Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Having trouble with http and basic auth
Hubitat upgrade 2.5.3.123 may have broken login
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Inspect - a small read-only helper panel for MSR
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reverse proxy & API ACL
tunnusT
I'm trying to allow anonymous access from a local network to /api/v1/log, but the problem now with the reverse proxy configuration is that this access is open via proxy to the internet. At least I wasn't able to configure ACL so that only an access from a local network would be permitted. reactor.yaml: baseurl: "http://192.168.1.12:8111" proxy_baseurl: "https://external.com:30000" trusted_proxy: "192.168.1.12" Local traffic would originate from 192.168.1.0/24 network. Synology is acting as a reverse proxy and hosting MSR as a docker container (which has its own network and IP 172.18.0.5). MSR build is latest-26298-fbb75fb8 users.yaml: - url: "/api/v1/log" method: "GET" source_ip: 172.18.0.0/24 allow: true Using the above ACL works, but it enables access via proxy also. If I use source_ip: 192.168.1.0/24, then it doesn't work either locally or remotely. So I'm kinda lost what should I use as source_ip in this case?
Multi-System Reactor
MFA
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Grouped devices
G
I've seen many of you using Dynamic Group Controller. I'm using it myself for monitoring device battery levels. I've read and re-read the Dynamic Group Controller docs and still cannot come to an answer for my question so let me paint my scenario: I've migrated from EchoSpeaks in Hubitat ('cause borked and seemingly unmaintained) to Alexa Devices in Home Assistant ('cause not borked in 2026.11.0) to be able to send TTS to my Echo devices. In EchoSpeaks I could create groups. Sweet. In Alexa Devices I don't seem to be able to do so. As such, my thought was "wait - isn't there a way in MSR?" Is this an effective scenario that Dynamic Group Controller can be used for?
Multi-System Reactor
Login protections
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Build 26284 stuck at Loading Reactor UI
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
MSR with reverse proxy
tunnusT
I'm trying to use MSR via reserve proxy in Synology DSM, but MSR page does not load https://<public ip>:30000/reactor/en-US/ At the same time logging page loads normally https://<public ip>:30000/api/v1/log I thought maybe authentication was messing it up, but there was no deny entries in the log, and also disabling authentication did not make any difference. For this use case VPN is not an option (that works, but as said not an option for this particular use case). Any ideas what could cause this? MSR build latest-26242-28d69aa8, Chrome browser
Multi-System Reactor
Missing attribute after upgrade
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Native fan capabilty
therealdbT
Nothing more to add. I see we have hvac_blower, but, anyway, maybe a native fan on the same assumptions of the fan from HASS could be reasonable. I have a couple of them. ie, this is from ESPHome via HASS. x_hass.domain="fan" x_hass.entity_id="fan.kitchen_seashell_hood_ventilation_fan" x_hass.floor_id=null x_hass.services=["fan","esphome"] x_hass.source="esphome" x_hass.state="off" x_hass_attr.friendly_name="Seashell Hood Ventilation Fan" x_hass_attr.percentage=50 x_hass_attr.percentage_step=25 x_hass_attr.preset_mode="" x_hass_attr.preset_modes=[] x_hass_attr.supported_features=49 Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Rule do not fire
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Rule condition shows TRUE in UI but Rule never transitions to SET — survives full restart
N
Build: latest-26221-b25bb3e3, Docker on Synology. Hi, I have a Rule whose Trigger/Constraints reference other Rules via Rule State ... is TRUE. At some point it stops firing. Expanding the rule's condition tree in the UI shows every Trigger and Constraint condition green/TRUE — confirmed live by walking into the room and watching Motion go true in real time. Rule History shows no new SET, just old reset entries. Tried, on the same rule, same evening: recreating the trigger conditions with fresh IDs, recreating the constraint conditions with fresh IDs (flat and wrapped in a new Group — wrapping in a Group produced one SET, but it didn't reproduce on repeat attempts with the same structure), and finally a full container restart with a verified-correct saved rule. Still no SET, even with a fresh live motion event right after the restart. Separately, I found that this rule (and its 10 per-room clones) share identical internal condition/group IDs with each other — leftover from a batch clone done months ago, never regenerated. Not sure if that's related, since fixing the IDs didn't reliably fix the symptom either. Has anyone seen a Rule State condition show TRUE in the UI without the Rule ever producing a SET, surviving a clean restart? Thanks in advance
Multi-System Reactor
DynamicGroupController and attributes
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits I'm back to trying to optimize a couple of things based on dynamic group. First of all, I think I found a typo in the doc: primary_attribute: "binary_sensor.state" primary_attribute_value: | d = false; each id in members: d = getEntity(id)?.attributes?.power_switch?.state or d, d I think the correct code snippet is d = false, All that said, my use case for dynamic groups is to group 3 different climate devices, so I could easily command them at the same time. Commands are good, but sometimes I want to check if any of the devices are on, and that's easily done with a similar snippet as the one you have in the docs. But this is limited to the primary attribute, while I want to have any of the attributes in the group to be driven by a similar logic (while all are null in the group). ie, access hvac_control.mode and see if any of the unit is set to cool, or heat. Is that possible, without re-defining an expression in each of my rules? Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Unofficial thread for compatibility
tunnusT
As there are statements about compatibility for home assistant versions in MSR new version announcements (e.g. "HassController: Bless Hass to 2025.7.3"), I thought it would be good idea to track other controllers as well. As an example, I can confirm that build "latest-25208-c53e8513" works with Hubitat Elevation C-8 platform version 2.4.2.134 using Maker API. Updates: (the latest versions first in the list) OK: build "latest-25264-2fbe9217" with Hubitat C-8 platform v. 2.4.3.123
Multi-System Reactor
Ooops - Deleted Reactor Ex Machina II
R
I accidentally deleted Reactor Ex Machina II (REM II) from my Reactor rules. I tried to recover it by deleting the .json and .dval in the Rules subdirectory and then recreating it from Togglebits original posting, but that did not work. Does anyone know how to recover REM ll ?
Multi-System Reactor
Bail out of failed reaction?
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
CrilleC
Edit: Solved in latest-26221. Bare-metal latest-26193 I have this group: "OKforLarm": name: OK för Larm select: - include_controller: vera - include_capability: door_sensor filter_expression: entity.attributes.door_sensor.state It contains the entities I expect but behaves a bit odd. When I open vera>device_10097 the entity attribute door_sensor.state changes to true but it won't show up as member in the group, when I also open vera>device_10095 they both shows as members and when I close vera>device_10095 it disappear from the group but when I close vera>device_10097 it lingers in the group until I restart Reactor.
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade Issues
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Having trouble with http and basic auth

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
9 Posts 3 Posters 1.9k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Alan_F
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I'm trying to move a Vera scene over to MSR and having trouble getting the authentication to work. The use case is to send http commands to a Dahua camera twice a day to change its mode.

    In Vera it works by simply using the username and password in the URL. e.g. luup.inet.wget("user:password@IPaddress/configManager.cgi?action=..." , 5)

    This format didn't work from a reactor http call, resulting in a 401 error. I tried moving the username and password to the http request headers section (Authentication: Basic base64encoded-user:password) and still am getting a 401 response.

    I have another rule that is successfully using basic authentication and the formats look the same, so I'm not sure what is different about this one. I logged into the camera and changed the logon method from digest to basic (although it was working for the Vera requests when it was set to digest).

    This is the last thing that is running from my Vera. Before I try to implement this in Node-Red, does anyone have any suggestions for other things I could try in MSR to get it to work?

    toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • tunnusT Offline
      tunnusT Offline
      tunnus
      wrote on last edited by tunnus
      #2

      You should be able to use Run lua -action

      Screenshot 2021-11-02 at 10.06.13.png

      Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Zigbee2MQTT & ZWA-2

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A Alan_F

        I'm trying to move a Vera scene over to MSR and having trouble getting the authentication to work. The use case is to send http commands to a Dahua camera twice a day to change its mode.

        In Vera it works by simply using the username and password in the URL. e.g. luup.inet.wget("user:password@IPaddress/configManager.cgi?action=..." , 5)

        This format didn't work from a reactor http call, resulting in a 401 error. I tried moving the username and password to the http request headers section (Authentication: Basic base64encoded-user:password) and still am getting a 401 response.

        I have another rule that is successfully using basic authentication and the formats look the same, so I'm not sure what is different about this one. I logged into the camera and changed the logon method from digest to basic (although it was working for the Vera requests when it was set to digest).

        This is the last thing that is running from my Vera. Before I try to implement this in Node-Red, does anyone have any suggestions for other things I could try in MSR to get it to work?

        toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbits
        wrote on last edited by toggledbits
        #3

        @alan_f said in Having trouble with http and basic auth:

        This format didn't work from a reactor http call, resulting in a 401 error. I tried moving the username and password to the http request headers section (Authentication: Basic base64encoded-user:password) and still am getting a 401 response.

        Please show us exactly what you did here.

        Also, did you look at the logs to see what the request was finally sending?

        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Offline
          A Offline
          Alan_F
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          I took the UserName and Password, used a base 64 encoder and input "UserName:Password" into the encoder. I took the output of the encoder ("ABCDEFGXXX") and entered (no quotes) "Authentication: Basic ABCDEFGXXX" into the http headers field. I have another http request in another rule that hits an API to control my thermostat and it work correctly using exactly the same process.

          The logs don't appear to make any reference to the http header:

          [latest-21297]2021-11-01T22:21:55.816Z Engine:INFO Set PTZ Camera to Day Mode rule<SET> all actions completed.
          [latest-21297]2021-11-01T22:21:55.845Z Engine:ERR Engine#1 reaction Set PTZ Camera to Day Mode rule<SET> step 3 HTTP request to http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/cgi-bin/ptz.cgi?action=start&channel=0&code=GotoPreset&arg1=0&arg2=18&arg3=0 failed: 401 Unauthorized
          [latest-21297]2021-11-01T22:21:55.854Z Engine:ERR Engine#1 reaction Set PTZ Camera to Day Mode rule<SET> step 1 HTTP request to http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/cgi-bin/configManager.cgi?action=setConfig&VideoInMode[0].Config[0]=0 failed: 401 Unauthorized

          Prior to attempting to use the http header field I had tried the below format, with the username and password in front of the URL:

          [latest-21297]2021-11-01T12:58:08.125Z Engine:ERR Engine#1 reaction Set PTZ Camera to Night Mode rule<SET> step 3 HTTP request to http://UserName:Password@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/cgi-bin/configManager.cgi?action=setConfig&VideoInExposure[0][1].Value1=1000&VideoInExposure[0][1].Value2=1000 failed: 401 Unauthorized

          I did get this working in Node-Red using digest authentication in a http-request node, so it probably isn't worth too much of everyone's time to track it down. I would prefer to have it in MSR because it is so much more user-friendly for me, but I can leave it in Node-Red if I can't figure out how to do it in MSR.

          @toggledbits - Long overdue additional donation on its way. Thanks for all your efforts and the end-user support.

          tunnusT toggledbitsT 2 Replies Last reply
          1
          • A Alan_F

            I took the UserName and Password, used a base 64 encoder and input "UserName:Password" into the encoder. I took the output of the encoder ("ABCDEFGXXX") and entered (no quotes) "Authentication: Basic ABCDEFGXXX" into the http headers field. I have another http request in another rule that hits an API to control my thermostat and it work correctly using exactly the same process.

            The logs don't appear to make any reference to the http header:

            [latest-21297]2021-11-01T22:21:55.816Z Engine:INFO Set PTZ Camera to Day Mode rule<SET> all actions completed.
            [latest-21297]2021-11-01T22:21:55.845Z Engine:ERR Engine#1 reaction Set PTZ Camera to Day Mode rule<SET> step 3 HTTP request to http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/cgi-bin/ptz.cgi?action=start&channel=0&code=GotoPreset&arg1=0&arg2=18&arg3=0 failed: 401 Unauthorized
            [latest-21297]2021-11-01T22:21:55.854Z Engine:ERR Engine#1 reaction Set PTZ Camera to Day Mode rule<SET> step 1 HTTP request to http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/cgi-bin/configManager.cgi?action=setConfig&VideoInMode[0].Config[0]=0 failed: 401 Unauthorized

            Prior to attempting to use the http header field I had tried the below format, with the username and password in front of the URL:

            [latest-21297]2021-11-01T12:58:08.125Z Engine:ERR Engine#1 reaction Set PTZ Camera to Night Mode rule<SET> step 3 HTTP request to http://UserName:Password@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/cgi-bin/configManager.cgi?action=setConfig&VideoInExposure[0][1].Value1=1000&VideoInExposure[0][1].Value2=1000 failed: 401 Unauthorized

            I did get this working in Node-Red using digest authentication in a http-request node, so it probably isn't worth too much of everyone's time to track it down. I would prefer to have it in MSR because it is so much more user-friendly for me, but I can leave it in Node-Red if I can't figure out how to do it in MSR.

            @toggledbits - Long overdue additional donation on its way. Thanks for all your efforts and the end-user support.

            tunnusT Offline
            tunnusT Offline
            tunnus
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @alan_f, as said, you could try 'run lua' action, although direct http request is by far the most optimum solution (and would not depend on Vera's existence...)

            Using MSR on Docker (Synology NAS), having InfluxDB, Grafana & Home Assistant, Zigbee2MQTT & ZWA-2

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A Alan_F

              I took the UserName and Password, used a base 64 encoder and input "UserName:Password" into the encoder. I took the output of the encoder ("ABCDEFGXXX") and entered (no quotes) "Authentication: Basic ABCDEFGXXX" into the http headers field. I have another http request in another rule that hits an API to control my thermostat and it work correctly using exactly the same process.

              The logs don't appear to make any reference to the http header:

              [latest-21297]2021-11-01T22:21:55.816Z Engine:INFO Set PTZ Camera to Day Mode rule<SET> all actions completed.
              [latest-21297]2021-11-01T22:21:55.845Z Engine:ERR Engine#1 reaction Set PTZ Camera to Day Mode rule<SET> step 3 HTTP request to http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/cgi-bin/ptz.cgi?action=start&channel=0&code=GotoPreset&arg1=0&arg2=18&arg3=0 failed: 401 Unauthorized
              [latest-21297]2021-11-01T22:21:55.854Z Engine:ERR Engine#1 reaction Set PTZ Camera to Day Mode rule<SET> step 1 HTTP request to http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/cgi-bin/configManager.cgi?action=setConfig&VideoInMode[0].Config[0]=0 failed: 401 Unauthorized

              Prior to attempting to use the http header field I had tried the below format, with the username and password in front of the URL:

              [latest-21297]2021-11-01T12:58:08.125Z Engine:ERR Engine#1 reaction Set PTZ Camera to Night Mode rule<SET> step 3 HTTP request to http://UserName:Password@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/cgi-bin/configManager.cgi?action=setConfig&VideoInExposure[0][1].Value1=1000&VideoInExposure[0][1].Value2=1000 failed: 401 Unauthorized

              I did get this working in Node-Red using digest authentication in a http-request node, so it probably isn't worth too much of everyone's time to track it down. I would prefer to have it in MSR because it is so much more user-friendly for me, but I can leave it in Node-Red if I can't figure out how to do it in MSR.

              @toggledbits - Long overdue additional donation on its way. Thanks for all your efforts and the end-user support.

              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbits
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @alan_f said in Having trouble with http and basic auth:

              took the UserName and Password, used a base 64 encoder and input "UserName:Password" into the encoder. I took the output of the encoder ("ABCDEFGXXX") and entered (no quotes) "Authentication: Basic ABCDEFGXXX" into the http headers field. I have another http request in another rule that hits an API to control my thermostat and it work correctly using exactly the same process.

              And can you detail that exactly, please? If you used a command line tool, for example, with an echo statement, then you would likely have a newline added to the byte string and that would spoil the encoding. If you used a web encoder, that also may accidentally encode a newline depending on how you pasted the data, and there are a few that give incorrect results, especially if any Unicode characters are involved in the password.

              You can do this directly in the Headers of your request:

              Authorization: Basic ${{urlencode(username + ':' + password)}}
              

              Now, you go on to say that you got it working with Digest authentication on NR. Many sites do not allow HTTP Basic auth any more, and require you to use Digest. When you include a header like that above, you are specifically sending Basic, not Digest, and the target site may not be allowing it. Likewise, when you place the username and password in the URL, that's Basic, not Digest. So I suspect your site only allows Digest. I can add separate username and password fields to the HTTP Request action so that Reactor can more fully negotiate the authentication on the request.

              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A Offline
                A Offline
                Alan_F
                wrote on last edited by Alan_F
                #7

                Still 401 unauthorized using

                Authorization: Basic ${{urlencode('username' + ':' + 'password')}}

                (I added single quotes around username and password because it couldn't evaluate it without them)

                I just tried it using basic auth in NR and it failed with 401, so the issue appears to be that the camera won't accept basic authentication. There is a setting to allow it, but it doesn't seem to make a difference when I change it.

                When I was calling the command from the Vera luup it was using the http://username;password@IP?command syntax. I was sure that meant that it was using basic authentication all along. I don't understand enough about the different authentication methods to know whether it was really doing digest authentication based off of that URL format.

                So while I'm good for now with using NR, it would be useful to figure out how to handle digest authentication for http requests in MSR. Is it just a matter of setting the right headers or does it require enhancements to MSR itself?

                (The thread title should probably be "Having trouble with http and digest auth")

                toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A Alan_F

                  Still 401 unauthorized using

                  Authorization: Basic ${{urlencode('username' + ':' + 'password')}}

                  (I added single quotes around username and password because it couldn't evaluate it without them)

                  I just tried it using basic auth in NR and it failed with 401, so the issue appears to be that the camera won't accept basic authentication. There is a setting to allow it, but it doesn't seem to make a difference when I change it.

                  When I was calling the command from the Vera luup it was using the http://username;password@IP?command syntax. I was sure that meant that it was using basic authentication all along. I don't understand enough about the different authentication methods to know whether it was really doing digest authentication based off of that URL format.

                  So while I'm good for now with using NR, it would be useful to figure out how to handle digest authentication for http requests in MSR. Is it just a matter of setting the right headers or does it require enhancements to MSR itself?

                  (The thread title should probably be "Having trouble with http and digest auth")

                  toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbits
                  wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                  #8

                  Still 401 unauthorized using

                  That's expected. The server want's digest auth.

                  @alan_f said in Having trouble with http and basic auth:

                  When I was calling the command from the Vera luup it was using the http://username;password@IP?command syntax. I was sure that meant that it was using basic authentication all along.

                  No, wget was helping you. The initial request went with Basic authentication, and the server rejected it with a 401 asking for Digest, so wget took the username and password from the URL and used it for digest authentication. That behavior is easy to confirm using one of the many digest echo-back/test sites available:

                  wget https://anybody:anywhere@httpbin.org/digest-auth/auth/anybody/anywhere
                  

                  If you run this on a Linux command line, you'll see wget get a 401 and re-ask with digest:

                  pi@rpi4-1:~/Documents/MSR $ wget  https://anybody:anywhere@httpbin.org/digest-auth/auth/anybody/anywhere
                  --2021-11-02 13:46:06--  https://anybody:*password*@httpbin.org/digest-auth/auth/anybody/anywhere
                  Resolving httpbin.org (httpbin.org)... 34.192.79.103, 18.232.227.86, 54.156.165.4, ...
                  Connecting to httpbin.org (httpbin.org)|34.192.79.103|:443... connected.
                  HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 401 UNAUTHORIZED
                  Authentication selected: Digest realm="me@kennethreitz.com", nonce="901f9613ed31b5946d70e2c9c48e5b55", qop="auth", opaque="0e8c62a78c3b807801aed4341e958d57", algorithm=MD5, stale=FALSE
                  Reusing existing connection to httpbin.org:443.
                  HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
                  Length: 50 [application/json]
                  Saving to: ‘anywhere’
                  
                  anywhere                            100%[=================================================================>]      50  --.-KB/s    in 0s
                  
                  2021-11-02 13:46:06 (28.3 MB/s) - ‘anywhere’ saved [50/50]
                  

                  Authorization: Basic ${{urlencode('username' + ':' + 'password')}}
                  (I added single quotes around username and password because it couldn't evaluate it without them)

                  Strings always have to be quoted. I gave the structure as variables. If you're hard-coding them you can just do "username:password" as a single string with no concatenation (no + operators).

                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • A Offline
                    A Offline
                    Alan_F
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    I updated to the latest version and it is working with Digest auth and the new username / password fields. You are going to spoil us with this pace of development 😃

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    3
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    Recent Topics

                    • Hubitat upgrade 2.5.3.123 may have broken login
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      0
                      5
                      23

                    • Reactor Inspect - a small read-only helper panel for MSR
                      G
                      gwp1
                      2
                      8
                      521

                    • Reverse proxy & API ACL
                      tunnusT
                      tunnus
                      0
                      9
                      417

                    • MFA
                      T
                      tamorgen
                      0
                      28
                      1.2k

                    • Grouped devices
                      G
                      gwp1
                      0
                      3
                      160

                    • Login protections
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      0
                      2
                      205

                    • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                      toggledbitsT
                      toggledbits
                      5
                      152
                      160.3k

                    • Reactor Build 26284 stuck at Loading Reactor UI
                      T
                      tamorgen
                      0
                      16
                      1.7k

                    • MSR with reverse proxy
                      tunnusT
                      tunnus
                      0
                      12
                      862

                    • Missing attribute after upgrade
                      3
                      3rdStng
                      0
                      3
                      655

                    • Use of Google Gemini as an MSR and Hubitat configuration aid
                      therealdbT
                      therealdb
                      0
                      2
                      305

                    • [MSR] Native fan capabilty
                      therealdbT
                      therealdb
                      1
                      3
                      293
                    Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                    Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • Unsolved