at _ClientAPI._commandTimeout (http://192.168.1.100:8111/client/ClientAPI.js:807:179
Seeing this randomly when returning to open browser tab after being away awhile. Once, maybe twice a day.
"What did you do to trigger it?" Literally nothing, just walked away and returned and there it was.
Actions taken in reasonably close proximity to this particular instance of it popping up: I'd restarted the MSR container in Portainer.
I'll try to grab some logs here shortly.
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here.
Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions;
Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating;
Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later;
Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase;
Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions;
Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases);
Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
This post does not apply to users of Intel/AMD-based systems. If you are using a Reactor image tagged latest-amd64 or stable-amd64, then this post does not apply to you. It also does not apply to bare-metal installs; it's for users of docker images on ARM-based systems only (principally Raspberry Pi hosts, but could be others).
After January 15, 2026, I will no longer produce the aarch64-tagged docker image for Reactor. The ARM images will be arm64 for 64-bit operating systems, and armv7l for 32-bit operating systems.
For those of you running a container from the aarch64 image today, this will be a relatively simple change: you just need to switch the image used for your docker container to a differently-tagged image. If you are using docker-compose, then this is a relatively simple matter of changing the image line in your docker-compose.yaml file and then stopping (docker-compose down) and restarting (docker-compose up -d) your Reactor daemon.
But there's a catch... not all of you can safely just switch from the aarch64 image to the arm64 image. And, you can't just trust the output of uname -m, for example, because this exposes the CPU architecture, but not the word size of the OS running on that CPU.
For Raspberry Pi systems, the transition to 64-bit operating systems was long (starting in 2016) and not always obvious — although there was a first "official" 64-bit OS for RPis in 2020, it did not become a default recommendation in the Raspberry Pi Imager until 2021, and then that was only the default for Pi 3/4 systems with >4GB RAM; it was 2022 before it was universally recommended for all 64-bit CPUs regardless of RAM size. Depending on when you first imaged your RPi system and what default you may have been offered/chosen, you could today easily have a 64-bit CPU Raspberry Pi running a 32-bit version of the operating system. Upgrades along the way would not change this; changing it to fully 64-bit requires a full reimage of the system.
To establish if your OS is 64- or 32-bit, log in to your Pi and run: sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH. If the response is arm64 or aarch64, then you are running a 64-bit OS and you should use the arm64-tagged image. If it's anything else, you are running a 32-bit OS, and you should use the armv7l-tagged image.
pi@rpi4-1:~ $ sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH
armhf
pi@rpi4-1:~ $ uname -m
aarch64
pi@rpi4-1:~ $
In the example above, the uname command reports that the CPU is 64-bit architecture (aarch64), which is true for the host on which I ran these commands, but the DEB_HOST_ARCH value is armhf, indicating a 32-bit operating system. This system has to use the armv7l-tagged image.
Other systems will have their own ways of determining the word size of the running OS. Since the majority of Reactor users running ARM systems are on Raspberry Pis, I am able to supply the above instructions, but if you happen to have a different ARM system, you'll need to do some web searching to figure out how to expose that information. Or, you can just try the arm64 image, and if it doesn't start up, try the armv7l image.
Remember to always back up your system before making any changes.
For everyone, please make this change as soon as possible, and if you have any trouble finding a working image, please (1) go back to the current aarch64 image; and (2) let me know in this thread along with as much detail about your host system as you can offer (including the output of the dpkg-architecture command mentioned above).
Hi,
I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available.
None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5.
Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image?
Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way:
docker buildx build --push \
-t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \
--platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \
--file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile .
This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically.
Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications.
@toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this.
Thanks,
mgvra
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today.
Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes?
That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1?
[latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" }
[latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } }
[latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-]
[latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed!
[latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload:
{"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320}
[latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data:
{"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}}
[latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-]
[latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" }
[latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1
[latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }
[latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } }
[latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-]
[latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed!
[latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload:
{"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323}
[latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data:
{"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}}
[latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-]
[latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }
[latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2
[latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Hello,
I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light?
Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ
Please help,
P.S
Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down.
I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor).
My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long
I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Trouble connecting Vera to MSR
-
Thank you both. @Buxton I followed these directions and commented out "auth" in both files, restarted Vera, still got the same error messages.
What's strange is-- I took one of the request URLs (like http://10.0.0.141:3480/data_request?id=user_data&ns=1&Timeout=15&output_format=json&_r=1632187568275) and pasted it into my laptop's web browser, and I got a huge output file. So it seems like Vera is working.
Maybe it's a network configuration problem like you suggested, @toggledbits ? So I went to my Raspberry Pi that's running MSR, and I used wget then it successfully downloaded the output file to the pi as well. So I'm not sure why it's not working within MSR!
-
Let's go back to a previous question... are you getting a ton of these, or just occasionally?
-
Let's go back to a previous question... are you getting a ton of these, or just occasionally?
@toggledbits A ton
pi@MSR-raspberrypi:~/reactor $ node app.js basedir /home/pi/reactor confdir /home/pi/reactor/config datadir /home/pi/reactor/storage logsdir /home/pi/reactor/logs plugindir /home/pi/reactor/ext module.paths [ '/home/pi/reactor/node_modules', '/home/pi/node_modules', '/home/node_modules', '/node_modules' ] NODE_PATH undefined 2021-09-25T18:29:17.047Z <app:null> Reactor "1.0.1-21243-83a87ba" starting on v14.17.6 2021-09-25T18:29:17.051Z <app:INFO> Process ID 3194; platform linux/arm #1449 SMP Wed Aug 25 15:00:01 BST 2021; locale [ "en-GB", "UTF-8" ] 2021-09-25T18:29:17.053Z <app:INFO> Basedir /home/pi/reactor; data in /home/pi/reactor/storage 2021-09-25T18:29:17.054Z <app:INFO> NODE_PATH (undefined); module paths [ "/home/pi/reactor/node_modules", "/home/pi/node_modules", "/home/node_modules", "/node_modules" ] 2021-09-25T18:29:17.245Z <Plugin:null> Module Plugin v21173 2021-09-25T18:29:17.270Z <default:INFO> Module Entity v21177 2021-09-25T18:29:17.280Z <Controller:null> Module Controller v21226 2021-09-25T18:29:17.281Z <default:null> Module Structure v21229 2021-09-25T18:29:17.303Z <default:null> Module Ruleset v21096 2021-09-25T18:29:17.304Z <default:null> Module Rulesets v21096 2021-09-25T18:29:17.373Z <default:null> Module Rule v21224 2021-09-25T18:29:17.388Z <default:null> Module Engine v21213 2021-09-25T18:29:17.390Z <default:null> Module httpapi v21238 2021-09-25T18:29:17.396Z <default:null> Module httpproxy v21054 2021-09-25T18:29:17.443Z <default:null> Module wsapi v21196 2021-09-25T18:29:17.447Z <app:NOTICE> Starting Structure... 2021-09-25T18:29:17.455Z <default:NOTICE> Structure#1 plugin ID influx disabled; skipping 2021-09-25T18:29:17.459Z <default:INFO> Structure#1 starting controller interface vera (VeraController) 2021-09-25T18:29:17.470Z <default:INFO> Structure#1 starting controller interface hass (HassController) 2021-09-25T18:29:17.473Z <default:INFO> Structure#1 starting controller interface reactor_system (SystemController) 2021-09-25T18:29:17.614Z <default:null> Module VeraController v21236 2021-09-25T18:29:17.625Z <default:null> Module HassController v21243 2021-09-25T18:29:17.630Z <default:null> Module SystemController v21102 2021-09-25T18:29:17.641Z <VeraController:NOTICE> VeraController#vera starting 2021-09-25T18:29:17.809Z <VeraController:INFO> VeraController#vera loaded mapping ver 21236 rev 1 format 1 notice 2021-09-25T18:29:17.812Z <VeraController:INFO> VeraController: deviceclass vera_system_object capability sys_system does not provide attribute state 2021-09-25T18:29:17.926Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass device mapping data loaded; checking... 2021-09-25T18:29:17.997Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass attempting reconnection to ws://10.0.0.108:8123/api/websocket 2021-09-25T18:29:18.002Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting via WS to ws://10.0.0.108:8123/api/websocket 2021-09-25T18:29:18.018Z <default:NOTICE> Controller SystemController#reactor_system is now online. 2021-09-25T18:29:18.192Z <app:INFO> Structure running; pausing for controllers' initial ready 2021-09-25T18:29:18.261Z <VeraController:ERR> VeraController#vera update request failed: FetchError: request to http://10.0.0.141:3480/data_request?id=user_data&ns=1&Timeout=15&output_format=json&_r=1632594557823 failed, reason: socket hang up 2021-09-25T18:29:18.285Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connected, starting protocol 2021-09-25T18:29:18.304Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass successful authentication with ws://10.0.0.108:8123; fetching initial data... 2021-09-25T18:29:18.317Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass Hass reports version "2021.8.6" location Home timezone America/Detroit state RUNNING safe_mode false 2021-09-25T18:29:18.553Z <HassController:NOTICE> Controller HassController#hass is now online. 2021-09-25T18:29:23.290Z <VeraController:ERR> VeraController#vera update request failed: FetchError: request to http://10.0.0.141:3480/data_request?id=user_data&ns=1&Timeout=15&output_format=json&_r=1632594563265 failed, reason: socket hang up 2021-09-25T18:29:28.312Z <VeraController:ERR> VeraController#vera update request failed: FetchError: request to http://10.0.0.141:3480/data_request?id=user_data&ns=1&Timeout=15&output_format=json&_r=1632594568291 failed, reason: socket hang up 2021-09-25T18:29:33.339Z <VeraController:ERR> VeraController#vera update request failed: FetchError: request to http://10.0.0.141:3480/data_request?id=user_data&ns=1&Timeout=15&output_format=json&_r=1632594573317 failed, reason: socket hang up 2021-09-25T18:29:39.363Z <VeraController:ERR> VeraController#vera update request failed: FetchError: request to http://10.0.0.141:3480/data_request?id=user_data&ns=1&Timeout=15&output_format=json&_r=1632594579344 failed, reason: socket hang up 2021-09-25T18:29:46.392Z <VeraController:ERR> VeraController#vera update request failed: FetchError: request to http://10.0.0.141:3480/data_request?id=user_data&ns=1&Timeout=15&output_format=json&_r=1632594586368 failed, reason: socket hang up 2021-09-25T18:29:54.420Z <VeraController:ERR> VeraController#vera update request failed: FetchError: request to http://10.0.0.141:3480/data_request?id=user_data&ns=1&Timeout=15&output_format=json&_r=1632594594399 failed, reason: socket hang up 2021-09-25T18:30:03.448Z <VeraController:ERR> VeraController#vera update request failed: FetchError: request to http://10.0.0.141:3480/data_request?id=user_data&ns=1&Timeout=15&output_format=json&_r=1632594603429 failed, reason: socket hang up 2021-09-25T18:30:13.468Z <VeraController:ERR> VeraController#vera update request failed: FetchError: request to http://10.0.0.141:3480/data_request?id=user_data&ns=1&Timeout=15&output_format=json&_r=1632594613450 failed, reason: socket hang up 2021-09-25T18:30:18.265Z <app:NOTICE> Starting Reaction Engine... 2021-09-25T18:30:18.269Z <Engine:INFO> Reaction Engine starting 2021-09-25T18:30:18.273Z <Engine:INFO> Checking rule sets... 2021-09-25T18:30:18.285Z <Engine:INFO> Checking rules... 2021-09-25T18:30:18.287Z <Engine:INFO> Data check complete; no corrections. 2021-09-25T18:30:18.296Z <Engine:NOTICE> Reaction Engine running! 2021-09-25T18:30:18.297Z <app:NOTICE> Starting HTTP server and API... 2021-09-25T18:30:18.314Z <app:NOTICE> Startup complete 2021-09-25T18:30:18.323Z <app:NOTICE> HTTP API v1 21238 base URL http://10.0.0.5:8111; listening 2021-09-25T18:30:18.362Z <app:NOTICE> HTTP server running; registering proxy endpoints. 2021-09-25T18:30:18.365Z <app:NOTICE> Starting WSAPI... 2021-09-25T18:30:18.368Z <app:NOTICE> wsapi: starting version 21196 2021-09-25T18:30:18.405Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 master timer tick, local time "25/09/2021, 14:30:18" (TZ offset -240 mins from UTC) 2021-09-25T18:30:18.687Z <app:INFO> wsapi: connection from ::ffff:10.0.0.91 2021-09-25T18:30:24.490Z <VeraController:ERR> VeraController#vera update request failed: FetchError: request to http://10.0.0.141:3480/data_request?id=user_data&ns=1&Timeout=15&output_format=json&_r=1632594624469 failed, reason: socket hang up 2021-09-25T18:30:36.518Z <VeraController:ERR> VeraController#vera update request failed: FetchError: request to http://10.0.0.141:3480/data_request?id=user_data&ns=1&Timeout=15&output_format=json&_r=1632594636500 failed, reason: socket hang up 2021-09-25T18:30:49.536Z <VeraController:ERR> VeraController#vera update request failed: FetchError: request to http://10.0.0.141:3480/data_request?id=user_data&ns=1&Timeout=15&output_format=json&_r=1632594649518 failed, reason: socket hang up 2021-09-25T18:31:03.567Z <VeraController:ERR> VeraController#vera update request failed: FetchError: request to http://10.0.0.141:3480/data_request?id=user_data&ns=1&Timeout=15&output_format=json&_r=1632594663549 failed, reason: socket hang up 2021-09-25T18:31:18.580Z <VeraController:ERR> VeraController#vera update request failed: FetchError: request to http://10.0.0.141:3480/data_request?id=user_data&ns=1&Timeout=15&output_format=json&_r=1632594678567 failed, reason: socket hang up 2021-09-25T18:31:34.607Z <VeraController:ERR> VeraController#vera update request failed: FetchError: request to http://10.0.0.141:3480/data_request?id=user_data&ns=1&Timeout=15&output_format=json&_r=1632594694590 failed, reason: socket hang up -
What version of Vera firmware are you running? What are the specs of the Pi?
pasted it into my laptop's web browser, and I got a huge output file. So it seems like Vera is working.
How long did it take to get the response?
-
What version of Vera firmware are you running? What are the specs of the Pi?
pasted it into my laptop's web browser, and I got a huge output file. So it seems like Vera is working.
How long did it take to get the response?
@toggledbits
Vera Firmware: 1.7.5186 (7.31)
Pi: Raspberry Pi 3 Model B Plus Rev 1.3, and the Debian version is 10.10The response was immediate from the web browser, and from when I used wget within the Pi.
-
I have it running on both a 1GB 3B+ and a 4GB 4, but under Raspberry Pi OS/Raspian. I'd suggest trying that next.
-
@toggledbits Sorry, I should have been more specific, it’s running Raspberry Pi OS Lite. Are you saying it should be the regular Raspberry Pi OS?
-
OK. The version of nodejs you've got running isn't the one installed by the install script... did you run the install script? It will still let you use that version, that "should not" be a/the problem, but the script does other things... installs dependencies, certain versions... should not be run as root or under
su/sudo... did all that happen? -
OK. The version of nodejs you've got running isn't the one installed by the install script... did you run the install script? It will still let you use that version, that "should not" be a/the problem, but the script does other things... installs dependencies, certain versions... should not be run as root or under
su/sudo... did all that happen?@toggledbits Oh jeez, I followed the wrong set of instructions from the get-go. When you asked about the install script, I retraced my steps and realized what happened.
I followed the "Linux (various) Bare Metal" instructions because I did not read that the 4B instructions also worked for the 3B+.
So I just started fresh and followed the correct instructions, and everything seems to be working. Thank you for your help!
-
Sounds good. Still leaves me wondering what was going on, because the bare metal steps basically take you in the same direction as the installer (and the reverse is also true — you could run the Pi install script on pretty much any Linux box and probably get a valid install). In the background, I also brought up a 3B+ on RaspiOS and did a bare metal install with node 14.17.6 as you had, and it worked fine. So, not sure what may have gone sideways with your original install, but I'm glad the script straightened it out.
Did you let the install script install node 14.15, or did you let it go ahead with the 14.17 previously installed? That would narrow down some variables.
-
I just let it run with the 14.17
-
T toggledbits locked this topic on