Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. [SOLVED] restricting lights from a certain hour
Set reaction triggering wrong z-wave device
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Can you run MSR on Home Assistant OS ?
cw-kidC
Looking at using Home Assistant for the first time, either on a Home Assistant Green, their own hardware or buying a cheap second hand mini PC. Sounds like Home Assistant OS is linux based using Docker for HA etc. Would I also be able to install things like MSR as well on their OS ? On the same box? Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
cw-kidC
Hello I haven't updated my installation of MSR in a very long time. Its a bare metal Linux install currently on version 24366-3de60836 I see the latest version is now latest-26011-c621bbc7 I assume I cannot just jump from a very old version to the latest version? Or can I? Thanks
Multi-System Reactor
This trigger no longer working - complaining about the operator needing changing
cw-kidC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Self test
CatmanV2C
Having been messing around with some stuff I worked a way to self trigger some tests that I wanted to do on the HA <> MSR integration This got me wondering if there's an entity that changes state / is exposed when a configured controller goes off line? I can't see one but thought it might be hidden or something? Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
tunnusT
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration: users: # This section defines your valid users. admin: ******* groups: # This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application # and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to # more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here. admin_group: users: - admin applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications guests: users: "*" applications: - dashboard api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin_group allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: true session: timeout: 7200 # (seconds) rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true # If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged. log_acls: true # If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged. debug_acls: true My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
Multi-System Reactor
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request 2?
CatmanV2C
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks. Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option? No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor

[SOLVED] restricting lights from a certain hour

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
42 Posts 3 Posters 6.3k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • LibraSunL Offline
    LibraSunL Offline
    LibraSun
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    The future is looking bright!

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • LibraSunL LibraSun

      The future is looking bright!

      G Offline
      G Offline
      gwp1
      wrote on last edited by
      #14

      @librasun It's already bright - we're trying to make it less so lol

      *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
      *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

      *HAOS
      Core 2026.1.1
      w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
      FW: v1.1
      SDK: v7.23.1

      *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
      MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
      MQTTController: 25139
      ZWave Controller: 25139

      G 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • G gwp1

        @librasun It's already bright - we're trying to make it less so lol

        G Offline
        G Offline
        gwp1
        wrote on last edited by
        #15

        @gwp1 Welp, awoke this morning to... light. Really scratching my head here. Unless I'm misunderstanding how the not between works I'm stumped.

        I'll send @toggledbits a log snip for the ten minute window around this event.

        *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
        *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

        *HAOS
        Core 2026.1.1
        w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
        FW: v1.1
        SDK: v7.23.1

        *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
        MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
        MQTTController: 25139
        ZWave Controller: 25139

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • LibraSunL Offline
          LibraSunL Offline
          LibraSun
          wrote on last edited by
          #16

          I think I'd "widen" those time slots by another 30 minutes (i.e. 5-7am / 5-8am), and give it another day of testing. Something tells me it's too precise for now, still. Nothing else jumps out at me, but as you've already pinpointed, Logs are your friend as is watching the Rule's live status in RuleSets.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbits
            wrote on last edited by
            #17

            I disagree. Unless the controller is down at the moment, one minute would be sufficient widening to prevent a race condition. There's something more here than meets the eye.

            @gwp1 if you're going to send logs, don't snip, send me the whole thing, and also send all rules involved (if you click on the rule name in the Rule Sets list, it shows you the rule ID under the conditions -- there's a JSON file in your reactor/storage/rules with that ID as its base name).

            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbits
              wrote on last edited by toggledbits
              #18

              Actually, before we go any further, look at this more carefully:

              Let's say for the sake of argument that it's 4am. Your "not between" conditions are going to be true (4am is not between 5:30 and 7:30), so the condition is true, and that means your "exclusion" isn't.

              For me, based on what I understand your intent to be, and working within the existing structure, you really want these to be after operators with the earliest time you're willing to accept the lights coming on.

              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

              G 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                Actually, before we go any further, look at this more carefully:

                Let's say for the sake of argument that it's 4am. Your "not between" conditions are going to be true (4am is not between 5:30 and 7:30), so the condition is true, and that means your "exclusion" isn't.

                For me, based on what I understand your intent to be, and working within the existing structure, you really want these to be after operators with the earliest time you're willing to accept the lights coming on.

                G Offline
                G Offline
                gwp1
                wrote on last edited by gwp1
                #19

                @toggledbits Hmmm... that's an interesting approach. Mode + After alarm time = lights allowed. Let me try that.

                Edited to add screenshot of updated ruleset:
                1eb6e773-8a25-41a7-8abe-03627dce1649-image.png

                *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                *HAOS
                Core 2026.1.1
                w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                FW: v1.1
                SDK: v7.23.1

                *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                MQTTController: 25139
                ZWave Controller: 25139

                G 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • G gwp1

                  @toggledbits Hmmm... that's an interesting approach. Mode + After alarm time = lights allowed. Let me try that.

                  Edited to add screenshot of updated ruleset:
                  1eb6e773-8a25-41a7-8abe-03627dce1649-image.png

                  G Offline
                  G Offline
                  gwp1
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #20

                  @gwp1 Sadness abounds. Lights this morning. I've emailed @toggledbits the logs he requested in full.

                  Of note: when I was originally creating this rule I noticed something with the Weekday and Weekend "button/links"... when saved, the days chosen by using those were blank again. Only way I could save them visibly was by manually checking them. I should have filed a bug - work intervened and then it slipped my mind. Perhaps unrelated - perhaps not, if the choices aren't really saved.

                  *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                  *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                  *HAOS
                  Core 2026.1.1
                  w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                  FW: v1.1
                  SDK: v7.23.1

                  *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                  MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                  MQTTController: 25139
                  ZWave Controller: 25139

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbits
                    wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                    #21

                    The log shows that this rule set at 20:28 and ran the "Rainstorm Lights ON" reaction from its set reaction. It remained set until 22:55, when it reset and ran the "Rainstorm lights OFF" reaction from its reset reaction.

                    The rule remained reset for the remainder of the log. It did not set at 05:30 or any other time, it did not start its set reaction or the "Rainstorm Lights ON" reaction it references.

                    However, the "Rainstorm Lights ON" reaction was run by another reaction at 05:30. So you've got a mention of this somewhere. I can't easily tell which (I'd need a higher level of debug), but it is probably one of active objects (or something they start):

                    • Rule Notify: Mode Day ON<SET>
                    • Rule Notify: Mode Night ON<RESET>
                    • Rule Notify: Screened room door<RESET>
                    • Cooling All Modes but Night: ON<SET>
                    • Reaction Sunset light group on

                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                      The log shows that this rule set at 20:28 and ran the "Rainstorm Lights ON" reaction from its set reaction. It remained set until 22:55, when it reset and ran the "Rainstorm lights OFF" reaction from its reset reaction.

                      The rule remained reset for the remainder of the log. It did not set at 05:30 or any other time, it did not start its set reaction or the "Rainstorm Lights ON" reaction it references.

                      However, the "Rainstorm Lights ON" reaction was run by another reaction at 05:30. So you've got a mention of this somewhere. I can't easily tell which (I'd need a higher level of debug), but it is probably one of active objects (or something they start):

                      • Rule Notify: Mode Day ON<SET>
                      • Rule Notify: Mode Night ON<RESET>
                      • Rule Notify: Screened room door<RESET>
                      • Cooling All Modes but Night: ON<SET>
                      • Reaction Sunset light group on
                      G Offline
                      G Offline
                      gwp1
                      wrote on last edited by gwp1
                      #22

                      @toggledbits
                      "this rule set at 20:28 and ran the "Rainstorm Lights ON" reaction from its set reaction. It remained set until 22:55, when it reset and ran the "Rainstorm lights OFF" reaction from its reset reaction."

                      Yes, makes sense as this rule gets included in the @sunset rule for those two lights it controls. That would be sunset (20:28 until sleep time 22:55). Reaction Sunset light group on contains the rest of the lights that come on at sunset, of which this is a subset.

                      I'll look at what's happening at 05:30 (IIFC it's just a mode change ruleset).

                      Rule Notify: Mode Day ON<SET> This is the 05:30 mode change
                      Rule Notify: Mode Night ON<RESET> I would gather this is Night Mode ON deactivating
                      Rule Notify: Screened room door<RESET> This is the screened room door sensor alert being turned off after Night mode is deactivated
                      Cooling All Modes but Night: ON<SET> This is HVAC switching from Night Mode to everything else with the mode change.

                      *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                      *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                      *HAOS
                      Core 2026.1.1
                      w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                      FW: v1.1
                      SDK: v7.23.1

                      *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                      MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                      MQTTController: 25139
                      ZWave Controller: 25139

                      G 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • G gwp1

                        @toggledbits
                        "this rule set at 20:28 and ran the "Rainstorm Lights ON" reaction from its set reaction. It remained set until 22:55, when it reset and ran the "Rainstorm lights OFF" reaction from its reset reaction."

                        Yes, makes sense as this rule gets included in the @sunset rule for those two lights it controls. That would be sunset (20:28 until sleep time 22:55). Reaction Sunset light group on contains the rest of the lights that come on at sunset, of which this is a subset.

                        I'll look at what's happening at 05:30 (IIFC it's just a mode change ruleset).

                        Rule Notify: Mode Day ON<SET> This is the 05:30 mode change
                        Rule Notify: Mode Night ON<RESET> I would gather this is Night Mode ON deactivating
                        Rule Notify: Screened room door<RESET> This is the screened room door sensor alert being turned off after Night mode is deactivated
                        Cooling All Modes but Night: ON<SET> This is HVAC switching from Night Mode to everything else with the mode change.

                        G Offline
                        G Offline
                        gwp1
                        wrote on last edited by gwp1
                        #23

                        @gwp1 "However, the "Rainstorm Lights ON" reaction was run by another reaction at 05:30."

                        Wouldn't it be triggered because of the mode change? Mode (either day or evening) is a trigger for Rainstorm lights ON - but having the time restriction should stop it from turning on those lights, no?

                        *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                        *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                        *HAOS
                        Core 2026.1.1
                        w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                        FW: v1.1
                        SDK: v7.23.1

                        *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                        MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                        MQTTController: 25139
                        ZWave Controller: 25139

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • toggledbitsT Offline
                          toggledbitsT Offline
                          toggledbits
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #24

                          No, it looks like something else, not the rule we've been looking at, is running that reaction. The rule never went true/set after 22:55

                          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                          G 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                            No, it looks like something else, not the rule we've been looking at, is running that reaction. The rule never went true/set after 22:55

                            G Offline
                            G Offline
                            gwp1
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #25

                            @toggledbits Rule ID: rule-198 should run Rainstorm Lights ON reactions plus Sunset Light group ON reaction together to equal turning on all necessary lighting at sunset.

                            *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                            *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                            *HAOS
                            Core 2026.1.1
                            w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                            FW: v1.1
                            SDK: v7.23.1

                            *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                            MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                            MQTTController: 25139
                            ZWave Controller: 25139

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbits
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #26

                              Something ran "Rainstorm Lights ON" at 05:30. It was likely one of the rules or the reaction I listed above, as those were active at the time. The rule "Rainstorm: on, off with UV" was not active at this time, so it did not run it.

                              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                              G 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                Something ran "Rainstorm Lights ON" at 05:30. It was likely one of the rules or the reaction I listed above, as those were active at the time. The rule "Rainstorm: on, off with UV" was not active at this time, so it did not run it.

                                G Offline
                                G Offline
                                gwp1
                                wrote on last edited by gwp1
                                #27

                                @toggledbits Rule Notify: Mode Day ON<SET> This is the 05:30 mode change and the mode change is a condition for the running of Rainstorm Lights ON - but shouldn't/wouldn't the conditions around not before <xx time> belay that order? (That was my intent, anyway.)

                                Would moving the time conditions to Constraints be a better approach?

                                *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                                *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                                *HAOS
                                Core 2026.1.1
                                w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                                FW: v1.1
                                SDK: v7.23.1

                                *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                                MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                                MQTTController: 25139
                                ZWave Controller: 25139

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • LibraSunL Offline
                                  LibraSunL Offline
                                  LibraSun
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #28

                                  I hope what I'm about to mention applies to your situation... running Rule B's SET (or RESET) reaction from Rule A:

                                  1. Does NOT cause Rule B to show as "Set"
                                  2. Does NOT leave a lasting trace in the Status page
                                  3. Does NOT change the "Last set" timestamp on Rule B
                                    ...is therefore sometimes a real challenge to catch in the act, much less diagnose, without lots of Log-intensive scrutiny.
                                    These are the reasons I requested some features along those lines, to help "see" what's happening.
                                  G 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • LibraSunL LibraSun

                                    I hope what I'm about to mention applies to your situation... running Rule B's SET (or RESET) reaction from Rule A:

                                    1. Does NOT cause Rule B to show as "Set"
                                    2. Does NOT leave a lasting trace in the Status page
                                    3. Does NOT change the "Last set" timestamp on Rule B
                                      ...is therefore sometimes a real challenge to catch in the act, much less diagnose, without lots of Log-intensive scrutiny.
                                      These are the reasons I requested some features along those lines, to help "see" what's happening.
                                    G Offline
                                    G Offline
                                    gwp1
                                    wrote on last edited by gwp1
                                    #29

                                    @librasun I'm going to temporarily divorce the @sunset rule from the Rainstorm rule just to see what happens come morning. Moved the day/time/weekday conditions to Constraints first. At least then I can rule that out.

                                    Might be harder to track tomorrow depending on how bright it is at 07:30.

                                    I'm wondering if I'm falling into the pit of trying to "make a truth truthier" when it comes to the triggers.

                                    *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                                    *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                                    *HAOS
                                    Core 2026.1.1
                                    w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                                    FW: v1.1
                                    SDK: v7.23.1

                                    *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                                    MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                                    MQTTController: 25139
                                    ZWave Controller: 25139

                                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • G gwp1

                                      @librasun I'm going to temporarily divorce the @sunset rule from the Rainstorm rule just to see what happens come morning. Moved the day/time/weekday conditions to Constraints first. At least then I can rule that out.

                                      Might be harder to track tomorrow depending on how bright it is at 07:30.

                                      I'm wondering if I'm falling into the pit of trying to "make a truth truthier" when it comes to the triggers.

                                      G Offline
                                      G Offline
                                      gwp1
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #30

                                      @gwp1 No change, lights still came on at 05:30. I did roll over and grab my phone, load up the MSR UI and manually trigger the ruleset only to have it turn the lights back off. Before retriggering, I looked at the status of the ruleset and it met everything it was supposed to - the lights were just still on (having come on when they really shouldn't have.)

                                      Trying to rethink how to write this to get to the goal.

                                      *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                                      *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                                      *HAOS
                                      Core 2026.1.1
                                      w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                                      FW: v1.1
                                      SDK: v7.23.1

                                      *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                                      MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                                      MQTTController: 25139
                                      ZWave Controller: 25139

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • toggledbitsT Offline
                                        toggledbitsT Offline
                                        toggledbits
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #31

                                        @gwp1 before you change anything, do this: archive your entire "storage" subdirectory (ZIP) and send it to me.

                                        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                        G 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                          @gwp1 before you change anything, do this: archive your entire "storage" subdirectory (ZIP) and send it to me.

                                          G Offline
                                          G Offline
                                          gwp1
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #32

                                          @toggledbits Done.

                                          *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.177
                                          *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                                          *HAOS
                                          Core 2026.1.1
                                          w/ HA Connect ZWA-2
                                          FW: v1.1
                                          SDK: v7.23.1

                                          *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                                          MSR: latest-26011-c621bbc7
                                          MQTTController: 25139
                                          ZWave Controller: 25139

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Recent Topics

                                          • Set reaction triggering wrong z-wave device
                                            T
                                            tamorgen
                                            0
                                            17
                                            92

                                          • Can you run MSR on Home Assistant OS ?
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            12
                                            150

                                          • RPi Alternative: Orange Pi 4 LTS (3GB RAM/16GB eMMC)
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            2
                                            1.7k

                                          • RPi Alternative: Orange Pi Zero 2 (1GB)
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            2
                                            3
                                            3.5k

                                          • RPi Alternative: Libre Computer AML-S905X-CC "Le Potato" (2GB RAM)
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            5
                                            6
                                            3.1k

                                          • HA and AI
                                            therealdbT
                                            therealdb
                                            0
                                            4
                                            144

                                          • How to upgrade from an old version of MSR?
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            26
                                            419

                                          • This trigger no longer working - complaining about the operator needing changing
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            18
                                            168

                                          • Self test
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            3
                                            115

                                          • Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            2
                                            127

                                          • VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
                                            S
                                            SweetGenius
                                            1
                                            1
                                            92

                                          • Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            3
                                            1
                                            84
                                          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                          Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Unsolved