Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. [SOLVED] All Modes not visible in MSR 21337 from Hubitat
Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
toggledbitsT
This post does not apply to users of Intel/AMD-based systems. If you are using a Reactor image tagged latest-amd64 or stable-amd64, then this post does not apply to you. It also does not apply to bare-metal installs; it's for users of docker images on ARM-based systems only (principally Raspberry Pi hosts, but could be others). After January 15, 2026, I will no longer produce the aarch64-tagged docker image for Reactor. The ARM images will be arm64 for 64-bit operating systems, and armv7l for 32-bit operating systems. For those of you running a container from the aarch64 image today, this will be a relatively simple change: you just need to switch the image used for your docker container to a differently-tagged image. If you are using docker-compose, then this is a relatively simple matter of changing the image line in your docker-compose.yaml file and then stopping (docker-compose down) and restarting (docker-compose up -d) your Reactor daemon. But there's a catch... not all of you can safely just switch from the aarch64 image to the arm64 image. And, you can't just trust the output of uname -m, for example, because this exposes the CPU architecture, but not the word size of the OS running on that CPU. For Raspberry Pi systems, the transition to 64-bit operating systems was long (starting in 2016) and not always obvious — although there was a first "official" 64-bit OS for RPis in 2020, it did not become a default recommendation in the Raspberry Pi Imager until 2021, and then that was only the default for Pi 3/4 systems with >4GB RAM; it was 2022 before it was universally recommended for all 64-bit CPUs regardless of RAM size. Depending on when you first imaged your RPi system and what default you may have been offered/chosen, you could today easily have a 64-bit CPU Raspberry Pi running a 32-bit version of the operating system. Upgrades along the way would not change this; changing it to fully 64-bit requires a full reimage of the system. To establish if your OS is 64- or 32-bit, log in to your Pi and run: sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH. If the response is arm64 or aarch64, then you are running a 64-bit OS and you should use the arm64-tagged image. If it's anything else, you are running a 32-bit OS, and you should use the armv7l-tagged image. pi@rpi4-1:~ $ sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH armhf pi@rpi4-1:~ $ uname -m aarch64 pi@rpi4-1:~ $ In the example above, the uname command reports that the CPU is 64-bit architecture (aarch64), which is true for the host on which I ran these commands, but the DEB_HOST_ARCH value is armhf, indicating a 32-bit operating system. This system has to use the armv7l-tagged image. Other systems will have their own ways of determining the word size of the running OS. Since the majority of Reactor users running ARM systems are on Raspberry Pis, I am able to supply the above instructions, but if you happen to have a different ARM system, you'll need to do some web searching to figure out how to expose that information. Or, you can just try the arm64 image, and if it doesn't start up, try the armv7l image. Remember to always back up your system before making any changes. For everyone, please make this change as soon as possible, and if you have any trouble finding a working image, please (1) go back to the current aarch64 image; and (2) let me know in this thread along with as much detail about your host system as you can offer (including the output of the dpkg-architecture command mentioned above).
Multi-System Reactor
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] reactor-mqtt-contrib package for additional MQTT templates
therealdbT
I'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only). Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package: https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go. I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them. The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression. Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests
Multi-System Reactor
HA 2025.9.4 Supported Yet?
CatmanV2C
Tangentially did I miss 2025.9.4 getting blessed in MSR? I've been holding off Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Rule Set UI bug - RESOLVED
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Copy&Paste of Rules
therealdbT
I don't know if I'm the only one, but managing more than one Reactor installs, the need to have some sort of copy&paste for rules has grown on me. While I understand the technical challenges, I'm wondering if a "god mode" where I could copy the raw JSON rule and paste it into another rule could be an advanced, flag only feature that could benefit power users. I know I can copy the JSON file and proceed, but I must stop Reactor and when doing maintenance, it's more clicks to do. Just an idea
Multi-System Reactor

[SOLVED] All Modes not visible in MSR 21337 from Hubitat

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
22 Posts 2 Posters 2.2k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • toggledbitsT Offline
    toggledbitsT Offline
    toggledbits
    wrote on last edited by toggledbits
    #3

    I just tested mode sensitivity, which I also had done before the build, and it's working as expected. So that part is fine. The log shows "Day mode" rule is going to Reset state, so unless your action is in the Reset reaction, I wouldn't expect it to log the change you seem to anticipate. You haven't shown the rules or reactions, so I have no way of judging what it will do or whether what I can see it doing is right. Show your work, please! Also check your host time zone settings. Logs are Zulu (UTC), not ET, and that would account for a five hour difference in host time vs log time, normally (standard time).

    http://your-reactor-ip:8111/diag/sun

    Also look at the rule detail panel any time you are troubleshooting logic. Your log snippets don't show any actions being run at all for rule-kmfo3pz8, just the rule eval/update to Reset state. Logging of actions in HubitatController is currently unconditional, so if any action was being sent, it would be in the logs (regardless of log level).

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

      I just tested mode sensitivity, which I also had done before the build, and it's working as expected. So that part is fine. The log shows "Day mode" rule is going to Reset state, so unless your action is in the Reset reaction, I wouldn't expect it to log the change you seem to anticipate. You haven't shown the rules or reactions, so I have no way of judging what it will do or whether what I can see it doing is right. Show your work, please! Also check your host time zone settings. Logs are Zulu (UTC), not ET, and that would account for a five hour difference in host time vs log time, normally (standard time).

      http://your-reactor-ip:8111/diag/sun

      Also look at the rule detail panel any time you are troubleshooting logic. Your log snippets don't show any actions being run at all for rule-kmfo3pz8, just the rule eval/update to Reset state. Logging of actions in HubitatController is currently unconditional, so if any action was being sent, it would be in the logs (regardless of log level).

      G Offline
      G Offline
      gwp1
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      @toggledbits The host time is currently 12/4/2021, 10:41:24 AM offset -300 minutes from UTC, which lines up to log timestamps of 15:xx:xx.

      c363e0d1-506e-4bb9-8aaa-4056295ce48a-image.png

      This ruleset hasn't changed since MSR came online months ago so I'm loathe to point to that, esp since it's across multiple modes.

      Searching the log for this ruleset shows it first appearing at that RESET! line.

      c1a8ea88-7dd4-4819-bff7-0b855654a81f-image.png

      I've rolled back to 21332 and retested. Mode day did not kick over as expected. Given this has worked flawlessly with this build I'm digging further. Right now it appears like the house never moved to mode night even though all the actions (lights off, announcement made, unlocked locks locked) happened.

      How far back does MSR retain logs time-wise?

      *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.149
      *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

      *HASS 2025.11.1
      w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

      *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
      MSR: latest-25310-dc2bb580
      MQTTController: 25139
      ZWave Controller: 25139

      toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • G gwp1

        @toggledbits The host time is currently 12/4/2021, 10:41:24 AM offset -300 minutes from UTC, which lines up to log timestamps of 15:xx:xx.

        c363e0d1-506e-4bb9-8aaa-4056295ce48a-image.png

        This ruleset hasn't changed since MSR came online months ago so I'm loathe to point to that, esp since it's across multiple modes.

        Searching the log for this ruleset shows it first appearing at that RESET! line.

        c1a8ea88-7dd4-4819-bff7-0b855654a81f-image.png

        I've rolled back to 21332 and retested. Mode day did not kick over as expected. Given this has worked flawlessly with this build I'm digging further. Right now it appears like the house never moved to mode night even though all the actions (lights off, announcement made, unlocked locks locked) happened.

        How far back does MSR retain logs time-wise?

        toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbits
        wrote on last edited by toggledbits
        #5

        @gwp1 said in Modes not changing correctly since 21337:

        How far back does MSR retain logs time-wise?

        As far as your log rotation allows.

        Can you go back to 21337 and show the result of the rule detail/status panel?

        Also, make sure to check the case of all mode setting actions. Mode names are case-sensitive in Hubitat ( day =/= Day ), so if they don't match, the action won't work. When testing in conditions, make sure the test is case-insensitive (it is in the rule you've shown, so that's good).

        G 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

          @gwp1 said in Modes not changing correctly since 21337:

          How far back does MSR retain logs time-wise?

          As far as your log rotation allows.

          Can you go back to 21337 and show the result of the rule detail/status panel?

          Also, make sure to check the case of all mode setting actions. Mode names are case-sensitive in Hubitat ( day =/= Day ), so if they don't match, the action won't work. When testing in conditions, make sure the test is case-insensitive (it is in the rule you've shown, so that's good).

          G Offline
          G Offline
          gwp1
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          @toggledbits I just moved back to 21337 a moment ago. I cannot seem to get the house into mode night atm. Troubleshooting this as my thinking now is that the house, though doing all the actions (and I repeated that just now), doesn't actually going into mode night anymore.

          *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.149
          *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

          *HASS 2025.11.1
          w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

          *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
          MSR: latest-25310-dc2bb580
          MQTTController: 25139
          ZWave Controller: 25139

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbits
            wrote on last edited by toggledbits
            #7

            Try "Night" (capital N)... case matters to Hubitat

            G 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

              Try "Night" (capital N)... case matters to Hubitat

              G Offline
              G Offline
              gwp1
              wrote on last edited by gwp1
              #8

              @toggledbits When it is time for the house to go into night there is an Alexa routine that flips a virtual switch. This is the sole trigger and the result is the running of a Reaction.

              3f86e866-4a46-485e-9644-1aa84f67f559-image.png

              This has been unchanged.

              At the end of the reaction is a :10 delay and the virtual switch flips back off again (for next time.) That's it. Nothing fancy. All of these steps are working except for the mode actually changing to night.

              This has worked for MONTHS untouched. I'm literally watching it step thru here:

              1805cdf5-a08e-43f9-a649-db12a871ec25-image.png

              80b5cebe-623f-4d36-9d62-c7284db77f5e-image.png

              *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.149
              *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

              *HASS 2025.11.1
              w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

              *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
              MSR: latest-25310-dc2bb580
              MQTTController: 25139
              ZWave Controller: 25139

              G 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • G gwp1

                @toggledbits When it is time for the house to go into night there is an Alexa routine that flips a virtual switch. This is the sole trigger and the result is the running of a Reaction.

                3f86e866-4a46-485e-9644-1aa84f67f559-image.png

                This has been unchanged.

                At the end of the reaction is a :10 delay and the virtual switch flips back off again (for next time.) That's it. Nothing fancy. All of these steps are working except for the mode actually changing to night.

                This has worked for MONTHS untouched. I'm literally watching it step thru here:

                1805cdf5-a08e-43f9-a649-db12a871ec25-image.png

                80b5cebe-623f-4d36-9d62-c7284db77f5e-image.png

                G Offline
                G Offline
                gwp1
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                @gwp1 Ok, this is very odd. I can change the mode in this reaction to any other mode but night and it works. Put it back to night as the outcome and nada.

                *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.149
                *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                *HASS 2025.11.1
                w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                MSR: latest-25310-dc2bb580
                MQTTController: 25139
                ZWave Controller: 25139

                toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbits
                  wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                  #10
                  This post is deleted!
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • G gwp1

                    @gwp1 Ok, this is very odd. I can change the mode in this reaction to any other mode but night and it works. Put it back to night as the outcome and nada.

                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbits
                    wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                    #11

                    @gwp1 Please show the entity detail for the "Mode" entity (Entities list).

                    Also, try setting "Night" from the Entities list actions. And grab logs for the action if it doesn't change.

                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                      @gwp1 Please show the entity detail for the "Mode" entity (Entities list).

                      Also, try setting "Night" from the Entities list actions. And grab logs for the action if it doesn't change.

                      G Offline
                      G Offline
                      gwp1
                      wrote on last edited by gwp1
                      #12

                      @toggledbits This is odd. Wouldn't I expect to see all the modes listed under x_hubitat_sys_mode.modes={"Day":1}?

                      6049c2a4-770a-4d1f-81d0-b2937d16bf2c-image.png

                      Tried setting Night from the Entities list actions. Nada.

                      [latest-21337]2021-12-04T16:45:03.111Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:793> Rule#rule-kphozuch Upstairs bulb requesting eval; entity-changed from Entity#hubitat>55
                      [latest-21337]2021-12-04T16:45:03.112Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:793> Rule#rule-komaz8fr Upstairs motion requesting eval; entity-changed from Entity#hubitat>55
                      [latest-21337]2021-12-04T16:45:03.113Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:1005> Rule#rule-kphozuch (Upstairs bulb) evaluate() acquiring mutex
                      [latest-21337]2021-12-04T16:45:03.114Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:1005> Rule#rule-komaz8fr (Upstairs motion) evaluate() acquiring mutex
                      [latest-21337]2021-12-04T16:45:03.120Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:1009> Rule#rule-kphozuch._evaluate() mutex acquired, evaluating
                      [latest-21337]2021-12-04T16:45:03.121Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:1013> Rule#rule-kphozuch update rate is 0/min limit 60/min
                      [latest-21337]2021-12-04T16:45:03.122Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:936> Rule#rule-kphozuch evaluateExpressions() with 0 expressions
                      [latest-21337]2021-12-04T16:45:03.124Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:1033> Rule#rule-kphozuch._evaluate() trigger state now false (was false)
                      [latest-21337]2021-12-04T16:45:03.125Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:1035> Rule#rule-kphozuch._evaluate() constraints state true
                      [latest-21337]2021-12-04T16:45:03.127Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:1044> Rule#rule-kphozuch rule state now false, changed no
                      [latest-21337]2021-12-04T16:45:03.131Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:1009> Rule#rule-komaz8fr._evaluate() mutex acquired, evaluating
                      [latest-21337]2021-12-04T16:45:03.133Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:1013> Rule#rule-komaz8fr update rate is 0/min limit 60/min
                      [latest-21337]2021-12-04T16:45:03.134Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:936> Rule#rule-komaz8fr evaluateExpressions() with 0 expressions
                      [latest-21337]2021-12-04T16:45:03.136Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:1033> Rule#rule-komaz8fr._evaluate() trigger state now false (was false)
                      [latest-21337]2021-12-04T16:45:03.137Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:1035> Rule#rule-komaz8fr._evaluate() constraints state true
                      [latest-21337]2021-12-04T16:45:03.139Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:1044> Rule#rule-komaz8fr rule state now false, changed no
                      [latest-21337]2021-12-04T16:45:46.427Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:793> Rule#rule-grpoix7c2a Office On/Off requesting eval; entity-changed from Entity#hubitat>51
                      [latest-21337]2021-12-04T16:45:46.429Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:1005> Rule#rule-grpoix7c2a (Office On/Off) evaluate() acquiring mutex
                      [latest-21337]2021-12-04T16:45:46.431Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:1009> Rule#rule-grpoix7c2a._evaluate() mutex acquired, evaluating
                      [latest-21337]2021-12-04T16:45:46.432Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:1013> Rule#rule-grpoix7c2a update rate is 2/min limit 60/min
                      [latest-21337]2021-12-04T16:45:46.433Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:936> Rule#rule-grpoix7c2a evaluateExpressions() with 0 expressions
                      [latest-21337]2021-12-04T16:45:46.436Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:1033> Rule#rule-grpoix7c2a._evaluate() trigger state now false (was false)
                      [latest-21337]2021-12-04T16:45:46.437Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:1035> Rule#rule-grpoix7c2a._evaluate() constraints state true
                      [latest-21337]2021-12-04T16:45:46.439Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:1044> Rule#rule-grpoix7c2a rule state now false, changed no
                      [latest-21337]2021-12-04T16:45:46.673Z <HubitatController:null> HubitatController#hubitat final action path for x_hubitat_sys_mode.set on Entity#hubitat>sys_mode: http://192.168.1.214/apps/api/14/modes/Night

                      *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.149
                      *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                      *HASS 2025.11.1
                      w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                      *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                      MSR: latest-25310-dc2bb580
                      MQTTController: 25139
                      ZWave Controller: 25139

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toggledbitsT Offline
                        toggledbitsT Offline
                        toggledbits
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        According to the entity, the only mode that exists on the hub is Day. Log in to your hub and check the Modes screen. If that agrees, something happened to your hub (firmware upgrade to latest new version recently?).

                        G 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                          According to the entity, the only mode that exists on the hub is Day. Log in to your hub and check the Modes screen. If that agrees, something happened to your hub (firmware upgrade to latest new version recently?).

                          G Offline
                          G Offline
                          gwp1
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          @toggledbits d5562d84-24e6-4aa8-bc58-65555ab8caff-image.png

                          Latest release to 2.3.0.115 on Hubitat. Rolling back to .113 to see what happens.

                          *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.149
                          *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                          *HASS 2025.11.1
                          w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                          *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                          MSR: latest-25310-dc2bb580
                          MQTTController: 25139
                          ZWave Controller: 25139

                          G 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • G gwp1

                            @toggledbits d5562d84-24e6-4aa8-bc58-65555ab8caff-image.png

                            Latest release to 2.3.0.115 on Hubitat. Rolling back to .113 to see what happens.

                            G Offline
                            G Offline
                            gwp1
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            @gwp1 Rolled back to .113, saw this:

                            aeeca882-f92d-43d7-b045-ebf68bce460c-image.png

                            When the restore was done it was in Evening because that's where it was when the release was deployed and backup taken.

                            Did a Tools > Restart on MSR to ensure everything was synced and now I see this again:

                            c2fcaee3-4aec-4212-84f7-129ed07fc604-image.png

                            *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.149
                            *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                            *HASS 2025.11.1
                            w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                            *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                            MSR: latest-25310-dc2bb580
                            MQTTController: 25139
                            ZWave Controller: 25139

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbits
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              Are you on their latest firmware?

                              G 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                Are you on their latest firmware?

                                G Offline
                                G Offline
                                gwp1
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #17

                                @toggledbits Well I was until apparently an hour ago lol Seems there's .116 out now. Also, rolling back apparently doesn't restore the old firmware to .113 like I thought it would. I'm still on .115. Guess I'll fail forward to .116.

                                *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.149
                                *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                                *HASS 2025.11.1
                                w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                                *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                                MSR: latest-25310-dc2bb580
                                MQTTController: 25139
                                ZWave Controller: 25139

                                G 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • G gwp1

                                  @toggledbits Well I was until apparently an hour ago lol Seems there's .116 out now. Also, rolling back apparently doesn't restore the old firmware to .113 like I thought it would. I'm still on .115. Guess I'll fail forward to .116.

                                  G Offline
                                  G Offline
                                  gwp1
                                  wrote on last edited by gwp1
                                  #18

                                  @gwp1 On Hubitat's latest, .116. No change.

                                  5d7b9c70-4ecc-4c0d-8180-51c440079eca-image.png

                                  Following my Rule#1 of troubleshooting, "what changed?" I rolled back MSR to 21332 (because I'd just updated to 21337) just in case and now I see this:

                                  b7e462b6-7251-45a4-b06c-c0647c3ebac3-image.png

                                  Things are behaving as they should. Using the Entities menu I triggered mode night and it flipped over (only to flip back to day as it should because it's day time - but I watched it three times visibly flip to the correct mode.)

                                  *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.149
                                  *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                                  *HASS 2025.11.1
                                  w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                                  *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                                  MSR: latest-25310-dc2bb580
                                  MQTTController: 25139
                                  ZWave Controller: 25139

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • toggledbitsT Offline
                                    toggledbitsT Offline
                                    toggledbits
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #19

                                    Yup, and I think I see the issue... stay tuned...

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • toggledbitsT Offline
                                      toggledbitsT Offline
                                      toggledbits
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #20

                                      OK. 21338

                                      G 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                        OK. 21338

                                        G Offline
                                        G Offline
                                        gwp1
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #21

                                        @toggledbits Yep - all good! Thanks Patrick, I'll mark this as solved. Appreciate it.

                                        *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.149
                                        *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                                        *HASS 2025.11.1
                                        w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                                        *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                                        MSR: latest-25310-dc2bb580
                                        MQTTController: 25139
                                        ZWave Controller: 25139

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • toggledbitsT Offline
                                          toggledbitsT Offline
                                          toggledbits
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #22

                                          Thanks for doing the footwork, being the hands and eyes! Sorry for the trouble. Onward!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Recent Topics

                                          • Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
                                            G
                                            gwp1
                                            0
                                            6
                                            50

                                          • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            5
                                            129
                                            73.4k

                                          • Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            1
                                            1
                                            36

                                          • Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
                                            M
                                            mgvra
                                            1
                                            3
                                            105

                                          • Script action and custom timers
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            4
                                            118

                                          • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            12
                                            325

                                          • There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
                                            akbooerA
                                            akbooer
                                            1
                                            2
                                            105

                                          • Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
                                            CrilleC
                                            Crille
                                            0
                                            6
                                            131

                                          • Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            17
                                            386

                                          • Shelly Wall Display XL
                                            akbooerA
                                            akbooer
                                            2
                                            9
                                            752

                                          • [Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            26
                                            707

                                          • [Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
                                            CrilleC
                                            Crille
                                            0
                                            12
                                            443
                                          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                          Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Unsolved