Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Gradually turn on lights.
How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
cw-kidC
Hello I haven't updated my installation of MSR in a very long time. Its a bare metal Linux install currently on version 24366-3de60836 I see the latest version is now latest-26011-c621bbc7 I assume I cannot just jump from a very old version to the latest version? Or can I? Thanks
Multi-System Reactor
Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
tunnusT
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration: users: # This section defines your valid users. admin: ******* groups: # This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application # and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to # more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here. admin_group: users: - admin applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications guests: users: "*" applications: - dashboard api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin_group allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: true session: timeout: 7200 # (seconds) rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true # If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged. log_acls: true # If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged. debug_acls: true My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
Multi-System Reactor
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request 2?
CatmanV2C
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks. Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option? No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reset a delay
CatmanV2C
I'm sure this has been asked, and answered, but damned if I can figure it out Use case: I have a rear garden with lights. A door from the kitchen into the garden and a door from the garage. Currently if I open the kitchen door the lights come on (yay) and a 3 minute delay starts. After 3 minutes, no matter what else happens, the lights go off (Boo! But also yay!) What I would like is for the 3 minute delay until the lights go off to start from the latest door open event. That is, if I'm going from kitchen to garage, and back again, the lights stay on until there's three minutes of no activity. I've tried 'hacking' with a virtual switch, but can't seem to stop the delay. Any pointers? TIA C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Loading Screen Safari
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Constraints states visually do not match actual
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Gradually turn on lights.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Multi-System Reactor
21 Posts 6 Posters 3.3k Views 6 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Tom_DT Offline
    Tom_DT Offline
    Tom_D
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I have several lights that I would like to turn on very gradually over 15 or 20 seconds. from 0 to .25 in .01 increments.
    I have tried a few things that came nowhere near working, so here I am.

    latest-25082-3c348de6

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by toggledbits
      #2

      This is a Reaction; it can be a Rule's Set or Reset Reaction, or a Global or Rule Set-based Reaction:

      image.png

      Note some instructions are in the comment row.

      Also note that some entities, like those from Hubitat and ZWave-JS, may only show 0.99 as full brightness, so plan your upper-limit accordingly (I've done that here since it will generally work "well enough" for all dimmable entities from any controller). Ramping down would be similar.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      1 Reply Last reply
      👀
      2
      • Tom_DT Offline
        Tom_DT Offline
        Tom_D
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Thank you. I had tried variations of that, but I just needed a bit of a nudge in the right direction.

        latest-25082-3c348de6

        G 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Tom_DT Tom_D marked this topic as a question on
        • Tom_DT Tom_D has marked this topic as solved on
        • Tom_DT Tom_D

          Thank you. I had tried variations of that, but I just needed a bit of a nudge in the right direction.

          G Offline
          G Offline
          gwp1
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @Tom_D I've implemented this as it's much slicker than what I'd been previously doing. Of course, now with longer days and Daylight Saving Time in full effect it doesn't get called on very much so I can't confirm success lol

          *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
          *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

          *HAOS
          Core 2026.1.1
          w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
          FW: v1.1
          SDK: v7.23.1

          *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
          MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
          MQTTController: 25139
          ZWave Controller: 25139

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • V Offline
            V Offline
            vezinpi
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @toggledbits I am having some difficulty implementing the suggested approach. In my case, what you suggested above worked but with some limitations. Maybe due to the fact that I am not using the Z-Wave controller but Z-Wave JS UI.

            I have created the same rule as you suggested but to better understand what is happening I perform some test from the "Entities" menu.

            1- The "dimming.step" when changed does not stick after a dimming.up/down

            In the "Entities" menu I set the attribute "dimming.step" to 0.05. Still in the etities menu, I then perform a "dimming.up" and can confirm that indeed the "dimming.level" went up by 0.05 however at the same time the dimming.step goes back to 0.1 (default). From that point, any subsequent "dimming.up" uses the default.

            2- The dimming.up does not exceed the previous level (This might be normal but a bit difficult to manage?)

            If the dimming level was set to 60% and then turn off, performing a "dimming up" will not go beyond 60%. So implementing the rule as suggested, make an infinite while since .99 is never reached.

            I tried this on 2 type of z-wave devices with the same result.

            Thanks in advance

            G 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • CatmanV2C Offline
              CatmanV2C Offline
              CatmanV2
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              This was actually the use case that started my journey into HA eeeek years ago with a couple of X10 units since they were cheaper than sunrise lamps!

              C

              The Ex-Vera abuser know as CatmanV2.....

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • V vezinpi

                @toggledbits I am having some difficulty implementing the suggested approach. In my case, what you suggested above worked but with some limitations. Maybe due to the fact that I am not using the Z-Wave controller but Z-Wave JS UI.

                I have created the same rule as you suggested but to better understand what is happening I perform some test from the "Entities" menu.

                1- The "dimming.step" when changed does not stick after a dimming.up/down

                In the "Entities" menu I set the attribute "dimming.step" to 0.05. Still in the etities menu, I then perform a "dimming.up" and can confirm that indeed the "dimming.level" went up by 0.05 however at the same time the dimming.step goes back to 0.1 (default). From that point, any subsequent "dimming.up" uses the default.

                2- The dimming.up does not exceed the previous level (This might be normal but a bit difficult to manage?)

                If the dimming level was set to 60% and then turn off, performing a "dimming up" will not go beyond 60%. So implementing the rule as suggested, make an infinite while since .99 is never reached.

                I tried this on 2 type of z-wave devices with the same result.

                Thanks in advance

                G Offline
                G Offline
                gwp1
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                @vezinpi can you share screenshots of the rules?

                I implemented this and it appears to be working fine (though I want to do some fine tuning).

                *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                *HAOS
                Core 2026.1.1
                w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                FW: v1.1
                SDK: v7.23.1

                *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                MQTTController: 25139
                ZWave Controller: 25139

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • V Offline
                  V Offline
                  vezinpi
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @gwp1 Here is the screen capture. It is basically a copy of what toggledbits provided. Keep in mind that it is working fine with the default dimming.step and if your dimmer is normally set to 100% before being turned off.

                  From the screen capture you can see that, in my case, the "Current value" is 0.59...This is as high as it will go if the previous state of the dimmer was 60%. This situation causes the while to repeat every 2 second indefinitely. I have to kill it in the "running reaction" status screen or to disable the rule.

                  image.png

                  G 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • V vezinpi

                    @gwp1 Here is the screen capture. It is basically a copy of what toggledbits provided. Keep in mind that it is working fine with the default dimming.step and if your dimmer is normally set to 100% before being turned off.

                    From the screen capture you can see that, in my case, the "Current value" is 0.59...This is as high as it will go if the previous state of the dimmer was 60%. This situation causes the while to repeat every 2 second indefinitely. I have to kill it in the "running reaction" status screen or to disable the rule.

                    image.png

                    G Offline
                    G Offline
                    gwp1
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    @vezinpi mine is as such:

                    c49d3fa7-b5b0-429b-8546-46936b06bf7c-image.png

                    Here's the rule's Set Reaction that pulls this in.

                    07704c8c-6a37-4c7b-b67f-d8285f955bad-image.png

                    I also have another group under this same rule's Set Reaction for Evenings.

                    0cd4a81b-ea76-43b7-a6a5-a7c6e719ab28-image.png

                    Everything I've seen shows this as working as intended. Only rises to 30% in the mornings, 80% at night. Only the mornings get the slow roll ramp up.

                    *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                    *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                    *HAOS
                    Core 2026.1.1
                    w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                    FW: v1.1
                    SDK: v7.23.1

                    *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                    MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                    MQTTController: 25139
                    ZWave Controller: 25139

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • V Offline
                      V Offline
                      vezinpi
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10
                      This post is deleted!
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • V Offline
                        V Offline
                        vezinpi
                        wrote on last edited by vezinpi
                        #11

                        Hi again, more accurate info for the "Perform dimming.up/down"

                        I have just made a test from the entity menu. Using the default dimming.step (0.1) I did the following starting with the dimmer off:

                        1- Perform dimming.up 10 times

                        This should have brought the dimmer to 100% but it did stop at 60% (0.59...)

                        2- Perform dimming.down 10 times

                        This should have brought the dimmer to 0% but it did stop at 50%

                        From 100%, I can only dimmed.down to 50%
                        from 0%, I can only dimmed.up to 60% (0.59)

                        The dimming.set "value" works all the time

                        Here is the log from Z-Wave JS for the 10x dimming.up followed by the 10x dimming.down test.

                        2025-07-07 23:32:00.315 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 0 => 10
                        2025-07-07 23:32:00.328 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 10 => 10
                        2025-07-07 23:32:03.828 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-targetValue 10 => 20
                        2025-07-07 23:32:03.834 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 10 => 20
                        2025-07-07 23:32:03.854 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 20 => 20
                        2025-07-07 23:32:06.007 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-targetValue 20 => 30
                        2025-07-07 23:32:06.014 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 20 => 30
                        2025-07-07 23:32:06.045 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 30 => 30
                        2025-07-07 23:32:08.149 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-targetValue 30 => 40
                        2025-07-07 23:32:08.152 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 30 => 40
                        2025-07-07 23:32:08.165 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 40 => 40
                        2025-07-07 23:32:10.289 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-targetValue 40 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:10.295 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 40 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:10.308 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:12.397 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-targetValue 50 => 59
                        2025-07-07 23:32:12.401 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 50 => 59
                        2025-07-07 23:32:12.416 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 59 => 59
                        2025-07-07 23:32:14.848 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-targetValue 59 => 59
                        2025-07-07 23:32:14.853 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 59 => 59
                        2025-07-07 23:32:14.866 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 59 => 59
                        2025-07-07 23:32:16.744 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-targetValue 59 => 59
                        2025-07-07 23:32:16.749 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 59 => 59
                        2025-07-07 23:32:16.762 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 59 => 59
                        2025-07-07 23:32:18.651 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-targetValue 59 => 59
                        2025-07-07 23:32:18.654 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 59 => 59
                        2025-07-07 23:32:18.665 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 59 => 59
                        2025-07-07 23:32:20.649 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-targetValue 59 => 59
                        2025-07-07 23:32:20.652 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 59 => 59
                        2025-07-07 23:32:20.661 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 59 => 59
                        2025-07-07 23:32:22.864 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-targetValue 59 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:22.870 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 59 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:22.881 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:26.963 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-targetValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:26.966 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:26.975 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:29.030 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-targetValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:29.035 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:29.052 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:31.234 DEBUG Z-WAVE: Polling value 49-0-Air temperature
                        2025-07-07 23:32:31.289 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 036] Metadata updated: 49-0-Air temperature
                        2025-07-07 23:32:31.292 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 036] Value updated: 49-0-Air temperature 24 => 24
                        2025-07-07 23:32:31.297 DEBUG Z-WAVE: 36-49-0-Air temperature will be polled in 60 seconds
                        2025-07-07 23:32:31.715 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-targetValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:31.718 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:31.727 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:34.557 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-targetValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:34.562 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:34.578 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:36.379 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-targetValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:36.384 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:36.398 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:38.130 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-targetValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:38.133 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:38.141 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:39.756 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-targetValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:39.759 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:39.767 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:41.731 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-targetValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:41.737 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:41.756 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:43.814 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-targetValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:43.819 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 50 => 50
                        2025-07-07 23:32:43.828 INFO Z-WAVE: [Node 005] Value updated: 38-0-currentValue 50 => 50 ~~~
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • toggledbitsT Offline
                          toggledbitsT Offline
                          toggledbits
                          wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                          #12

                          Sounds like you might have dimming.minimum on the entity set to 0.1? And what of dimming.maximum? Failing that, does the device itself have min/max set in its Z-Wave configuration?

                          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • V Offline
                            V Offline
                            vezinpi
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Hi,

                            The dimming.maximum/minimum are set to 1 and 0

                            image.png

                            @toggledbits said in Gradually turn on lights.:

                            Failing that, does the device itself have min/max set in its Z-Wave configuration?

                            Not sure exactely how to check this. The device is a Zooz ZEN 72. I look in the Z-Wave JS UI and could not find any parameter that would limit the dimming min/max.

                            I might be wrong here but it is my understanding that the Z-Wave JS UI sits between HA and the devices. Since the Z-Wave JS UI log shows that any level change request above 60 from MSR, stays at 60, it can only be coming from MSR or HA. In addition the dimming.set works without any issues.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbits
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              OK. There are some rounding issues with JavaScript, and I think I can tune things up to work around them a little better. Stay tuned.

                              Also, tip: use the Copy Attributes button instead of screen-grabbing the attributes. Gives more data.

                              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • toggledbitsT Offline
                                toggledbitsT Offline
                                toggledbits
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                Yup, a lot going on here. ZWave and ZWave-JS produce values for brightness in the range 0-99. HA maps that into its 0-255 scale, so precision oddities are introduced there. HassController then attempts to scale HA's 0-255 into Reactor's 0-1, which introduces more precision oddities.

                                I've made an interim build with a handful of adjustments. It is published only for docker aarch64/arm64 (RPi 64-bit and similar) right now, because I don't have time to repackage the whole thing for all platforms right now (I'll be unavailable from 11th through 20th), and it's too risky. For others reading, I don't recommend going to this build unless you need this specific fix immediately.

                                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • V Offline
                                  V Offline
                                  vezinpi
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  @toggledbits Thank you for looking into this.

                                  There is absolutely no rush on any of this on my side. When I read the post I really liked the approach you suggested and made a test rule to see how I could use it and got into some issues.

                                  Since you took the time to make an interim built, I will take the time to test it and report back here with the result. This way, you will know the status when you return.

                                  Thanks again

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • V Offline
                                    V Offline
                                    vezinpi
                                    wrote on last edited by vezinpi
                                    #17

                                    Loaded the new built and as expected, the dimming.up/down are working for all levels. I also noticed that the dimming.level reported are nicely round up to one digit after the "." except for 50% where it displays "0.51" (not really an isssue just reporting what I see)

                                    However, the other issue mentionned my opening post (that got kind of forgotten) is still present. Here is the refference:

                                    said in Gradually turn on lights.:

                                    1- The "dimming.step" when changed does not stick after a dimming.up/down

                                    In the "Entities" menu I set the attribute "dimming.step" to 0.05. Still in the etities menu, I then perform a "dimming.up" and can confirm that indeed the "dimming.level" went up by 0.05 however at the same time the dimming.step goes back to 0.1 (default). From that point, any subsequent "dimming.up" uses the default.

                                    Again, this can wait until your next release if a fix is indeed needed.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • toggledbitsT Offline
                                      toggledbitsT Offline
                                      toggledbits
                                      wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                                      #18

                                      Have you done a hard refresh on the browser? If that's not it, check file permissions on your storage directory, and also check the logs to see if any errors are emitted when you change the attribute value and within the window of about two minutes after (allowing for the delayed-write strategy caching). The other likely issue is that your storage directory has issues and isn't properly saving the state data for the entity.

                                      Edit: Well, I said:

                                      There is no code that changes dimming.step other than the button you use on the UI.

                                      And that's technically true, there's no code, but... seems there is a stray directive in the entity mapping data table hass_devices.yaml, which is specific to HassController, left over from wayyyyy long ago that should not be there today, and will do what you are observing. Simple fix. I'll roll a new docker image shortly.

                                      Edit 2: Updated container is up and ready.

                                      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • V Offline
                                        V Offline
                                        vezinpi
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        As usual, you nailed it!

                                        With a dimming.step of 0.03, it does a very nice gradation.

                                        Many thanks

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • T Offline
                                          T Offline
                                          tbully
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          I'm having this same issue with a bare metal install. I assume this fix will be included in a future release? (No hurry. This is just a nice-to-have thing...)

                                          toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Recent Topics

                                          • How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
                                            cw-kidC
                                            cw-kid
                                            0
                                            3
                                            42

                                          • Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            2
                                            71

                                          • VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
                                            S
                                            SweetGenius
                                            1
                                            1
                                            53

                                          • Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            3
                                            1
                                            46

                                          • Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
                                            G
                                            gwp1
                                            0
                                            1
                                            71

                                          • [Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
                                            CrilleC
                                            Crille
                                            0
                                            4
                                            121

                                          • [Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
                                            therealdbT
                                            therealdb
                                            0
                                            3
                                            124

                                          • Possible feature request 2?
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            3
                                            102

                                          • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            5
                                            133
                                            80.3k

                                          • Genuinely impressed with Zigbee and HA / Reactor
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            1
                                            9
                                            403

                                          • Copying a global reaction
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            3
                                            129

                                          • [HowTo] Using HABridge with Reactor
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            9
                                            467
                                          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                          Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Unsolved