Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. This trigger no longer working - complaining about the operator needing changing
This trigger no longer working - complaining about the operator needing changing
cw-kidC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
cw-kidC
Hello I haven't updated my installation of MSR in a very long time. Its a bare metal Linux install currently on version 24366-3de60836 I see the latest version is now latest-26011-c621bbc7 I assume I cannot just jump from a very old version to the latest version? Or can I? Thanks
Multi-System Reactor
Can you run MSR on Home Assistant OS ?
cw-kidC
Looking at using Home Assistant for the first time, either on a Home Assistant Green, their own hardware or buying a cheap second hand mini PC. Sounds like Home Assistant OS is linux based using Docker for HA etc. Would I also be able to install things like MSR as well on their OS ? On the same box? Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Self test
CatmanV2C
Having been messing around with some stuff I worked a way to self trigger some tests that I wanted to do on the HA <> MSR integration This got me wondering if there's an entity that changes state / is exposed when a configured controller goes off line? I can't see one but thought it might be hidden or something? Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
tunnusT
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration: users: # This section defines your valid users. admin: ******* groups: # This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application # and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to # more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here. admin_group: users: - admin applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications guests: users: "*" applications: - dashboard api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin_group allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: true session: timeout: 7200 # (seconds) rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true # If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged. log_acls: true # If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged. debug_acls: true My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
Multi-System Reactor
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request 2?
CatmanV2C
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks. Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option? No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

This trigger no longer working - complaining about the operator needing changing

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
17 Posts 2 Posters 12 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cw-kidC Online
    cw-kidC Online
    cw-kid
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    I just unpaired a Fibaro motion sensor from an Ezlo hub and paired it to my Vera hub instead. I already had an existing rule and just tried to fix it by changing the now "unknown" device to the "new" device etc.

    But the trigger looks wrong and if I attempted to correct it I get a message from MSR about removing none default conditions.

    Trigger:

    34a51260-beef-4ad5-894d-6b0ad816a84b-image.png

    I think the "Is True" part now needs changing to -- value of 1 instead. However when I select the -- operator I see this message.

    4b56c969-a0fc-4639-8b90-256b803b99b2-image.png

    Here is the rest of the rule:

    Constraints:

    d1845f1b-f846-4315-a927-641169f05ef0-image.png

    Set Reaction:

    f77bbd7c-13ca-47ed-a520-35d3e9a57f48-image.png 88de80a8-c0ea-4df4-9884-0a1e44f4bd55-image.png

    Reset Reaction:

    9708dd1e-8e35-4098-bb02-7ea229db398c-image.png

    In MSR for Vera devices I now only seem to have the Extended attribute options available in the menu, so the values for a tripped or not tripped motion sensor for example are always going to be 1 or 0

    39e986bf-159b-4ca3-9b8a-ca1f615b98b8-image.png

    Seems in the past however for Vera devices you could select another option rather than an extended attribute (One that MSR created for the user to make it "easier") and use True or False and it looks like it was using that also when this motion sensor device was previously paired to the Ezlo hub. If that makes sense?

    I just found this old screenshot on the forum on an old post. I think its the binary_sensor.state (primary) I am thinking of that we used in the past with True or False. Those have now gone etc.

    2a09962d-6076-42ed-be7a-bc00a2eae8a3-image.png

    Thanks

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote last edited by toggledbits
      #2

      "Changing the operator on this condition will remove the non-default condition options currently set."

      It's just telling you that the conditions options (under the dot-dot-dot button/icon) are going to be cleared because the operator is changing. That's because not every condition option is available for every operator. If you choose a Reactor-defined capability and attribute, it will recognize the operator's required type (so things like is TRUE and is FALSE will be allowed for attributes known to be boolean). When you use any extended attribute, like x_vera_anything.anything (the x_vera part being the clue that's an extended capability and attribute), that system's native type governs, and for Vera, that's a string, so is TRUE and is FALSE don't apply.

      General recommendation is don't use the extended attributes when a Reactor-defined attribute is available.

      To look beyond this, you'd need to post the attribute list for the device for starters. There's a Copy Attributes button in the entity detail. Use that, and paste the output here.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      cw-kidC 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • cw-kidC Online
        cw-kidC Online
        cw-kid
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        Think I might have to delete the rule and start again with some slightly different logic.

        Trigger:

        Motion is detected in the Hallway

        Constraints: (Conditions)

        LUX Level <= 100
        Motion Sensor = Disarmed
        A virtual switch (Dark Mode) = OFF

        Set Reaction:

        If Vera is in Home Mode then set the Hallway light to 40%

        If Vera is in Night Mode then set the Hallway light to 20%

        Reset Reaction:

        Turn the light OFF


        I think this rule worked in the past but it was disabled for a while so maybe not. Don't think I arm this motion sensor for any reason, perhaps I need two rules instead now.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          Don't scorch the earth yet. Let's figure it out.

          Post the attribute list for the device for starters. There's a Copy Attributes button in the entity detail. Use that, and paste the output here.

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

            "Changing the operator on this condition will remove the non-default condition options currently set."

            It's just telling you that the conditions options (under the dot-dot-dot button/icon) are going to be cleared because the operator is changing. That's because not every condition option is available for every operator. If you choose a Reactor-defined capability and attribute, it will recognize the operator's required type (so things like is TRUE and is FALSE will be allowed for attributes known to be boolean). When you use any extended attribute, like x_vera_anything.anything (the x_vera part being the clue that's an extended capability and attribute), that system's native type governs, and for Vera, that's a string, so is TRUE and is FALSE don't apply.

            General recommendation is don't use the extended attributes when a Reactor-defined attribute is available.

            To look beyond this, you'd need to post the attribute list for the device for starters. There's a Copy Attributes button in the entity detail. Use that, and paste the output here.

            cw-kidC Online
            cw-kidC Online
            cw-kid
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @toggledbits said in This trigger no longer working - complaining about the operator needing changing:

            It's just telling you that the conditions options (under the dot-dot-dot button/icon) are going to be cleared because the operator is changing.

            oh is that all? I thought it meant it was going to start deleting some of the lower Constraints in the rule.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

              "Changing the operator on this condition will remove the non-default condition options currently set."

              It's just telling you that the conditions options (under the dot-dot-dot button/icon) are going to be cleared because the operator is changing. That's because not every condition option is available for every operator. If you choose a Reactor-defined capability and attribute, it will recognize the operator's required type (so things like is TRUE and is FALSE will be allowed for attributes known to be boolean). When you use any extended attribute, like x_vera_anything.anything (the x_vera part being the clue that's an extended capability and attribute), that system's native type governs, and for Vera, that's a string, so is TRUE and is FALSE don't apply.

              General recommendation is don't use the extended attributes when a Reactor-defined attribute is available.

              To look beyond this, you'd need to post the attribute list for the device for starters. There's a Copy Attributes button in the entity detail. Use that, and paste the output here.

              cw-kidC Online
              cw-kidC Online
              cw-kid
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @toggledbits said in This trigger no longer working - complaining about the operator needing changing:

              If you choose a Reactor-defined capability and attribute, it will recognize the operator's required type (so things like is TRUE and is FALSE will be allowed for attributes known to be boolean)

              Yes that's right that's how it use to work. However now I am noticing I don't seem to have these Reactor defined capability and attribute anymore in that menu. I just seem to have the extended attributes only now. I will post the attributes list of this device in a moment.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                "Changing the operator on this condition will remove the non-default condition options currently set."

                It's just telling you that the conditions options (under the dot-dot-dot button/icon) are going to be cleared because the operator is changing. That's because not every condition option is available for every operator. If you choose a Reactor-defined capability and attribute, it will recognize the operator's required type (so things like is TRUE and is FALSE will be allowed for attributes known to be boolean). When you use any extended attribute, like x_vera_anything.anything (the x_vera part being the clue that's an extended capability and attribute), that system's native type governs, and for Vera, that's a string, so is TRUE and is FALSE don't apply.

                General recommendation is don't use the extended attributes when a Reactor-defined attribute is available.

                To look beyond this, you'd need to post the attribute list for the device for starters. There's a Copy Attributes button in the entity detail. Use that, and paste the output here.

                cw-kidC Online
                cw-kidC Online
                cw-kid
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @toggledbits said in This trigger no longer working - complaining about the operator needing changing:

                When you use any extended attribute, like x_vera_anything.anything (the x_vera part being the clue that's an extended capability and attribute), that system's native type governs, and for Vera, that's a string, so is TRUE and is FALSE don't apply.

                Yes that's correct, I understand that is why I now need to use 1 or 0 instead of True or False etc.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cw-kidC Online
                  cw-kidC Online
                  cw-kid
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  x_vera_device.configured=true
                  x_vera_device.device_number=837
                  x_vera_device.device_type="urn:schemas-micasaverde-com:device:GenericIO:1"
                  x_vera_device.failed=null
                  x_vera_device.parent_device=1
                  x_vera_device.room_id="11"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_HaDevice1.BatteryDate="1769544986"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_HaDevice1.BatteryLevel="100"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_HaDevice1.ChildrenSameRoom="1"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_HaDevice1.Configured="1"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_HaDevice1.EnableFlashControl="1"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_HaDevice1.FirstConfigured="1769545001"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_HaDevice1.LastUpdate="1769545001"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_HaDevice1.ModeSetting="1:;2:A;3:;4:A"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_HaDevice1.sl_Alarm="TAMPER_ALARM"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_HaDevice1.sl_Alarm_updated=1769547652204
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_HaDevice1.sl_TamperAlarm="0"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_HaDevice1.sl_TamperAlarm_updated=1769547682708
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_SecuritySensor1.Armed="0"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_SecuritySensor1.ArmedTripped="0"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_SecuritySensor1.IgnoreTripTime="2"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_SecuritySensor1.LastTamper="1769547681"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_SecuritySensor1.LastTrip="1769547681"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_SecuritySensor1.Tripped="0"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.AgiInfo="X"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.AlarmType="0x7,"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.AlarmVersion="0,1"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.AssociationNum="5"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.Capabilities="83,156,1,4,7,1,R,B,RS,|32S,34,48S:1,49:8,86,89,90S,94,112S,113S:5,114,115,122,128,132S:2,133S,134,142S,152,156S,"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.ConfiguredAssoc=""
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.ConfiguredVariable="1-Motion detection sensitivity (8-255),1d,,6-Motion detection-alarm cancellation delay,2d,,24-Tamper operating modes (0-2),1d,,40-Illuminance report-threshold,2d,,42-Illuminance report-interval,2d,,60-Temperature report-threshold,2d,,62-Temperature measuring-interval,2d,,64-Temperature report-interval,2d,,66-Temperature offset,2d,"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.ConfiguredWakeupInterval="7200"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.FirmwareInfo="271,2065,12631"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.LastReset="1769544953"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.ManufacturerInfo="271,2049,4098"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.NodeInfo="22,31,56,59,5e,72,73,7a,80,86,98,"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.PlusInfo="1,6,0,12,7,12,7"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.SecurityFailed="0"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.SensorMlType="1,3,25"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.SubscribedAlarms=",0x7,"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.VariablesGet="1,15,6,30,24,0,40,200,42,3600,60,10,62,900,64,0,66,0,"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.VariablesSet="1-Motion detection sensitivity (8-255),1d,,6-Motion detection-alarm cancellation delay,2d,,24-Tamper operating modes (0-2),1d,,40-Illuminance report-threshold,2d,,42-Illuminance report-interval,2d,,60-Temperature report-threshold,2d,,62-Temperature measuring-interval,2d,,64-Temperature report-interval,2d,,66-Temperature offset,2d,"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.VersionInfo="3,4,24,3,3"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.WakeupCapabilities="1,65535,7200,1"
                  x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.WakeupInterval="7200"
                  zwave_device.capabilities="83,156,1,4,7,1,R,B,RS,|32S,34,48S:1,49:8,86,89,90S,94,112S,113S:5,114,115,122,128,132S:2,133S,134,142S,152,156S,"
                  zwave_device.failed=null
                  zwave_device.manufacturer_info="271,2049,4098"
                  zwave_device.node_id=162
                  zwave_device.version_info="3,4,24,3,3"

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbits
                    wrote last edited by toggledbits
                    #9

                    I would delete the entity (using the delete button in the entity detail display), and the restart Reactor and see if it re-creates the Reactor-defined capabilities and attributes.

                    If not, look at the reactor.log file and see if it logged any errors related to VeraController.

                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                    cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • cw-kidC Online
                      cw-kidC Online
                      cw-kid
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      Well I've fixed the Trigger now. It was my fault I misunderstood what the popup was telling me. It was telling me it was gonna get rid of "is True" and blank that out, which is fine and as you said.

                      I thought it meant it was going to remove some other "Conditions" further down in the rule as I said.

                      Thanks

                      3337e979-de83-46a5-946b-ef52e1e25497-image.png

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                        I would delete the entity (using the delete button in the entity detail display), and the restart Reactor and see if it re-creates the Reactor-defined capabilities and attributes.

                        If not, look at the reactor.log file and see if it logged any errors related to VeraController.

                        cw-kidC Online
                        cw-kidC Online
                        cw-kid
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        @toggledbits said in This trigger no longer working - complaining about the operator needing changing:

                        I would delete the entity (using the delete button in the entity detail display), and the restart Reactor and see if it re-creates the Reactor-defined capabilities and attributes.

                        OK let me see if I can do that. You mean pressing the X here ? And then adding it back in to the trigger right?

                        3369cb2c-45d2-486c-a5e5-59b0c82771b8-image.png

                        toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • cw-kidC cw-kid

                          @toggledbits said in This trigger no longer working - complaining about the operator needing changing:

                          I would delete the entity (using the delete button in the entity detail display), and the restart Reactor and see if it re-creates the Reactor-defined capabilities and attributes.

                          OK let me see if I can do that. You mean pressing the X here ? And then adding it back in to the trigger right?

                          3369cb2c-45d2-486c-a5e5-59b0c82771b8-image.png

                          toggledbitsT Offline
                          toggledbitsT Offline
                          toggledbits
                          wrote last edited by toggledbits
                          #12

                          @cw-kid said in This trigger no longer working - complaining about the operator needing changing:

                          OK let me see if I can do that. You mean pressing the X here ? And then adding it back in to the trigger right?

                          No... Entities page... where you got the Copy Attributes output. There's a delete button there.

                          Delete the entity, then restart Reactor. It will come back, hopefully with binary_sensor capability.

                          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • cw-kidC Online
                            cw-kidC Online
                            cw-kid
                            wrote last edited by
                            #13

                            OK Got it.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • cw-kidC Online
                              cw-kidC Online
                              cw-kid
                              wrote last edited by
                              #14

                              After Delete / Restart:

                              arming.state=false
                              battery_power.alert_level=0.5
                              battery_power.level=1
                              battery_power.since=1769544986000
                              binary_sensor.state=false
                              motion_sensor.state=false
                              x_vera_device.configured=true
                              x_vera_device.device_number=837
                              x_vera_device.device_type="urn:schemas-micasaverde-com:device:MotionSensor:1"
                              x_vera_device.failed=null
                              x_vera_device.parent_device=1
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_HaDevice1.BatteryDate="1769544986"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_HaDevice1.BatteryLevel="100"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_HaDevice1.ChildrenSameRoom="1"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_HaDevice1.Configured="1"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_HaDevice1.EnableFlashControl="1"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_HaDevice1.FirstConfigured="1769545001"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_HaDevice1.LastUpdate="1769545001"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_HaDevice1.ModeSetting="1:;2:A;3:;4:A"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_HaDevice1.sl_Alarm="TAMPER_ALARM"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_HaDevice1.sl_TamperAlarm="0"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_SecuritySensor1.Armed="0"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_SecuritySensor1.ArmedTripped="0"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_SecuritySensor1.IgnoreTripTime="2"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_SecuritySensor1.LastTamper="1769547681"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_SecuritySensor1.LastTrip="1769547681"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_SecuritySensor1.Tripped="0"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.AgiInfo="X"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.AlarmType="0x7,"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.AlarmVersion="0,1"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.AssociationNum="5"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.Capabilities="83,156,1,4,7,1,R,B,RS,|32S,34,48S:1,49:8,86,89,90S,94,112S,113S:5,114,115,122,128,132S:2,133S,134,142S,152,156S,"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.ConfiguredAssoc=""
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.ConfiguredVariable="1-Motion detection sensitivity (8-255),1d,,6-Motion detection-alarm cancellation delay,2d,,24-Tamper operating modes (0-2),1d,,40-Illuminance report-threshold,2d,,42-Illuminance report-interval,2d,,60-Temperature report-threshold,2d,,62-Temperature measuring-interval,2d,,64-Temperature report-interval,2d,,66-Temperature offset,2d,"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.ConfiguredWakeupInterval="7200"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.FirmwareInfo="271,2065,12631"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.LastReset="1769544953"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.ManufacturerInfo="271,2049,4098"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.NodeInfo="22,31,56,59,5e,72,73,7a,80,86,98,"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.PlusInfo="1,6,0,12,7,12,7"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.SecurityFailed="0"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.SensorMlType="1,3,25"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.SubscribedAlarms=",0x7,"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.VariablesGet="1,15,6,30,24,0,40,200,42,3600,60,10,62,900,64,0,66,0,"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.VariablesSet="1-Motion detection sensitivity (8-255),1d,,6-Motion detection-alarm cancellation delay,2d,,24-Tamper operating modes (0-2),1d,,40-Illuminance report-threshold,2d,,42-Illuminance report-interval,2d,,60-Temperature report-threshold,2d,,62-Temperature measuring-interval,2d,,64-Temperature report-interval,2d,,66-Temperature offset,2d,"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.VersionInfo="3,4,24,3,3"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.WakeupCapabilities="1,65535,7200,1"
                              x_vera_svc_micasaverde_com_ZWaveDevice1.WakeupInterval="7200"
                              zwave_device.capabilities="83,156,1,4,7,1,R,B,RS,|32S,34,48S:1,49:8,86,89,90S,94,112S,113S:5,114,115,122,128,132S:2,133S,134,142S,152,156S,"
                              zwave_device.failed=null
                              zwave_device.manufacturer_info="271,2049,4098"
                              zwave_device.node_id=162
                              zwave_device.version_info="3,4,24,3,3"

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • cw-kidC Online
                                cw-kidC Online
                                cw-kid
                                wrote last edited by cw-kid
                                #15

                                They are back in the menu now!

                                image.png

                                deb90440-9e4b-4526-80f5-aa578ad5b893-image.png

                                But it seems all the Vera devices and rules I have looked at today none of them had Reactor defined capability / attributes. I will have to check some more rules / devices to see what is happening?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • toggledbitsT Offline
                                  toggledbitsT Offline
                                  toggledbits
                                  wrote last edited by toggledbits
                                  #16

                                  OK. That's easy to address.

                                  1. Stop Reactor
                                  2. Delete the entire storage/entities subdirectory (no others, just that one)
                                  3. Restart Reactor

                                  This will force all Controller-based entities to be rebuilt, like the motion sensor was, just in bulk.

                                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • cw-kidC Online
                                    cw-kidC Online
                                    cw-kid
                                    wrote last edited by cw-kid
                                    #17

                                    OK I might have to do it on bulk then as you say.

                                    I've been looking at some old rules that I have not touched or done anything with or messed with those devices at all, those rules seem fine and still have the binary_sensor.state attribute etc.

                                    But I am sure for "new" devices I have paired back to the Vera hub today and then had to correct / edit those rules or create new rules, them ones only showed me the extended attributes only in that menu.

                                    These are some other "new" devices paired / added today to the Vera hub and their rules / triggers.

                                    1. This is the Site Sensor plugin new today on Vera, it only has extended attributes (Maybe expected for that as its a virtual device?)

                                    b46c6bc0-91c8-425b-97fa-c6d6626f584e-image.png

                                    1. Another motion sensor I paired today a Hank one. That also has no Reactor defined Capability / Attribute, there was only extended attributes available in the menu.

                                    1e0dd3a3-a3e7-4723-9359-976771af78ea-image.png

                                    1. This one did work, a Hank door sensor, I paired yesterday, that one does have binary_sensor.state.

                                    05131d19-3a4f-454e-a543-53c954b6d4f2-image.png

                                    So it seems hit or miss if the new devices get them or not.

                                    I will double check what happens? When I paired more new devices soon.

                                    Thanks.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    Recent Topics

                                    • This trigger no longer working - complaining about the operator needing changing
                                      cw-kidC
                                      cw-kid
                                      0
                                      17
                                      12

                                    • How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
                                      cw-kidC
                                      cw-kid
                                      0
                                      17
                                      224

                                    • Can you run MSR on Home Assistant OS ?
                                      therealdbT
                                      therealdb
                                      0
                                      2
                                      12

                                    • HA and AI
                                      PablaP
                                      Pabla
                                      0
                                      2
                                      98

                                    • Self test
                                      CatmanV2C
                                      CatmanV2
                                      0
                                      3
                                      86

                                    • Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
                                      toggledbitsT
                                      toggledbits
                                      0
                                      2
                                      111

                                    • VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
                                      S
                                      SweetGenius
                                      1
                                      1
                                      79

                                    • Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
                                      toggledbitsT
                                      toggledbits
                                      3
                                      1
                                      74

                                    • Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
                                      G
                                      gwp1
                                      0
                                      1
                                      91

                                    • [Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
                                      CrilleC
                                      Crille
                                      0
                                      4
                                      183

                                    • [Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
                                      therealdbT
                                      therealdb
                                      0
                                      3
                                      174

                                    • Possible feature request 2?
                                      CatmanV2C
                                      CatmanV2
                                      0
                                      3
                                      147
                                    Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                    Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                                    • Login

                                    • Don't have an account? Register

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular
                                    • Unsolved