Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Set Reaction > Script Action
How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
cw-kidC
Hello I haven't updated my installation of MSR in a very long time. Its a bare metal Linux install currently on version 24366-3de60836 I see the latest version is now latest-26011-c621bbc7 I assume I cannot just jump from a very old version to the latest version? Or can I? Thanks
Multi-System Reactor
This trigger no longer working - complaining about the operator needing changing
cw-kidC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Can you run MSR on Home Assistant OS ?
cw-kidC
Looking at using Home Assistant for the first time, either on a Home Assistant Green, their own hardware or buying a cheap second hand mini PC. Sounds like Home Assistant OS is linux based using Docker for HA etc. Would I also be able to install things like MSR as well on their OS ? On the same box? Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Self test
CatmanV2C
Having been messing around with some stuff I worked a way to self trigger some tests that I wanted to do on the HA <> MSR integration This got me wondering if there's an entity that changes state / is exposed when a configured controller goes off line? I can't see one but thought it might be hidden or something? Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
tunnusT
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration: users: # This section defines your valid users. admin: ******* groups: # This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application # and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to # more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here. admin_group: users: - admin applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications guests: users: "*" applications: - dashboard api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin_group allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: true session: timeout: 7200 # (seconds) rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true # If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged. log_acls: true # If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged. debug_acls: true My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
Multi-System Reactor
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request 2?
CatmanV2C
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks. Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option? No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Set Reaction > Script Action

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
11 Posts 4 Posters 1.9k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • wmarcolinW Offline
    wmarcolinW Offline
    wmarcolin
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi

    Use case: possibility of using a script instead of setting up an action in this way.

    4bff09e1-539b-46c8-8c37-090b1b966284-image.png

    If I have a variable that contains the device IDs within the array, could I use a script to execute the powe_switch.on command for the devices in this list?

    b4dfc617-412a-42ff-ae7b-ae8f0d65c39e-image.png

    I tried to understand in the manual (https://reactor.toggledbits.com/docs/Script-Action/) how to use this script feature, but I was unsuccessful. Are there any examples here in the forum of how to use it so I can continue my development?

    Thanks.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • CrilleC Online
      CrilleC Online
      Crille
      wrote on last edited by Crille
      #2

      If you already have them i a dynamic group you could perform power_switch.on on that group as an Entity action. Or if the devices should do different actions on/dimming etc, you could create a Global Reaction that does what you specify and simply run that as Set Reaction.

      Edit: I confused Script action with Shell command and have not tried Script action but my guess would be performAction(entity_id, action, args) if you really want to do it in a script rather than directly on the group Entity.

      wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • CrilleC Crille

        If you already have them i a dynamic group you could perform power_switch.on on that group as an Entity action. Or if the devices should do different actions on/dimming etc, you could create a Global Reaction that does what you specify and simply run that as Set Reaction.

        Edit: I confused Script action with Shell command and have not tried Script action but my guess would be performAction(entity_id, action, args) if you really want to do it in a script rather than directly on the group Entity.

        wmarcolinW Offline
        wmarcolinW Offline
        wmarcolin
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @Crille

        Thank you for your comment, but I need this to be executed by an action already within the routines I program in Reactor.

        So using it within the configuration would not help me.

        The selection of devices is indeed within the Dynamic Group, which is perfect, but I was wondering if I could do something like a script, which would require a routine like the one I have today, where I send a list of devices to be turned on, even if they are already on, so I don't have to create a group to analyze the status of each one.

        I want to do something smarter.

        Anyway, thank you, and let's see if we have any other recommendations.

        toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • wmarcolinW wmarcolin

          @Crille

          Thank you for your comment, but I need this to be executed by an action already within the routines I program in Reactor.

          So using it within the configuration would not help me.

          The selection of devices is indeed within the Dynamic Group, which is perfect, but I was wondering if I could do something like a script, which would require a routine like the one I have today, where I send a list of devices to be turned on, even if they are already on, so I don't have to create a group to analyze the status of each one.

          I want to do something smarter.

          Anyway, thank you, and let's see if we have any other recommendations.

          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by toggledbits
          #4

          @wmarcolin said in Set Reaction > Script Action:

          Thank you for your comment, but I need this to be executed by an action already within the routines I program in Reactor.

          @crille is spot on. That's exactly what his suggestion does. Here's a trivial example of what he's saying:

          20d61d39-a97d-42a0-b863-3957f7bbf438-image.png

          In this case, I'm not using the contents of a dynamic group, I'm just building a list on the fly using matchEntities(), but the effect is the same. At midnight every night, this rule turns all things that have the power_switch capability off.

          If your listed switches are in a group, either created using DynamicGroupController, or an expression of some grouping the underlying controller has (Vera and Hubitat have groups and Reactor expresses those as group entities you can use), then you can easily modify this example.

          And in fact, you don't even need to do that, because Reactor understands how to do actions on groups, so you can just do one action on the group entity (in a regular Entity Action or by calling performAction() in a Script Action) and Reactor will perform that action on all members of the group (so, you don't even need the each expression construction).

          3be9e0e4-2184-490f-974b-b2c089bdeab8-image.png

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

            @wmarcolin said in Set Reaction > Script Action:

            Thank you for your comment, but I need this to be executed by an action already within the routines I program in Reactor.

            @crille is spot on. That's exactly what his suggestion does. Here's a trivial example of what he's saying:

            20d61d39-a97d-42a0-b863-3957f7bbf438-image.png

            In this case, I'm not using the contents of a dynamic group, I'm just building a list on the fly using matchEntities(), but the effect is the same. At midnight every night, this rule turns all things that have the power_switch capability off.

            If your listed switches are in a group, either created using DynamicGroupController, or an expression of some grouping the underlying controller has (Vera and Hubitat have groups and Reactor expresses those as group entities you can use), then you can easily modify this example.

            And in fact, you don't even need to do that, because Reactor understands how to do actions on groups, so you can just do one action on the group entity (in a regular Entity Action or by calling performAction() in a Script Action) and Reactor will perform that action on all members of the group (so, you don't even need the each expression construction).

            3be9e0e4-2184-490f-974b-b2c089bdeab8-image.png

            wmarcolinW Offline
            wmarcolinW Offline
            wmarcolin
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @toggledbits

            fe8bb433-b91b-4260-9864-7f3d6074778c-Untitled.jpg

            I don't know what other words to use to describe Reactor! If I had read the entire manual, I wouldn't have posted about Group Action. Now that I've read everything that DynamicGroupController can do, it's impressive.

            I was definitely one of the enthusiasts when this was implemented, and now with this option to take actions, it's wonderful. It's going to simplify a lot of rules for me.

            Thank you very much @t. Every day I'm surprised by the things that can be done in Reactor.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • therealdbT Offline
              therealdbT Offline
              therealdb
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              I use script action a lot with arrays of devices defined in a variable. Very handy for when you want to do it without messing with config files.

              --
              On a mission to automate everything.

              My MS Reactor contrib
              My Luup Plug-ins

              wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • therealdbT therealdb

                I use script action a lot with arrays of devices defined in a variable. Very handy for when you want to do it without messing with config files.

                wmarcolinW Offline
                wmarcolinW Offline
                wmarcolin
                wrote on last edited by wmarcolin
                #7

                @therealdb

                This feature is really fantastic. I'm changing a lot of rules for it.

                Now you could help me with this one. I need to know if the button is stuck, i.e., if it hasn't returned to zero, and force a refresh.

                The selection rule is already correct, but now I can't understand how to define the Group Action to apply x_hubitatRefresh.refresh.

                        "dgc_PushableButton_N0":
                          name: DGC PushableButton Not 0
                          select:
                            - include_capability:
                              - x_hubitat_PushableButton
                            - exclude_entity:
                              - "hubitatC8>2672"  # Alarm Sirene
                              - "hubitatC8>2100"  # Remote Adriane
                              - "hubitatC8>420"   # Remote Quad
                          group_actions: x_hubitat_Refresh
                          filter_expression: >
                            entity.attributes.x_hubitat_PushableButton.pushed != 0 and
                            entity.attributes.x_hubitat_PushableButton.pushed != null
                
                

                Could you help me with your experience?

                This is what I want to change.

                6bc1ff1f-4403-4906-b947-f11916b2ab16-image.png

                Only apply refresh, to the button selected by the DynamicGroup.

                Or in this case is Script that I need to create?

                Thanks.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbits
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Just send the refresh command to the group.

                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                  wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                    Just send the refresh command to the group.

                    wmarcolinW Offline
                    wmarcolinW Offline
                    wmarcolin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    @toggledbits

                    Sorry, I don't understand, it doesn't work the way it's written below.

                    c78b3851-56c0-4d7e-873d-9935042d9555-image.png

                    What information do I have to assign to grup_actions, or is it something else?

                    Thanks
                    Wilson

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • toggledbitsT Offline
                      toggledbitsT Offline
                      toggledbits
                      wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                      #10

                      I apologize... yes, because that group is fully dynamic (its contents are determined by filter expressions), the range of its actions cannot be determined at startup, so in this instance, you will have to use a Script Action:

                      each id in getEntity("groups>dgc_PushableButton_N0").attributes.sys_group.members: 
                        performAction( id, "x_hubitat_Refresh.refresh", {} )
                      

                      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                      wmarcolinW 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                        I apologize... yes, because that group is fully dynamic (its contents are determined by filter expressions), the range of its actions cannot be determined at startup, so in this instance, you will have to use a Script Action:

                        each id in getEntity("groups>dgc_PushableButton_N0").attributes.sys_group.members: 
                          performAction( id, "x_hubitat_Refresh.refresh", {} )
                        
                        wmarcolinW Offline
                        wmarcolinW Offline
                        wmarcolin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        @toggledbits said in Set Reaction > Script Action:

                        each id in getEntity("groups>dgc_PushableButton_N0").attributes.sys_group.members:
                        performAction( id, "x_hubitat_Refresh.refresh", {} )

                        EXCELLENT, IT WORKED!!! Thank you very much.

                        I was already working on this script, based on the example at the beginning of this discussion, but I was using performOnEntity.

                        each id in getEntity('groups>dgc_PushableButton_N0').attributes.sys_group.members: performOnEntity(id, 'x_hubitat_Refresh.refresh')
                        

                        Thank you very much for your help. Another lesson learned, and I am already putting more optimizations into practice.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        Recent Topics

                        • How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
                          CrilleC
                          Crille
                          0
                          25
                          291

                        • This trigger no longer working - complaining about the operator needing changing
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          18
                          43

                        • Can you run MSR on Home Assistant OS ?
                          therealdbT
                          therealdb
                          0
                          2
                          17

                        • HA and AI
                          PablaP
                          Pabla
                          0
                          2
                          104

                        • Self test
                          CatmanV2C
                          CatmanV2
                          0
                          3
                          95

                        • Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          0
                          2
                          115

                        • VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
                          S
                          SweetGenius
                          1
                          1
                          81

                        • Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
                          toggledbitsT
                          toggledbits
                          3
                          1
                          76

                        • Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
                          G
                          gwp1
                          0
                          1
                          91

                        • [Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
                          CrilleC
                          Crille
                          0
                          4
                          190

                        • [Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
                          therealdbT
                          therealdb
                          0
                          3
                          175

                        • Possible feature request 2?
                          CatmanV2C
                          CatmanV2
                          0
                          3
                          150
                        Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                        Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Unsolved