Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. [Solved] Arm for Eastern Standard Time/Daylight Saving Time
Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
toggledbitsT
This post does not apply to users of Intel/AMD-based systems. If you are using a Reactor image tagged latest-amd64 or stable-amd64, then this post does not apply to you. It also does not apply to bare-metal installs; it's for users of docker images on ARM-based systems only (principally Raspberry Pi hosts, but could be others). After January 15, 2026, I will no longer produce the aarch64-tagged docker image for Reactor. The ARM images will be arm64 for 64-bit operating systems, and armv7l for 32-bit operating systems. For those of you running a container from the aarch64 image today, this will be a relatively simple change: you just need to switch the image used for your docker container to a differently-tagged image. If you are using docker-compose, then this is a relatively simple matter of changing the image line in your docker-compose.yaml file and then stopping (docker-compose down) and restarting (docker-compose up -d) your Reactor daemon. But there's a catch... not all of you can safely just switch from the aarch64 image to the arm64 image. And, you can't just trust the output of uname -m, for example, because this exposes the CPU architecture, but not the word size of the OS running on that CPU. For Raspberry Pi systems, the transition to 64-bit operating systems was long (starting in 2016) and not always obvious — although there was a first "official" 64-bit OS for RPis in 2020, it did not become a default recommendation in the Raspberry Pi Imager until 2021, and then that was only the default for Pi 3/4 systems with >4GB RAM; it was 2022 before it was universally recommended for all 64-bit CPUs regardless of RAM size. Depending on when you first imaged your RPi system and what default you may have been offered/chosen, you could today easily have a 64-bit CPU Raspberry Pi running a 32-bit version of the operating system. Upgrades along the way would not change this; changing it to fully 64-bit requires a full reimage of the system. To establish if your OS is 64- or 32-bit, log in to your Pi and run: sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH. If the response is arm64 or aarch64, then you are running a 64-bit OS and you should use the arm64-tagged image. If it's anything else, you are running a 32-bit OS, and you should use the armv7l-tagged image. pi@rpi4-1:~ $ sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH armhf pi@rpi4-1:~ $ uname -m aarch64 pi@rpi4-1:~ $ In the example above, the uname command reports that the CPU is 64-bit architecture (aarch64), which is true for the host on which I ran these commands, but the DEB_HOST_ARCH value is armhf, indicating a 32-bit operating system. This system has to use the armv7l-tagged image. Other systems will have their own ways of determining the word size of the running OS. Since the majority of Reactor users running ARM systems are on Raspberry Pis, I am able to supply the above instructions, but if you happen to have a different ARM system, you'll need to do some web searching to figure out how to expose that information. Or, you can just try the arm64 image, and if it doesn't start up, try the armv7l image. Remember to always back up your system before making any changes. For everyone, please make this change as soon as possible, and if you have any trouble finding a working image, please (1) go back to the current aarch64 image; and (2) let me know in this thread along with as much detail about your host system as you can offer (including the output of the dpkg-architecture command mentioned above).
Multi-System Reactor
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] reactor-mqtt-contrib package for additional MQTT templates
therealdbT
I'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only). Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package: https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go. I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them. The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression. Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests
Multi-System Reactor
HA 2025.9.4 Supported Yet?
CatmanV2C
Tangentially did I miss 2025.9.4 getting blessed in MSR? I've been holding off Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Rule Set UI bug - RESOLVED
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Copy&Paste of Rules
therealdbT
I don't know if I'm the only one, but managing more than one Reactor installs, the need to have some sort of copy&paste for rules has grown on me. While I understand the technical challenges, I'm wondering if a "god mode" where I could copy the raw JSON rule and paste it into another rule could be an advanced, flag only feature that could benefit power users. I know I can copy the JSON file and proceed, but I must stop Reactor and when doing maintenance, it's more clicks to do. Just an idea
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Help with scene controller cycling logic
therealdbT
I’ve added a couple of Shelly Wave i4 as scene controllers and I’m planning to add more, since I can just use standard buttons instead of battery-powered scene controllers, which also looks better aesthetically. That said, I’m struggling to figure out how to write a simple rule that cycles between states every time I press a button. Example: Light 1 ON → OFF, then Light 2 ON → OFF. The part I can’t get right is handling the case where Light 1 or Light 2 might already be ON independently of the rule. Maybe it’s just too much sun and relaxation clouding my brain, but any hint would be appreciated.
Multi-System Reactor

[Solved] Arm for Eastern Standard Time/Daylight Saving Time

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
7 Posts 3 Posters 583 Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    gwp1
    wrote on last edited by gwp1
    #1

    Where are our latching experts?

    Daylight Saving Time here in the States has begun. I'd like to create a couple "Arm for" rules for potential referencing for iblinds rules.

    • DST starts the second Sunday in March at 02:00 ET.
    • EST starts the first Sunday in November at 02:00 ET.

    Here's what I have so far:
    4cf3307d-d5ff-4407-a932-8885628c487d-image.png And the latching:
    553adeb0-15bc-49fd-b0ef-b79ed05c835c-image.png

    7098c687-35a9-4aba-95ec-4b2952494b49-image.png

    I've done the trick with changing the test date discussed in another thread here that allows for time travel back to when the latch should start. It took a few attempts and I finally had it do the 03:00 ET hour because, technically, the 02:00 ET doesn't exist during the transition to DST.

    Current status:
    47bfe796-5b36-4afa-843e-6e77b4ec645c-image.png

    Anyone with experience with this feel free to heckle my work with the goal being to beat this thing into submission 🙂

    *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.149
    *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

    *HASS 2025.11.1
    w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

    *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
    MSR: latest-25310-dc2bb580
    MQTTController: 25139
    ZWave Controller: 25139

    toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A Offline
      A Offline
      Alan_F
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I tried to follow your example but I'm confused. Shouldn't the "and the rest" rule start on April 1st instead of March 1st? I'm definitely not a latching expert, so maybe I'm the wrong person to try to understand what you've done.

      Not being competent with latching, the approach I would probably take would be to create an expression 'is_dst' and have a rule that sets it to true on the second Sunday of March at 0300 and sets it to false on the first Sunday in November at 01:59:59. Initially set it to the correct value and then just refer to the expression whenever a rule needs to know if DST is in effect. Seems simpler to me and I think it would work just as well.

      My state legislature is considering a bill to stay on DST permanently. It would require federal approval, so it's probably not going to happen anytime soon, but there's another way to solve the problem. 😁

      G 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A Alan_F

        I tried to follow your example but I'm confused. Shouldn't the "and the rest" rule start on April 1st instead of March 1st? I'm definitely not a latching expert, so maybe I'm the wrong person to try to understand what you've done.

        Not being competent with latching, the approach I would probably take would be to create an expression 'is_dst' and have a rule that sets it to true on the second Sunday of March at 0300 and sets it to false on the first Sunday in November at 01:59:59. Initially set it to the correct value and then just refer to the expression whenever a rule needs to know if DST is in effect. Seems simpler to me and I think it would work just as well.

        My state legislature is considering a bill to stay on DST permanently. It would require federal approval, so it's probably not going to happen anytime soon, but there's another way to solve the problem. 😁

        G Offline
        G Offline
        gwp1
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @alan_f Are you doing this as two sep rules or building the start/end Sunday dates into a single rule?

        And if you vote for ME as POTUS in 2024 I'll make every effort to get DST to be Daylight Standard Time and not Daylight Saving Time! 😉

        *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.149
        *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

        *HASS 2025.11.1
        w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

        *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
        MSR: latest-25310-dc2bb580
        MQTTController: 25139
        ZWave Controller: 25139

        A 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • G gwp1

          @alan_f Are you doing this as two sep rules or building the start/end Sunday dates into a single rule?

          And if you vote for ME as POTUS in 2024 I'll make every effort to get DST to be Daylight Standard Time and not Daylight Saving Time! 😉

          A Offline
          A Offline
          Alan_F
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @gwp1 I'm not actually doing this, that was just my thoughts on how it could be done (= untested speculation 😁). I think it would have to be two rules. That way each rule is firing at one specific date and time and you wouldn't be trying to create a rule that is active at all dates and times between DST start and DST end, which I think leads you down the OP's path using latching. If you have one rule with a reset action there's no need for the expression, you could just use the rule state to tell if it's DST.

          G 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Alan_F

            @gwp1 I'm not actually doing this, that was just my thoughts on how it could be done (= untested speculation 😁). I think it would have to be two rules. That way each rule is firing at one specific date and time and you wouldn't be trying to create a rule that is active at all dates and times between DST start and DST end, which I think leads you down the OP's path using latching. If you have one rule with a reset action there's no need for the expression, you could just use the rule state to tell if it's DST.

            G Offline
            G Offline
            gwp1
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @alan_f I gave it some thought last night and came to the same conclusion: two rules, each essentially recording the variable at the designated trigger time/s.

            Using the Test Date functionality in reactor.yaml I was able to trigger the DST start successfully.

            That's the joy of MSR: more than one way to the end game.

            *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.149
            *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

            *HASS 2025.11.1
            w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

            *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
            MSR: latest-25310-dc2bb580
            MQTTController: 25139
            ZWave Controller: 25139

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • G gwp1

              Where are our latching experts?

              Daylight Saving Time here in the States has begun. I'd like to create a couple "Arm for" rules for potential referencing for iblinds rules.

              • DST starts the second Sunday in March at 02:00 ET.
              • EST starts the first Sunday in November at 02:00 ET.

              Here's what I have so far:
              4cf3307d-d5ff-4407-a932-8885628c487d-image.png And the latching:
              553adeb0-15bc-49fd-b0ef-b79ed05c835c-image.png

              7098c687-35a9-4aba-95ec-4b2952494b49-image.png

              I've done the trick with changing the test date discussed in another thread here that allows for time travel back to when the latch should start. It took a few attempts and I finally had it do the 03:00 ET hour because, technically, the 02:00 ET doesn't exist during the transition to DST.

              Current status:
              47bfe796-5b36-4afa-843e-6e77b4ec645c-image.png

              Anyone with experience with this feel free to heckle my work with the goal being to beat this thing into submission 🙂

              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbits
              wrote on last edited by toggledbits
              #6

              @gwp1 I thought I'd chime in on this. The latest release includes a dst flag in the Sun Information entity as a simplification, but here's my version using conditions, because I think it's useful to have more examples with latching to ponder:

              28f4e47d-efab-44e4-884c-346602653150-image.png

              The first subgroup, named "Start", detects the start of DST (here in the US, second Sunday in March). at (or after) 2am. This group is the latching element, so the group itself has the latched option enabled. Once it goes true, it remains latched true until its peer group, named "End", goes false.

              The second subgroup, "End", detects the end of DST (the first Sunday in November for US). It is a NOT AND group, meaning it is true except after 2am on the change date. At that time, it goes false, and this allows the latched "Start" group to reset.

              The key thing to remember is that a latched condition (either a single condition or a group) must be paired in an AND group with at least one other non-latched condition that can reset it. Since the "Start" and "End" groups are contained in the rule's enclosing AND group, that serves the function.

              S. 623 was passed by the US Senate on March 15 and is on its way to the House. If it passes, then at least here in the US, we may soon not need to worry about any of this.

              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

              G 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                @gwp1 I thought I'd chime in on this. The latest release includes a dst flag in the Sun Information entity as a simplification, but here's my version using conditions, because I think it's useful to have more examples with latching to ponder:

                28f4e47d-efab-44e4-884c-346602653150-image.png

                The first subgroup, named "Start", detects the start of DST (here in the US, second Sunday in March). at (or after) 2am. This group is the latching element, so the group itself has the latched option enabled. Once it goes true, it remains latched true until its peer group, named "End", goes false.

                The second subgroup, "End", detects the end of DST (the first Sunday in November for US). It is a NOT AND group, meaning it is true except after 2am on the change date. At that time, it goes false, and this allows the latched "Start" group to reset.

                The key thing to remember is that a latched condition (either a single condition or a group) must be paired in an AND group with at least one other non-latched condition that can reset it. Since the "Start" and "End" groups are contained in the rule's enclosing AND group, that serves the function.

                S. 623 was passed by the US Senate on March 15 and is on its way to the House. If it passes, then at least here in the US, we may soon not need to worry about any of this.

                G Offline
                G Offline
                gwp1
                wrote on last edited by gwp1
                #7

                @toggledbits I saw your release notes and immediately dropped 22080 in place and went straight to the variable rules I'd built from @Alan_F's comment and disabled them in favor of the system's SunInfo dst flag. I didn't delete the others - I really want to fully grasp latching.

                I'm not holding my breath on the possible law - it was written back in 2021 and the House keeps putting it in committee.

                Fingers crossed!

                *Hubitat C-7 2.4.3.149
                *Proxmox VE v8, Beelink MiniPC 12GBs, SSD

                *HASS 2025.11.1
                w/ ZST10-700 fw 7.18.3

                *Prod MSR in docker/portainer
                MSR: latest-25310-dc2bb580
                MQTTController: 25139
                ZWave Controller: 25139

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                Recent Topics

                • Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  0
                  1
                  28

                • Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
                  M
                  mgvra
                  1
                  3
                  86

                • Script action and custom timers
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  0
                  4
                  103

                • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
                  CatmanV2C
                  CatmanV2
                  0
                  12
                  288

                • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                  CatmanV2C
                  CatmanV2
                  5
                  128
                  73.1k

                • There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
                  akbooerA
                  akbooer
                  1
                  2
                  97

                • Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
                  CrilleC
                  Crille
                  0
                  6
                  111

                • Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  0
                  17
                  345

                • Shelly Wall Display XL
                  akbooerA
                  akbooer
                  2
                  9
                  723

                • [Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  0
                  26
                  605

                • [Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
                  CrilleC
                  Crille
                  0
                  12
                  413

                • No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
                  toggledbitsT
                  toggledbits
                  0
                  2
                  107
                Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • Unsolved