Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. MSR Not Recognizing Old HASS on New VM
Date/time condition
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Device log?
G
@toggledbits is there a log that will show me what rule is turning on a specific device? I've got a switch that has been kicking on at 2200 ET for several nights now and the reactor.log doesn't have a thing in it that I can see on a device level (it being more rules-based).
Multi-System Reactor
Midnight crossing not working in date/time condition (build 25325)
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Error: Command timeout
G
at _ClientAPI._commandTimeout (http://192.168.1.100:8111/client/ClientAPI.js:807:179 Seeing this randomly when returning to open browser tab after being away awhile. Once, maybe twice a day. "What did you do to trigger it?" Literally nothing, just walked away and returned and there it was. Actions taken in reasonably close proximity to this particular instance of it popping up: I'd restarted the MSR container in Portainer. I'll try to grab some logs here shortly.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
toggledbitsT
This post does not apply to users of Intel/AMD-based systems. If you are using a Reactor image tagged latest-amd64 or stable-amd64, then this post does not apply to you. It also does not apply to bare-metal installs; it's for users of docker images on ARM-based systems only (principally Raspberry Pi hosts, but could be others). After January 15, 2026, I will no longer produce the aarch64-tagged docker image for Reactor. The ARM images will be arm64 for 64-bit operating systems, and armv7l for 32-bit operating systems. For those of you running a container from the aarch64 image today, this will be a relatively simple change: you just need to switch the image used for your docker container to a differently-tagged image. If you are using docker-compose, then this is a relatively simple matter of changing the image line in your docker-compose.yaml file and then stopping (docker-compose down) and restarting (docker-compose up -d) your Reactor daemon. But there's a catch... not all of you can safely just switch from the aarch64 image to the arm64 image. And, you can't just trust the output of uname -m, for example, because this exposes the CPU architecture, but not the word size of the OS running on that CPU. For Raspberry Pi systems, the transition to 64-bit operating systems was long (starting in 2016) and not always obvious — although there was a first "official" 64-bit OS for RPis in 2020, it did not become a default recommendation in the Raspberry Pi Imager until 2021, and then that was only the default for Pi 3/4 systems with >4GB RAM; it was 2022 before it was universally recommended for all 64-bit CPUs regardless of RAM size. Depending on when you first imaged your RPi system and what default you may have been offered/chosen, you could today easily have a 64-bit CPU Raspberry Pi running a 32-bit version of the operating system. Upgrades along the way would not change this; changing it to fully 64-bit requires a full reimage of the system. To establish if your OS is 64- or 32-bit, log in to your Pi and run: sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH. If the response is arm64 or aarch64, then you are running a 64-bit OS and you should use the arm64-tagged image. If it's anything else, you are running a 32-bit OS, and you should use the armv7l-tagged image. pi@rpi4-1:~ $ sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH armhf pi@rpi4-1:~ $ uname -m aarch64 pi@rpi4-1:~ $ In the example above, the uname command reports that the CPU is 64-bit architecture (aarch64), which is true for the host on which I ran these commands, but the DEB_HOST_ARCH value is armhf, indicating a 32-bit operating system. This system has to use the armv7l-tagged image. Other systems will have their own ways of determining the word size of the running OS. Since the majority of Reactor users running ARM systems are on Raspberry Pis, I am able to supply the above instructions, but if you happen to have a different ARM system, you'll need to do some web searching to figure out how to expose that information. Or, you can just try the arm64 image, and if it doesn't start up, try the armv7l image. Remember to always back up your system before making any changes. For everyone, please make this change as soon as possible, and if you have any trouble finding a working image, please (1) go back to the current aarch64 image; and (2) let me know in this thread along with as much detail about your host system as you can offer (including the output of the dpkg-architecture command mentioned above).
Multi-System Reactor
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor

MSR Not Recognizing Old HASS on New VM

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
20 Posts 2 Posters 1.6k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • toggledbitsT Offline
    toggledbitsT Offline
    toggledbits
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    Check the (Home Assistant) settings for the http component and make sure those make sense for the new IP you are on. Also make sure the websocket_api component is configured. Did you make any other configuration changes? Enable SSL/TLS? If you were using SSL/TLS on the old VM, did you issue a new certificate for new one?

    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • PablaP Offline
      PablaP Offline
      Pabla
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      I am not sure what to check for the http component in HA, however I confirmed that web socket is still in my configuration file. I have not made any other config changes, basically restored from my backup from the old VM. I wasn't using SSL/TLS on the old VM so I don't think I need to mess with it.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • PablaP Offline
        PablaP Offline
        Pabla
        wrote on last edited by Pabla
        #4

        Doing a bit of research on the HA forums and looks like someone has had almost the exact same issue and came to the solution of disabling https. Haven't tried that yet since I am unsure if that would be safe.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by toggledbits
          #5

          Try adding ignore_cert: true in the config section for HassController (after source and same indent level). You may additionally need to change the ws:// in the source to wss://. If that works, SSL/TLS is enabled in Hass and you are on a self-signed or invalid certificate (but no changes to Hass needed).

          Also, if your Hass http component configuration has ssl_certificate then SSL/TLS is enabled. That's another way to tell.

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          PablaP 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

            Try adding ignore_cert: true in the config section for HassController (after source and same indent level). You may additionally need to change the ws:// in the source to wss://. If that works, SSL/TLS is enabled in Hass and you are on a self-signed or invalid certificate (but no changes to Hass needed).

            Also, if your Hass http component configuration has ssl_certificate then SSL/TLS is enabled. That's another way to tell.

            PablaP Offline
            PablaP Offline
            Pabla
            wrote on last edited by Pabla
            #6

            @toggledbits tried setting ignore_cert: true and this is what came up in the logs tried both ws:// and wss//. I do not have the http component in my HA config file

            [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:52:29.492Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket
            [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:52:29.493Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [TypeError]TypeError [ERR_INVALID_PROTOCOL]: Protocol "http:" not supported. Expected "https:"
            [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:53:29.501Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket
            [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:53:29.502Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [TypeError]TypeError [ERR_INVALID_PROTOCOL]: Protocol "http:" not supported. Expected "https:"
            [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:54:29.507Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket
            [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:54:29.509Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [TypeError]TypeError [ERR_INVALID_PROTOCOL]: Protocol "http:" not supported. Expected "https:"
            [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:55:29.519Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket
            [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:55:29.519Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [TypeError]TypeError [ERR_INVALID_PROTOCOL]: Protocol "http:" not supported. Expected "https:"
            [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:56:21.052Z <VeraController:INFO> VeraController#vera 0 dead entities older than 86400000s purged
            [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:56:29.528Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket
            [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:56:29.529Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [TypeError]TypeError [ERR_INVALID_PROTOCOL]: Protocol "http:" not supported. Expected "https:"
            [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:57:29.530Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to ws://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket
            [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:57:29.531Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [TypeError]TypeError [ERR_INVALID_PROTOCOL]: Protocol "http:" not supported. Expected "https:"
            [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:58:20.106Z <Rule:INFO> "10 Min Light Polling" (Rule#rule-grpqldnna5) starting evaluation; because timer-trigger Timer#rule-grpqldnna5
            [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:58:20.107Z <Rule:INFO> "10 Min Light Polling" (Rule#rule-grpqldnna5) evaluated; rule state transition from RESET to SET!
            [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:58:20.124Z <Rule:INFO> "45 Min Light Polling" (Rule#rule-l6whyfqd) starting evaluation; because data-changed Data#states:cs-rule-grpqldnna5
            [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:58:20.124Z <Rule:INFO> "10 Min Light Polling" (Rule#rule-grpqldnna5) evaluation complete
            [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:58:20.125Z <Rule:INFO> "45 Min Light Polling" (Rule#rule-l6whyfqd) evaluated; trigger state unchanged (false); rule state remains RESET
            [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:58:20.126Z <Rule:INFO> "45 Min Light Polling" (Rule#rule-l6whyfqd) evaluation complete
            [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:58:20.126Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing ""10 Min Light Polling<SET>"" (rule-grpqldnna5:S)
            [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:58:20.139Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction "10 Min Light Polling<SET>" (rule-grpqldnna5:S)
            [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:58:20.140Z <HassController:null> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_system.call_service on System#hass>system action: [Object]{ "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "entity_id": "light.island_lights" }, "domain": "zwave_js", "service": "refresh_value" }
            [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:58:20.141Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1663729100140<2022-09-20, 7:58:20 p.m.> (call_service) failed: [Error]Error: WebSocket not connected
            [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:58:20.143Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction "10 Min Light Polling<SET>" (rule-grpqldnna5:S) from step 1"
            

            Not sure if this is useful but here are some logs pertaining to web socket from HA Supervisor

            22-09-20 19:39:48 INFO (MainThread) [supervisor.homeassistant.api] Updated Home Assistant API token
            22-09-20 19:58:33 INFO (MainThread) [supervisor.api.proxy] Home Assistant WebSocket API request initialize
            22-09-20 19:58:33 INFO (MainThread) [supervisor.api.proxy] WebSocket access from a0d7b954_vscode
            22-09-20 19:58:33 INFO (MainThread) [supervisor.api.proxy] Home Assistant WebSocket API request running
            22-09-20 19:58:38 INFO (MainThread) [supervisor.api.proxy] Home Assistant WebSocket API connection is closed
            
            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbits
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              The log snippet shows the ws:// result but no wss:// result. I'd like to see that, because it's probably a different message and maybe more useful. The messages you are showing clearly indicate it wants you to use wss://.

              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

              PablaP 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                The log snippet shows the ws:// result but no wss:// result. I'd like to see that, because it's probably a different message and maybe more useful. The messages you are showing clearly indicate it wants you to use wss://.

                PablaP Offline
                PablaP Offline
                Pabla
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                @toggledbits logs attached using wss://

                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:38:34.723Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:38:34.723Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to wss://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:38:34.723Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:38:39.737Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to wss://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:38:54.745Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:38:54.745Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to wss://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:38:54.746Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:38:59.748Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to wss://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:39:14.751Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:39:14.752Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to wss://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:39:14.752Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:39:19.759Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to wss://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:39:28.763Z <VeraController:INFO> VeraController#vera 0 dead entities older than 86400000s purged
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:39:34.765Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:39:34.765Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to wss://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:39:34.765Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:39:39.771Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to wss://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:39:54.776Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:39:54.777Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to wss://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:39:54.777Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:40:04.779Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to wss://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:40:19.786Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:40:19.787Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to wss://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:40:19.788Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:40:34.791Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass connecting to wss://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:40:49.796Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass websocket error during open/negotation: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:40:49.797Z <HassController:NOTICE> HassController#hass websocket to wss://192.168.8.113:8123/api/websocket closed during open/negotiation
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:40:49.798Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass failed to connect/initialize communication: [Error]Error: Opening handshake has timed out
                [latest-22258]2022-09-21T02:41:00.728Z <Rule:INFO> Inside Light Polling (Rule#rule-grpqlebtkk) starting evaluation; because timer-trigger Timer#rule-grpqlebtkk
                
                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbits
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  And that's also with ignore_cert: true, correct?

                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                  PablaP 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                    And that's also with ignore_cert: true, correct?

                    PablaP Offline
                    PablaP Offline
                    Pabla
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    @toggledbits correct

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • toggledbitsT Offline
                      toggledbitsT Offline
                      toggledbits
                      wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                      #11

                      OK. All I can suggest at this point is that maybe you have the old IP address of the previous system in Hass' configuration somewhere and it's messing things up. Beyond that, I'm out of ideas. Maybe shut down that VM, create a new one, install Hass fresh and clean without restoring the prior configuration, just use a default configuration, and see if you can connect to it. If you can, it's definitely something in the old config/restored install. If you can't, maybe something in the VM configuration... I don't know. This usually isn't much of a challenge, and HassController isn't doing anything tricky, it uses a standard Websocket library in wide use for its connections, so I'm doubtful there's suddenly some bug or incompatibility there.

                      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                      PablaP 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                        OK. All I can suggest at this point is that maybe you have the old IP address of the previous system in Hass' configuration somewhere and it's messing things up. Beyond that, I'm out of ideas. Maybe shut down that VM, create a new one, install Hass fresh and clean without restoring the prior configuration, just use a default configuration, and see if you can connect to it. If you can, it's definitely something in the old config/restored install. If you can't, maybe something in the VM configuration... I don't know. This usually isn't much of a challenge, and HassController isn't doing anything tricky, it uses a standard Websocket library in wide use for its connections, so I'm doubtful there's suddenly some bug or incompatibility there.

                        PablaP Offline
                        PablaP Offline
                        Pabla
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        @toggledbits Will try creating a new Hass install and see if I can get MSR to work. In terms of the existing config, none of the entities will get auto deleted since the controller is offline right? Also if I clear out he Hass config completely from MSR, restart MSR then reconfigure as if its the first time entering a Hass config in will this overwrite all my existing Hass entities?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • toggledbitsT Offline
                          toggledbitsT Offline
                          toggledbits
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          Just use a different ID for the new HassController instance... so if you had id: hass in the first config, use hass2 in the second.

                          It probably won't matter anyway, as the IDs should be stable... the new entities would have the same IDs as the old, be of the same type, etc.

                          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                          PablaP 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                            Just use a different ID for the new HassController instance... so if you had id: hass in the first config, use hass2 in the second.

                            It probably won't matter anyway, as the IDs should be stable... the new entities would have the same IDs as the old, be of the same type, etc.

                            PablaP Offline
                            PablaP Offline
                            Pabla
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            @toggledbits Just quickly set up a new Hass VM and am seeing the same errors. Tried with both ignore_cert: true and false no luck. This seems to be a VMware issue, I did do look through settings but couldn't really see anything that would stop MSR from connecting.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbits
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              To be specific, you need to try ws:// (ignore_cert does not matter for this case), and wss:// with ignore_cert: true. Both cases.

                              Beyond that, I'm at a loss. Are you running Hass in docker? Are you running Reactor in docker? I'd look at all of that, too...

                              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                              PablaP 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                To be specific, you need to try ws:// (ignore_cert does not matter for this case), and wss:// with ignore_cert: true. Both cases.

                                Beyond that, I'm at a loss. Are you running Hass in docker? Are you running Reactor in docker? I'd look at all of that, too...

                                PablaP Offline
                                PablaP Offline
                                Pabla
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                @toggledbits Neither are running in docker, both run on their own VM on the same host. Just the difference now is Reactor is running on a VirutalBox VM and MSR is on a VMware VM

                                toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • PablaP Pabla

                                  @toggledbits Neither are running in docker, both run on their own VM on the same host. Just the difference now is Reactor is running on a VirutalBox VM and MSR is on a VMware VM

                                  toggledbitsT Offline
                                  toggledbitsT Offline
                                  toggledbits
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #17

                                  @pabla said in MSR Not Recognizing Old HASS on New VM:

                                  Just the difference now is Reactor is running on a VirutalBox VM and MSR is on a VMware VM

                                  Huh?

                                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                  PablaP 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                    @pabla said in MSR Not Recognizing Old HASS on New VM:

                                    Just the difference now is Reactor is running on a VirutalBox VM and MSR is on a VMware VM

                                    Huh?

                                    PablaP Offline
                                    PablaP Offline
                                    Pabla
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #18

                                    @toggledbit Lol whoops meant to say MSR is running on a VirtualBox VM and Hass is running on a WMware VM

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • PablaP Offline
                                      PablaP Offline
                                      Pabla
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #19

                                      So did a little research and it looks like Websocket is not supported in VMware workstation 16.. I just bought an ODROID cause I am tired of tinkering with all these issues I have had with VMs

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • PablaP Offline
                                        PablaP Offline
                                        Pabla
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #20

                                        Just to close this thread up, it was a VMware issue as stated above. Moved over to an ODROID and MSR connected no problem.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                                        Reply
                                        • Reply as topic
                                        Log in to reply
                                        • Oldest to Newest
                                        • Newest to Oldest
                                        • Most Votes


                                        Recent Topics

                                        • Date/time condition
                                          toggledbitsT
                                          toggledbits
                                          0
                                          2
                                          8

                                        • Is there a way to turn this section (image in post) off?
                                          toggledbitsT
                                          toggledbits
                                          0
                                          1
                                          41

                                        • Device log?
                                          toggledbitsT
                                          toggledbits
                                          0
                                          2
                                          68

                                        • Midnight crossing not working in date/time condition (build 25325)
                                          tunnusT
                                          tunnus
                                          0
                                          3
                                          71

                                        • Error: Command timeout
                                          G
                                          gwp1
                                          0
                                          6
                                          177

                                        • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                                          toggledbitsT
                                          toggledbits
                                          5
                                          131
                                          75.2k

                                        • [Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
                                          CrilleC
                                          Crille
                                          0
                                          5
                                          263

                                        • Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
                                          G
                                          gwp1
                                          0
                                          6
                                          277

                                        • Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
                                          toggledbitsT
                                          toggledbits
                                          1
                                          1
                                          103

                                        • Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
                                          M
                                          mgvra
                                          1
                                          3
                                          204

                                        • Script action and custom timers
                                          toggledbitsT
                                          toggledbits
                                          0
                                          4
                                          220
                                        Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                        Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                                        • Login

                                        • Don't have an account? Register

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Categories
                                        • Recent
                                        • Tags
                                        • Popular
                                        • Unsolved