process_reaction_queue() task returned, new status -1; task 1179
                                  2021-10-01T14:04:02.212Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1367> _process_reaction_queue ending with 0 in queue; none delayed/ready; waiting
                                  

                                  (and then it continues with another http request in the same reaction, 2 s delay in between)

                                  Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT & ZWA-2

                                  toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • tunnusT tunnus

                                    @toggledbits if you'd be willing to troubleshoot this issue further, I could provide you the whole response to this http request? But where is that response stored on the filesystem?

                                    What seems to happen is that if my global expression/variable is empty, fresh data is initially stored to that, but subsequent queries are "ignored", data is not replaced.

                                    In the log I can see new/fresh values, but for some reason this new data is not used:

                                    2021-10-01T14:04:00.321Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:997> Rule#rule-ktc09w2v._evaluate() trigger state now false (was false)
                                    2021-10-01T14:04:00.323Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:999> Rule#rule-ktc09w2v._evaluate() constraints state true
                                    2021-10-01T14:04:00.325Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:1008> Rule#rule-ktc09w2v rule state now false, changed no
                                    2021-10-01T14:04:00.548Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 reaction Nibe uplink SiteSensor<SET> step 0 HTTP request to https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items?tags=nibe2vera&recursive=false succeeded (200 OK)
                                    2021-10-01T14:04:00.552Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1547> Engine#1 response type application/json
                                    2021-10-01T14:04:00.556Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1169> Engine#1 global set variable g_UplinkTest = (object) [ { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Control_HotWaterBoost", "state": "0", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": false, "options": [  ] }, "commandDescription": { "commandOptions": [ { "command": "0", "label": "Off" }, { "command": "1", "label": "3h" }, { "command": "2", "label": "6h" }, { "command": "3", "label": "12h" }, { "command": "4", "label": "One time" } ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Control_HotWaterBoost", "label": "Hot water boost", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Status_DegreeMinutes", "state": "-54.3", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Status_DegreeMinutes", "label": "Degree Minutes", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Ventilation_FanSpeed", "state": "72.0", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Ventilation_FanSpeed", "label": "Fan Speed", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Addition_Blocked", "state": "ON", "stateDescription": { "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Switch", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Addition_Blocked", "label": "Blocked", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_CprInfoEp14_CurrentComprFrequency", "state": "20.0 Hz", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number:Frequency", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_CprInfoEp14_CurrentComprFrequency", "label": "Compr. Frequency", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Status_OutdoorTemp", "state": "10.9 °C", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number:Temperature", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Status_OutdoorTemp", "label": "Outdoor Temp.", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Status_AlarmInfo", "state": "NULL", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%s", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "String", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Status_AlarmInfo", "label": "Alarm Info", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Status_HotWaterTop", "state": "46.3 °C", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number:Temperature", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Status_HotWaterTop", "label": "Hot Water Top", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] } ]
                                    2021-10-01T14:04:02.173Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1367> _process_reaction_queue() wake-up!
                                    2021-10-01T14:04:02.200Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1328> _process_reaction_queue() running task 1179 { "tid": 1179, "id": "rule-kt9u8aur:S", "rule": "rule-kt9u8aur", "__reaction": [RuleReaction#rule-kt9u8aur:S], "next_step": 2, "status": 0, "ts": 1633097040135, "parent": --null--, "__resolve": --function--, "__reject": --function--, "__promise": [object Promise], "attempts": 1 }
                                    2021-10-01T14:04:02.201Z <Engine:NOTICE> Resuming reaction Nibe uplink SiteSensor<SET> (rule-kt9u8aur:S) from step 2
                                    2021-10-01T14:04:02.204Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1537> Engine#1 request header accept: application/json
                                    2021-10-01T14:04:02.205Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1539> Engine#1 reaction rule-kt9u8aur:S step 2 request url https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items?tags=nibe2vera2&recursive=false data { "method": "GET", "timeout": 15000, "size": 8192, "agent": [object Object], "headers": [object Headers] }
                                    2021-10-01T14:04:02.208Z <Engine:INFO> Nibe uplink SiteSensor<SET> all actions completed.
                                    2021-10-01T14:04:02.209Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1332> _process_reaction_queue() task returned, new status -1; task 1179
                                    2021-10-01T14:04:02.212Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1367> _process_reaction_queue ending with 0 in queue; none delayed/ready; waiting
                                    

                                    (and then it continues with another http request in the same reaction, 2 s delay in between)

                                    toggledbitsT Offline
                                    toggledbitsT Offline
                                    toggledbits
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #19

                                    @tunnus said in SiteSensor migration:

                                    What seems to happen is that if my global expression/variable is empty, fresh data is initially stored to that, but subsequent queries are "ignored", data is not replaced.
                                    In the log I can see new/fresh values, but for some reason this new data is not used

                                    You're going to have to describe this in more detail.

                                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                    tunnusT 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                      @tunnus said in SiteSensor migration:

                                      What seems to happen is that if my global expression/variable is empty, fresh data is initially stored to that, but subsequent queries are "ignored", data is not replaced.
                                      In the log I can see new/fresh values, but for some reason this new data is not used

                                      You're going to have to describe this in more detail.

                                      tunnusT Offline
                                      tunnusT Offline
                                      tunnus
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #20

                                      @toggledbits I'll PM you relevant logs

                                      Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT & ZWA-2

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • toggledbitsT Offline
                                        toggledbitsT Offline
                                        toggledbits
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #21

                                        Make sure you test with 21275 first.

                                        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                        tunnusT 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                          Make sure you test with 21275 first.

                                          tunnusT Offline
                                          tunnusT Offline
                                          tunnus
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #22

                                          @toggledbits will do

                                          Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT & ZWA-2

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Recent Topics

                                          • How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
                                            cw-kidC
                                            cw-kid
                                            0
                                            1
                                            12

                                          • Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            2
                                            59

                                          • VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
                                            S
                                            SweetGenius
                                            1
                                            1
                                            48

                                          • Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            2
                                            1
                                            39

                                          • Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
                                            G
                                            gwp1
                                            0
                                            1
                                            68

                                          • [Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
                                            CrilleC
                                            Crille
                                            0
                                            4
                                            107

                                          • [Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
                                            therealdbT
                                            therealdb
                                            0
                                            3
                                            120

                                          • Possible feature request 2?
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            3
                                            90

                                          • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            5
                                            133
                                            80.2k

                                          • Genuinely impressed with Zigbee and HA / Reactor
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            1
                                            9
                                            397

                                          • Copying a global reaction
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            3
                                            122

                                          • [HowTo] Using HABridge with Reactor
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            9
                                            460
                                          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                          Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Unsolved