Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Rule update rates, limits, logic loops, warnings and throttling
MFA
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reverse proxy & API ACL
tunnusT
I'm trying to allow anonymous access from a local network to /api/v1/log, but the problem now with the reverse proxy configuration is that this access is open via proxy to the internet. At least I wasn't able to configure ACL so that only an access from a local network would be permitted. reactor.yaml: baseurl: "http://192.168.1.12:8111" proxy_baseurl: "https://external.com:30000" trusted_proxy: "192.168.1.12" Local traffic would originate from 192.168.1.0/24 network. Synology is acting as a reverse proxy and hosting MSR as a docker container (which has its own network and IP 172.18.0.5). MSR build is latest-26298-fbb75fb8 users.yaml: - url: "/api/v1/log" method: "GET" source_ip: 172.18.0.0/24 allow: true Using the above ACL works, but it enables access via proxy also. If I use source_ip: 192.168.1.0/24, then it doesn't work either locally or remotely. So I'm kinda lost what should I use as source_ip in this case?
Multi-System Reactor
Grouped devices
G
I've seen many of you using Dynamic Group Controller. I'm using it myself for monitoring device battery levels. I've read and re-read the Dynamic Group Controller docs and still cannot come to an answer for my question so let me paint my scenario: I've migrated from EchoSpeaks in Hubitat ('cause borked and seemingly unmaintained) to Alexa Devices in Home Assistant ('cause not borked in 2026.11.0) to be able to send TTS to my Echo devices. In EchoSpeaks I could create groups. Sweet. In Alexa Devices I don't seem to be able to do so. As such, my thought was "wait - isn't there a way in MSR?" Is this an effective scenario that Dynamic Group Controller can be used for?
Multi-System Reactor
Login protections
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Inspect - a small read-only helper panel for MSR
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Build 26284 stuck at Loading Reactor UI
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
MSR with reverse proxy
tunnusT
I'm trying to use MSR via reserve proxy in Synology DSM, but MSR page does not load https://<public ip>:30000/reactor/en-US/ At the same time logging page loads normally https://<public ip>:30000/api/v1/log I thought maybe authentication was messing it up, but there was no deny entries in the log, and also disabling authentication did not make any difference. For this use case VPN is not an option (that works, but as said not an option for this particular use case). Any ideas what could cause this? MSR build latest-26242-28d69aa8, Chrome browser
Multi-System Reactor
Missing attribute after upgrade
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Native fan capabilty
therealdbT
Nothing more to add. I see we have hvac_blower, but, anyway, maybe a native fan on the same assumptions of the fan from HASS could be reasonable. I have a couple of them. ie, this is from ESPHome via HASS. x_hass.domain="fan" x_hass.entity_id="fan.kitchen_seashell_hood_ventilation_fan" x_hass.floor_id=null x_hass.services=["fan","esphome"] x_hass.source="esphome" x_hass.state="off" x_hass_attr.friendly_name="Seashell Hood Ventilation Fan" x_hass_attr.percentage=50 x_hass_attr.percentage_step=25 x_hass_attr.preset_mode="" x_hass_attr.preset_modes=[] x_hass_attr.supported_features=49 Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Rule do not fire
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Rule condition shows TRUE in UI but Rule never transitions to SET — survives full restart
N
Build: latest-26221-b25bb3e3, Docker on Synology. Hi, I have a Rule whose Trigger/Constraints reference other Rules via Rule State ... is TRUE. At some point it stops firing. Expanding the rule's condition tree in the UI shows every Trigger and Constraint condition green/TRUE — confirmed live by walking into the room and watching Motion go true in real time. Rule History shows no new SET, just old reset entries. Tried, on the same rule, same evening: recreating the trigger conditions with fresh IDs, recreating the constraint conditions with fresh IDs (flat and wrapped in a new Group — wrapping in a Group produced one SET, but it didn't reproduce on repeat attempts with the same structure), and finally a full container restart with a verified-correct saved rule. Still no SET, even with a fresh live motion event right after the restart. Separately, I found that this rule (and its 10 per-room clones) share identical internal condition/group IDs with each other — leftover from a batch clone done months ago, never regenerated. Not sure if that's related, since fixing the IDs didn't reliably fix the symptom either. Has anyone seen a Rule State condition show TRUE in the UI without the Rule ever producing a SET, surviving a clean restart? Thanks in advance
Multi-System Reactor
DynamicGroupController and attributes
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits I'm back to trying to optimize a couple of things based on dynamic group. First of all, I think I found a typo in the doc: primary_attribute: "binary_sensor.state" primary_attribute_value: | d = false; each id in members: d = getEntity(id)?.attributes?.power_switch?.state or d, d I think the correct code snippet is d = false, All that said, my use case for dynamic groups is to group 3 different climate devices, so I could easily command them at the same time. Commands are good, but sometimes I want to check if any of the devices are on, and that's easily done with a similar snippet as the one you have in the docs. But this is limited to the primary attribute, while I want to have any of the attributes in the group to be driven by a similar logic (while all are null in the group). ie, access hvac_control.mode and see if any of the unit is set to cool, or heat. Is that possible, without re-defining an expression in each of my rules? Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Unofficial thread for compatibility
tunnusT
As there are statements about compatibility for home assistant versions in MSR new version announcements (e.g. "HassController: Bless Hass to 2025.7.3"), I thought it would be good idea to track other controllers as well. As an example, I can confirm that build "latest-25208-c53e8513" works with Hubitat Elevation C-8 platform version 2.4.2.134 using Maker API. Updates: (the latest versions first in the list) OK: build "latest-25264-2fbe9217" with Hubitat C-8 platform v. 2.4.3.123
Multi-System Reactor
Ooops - Deleted Reactor Ex Machina II
R
I accidentally deleted Reactor Ex Machina II (REM II) from my Reactor rules. I tried to recover it by deleting the .json and .dval in the Rules subdirectory and then recreating it from Togglebits original posting, but that did not work. Does anyone know how to recover REM ll ?
Multi-System Reactor
Bail out of failed reaction?
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
CrilleC
Edit: Solved in latest-26221. Bare-metal latest-26193 I have this group: "OKforLarm": name: OK för Larm select: - include_controller: vera - include_capability: door_sensor filter_expression: entity.attributes.door_sensor.state It contains the entities I expect but behaves a bit odd. When I open vera>device_10097 the entity attribute door_sensor.state changes to true but it won't show up as member in the group, when I also open vera>device_10095 they both shows as members and when I close vera>device_10095 it disappear from the group but when I close vera>device_10097 it lingers in the group until I restart Reactor.
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade Issues
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Rule update rates, limits, logic loops, warnings and throttling

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
6 Posts 2 Posters 1.7k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • LibraSunL Offline
    LibraSunL Offline
    LibraSun
    wrote on last edited by LibraSun
    #1

    As is my custom, I often create ungainly Rules designed to push the limits of MSR until some problem crops up (UI glitch, runtime error, faulty logic, etc.). I'm starting this topic - and sharing a cautionary example below - to invite MSR power users to embrace best practices in their routines.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • LibraSunL Offline
      LibraSunL Offline
      LibraSun
      wrote on last edited by LibraSun
      #2

      Onward to my wayward example...

      Most recently, I noticed this line in Reactor.log

      Rule:WARN (Circulate House Air (auto)) update rate 61/min exceeds limit (60/min)! Logic loop? Throttling...
      

      suggesting that I had an issue in my "Circulate House Air" rule that caused "flapping" -- uncontrolled or unexpectedly high rates of triggering -- which invoked MSR's automatic throttling (suppression) of that rule.

      Because it's a fairly simple rule -- watch two Expressions (one a boolean, the other a calculated value from sensors), and check whether particular virtual switch is ON -- I was easily able to scrutinize its logic and layout.

      Here were the essentials:

      TRIGGERS

      [ Expression Value ] [ tempVar ] [ > ] [ 2 ] // IF temperature variation exceeds a certain threshold (a rare occurrence!); Pulse for 10 sec., repeat every 1200 secs.
      

      CONSTRAINTS

      [ Expression Value ] [ modesMatch ] [ is TRUE ] // only when A/C and Vera show same House Mode setting for 10+ secs.
      [ Entity Attribute ] [ VSwitch.status ] [ is TRUE ] // switch must also be ON
      

      REACTION

      [ Entity Action ] [ ACblower.power ] [ == ] [ 1 ] // turn on blower (auto-resets itself after 30 seconds)
      

      EXPRESSIONS

      tempVar := <mean deviation formula based on 4 sensors>
      modesMatch := <TRUE when A/C house mode matches Vera's>
      

      At first glance, all seemed well. Except MSR had expressly warned me (via the Log, at least) that something was amiss.

      Speculating that it was simply the arrangement of items within TRIGGERS and CONSTRAINTS, I moved the "VSwitch" condition from Constraints up into Triggers, and the "tempVar" expression down into Constraints, then re-enabled the Rule.

      Yet the throttling problem remains, according to the Log. While currently tempVar == 3, the VSwitch is OFF and modesMatch is FALSE -- that is, both Triggers and Constraints read 'false' -- so I would have thought it impossible for the Rule to be so active behind the scenes.

      Any insights on this problem?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • LibraSunL Offline
        LibraSunL Offline
        LibraSun
        wrote on last edited by LibraSun
        #3

        FEATURE REQUEST

        Display each active Rule's current rate and/or display a warning in UI whenever Throttling occurs. (Probably already on the MSR roadmap)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by toggledbits
          #4

          If your log level is 5 or above for the rule in question, you will see messages logged like this:

          2021-03-15T15:21:07.639Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:444> {ruleid} notification {type} {data} from {sender}
          

          So this will tell you what is triggering the request for re-evaluation.

          If you didn't know, you can set the logging level (in config/logging.yaml) for a particular rule, so it's useful to set the generic level (level entry under Rule:) to 4 to keep other rules quiet, and then create a new entry with key Rule#ruleid: and subkey level set to 5 or whatever. This will focus the detailed debug output on the single rule and hold the noise down from the stuff you're not as interested in.

          logging:
            ... other stuff ...
            Rule:
              level: 4
            Rule#rule-f984r5nfe
              level: 5
          

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • LibraSunL Offline
            LibraSunL Offline
            LibraSun
            wrote on last edited by LibraSun
            #5

            So far, with the default logging level of 4 set in LOGGING.YAML, I merely see these not-so-illustrative entries immediately before the <WARN> line:

            2021-03-15T15:34:34.150Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:800> Rule#rule-km9hxs0z (Circulate House Air (auto)) evaluate() acquiring mutex
            
            2021-03-15T15:34:34.150Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:804> Rule#rule-km9hxs0z._evaluate() mutex acquired, evaluating
            
            2021-03-15T15:34:34.151Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:808> Rule#rule-km9hxs0z update rate is 61/min limit 60/min
            

            I'll proceed to try higher level inspection (by altering the level: for this Rule only) later today, and see what specifically turns up. For now, I have the Rule disabled.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbits
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Do not (ever) change the default logging level. Only change the logging level for the specific Rule and Rule#rule-id classes.

              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              Recent Topics

              • MFA
                toggledbitsT
                toggledbits
                0
                19
                399

              • Reverse proxy & API ACL
                toggledbitsT
                toggledbits
                0
                5
                64

              • Grouped devices
                G
                gwp1
                0
                3
                71

              • Login protections
                toggledbitsT
                toggledbits
                0
                2
                125

              • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                toggledbitsT
                toggledbits
                5
                152
                151.5k

              • Reactor Inspect - a small read-only helper panel for MSR
                G
                gwp1
                2
                6
                379

              • Reactor Build 26284 stuck at Loading Reactor UI
                T
                tamorgen
                0
                16
                1.4k

              • MSR with reverse proxy
                tunnusT
                tunnus
                0
                12
                728

              • Missing attribute after upgrade
                3
                3rdStng
                0
                3
                425

              • Use of Google Gemini as an MSR and Hubitat configuration aid
                therealdbT
                therealdb
                0
                2
                245

              • [MSR] Native fan capabilty
                therealdbT
                therealdb
                1
                3
                244

              • [MSR] Rule do not fire
                therealdbT
                therealdb
                0
                4
                351
              Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
              Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • Unsolved