Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. SiteSensor migration
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] reactor-mqtt-contrib package for additional MQTT templates
therealdbT
I'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only). Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package: https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go. I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them. The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression. Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests
Multi-System Reactor
HA 2025.9.4 Supported Yet?
CatmanV2C
Tangentially did I miss 2025.9.4 getting blessed in MSR? I've been holding off Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Rule Set UI bug - RESOLVED
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Copy&Paste of Rules
therealdbT
I don't know if I'm the only one, but managing more than one Reactor installs, the need to have some sort of copy&paste for rules has grown on me. While I understand the technical challenges, I'm wondering if a "god mode" where I could copy the raw JSON rule and paste it into another rule could be an advanced, flag only feature that could benefit power users. I know I can copy the JSON file and proceed, but I must stop Reactor and when doing maintenance, it's more clicks to do. Just an idea
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Help with scene controller cycling logic
therealdbT
I’ve added a couple of Shelly Wave i4 as scene controllers and I’m planning to add more, since I can just use standard buttons instead of battery-powered scene controllers, which also looks better aesthetically. That said, I’m struggling to figure out how to write a simple rule that cycles between states every time I press a button. Example: Light 1 ON → OFF, then Light 2 ON → OFF. The part I can’t get right is handling the case where Light 1 or Light 2 might already be ON independently of the rule. Maybe it’s just too much sun and relaxation clouding my brain, but any hint would be appreciated.
Multi-System Reactor
Stop the MSR by an external switch on Hubitat.
wmarcolinW
Use case: When performing home maintenance, such as air conditioning, I want all rules involving air conditioning to be disabled. To do this, to day, I have a virtual switch that I placed within all rules involving air conditioning, meaning that if I turn it off, none of them work. Then another situation: the water pump system and garden irrigation, another switch. In short, I had to create several virtual switches in Hubitat to disable rules in MSR. Unfortunately, however, I was unable to cover all scenarios, so I wondered if it would be possible for MSR to support a virtual MSR switch, which, when configured in the reactor settings, would function as a general on/off switch for MSR. If it is configured and turned off, the entire rules and actions in MSR stops working, except for the status change reading process, specifically for this switch, which, when turned on, would restart the MSR. Would it be possible to do something like this? Any recommendations from the experts?
Multi-System Reactor

SiteSensor migration

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
22 Posts 4 Posters 2.2k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • tunnusT tunnus

    @toggledbits I know it's supposed to be something else as I can monitor the same values via a couple of different means (an app for instance).

    But as I wrote before, if I use local expressions, values are as they should be:

    Screenshot 2021-09-12 at 3.02.34.png

    toggledbitsT Away
    toggledbitsT Away
    toggledbits
    wrote on last edited by toggledbits
    #10

    @tunnus Well, I'm not getting a clear picture here from the little bits and pieces you're posting, so I set up a little test environment of my own where I have an HTTP request run, set a global variable, and have a rule with a condition that goes true when the global changes with a reaction that sends an alert notification that the variable has changed. I get the notification every time I run the HTTP request.

    Here's the rule:

    b897854e-0377-4d07-8f98-9be318276661-image.png

    And the variables:

    a5d579cb-3480-43fb-b94e-f81f4089a461-image.png 212872b0-6d58-44d7-ac06-2ead76c78192-image.png

    Here's the reaction I can run manually to make a request and store the result in the global variable. The API function I'm calling returns a timestamp (with milliseconds), so every request is pretty much guaranteed to give me a different response from the last.

    5de7eca4-b637-4764-8de3-662dee90061e-image.png

    This seems to model what you're telling me you want to do, and it works fine.

    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

    tunnusT wmarcolinW 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

      @tunnus Well, I'm not getting a clear picture here from the little bits and pieces you're posting, so I set up a little test environment of my own where I have an HTTP request run, set a global variable, and have a rule with a condition that goes true when the global changes with a reaction that sends an alert notification that the variable has changed. I get the notification every time I run the HTTP request.

      Here's the rule:

      b897854e-0377-4d07-8f98-9be318276661-image.png

      And the variables:

      a5d579cb-3480-43fb-b94e-f81f4089a461-image.png 212872b0-6d58-44d7-ac06-2ead76c78192-image.png

      Here's the reaction I can run manually to make a request and store the result in the global variable. The API function I'm calling returns a timestamp (with milliseconds), so every request is pretty much guaranteed to give me a different response from the last.

      5de7eca4-b637-4764-8de3-662dee90061e-image.png

      This seems to model what you're telling me you want to do, and it works fine.

      tunnusT Offline
      tunnusT Offline
      tunnus
      wrote on last edited by tunnus
      #11

      @toggledbits sorry, I tried to depict the problem in the first post as well as I could.

      But yes, your test case models my case and now I'm baffled. I'll try to setup my test from a scratch and see what happens...

      EDIT: replicated this case, no change. Local variables work nicely, but global expressions won’t update. Patrick, any logs I could provide to solve this?

      Only difference I could think of (between my and your test setup) is that if response structures (array etc) differ just enough and code handles local & global expressions a bit differently.

      Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT Away
        toggledbitsT Away
        toggledbits
        wrote on last edited by
        #12

        The key here is that the response to the HTTP request has to change. If it doesn't, then the changes isn't going to work, and nothing will trigger the rule to evaluate and cause the other global variables to be updated. Remember that changes requires an actual change of the value, not just a fetch of the value and setting it (again) to what's already there... no change, no changes.

        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

        tunnusT 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

          The key here is that the response to the HTTP request has to change. If it doesn't, then the changes isn't going to work, and nothing will trigger the rule to evaluate and cause the other global variables to be updated. Remember that changes requires an actual change of the value, not just a fetch of the value and setting it (again) to what's already there... no change, no changes.

          tunnusT Offline
          tunnusT Offline
          tunnus
          wrote on last edited by tunnus
          #13

          @toggledbits what's strange here is that I only change this:

          Screenshot 2021-09-13 at 12.19.22.png

          to this:

          Screenshot 2021-09-13 at 12.14.40.png

          or vice versa, URL & other settings remain the same, local expression works, changes are immediately detected. And yes, response is really changing.

          Here's the most current test rule:

          Screenshot 2021-09-13 at 12.19.55.png

          (at the time of the screenshot, "-111.0" was the correct value)

          The only time I get an updated/correct value (for the global expression) is when a global variable/expression is initialized (when it is empty), after that it remains the same.

          Maybe this problem is unique to my setup.

          Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • tunnusT Offline
            tunnusT Offline
            tunnus
            wrote on last edited by tunnus
            #14

            @LibraSun, @cw-kid & others, could you test if you can replicate this error I'm experiencing?

            EDIT: I have another rule querying the same API, for a bit different values and that works fine even with global expressions, so reproducing the same error might prove to be difficult...

            Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

              @tunnus Well, I'm not getting a clear picture here from the little bits and pieces you're posting, so I set up a little test environment of my own where I have an HTTP request run, set a global variable, and have a rule with a condition that goes true when the global changes with a reaction that sends an alert notification that the variable has changed. I get the notification every time I run the HTTP request.

              Here's the rule:

              b897854e-0377-4d07-8f98-9be318276661-image.png

              And the variables:

              a5d579cb-3480-43fb-b94e-f81f4089a461-image.png 212872b0-6d58-44d7-ac06-2ead76c78192-image.png

              Here's the reaction I can run manually to make a request and store the result in the global variable. The API function I'm calling returns a timestamp (with milliseconds), so every request is pretty much guaranteed to give me a different response from the last.

              5de7eca4-b637-4764-8de3-662dee90061e-image.png

              This seems to model what you're telling me you want to do, and it works fine.

              wmarcolinW Offline
              wmarcolinW Offline
              wmarcolin
              wrote on last edited by
              #15

              @toggledbits, in your test proposal, when the HTTP Request fails, an error is generated and thus an Alert is displayed on the dashboard. Since this is an under-control situation, is it possible to inhibit this alert?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT Away
                toggledbitsT Away
                toggledbits
                wrote on last edited by
                #16

                Depends on how you're doing the implementation. What's the error that's generated?

                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                  Depends on how you're doing the implementation. What's the error that's generated?

                  wmarcolinW Offline
                  wmarcolinW Offline
                  wmarcolin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #17

                  @toggledbits I am referring to this error alert, generated when I interrupt the internet access, automatically the HTTP GET will fail, which is expected and I will give the necessary treatment. But I would like to not have this alert in the status dashboard, because as I mention it would be an expected problem, I don't need the alert.

                  9e58b432-8e2a-4f54-8f76-d62db5c049ec-image.png

                  Now of course this is no big problem, just exploring more possibilities.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                    @tunnus Well, I'm not getting a clear picture here from the little bits and pieces you're posting, so I set up a little test environment of my own where I have an HTTP request run, set a global variable, and have a rule with a condition that goes true when the global changes with a reaction that sends an alert notification that the variable has changed. I get the notification every time I run the HTTP request.

                    Here's the rule:

                    b897854e-0377-4d07-8f98-9be318276661-image.png

                    And the variables:

                    a5d579cb-3480-43fb-b94e-f81f4089a461-image.png 212872b0-6d58-44d7-ac06-2ead76c78192-image.png

                    Here's the reaction I can run manually to make a request and store the result in the global variable. The API function I'm calling returns a timestamp (with milliseconds), so every request is pretty much guaranteed to give me a different response from the last.

                    5de7eca4-b637-4764-8de3-662dee90061e-image.png

                    This seems to model what you're telling me you want to do, and it works fine.

                    tunnusT Offline
                    tunnusT Offline
                    tunnus
                    wrote on last edited by tunnus
                    #18

                    @toggledbits if you'd be willing to troubleshoot this issue further, I could provide you the whole response to this http request? But where is that response stored on the filesystem?

                    What seems to happen is that if my global expression/variable is empty, fresh data is initially stored to that, but subsequent queries are "ignored", data is not replaced.

                    In the log I can see new/fresh values, but for some reason this new data is not used:

                    2021-10-01T14:04:00.321Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:997> Rule#rule-ktc09w2v._evaluate() trigger state now false (was false)
                    2021-10-01T14:04:00.323Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:999> Rule#rule-ktc09w2v._evaluate() constraints state true
                    2021-10-01T14:04:00.325Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:1008> Rule#rule-ktc09w2v rule state now false, changed no
                    2021-10-01T14:04:00.548Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 reaction Nibe uplink SiteSensor<SET> step 0 HTTP request to https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items?tags=nibe2vera&recursive=false succeeded (200 OK)
                    2021-10-01T14:04:00.552Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1547> Engine#1 response type application/json
                    2021-10-01T14:04:00.556Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1169> Engine#1 global set variable g_UplinkTest = (object) [ { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Control_HotWaterBoost", "state": "0", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": false, "options": [  ] }, "commandDescription": { "commandOptions": [ { "command": "0", "label": "Off" }, { "command": "1", "label": "3h" }, { "command": "2", "label": "6h" }, { "command": "3", "label": "12h" }, { "command": "4", "label": "One time" } ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Control_HotWaterBoost", "label": "Hot water boost", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Status_DegreeMinutes", "state": "-54.3", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Status_DegreeMinutes", "label": "Degree Minutes", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Ventilation_FanSpeed", "state": "72.0", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Ventilation_FanSpeed", "label": "Fan Speed", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Addition_Blocked", "state": "ON", "stateDescription": { "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Switch", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Addition_Blocked", "label": "Blocked", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_CprInfoEp14_CurrentComprFrequency", "state": "20.0 Hz", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number:Frequency", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_CprInfoEp14_CurrentComprFrequency", "label": "Compr. Frequency", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Status_OutdoorTemp", "state": "10.9 °C", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number:Temperature", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Status_OutdoorTemp", "label": "Outdoor Temp.", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Status_AlarmInfo", "state": "NULL", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%s", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "String", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Status_AlarmInfo", "label": "Alarm Info", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Status_HotWaterTop", "state": "46.3 °C", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number:Temperature", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Status_HotWaterTop", "label": "Hot Water Top", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] } ]
                    2021-10-01T14:04:02.173Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1367> _process_reaction_queue() wake-up!
                    2021-10-01T14:04:02.200Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1328> _process_reaction_queue() running task 1179 { "tid": 1179, "id": "rule-kt9u8aur:S", "rule": "rule-kt9u8aur", "__reaction": [RuleReaction#rule-kt9u8aur:S], "next_step": 2, "status": 0, "ts": 1633097040135, "parent": --null--, "__resolve": --function--, "__reject": --function--, "__promise": [object Promise], "attempts": 1 }
                    2021-10-01T14:04:02.201Z <Engine:NOTICE> Resuming reaction Nibe uplink SiteSensor<SET> (rule-kt9u8aur:S) from step 2
                    2021-10-01T14:04:02.204Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1537> Engine#1 request header accept: application/json
                    2021-10-01T14:04:02.205Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1539> Engine#1 reaction rule-kt9u8aur:S step 2 request url https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items?tags=nibe2vera2&recursive=false data { "method": "GET", "timeout": 15000, "size": 8192, "agent": [object Object], "headers": [object Headers] }
                    2021-10-01T14:04:02.208Z <Engine:INFO> Nibe uplink SiteSensor<SET> all actions completed.
                    2021-10-01T14:04:02.209Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1332> _process_reaction_queue() task returned, new status -1; task 1179
                    2021-10-01T14:04:02.212Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1367> _process_reaction_queue ending with 0 in queue; none delayed/ready; waiting
                    

                    (and then it continues with another http request in the same reaction, 2 s delay in between)

                    Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT

                    toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • tunnusT tunnus

                      @toggledbits if you'd be willing to troubleshoot this issue further, I could provide you the whole response to this http request? But where is that response stored on the filesystem?

                      What seems to happen is that if my global expression/variable is empty, fresh data is initially stored to that, but subsequent queries are "ignored", data is not replaced.

                      In the log I can see new/fresh values, but for some reason this new data is not used:

                      2021-10-01T14:04:00.321Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:997> Rule#rule-ktc09w2v._evaluate() trigger state now false (was false)
                      2021-10-01T14:04:00.323Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:999> Rule#rule-ktc09w2v._evaluate() constraints state true
                      2021-10-01T14:04:00.325Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:1008> Rule#rule-ktc09w2v rule state now false, changed no
                      2021-10-01T14:04:00.548Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 reaction Nibe uplink SiteSensor<SET> step 0 HTTP request to https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items?tags=nibe2vera&recursive=false succeeded (200 OK)
                      2021-10-01T14:04:00.552Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1547> Engine#1 response type application/json
                      2021-10-01T14:04:00.556Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1169> Engine#1 global set variable g_UplinkTest = (object) [ { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Control_HotWaterBoost", "state": "0", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": false, "options": [  ] }, "commandDescription": { "commandOptions": [ { "command": "0", "label": "Off" }, { "command": "1", "label": "3h" }, { "command": "2", "label": "6h" }, { "command": "3", "label": "12h" }, { "command": "4", "label": "One time" } ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Control_HotWaterBoost", "label": "Hot water boost", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Status_DegreeMinutes", "state": "-54.3", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Status_DegreeMinutes", "label": "Degree Minutes", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Ventilation_FanSpeed", "state": "72.0", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Ventilation_FanSpeed", "label": "Fan Speed", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Addition_Blocked", "state": "ON", "stateDescription": { "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Switch", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Addition_Blocked", "label": "Blocked", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_CprInfoEp14_CurrentComprFrequency", "state": "20.0 Hz", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number:Frequency", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_CprInfoEp14_CurrentComprFrequency", "label": "Compr. Frequency", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Status_OutdoorTemp", "state": "10.9 °C", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number:Temperature", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Status_OutdoorTemp", "label": "Outdoor Temp.", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Status_AlarmInfo", "state": "NULL", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%s", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "String", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Status_AlarmInfo", "label": "Alarm Info", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] }, { "link": "https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items/NibeRESTAPI_Status_HotWaterTop", "state": "46.3 °C", "stateDescription": { "pattern": "%.0f", "readOnly": true, "options": [  ] }, "editable": true, "type": "Number:Temperature", "name": "NibeRESTAPI_Status_HotWaterTop", "label": "Hot Water Top", "tags": [ "nibe2vera" ], "groupNames": [  ] } ]
                      2021-10-01T14:04:02.173Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1367> _process_reaction_queue() wake-up!
                      2021-10-01T14:04:02.200Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1328> _process_reaction_queue() running task 1179 { "tid": 1179, "id": "rule-kt9u8aur:S", "rule": "rule-kt9u8aur", "__reaction": [RuleReaction#rule-kt9u8aur:S], "next_step": 2, "status": 0, "ts": 1633097040135, "parent": --null--, "__resolve": --function--, "__reject": --function--, "__promise": [object Promise], "attempts": 1 }
                      2021-10-01T14:04:02.201Z <Engine:NOTICE> Resuming reaction Nibe uplink SiteSensor<SET> (rule-kt9u8aur:S) from step 2
                      2021-10-01T14:04:02.204Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1537> Engine#1 request header accept: application/json
                      2021-10-01T14:04:02.205Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1539> Engine#1 reaction rule-kt9u8aur:S step 2 request url https://192.168.XXXX:8443/rest/items?tags=nibe2vera2&recursive=false data { "method": "GET", "timeout": 15000, "size": 8192, "agent": [object Object], "headers": [object Headers] }
                      2021-10-01T14:04:02.208Z <Engine:INFO> Nibe uplink SiteSensor<SET> all actions completed.
                      2021-10-01T14:04:02.209Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1332> _process_reaction_queue() task returned, new status -1; task 1179
                      2021-10-01T14:04:02.212Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1367> _process_reaction_queue ending with 0 in queue; none delayed/ready; waiting
                      

                      (and then it continues with another http request in the same reaction, 2 s delay in between)

                      toggledbitsT Away
                      toggledbitsT Away
                      toggledbits
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #19

                      @tunnus said in SiteSensor migration:

                      What seems to happen is that if my global expression/variable is empty, fresh data is initially stored to that, but subsequent queries are "ignored", data is not replaced.
                      In the log I can see new/fresh values, but for some reason this new data is not used

                      You're going to have to describe this in more detail.

                      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                      tunnusT 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                        @tunnus said in SiteSensor migration:

                        What seems to happen is that if my global expression/variable is empty, fresh data is initially stored to that, but subsequent queries are "ignored", data is not replaced.
                        In the log I can see new/fresh values, but for some reason this new data is not used

                        You're going to have to describe this in more detail.

                        tunnusT Offline
                        tunnusT Offline
                        tunnus
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #20

                        @toggledbits I'll PM you relevant logs

                        Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • toggledbitsT Away
                          toggledbitsT Away
                          toggledbits
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #21

                          Make sure you test with 21275 first.

                          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                          tunnusT 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                            Make sure you test with 21275 first.

                            tunnusT Offline
                            tunnusT Offline
                            tunnus
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #22

                            @toggledbits will do

                            Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Hubitat C-8, Zigbee2MQTT

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            Recent Topics

                            • Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
                              M
                              mgvra
                              1
                              1
                              11

                            • Script action and custom timers
                              toggledbitsT
                              toggledbits
                              0
                              2
                              34

                            • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
                              CatmanV2C
                              CatmanV2
                              0
                              12
                              168

                            • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                              CatmanV2C
                              CatmanV2
                              5
                              128
                              72.5k

                            • There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
                              akbooerA
                              akbooer
                              1
                              2
                              57

                            • Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
                              CrilleC
                              Crille
                              0
                              6
                              50

                            • Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
                              toggledbitsT
                              toggledbits
                              0
                              17
                              238

                            • Shelly Wall Display XL
                              akbooerA
                              akbooer
                              2
                              9
                              660

                            • [Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
                              toggledbitsT
                              toggledbits
                              0
                              26
                              388

                            • [Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
                              CrilleC
                              Crille
                              0
                              12
                              328

                            • No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
                              toggledbitsT
                              toggledbits
                              0
                              2
                              77

                            • Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
                              toggledbitsT
                              toggledbits
                              0
                              2
                              112
                            Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                            Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • Unsolved