@toggledbits I understand that you do not perform testing on Mac computers but thought I'd share the following with you in case something can be done.
I started seeing these errors with version 24302. I thought that upgrading to 24343 would have fixed the issue but unfortunately not. I either have to close the browser or clear the cache for the errors to stop popping-up but they slowly come back.
I see these errors on the following browsers:
Safari 16.6.1 on macOS Big Sur Safari 18.1.1 on MacOS Sonoma DuckDuckGo 1.118.0 on macOS Big Sur and Sonoma Firefox 133.0.3 on macOS Big Sur Chrome 131.0.6778 on macOS Big SurHere are the errors
Safari while creating/updating an expression
@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:543:91 makeExprMenu@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:537:28 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:92:64 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:89:68 each@http://192.168.0.13:8111/node_modules/jquery/dist/jquery.min.js:2:3133 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:89:35 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:98:44 forEach@[native code] @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:95:54 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:106:44 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/Observable.js:78:28 signalModified@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/ee.js:146:21 signalModified@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/expression-editor.js:40:29 reindexExpressions@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/expression-editor.js:71:32 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/expression-editor.js:608:40 dispatch@http://192.168.0.13:8111/node_modules/jquery/dist/jquery.min.js:2:40040DuckDuckGo while clicking on status
http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reactor-ui-status.js:789:44 asyncFunctionResume@[native code] saveGridLayout@[native code] dispatchEvent@[native code] _triggerEvent@http://192.168.0.13:8111/node_modules/gridstack/dist/gridstack.js:1401:30 _triggerAddEvent@http://192.168.0.13:8111/node_modules/gridstack/dist/gridstack.js:1383:31 makeWidget@http://192.168.0.13:8111/node_modules/gridstack/dist/gridstack.js:968:30 addWidget@http://192.168.0.13:8111/node_modules/gridstack/dist/gridstack.js:388:24 placeWidgetAdder@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reactor-ui-status.js:183:44Firefox while updating a rule
@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:543:91 makeExprMenu@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:537:28 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:92:64 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:89:68 each@http://192.168.0.13:8111/node_modules/jquery/dist/jquery.min.js:2:3133 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reaction-editor.js:89:35 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:98:44 forEach@[native code] @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:95:54 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:106:44 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/Observable.js:78:28 notifySaved@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/ee.js:82:21 notifySaved@http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/expression-editor.js:47:26 @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reactor-ui-rules.js:1460:39 forEach@[native code] @http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/reactor-ui-rules.js:1459:58Chrome while creating/updating an expression
TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'getEditor') at RuleEditor.makeExprMenu (http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/rule-editor.js:1788:86) at Object.handler (http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/rule-editor.js:2174:54) at http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:98:44 at Array.forEach (<anonymous>) at MessageBus._sendToBus (http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:95:54) at MessageBus.send (http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/MessageBus.js:106:44) at ExpressionEditor.publish (http://192.168.0.13:8111/client/Observable.js:78:28) at ExpressionEditor.signalModified (http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/ee.js:146:14) at ExpressionEditor.signalModified (http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/expression-editor.js:40:15) at ExpressionEditor.reindexExpressions (http://192.168.0.13:8111/reactor/en-ca/lib/js/expression-editor.js:71:18) ``Thanks to @toggledbits for adding a custom CSS. I've started doing a darker Reactor style.
Here's the file: https://gist.github.com/dbochicchio/825098ac13b7f8cac22012eae37ff7ce
A couple of things are still too bright and I'll eventually catch-up. Just place it under your /config directory, naming the file as customstyles.css. Hard refresh your browser.
Hi
Having to rebuild my Linux Debian box as the SSD failed. And I have forgotten exactly what I did the first time to get it all setup.
I have Debian 12 up and running on the new SSD, I only have console no Desktop GUI.
I am trying to do the bare metal install for MSR. However I am not sure if I am meant to install nodejs whlist logged in as the root user or as the none root user with my name ?
I used putty and connected via SSH and logged in as root and I installed nodejs but I think this was wrong as when logged in as my user name and I do a node -v command it says node is not installed or doesn't show any version number anyway.
But when logged in as root and I do a node -v command it does show me its installed and displays the version number. maybe its a path issue for my username and he can't see node is installed?
So now I am thinking I should of installed node whilst logged in as my user name and not as the root user.
This is how I installed nodejs as whilst logged in as root
ac7bf6c3-23ad-46fc-8ada-44af6704e63e-image.png
Thanks in advance.
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here.
Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.As the title says, here's my OpenAI Controller for Reactor:
OpenAI Controller per Reactor. Contribute to dbochicchio/reactor-openai development by creating an account on GitHub.
It supports both OpenAI and Azure OpenAI endpoints. You'll need keys/endpoints, according to each service.
The controller supports multiple models, and each one could be mapped as an entity.
It's quite easy to use, and responses can be stored in variables, for easy access. Or sent to another action (Text To Speech, another endpoint, etc).
9013ae50-fd68-42a2-87c3-97479132e465-image.png
80a88eec-7c89-464a-8196-690b4b72d044-image.png
Have fun with LLM into your scenes!
In Home Assistant I have an integration that if I add entities to it, I will get the following error in MSR as certain entity values I'm using in expressions are null for a moment. This is more or less cosmetic issue and happens very rarely as I rarely modify that integration on the hass side.
Screenshot 2024-11-28 at 22.20.41.png
And the expression is
Screenshot 2024-11-28 at 22.38.19.png
Could I "wrap" hass-entity shown above somewhat differently to prevent this error from happening? Using build 24302.
Hello
I am trying to set up Multi System Reactor to automate routines across multiple smart home devices & platforms (e.g., Home Assistant, SmartThings, and Hubitat). While I have successfully linked the systems; I am facing issues with:
-Delays in triggering actions on secondary devices.
-Inconsistent execution of complex logic conditions.
-Synchronization of states between devices when one system updates.
Is there a recommended way to optimize performance & confirm seamless state sharing across systems?
I have checked https://smarthome.community/category/22/multi-system-reactor-msbi guide for reference but still need advice.
Any tips on debugging or log analysis to pinpoint where the issue arises would also be appreciated.
Thank you !
I've managed to use MSR UI on iOS devices to some degree*, so that although UI elements (e.g. rule sets) are not visible in portrait mode, you've seen them in landscape. Now with recents builds (24302) this does not work anymore, elements (rule sets, entities) are not anymore visible in landscape mode.
Does anyone have similar experiences? Using iOS 18 and Safari/Chrome browser.
( *Drag & drop of rule conditions have never worked on a mobile)
@toggledbits Since I have upgraded ZWaveJSController to 24293 from 24257 I am seeing entries related to registering action set_volume, but action is not defined by the capability 143 every time I restart Reactor.
The Siren seems to be doing what it is supposed to do. The volume levels are fine. Should I worry about it?
Reactor version 24302
ZWaveJSController version 24293
Z-Wave JS UI version 9.27.4
zwave-js version 14.3.4
I have the following ACL defined:
groups: admin: users: - admin applications: true api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: trueAnd I have authenticated to MSR as "admin" user. However, I'm getting "access denied" when trying to access http://*******:8111/api/v1/log
So what I'm missing, is my ACL incorrectly defined?
Using build 24302 on Docker.
Hi
I have just connected a bunch of EzloPi controllers to MSR to import some ESP based devices etc.
They all seemed to have worked and imported in to MSR apart from I have one missing device. It is a Digital Gas Sensor device.
This is how that device looks in the Ezlo API.
Devices Info:
_id: "10696001" deviceTypeId: "ezlopi" parentDeviceId: "10696000" category: "level_sensor" subcategory: "" gatewayId: "457a5069" batteryPowered: false name: "Gas Sensor Digital" type: "sensor" reachable: true persistent: true serviceNotification: false armed: false roomId: "" security: "no" ready: true status: "idle" parentRoom: true protectConfig: "default"Items Info:
_id: "20696001" deviceId: "10696001" hasGetter: true hasSetter: false name: "smoke_density" show: true valueType: "substance_amount" scale: "parts_per_million" value: 2.7472610473632812 valueFormatted: "2.75" status: "idle"There is also an Analog Gas sensor that one did import in to MSR OK.
68d63dab-b871-4f44-912b-cf6e0b9eb4c6-image.png
Devices Info:
_id: "10696000" deviceTypeId: "ezlopi" parentDeviceId: "10696000" category: "security_sensor" subcategory: "gas" gatewayId: "457a5069" batteryPowered: false name: "Gas Sensor Analog" type: "sensor" reachable: true persistent: true serviceNotification: false armed: false roomId: "" security: "no" ready: true status: "idle" parentRoom: true protectConfig: "default"Items Info:
_id: "20696000" deviceId: "10696000" hasGetter: true hasSetter: false name: "gas_alarm" show: true valueType: "token" enum: 0: "no_gas" 1: "combustible_gas_detected" 2: "toxic_gas_detected" 3: "unknown" valueFormatted: "no_gas" value: "no_gas" status: "idle"And this is how this MQ2 Gas Sensor looks like on their dashboard:
Digital
cb77dfa3-4af5-4d06-9635-89207a716a89-image.png
Analog
4fb4da1b-e946-4b89-876c-bcd9f5699b6c-image.png
They have an EzloPi website here you can create your own sensor projects using ESP boards, which is very interesting stuff!
And I just wrote on the Ezlo forum here, how to connect an EzloPi controller to MSR.
THANKS.
A couple of things for you @toggledbits, since you mentioned that this release has new features and some tweaks are expected.
Local expressions cannot be deleted. Pushing the X button has no effect for me.
When cloning an entity action, the result is strange (first is cloned one, second is the original action):
a92ea094-9e2c-4aaa-bf47-2d07a6ffdbd0-image.png
When changing the action on the cloned element, the params are added to the original one. See screenshot:
92ac3011-83c8-466b-bd23-47d483ad7a52-image.png
Dark theme has a couple of strange contrasts. One is visible in the previous screenshots (white text on yellow background). Another one is in groups (blue text on blue background):
9b3c4988-53ef-44e6-9672-30e744cacb75-image.png
Overall, I found blue, yellow, red and green (in buttons and forms) to be too bright.
On the bright side:
I love the new script action: thank you! The dark theme is a great start to avoid getting blinded at night I promise I'll try very soon the new features around actions. Thanks!@toggledbits
I just upgraded to version MSR 24293, bare metal running on Fedora. Upon restart, I am getting a error banner:
I followed the new directions about npm
npm i --no-save --no-package-lock --omit dev
Any idea what the issue is?
Seems like switching the UI to the newly added dark mode (thank you for this) does nothing. The UI stays in light mode and only a few buttons turn into dark mode (see screenshot)
Things I have tried:
Hard refresh
Different browser
Different computer
Restarting Reactor
Failed troubleshooting attempts:
No errors in Chrome console
No relevant errors in Reactor log (can still PM the full log file)
Reactor version: latest-24293-ea42a81d
Hardware: Odroid N2+
Linux version: Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS
3df2806f-9146-485b-9ec1-d056e91cefe5-image.png Dark mode enabled
ff823023-c079-4684-b01f-d6ac6527d31a-image.png Light mode enabled
Good morning,
I have a service MQTT service that needs a restart occasionally. The add-on (Smartbed MQTT) is for the smart bed base for my bed. It has a "safety light" that I can control from HAAS & MSR as a light entity, and also moves the head of the bed to a preset at bedtime, and then lies it back flat in the morning The problem is, from time to time, the light becomes "unavailable" Restarting from the Add-ons tab in HAAS always fixes it, but I should be able to detect when it happens when "light.tempur_pedic_safety_lights" is not true or false, i.e., unavailable.
What I don't know how to do is how to restart that service. Does anybody have experience in restarting add-ons from MSR?
Running:
Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-24212-3ce15e25 ZWaveJSController [0.1.24232]HAAS:
RPi5-64 (8GB) Core 2024.7.3 Supervisor 2024.08.0 Operating System 13.0 Frontend 20240710.0Vera vs MSR lock code logic
-
This should help you pinpoint it... go back to Vera > Devices > find your lock > click the ► next to it > Advanced > click "Variables" tab > find
sl_UserCode
> clickEdit
> look at top of pop-up panel for exact serviceId::parameterName.Those are the details that MSR will need to have you paste in under
x_vera_device.set_variable
. Sample screenshot shown here:
Hope this gets you one step further!
-
Thank you Libra,
I had an incomplete value in "service" when I was testing. I was so close... damnit.
Works now, and thank you for teaching me something.
-
@librasun, I wish I could say it was a typo, but it was more of a lack of understanding of what I had to set. I had "service" set to "DoorLock1" instead of the full value.
I might have spoken a little too soon on everything working. I sent the command, and it worked, but then I got an alert for a Lua reload.
When I send the command through Vera>device>advanced>variables for sl_UserCode, it works fine, and I can change it to anything without causing a reload.
When I send the command through MSR, it does change the lock value as if I had done it through Vera, but it also causes a reload after about 10 seconds. After the reload, it returns to the last value physically entered into the lock.
Any ideas? I do not think it is formatting because the value sets properly when looking at the lock data.
So close!
-
Hmm, all I can forewarn you about is to check whether you have created circular logic, in which case MSR may be firing multiple copies of what looks to you and me like a single event. MSR is FAST!! Vera likes SLOW.
So, do check, for instance, whether you have a Rule reacting to
[sl_UserCode] [changes]
. It would naturally re-react when MSR itself changes that parameter on Vera! What you'd need in order to "throttle" that behavior is a Constraint (often used as a safeguard against multiple firing of a Rule).If your workflow arbitrarily changes
sl_UserCode
to0
or"none"
, then the Constraint could very well read (I'm paraphrasing of course):[ sl_UserCode ] [ <> ] [ 0 ]
or
[ sl_UserCode ] [ <> ] [ none ]
so that MSR won't continue to run this Rule when the latest value in that parameter was the one MSR put there.
Hope this helps a bit more!
-
I only have a condition that lets me see the code (no reactions set) and a global reaction to let me set the code. The lock is not referenced in any other MSR condition or reaction. I was testing by watching the variable on the lock and pushing the play button on the reaction that sets the variable.
I am assuming that the value of "0" works because I can set that value inside of Vera with no issue. I have also tried sending a string that matches another valid lock code. It also seems like if I send that lock (Schlage lever lock) any set variable command through MRS, I get a reload. (Armed, Tripped, whatever)
Here are the screenshots of both the global reaction I use to set the variable and the condition I use to monitor the status.
(I don't know what is up with the pictures, but I attach two and one duplicates)
-
Yeah, the screenshots are hard to see due to the Forum UI mixing them up somehow, but I can still read 'em.
I presume you'll eventually have the Trigger'ed rule call the Global Reaction once you're satisfied with things? Meanwhile, you seem to be saying that Vera restarts or otherwise spazzes in response to the Schlage Lock having one of its parameters set. How odd!
I see nothing overtly wrong here, as far as your MSR setup is concerned.
-
I am wondering if this comes back to my particular Vera environment. I have another one of these locks, and I am going to set it up on the test Vera and see if the behavior is any different.
-
We'll only be guessing until you crank out the LuaUPnP log from your Vera (by calling <your_vera_ip>/cgi-bin/cmh/log.sh?Device=LuaUPnP) AND from your
reactor.log
file from your MSR setup, and inspect them both for clues. You need to know what's being sent immediately prior to these reboots. -
OK, I think I figured out what is going on.
I added the secondary controller to MSR, and this what I found testing two of the locks in my system.
Primary Controller with MSR interacting Vera Shop entities
Lock physically on controller: Shop back door (Device ID 134)
Lock bought in by bridged Vera: House back door (device ID 410 on primary and device ID 104 shown on primary as house back door 1)
Setting any variable on either lock, with any device ID, causes Lua to reload.Secondary controller with MSR interacting Vera House entities
Lock physically on controller: House back door (Device ID 96, same device that as appears on bridged primary device IDs 410 and 104)
Setting any variable on the lock does not cause Lua to reload, and the value holds until a door pin code is entered.I am 99% sure this is all due to bridging. This might not make total sense, but I did the best I could to describe this, and I AM NOT in any way requesting that @toggledbits should look into addressing an oddball problem of my own doing. When I did this, there was no MSR, and I believe MSR has effectively eliminated the need for IP Vera bridging.
-
+1 for un-bridging those controllers if it means you can use MSR as a pass-through instead.
Something in my gut tells me the rebooting Vera is somehow getting "ping-ponged" in such a manner that successive commands become stacked, time out, and trip the Luup engine's fight or flight response. -
I was going to dig into the issue further, but it would be a giant waste of time since MSR eliminates the need for Vera bridging.
-
I take it by now you read ezlo's list of "Known Issues" that include the specific issue you've reported? Seems to still be a problem, even with the second release of 7.32 beta firmware. Thus, I believe you're taking the smart route away from bridging.
-
-