Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Unable to pull attributes into Global Expression (Hubitat)
Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
CrilleC
Edit: Solved in latest-26221. Bare-metal latest-26193 I have this group: "OKforLarm": name: OK för Larm select: - include_controller: vera - include_capability: door_sensor filter_expression: entity.attributes.door_sensor.state It contains the entities I expect but behaves a bit odd. When I open vera>device_10097 the entity attribute door_sensor.state changes to true but it won't show up as member in the group, when I also open vera>device_10095 they both shows as members and when I close vera>device_10095 it disappear from the group but when I close vera>device_10097 it lingers in the group until I restart Reactor.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
DynamicGroupController and attributes
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits I'm back to trying to optimize a couple of things based on dynamic group. First of all, I think I found a typo in the doc: primary_attribute: "binary_sensor.state" primary_attribute_value: | d = false; each id in members: d = getEntity(id)?.attributes?.power_switch?.state or d, d I think the correct code snippet is d = false, All that said, my use case for dynamic groups is to group 3 different climate devices, so I could easily command them at the same time. Commands are good, but sometimes I want to check if any of the devices are on, and that's easily done with a similar snippet as the one you have in the docs. But this is limited to the primary attribute, while I want to have any of the attributes in the group to be driven by a similar logic (while all are null in the group). ie, access hvac_control.mode and see if any of the unit is set to cool, or heat. Is that possible, without re-defining an expression in each of my rules? Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade Issues
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Question regarding "in" vs "contains" vs contents of the string
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Logon screen timeout
G
Noticing since 170 that the lock screen doesn't switch to the logon prompt but, rather, stays on the active UI until such time as you go to click something within it. Then it jumps to the login screen. Brave browser Brave 1.92.139 (Official Build) (arm64) Chromium: 150.0.7871.114
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Copy&past of actions and/or drag&drop between set/reset
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits One thing that bothers me while doing work on new systems/new features, is that I cannot copy&paste actions, and I cannot drag&drop between set and resets. #1 is for when I want to copy an action between different rules opened in two separate browser windows, while #2 is when I just need to flip a bunch of actions in the reset, or move some logic back and forth. Both will be appreciated, but I understand the technical challenges. Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade advice - upgrade from aarch64 to ARM64 image
T
I'm currently on version 26011. I understand that the aarch64 image is no longer supported. So, I therefore need to update to the ARM64 image. Can anyone possibly suggest how I update my docker compose.yaml file (see below). Ideally I'd like to keep my existing reactions etc. rather than start from scratch. # Multi-System Reactor template docker-compose.yml (version 22160) # # Change the lines indicated by "DO"... # services: reactor: container_name: reactor environment: # DO change the TZ: line to set your local time zone. # See valid TZ list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tz_database_time_zones TZ: GB # # DO NOT change this path. Your directory location is in "source" below. REACTOR_DATA_PREFIX: /var/reactor # DO change the image below to the one you are using (e.g. armv7l or aarch64 for RPi 4) image: toggledbits/reactor:latest-aarch64 restart: "always" expose: - 8111 ports: - 8111:8111 volumes: # DO change the /home/username/reactor below to the directory you created for # your local data; DO NOT change the /var/reactor part - /home/pi/docker/reactor:/var/reactor - /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro tmpfs: /tmp
Multi-System Reactor
Alexa for MSR, any interest?
MikeReadingtonM
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Telegram notification broke with latest update
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Phantom device, “INFO” appears
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] Mode Status NULL
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[RESOLVED] HTTP query failing after version 26177
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Question about the find function
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Answered] OK to remove old json files?
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Deprecation Announcement: 32-bit ARM *docker* images
toggledbitsT
If you are using the armv7l docker image, the OpenJS Foundation that publishes node is no longer producing 32-bit builds as of v24. That means the last supported LTS version of node for armv7l is v22, which will go End-of-Life in May 2027. Therefore, the Reactor armv7l image is now deprecated and will only be produced until node v22 goes EOL, and I will not publish armv7l images beyond that date. If you are running an RPi 3 or earlier with Reactor, you are on this image, and will need to upgrade hardware to a 64-bit model and use the arm64 image. If you need help getting it done, ask in this category.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] build 26150 - engine not starting
G
@toggledbits I pulled the image (well, Watchtower did) and within minutes the whole system went offline. The log looks like it ends with 26143. [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-mkahsmgf/26qq82mw-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lqyfljfi/22f8on0t-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lsb61rw8/24oenqi2-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lrh58he0/rule-lrh58he0:S-1c00gfib-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lrh58he0/1c00dylr-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lrh58he0/1nam9w5u-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-miuh2qqi/22ls4lql-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-kwc6rmci/rule-kwc6rmci:S-1vj8sdfc-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-kwc6rmci/rule-kwc6rmci:S-1qanz01x-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/24lq19p6-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-mk0o8iox/23oy468y-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-miscg2h3/rule-miscg2h3:S-22gmbq1c-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-kxgrfjke/238p0old-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-m7ccsso5/re-m7ccsso5-1r0myjxa-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/19nl9wq2-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/rule-ladyja6a:S-yl3xk9t-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ladyja6a/rule-ladyja6a:S-yl3vv5m-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-ln7j2nqp/re-ln7j2nqp-22mx9lzd-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-ln7j2nqp/22mx87c8-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-licneppy/1mzwe7ht-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-ml3194ih/25jqt1j4-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-kxgrg7kf/227hshak-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-reactorexmachina/13ua1p95-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-reactorexmachina/13uagam7-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-grpvl9oypg/rule-grpvl9oypg:R-134x4cbv-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-grpvl9oypg/rule-grpvl9oypg:R-134x2fyl-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#re-lscjrws1/238p5c22-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <default:INFO> Closing container Container#Predicate#rule-lbwr0jvq/1xkczf03-cons [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <Structure:NOTICE> Structure Structure#1 stopped [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <app:NOTICE> Closing APIs... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <wsapi:NOTICE> wsapi: closing... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.547Z <wsapi:NOTICE> wsapi: disconnecting from "192.168.1.23#82" (1001 service closing) [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.548Z <httpapi:NOTICE> HTTP API closing... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.549Z <wsapi:NOTICE> wsapi: server closed [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.549Z <httpapi:INFO> HTTP server closed. [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.549Z <app:NOTICE> Stopping timers... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.551Z <app:null> Shutdown complete, process ID 1 [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.551Z <app:null> Closing logs... [latest-26143]2026-05-31T15:23:44.551Z <default:null> Closing log I can SSH to the VM. Alas, I do not have the previous image for 26143 as I'm a little too quick sometimes on housekeeping.
Multi-System Reactor
http request action & digest auth
tunnusT
I’m using the HTTP Request action in MSR and need to authenticate against an endpoint that uses HTTP Digest authentication. Now that endpoint was changed to use SHA-256 in digest auth, so I would like to know if MSR supports it, or is it limited to MD5-based digest auth?
Multi-System Reactor

Unable to pull attributes into Global Expression (Hubitat)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
14 Posts 2 Posters 2.1k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 3 Offline
    3 Offline
    3rdStng
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I have begun my migration off of Vera and over to Hubitat. One device and one app at a time. I am working on my Netamo app/devices right now. The Netatmo Client App in Hubitat pulls all the information in and I can use the values within rules. However I am unable to use these value within an expression. Or at least a Global Expression. Honestly haven't tried a local one yet. In my screenshot below, the Global Expression as a value from the Vera Netatmo plugin, but when I try to change this to the Hubitat entity, there are no attributes to pull in. Below that is what I am able to see within the Rule itself.
    2021-08-25_161150.jpg

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by toggledbits
      #2

      What is shown in the Entities detail display for hubitat>39?

      Regardless, that doesn't stop you from using them. That's just a tool to help make it easier to write the expression. You can still write it out:

      getEntity( 'hubitat>39' ).attributes.humidity_sensor.value
      

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      3 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT toggledbits

        What is shown in the Entities detail display for hubitat>39?

        Regardless, that doesn't stop you from using them. That's just a tool to help make it easier to write the expression. You can still write it out:

        getEntity( 'hubitat>39' ).attributes.humidity_sensor.value
        
        3 Offline
        3 Offline
        3rdStng
        wrote on last edited by 3rdStng
        #3

        @toggledbits said in Unable to pull attributes into Global Expression (Hubitat):

        What is shown in the Entities detail display for hubitat>39?

        Ah. Good to know. I can write that out, or attempt to. Here is what is shown under the entity.
        NetO.jpg

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Strange. Have you done a hard refresh on the browser?

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          3 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

            Strange. Have you done a hard refresh on the browser?

            3 Offline
            3 Offline
            3rdStng
            wrote on last edited by 3rdStng
            #5

            @toggledbits said in Unable to pull attributes into Global Expression (Hubitat):

            Strange. Have you done a hard refresh on the browser?

            Yes. And to add more to the confusion, in my Triggers, if the ==/<> option is changes, the Condition must be sustained for section is completely missing.

            2021-08-25_224352.jpg

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • 3 Offline
              3 Offline
              3rdStng
              wrote on last edited by 3rdStng
              #6

              Actually. I think the changes is a bug. I tried to set my old Netatmo entity back in and even with that there is no Condition must be sustained option. Regardless of the entity, when the ==/<> (I forget what this is called) is set to changes, that field/option is missing. My original rule for this was imported from RfV.

              EDIT: I have a work around. And steps to follow to see if you can reproduce it.

              Set the operator to something other than changes and open the Conditions options
              Change your operator to changes (BTW, the menu option is very small with the Conditions options open.)
              Set your Condition must be sustained for xxxx value.
              Close your Conditions options.
              Cond.jpg The work around works. This trigger must be sustained for 3 hours before being true.
              True.jpg

              Was running 21236-90dd714. Upgraded to 21237-e161aed and still seeing both issues. In fact my operators in general for any new rule are only showing me the above list now. Existing rules I get the full drop down list. I don't know what happened.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbits
                wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                #7

                No, logically "changes" and "sustained for" cannot go together. "Changes" is an instantaneous at the moment the change occurs. It is therefore not capable of being "sustained" for any period of time. Also don't assume that just because Reactor for Vera allowed you to do something that (a) it was right, and (b) MSR will work the same. There are a lot of things in MSR that are fixed behaviors of things that should never have been in R4V.

                Also, unless I'm certain what is causing a problem and can put in a fix, not every build is going to have a fix for every issue that may be being discussed. Your first issue doesn't happen for me, and I've never seen it, so in the absence of being able to reproduce it myself, I can't fix it, and that won't change until I can see it. The second issue is, I think, a misunderstanding, and also too new to make the build window even if it was a something to address/fix.

                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • 3 Offline
                  3 Offline
                  3rdStng
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Oh I totally get it. Sorry if I came across as I was expecting it to be fixed in the newer build. That wasn't my intent. I just wanted to test a newer build JIC.

                  It makes sense that changes are immediate. What I'm doing is watching the internal temp reading from my Netatmo and if it hasn't changed in in 3 hours, then reboot the netatmo device. I suppose I could do this with a pulse and a expression. Setting the variable then compare the new reading to the previous reading every 3 hours. If they are == then reboot.

                  I'm happy to troubleshoot the Hubitat Expression issue with you. Is there anything I can run for you?

                  3 toggledbitsT 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • 3 3rdStng

                    Oh I totally get it. Sorry if I came across as I was expecting it to be fixed in the newer build. That wasn't my intent. I just wanted to test a newer build JIC.

                    It makes sense that changes are immediate. What I'm doing is watching the internal temp reading from my Netatmo and if it hasn't changed in in 3 hours, then reboot the netatmo device. I suppose I could do this with a pulse and a expression. Setting the variable then compare the new reading to the previous reading every 3 hours. If they are == then reboot.

                    I'm happy to troubleshoot the Hubitat Expression issue with you. Is there anything I can run for you?

                    3 Offline
                    3 Offline
                    3rdStng
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Something is definitely up with my Reactor. Any new rules that I create I only have a very short list of operator choices. I blew away my docker image and pulled a new one. I also tried going back to the generic 1.0.0. I tried via Incognito Mode and in a different browser in case it was a cookie issue. All had the same results, and it doesn't matter which hub I pull from.

                    What logs can/should I pull for you? Thinking back to the only changes I made yesterday. I installed the Netatmo Client app and drivers in my HE hub and presented them via the Maker API. I was changing my temperature related rules from the Vera device to the HE device. Outside of that, there weren't any real changes that I recall to Reactor. Oh. I upgraded from 21228 to 21236 earlier in the day. Then was presented with a 21236 again about an hour later. And then to 21237 late last night. But I don't think these are related.
                    lists.jpg

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • 3 3rdStng

                      Oh I totally get it. Sorry if I came across as I was expecting it to be fixed in the newer build. That wasn't my intent. I just wanted to test a newer build JIC.

                      It makes sense that changes are immediate. What I'm doing is watching the internal temp reading from my Netatmo and if it hasn't changed in in 3 hours, then reboot the netatmo device. I suppose I could do this with a pulse and a expression. Setting the variable then compare the new reading to the previous reading every 3 hours. If they are == then reboot.

                      I'm happy to troubleshoot the Hubitat Expression issue with you. Is there anything I can run for you?

                      toggledbitsT Offline
                      toggledbitsT Offline
                      toggledbits
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @3rdstng Here's an approach:

                      ae749aec-7913-4328-9bec-67272346f699-image.png

                      Using the "delay reset" for 180 minutes (10,800 seconds) will hold the changes condition true for three hours. The group is set to NOT to invert the sense of the output.

                      When the temperature changes, and for three hours after, the condition will be true, so the rule will be false. If there are no changes for three consecutive hours, the condition goes false, so the rule will go true (set).

                      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • 3 Offline
                        3 Offline
                        3rdStng
                        wrote on last edited by 3rdStng
                        #11

                        Thank you @toggledbits - There is something else going on too. I thought it was machine related, so I deleted my post. But after hard refreshing the browsers on my other machine, and testing on a 3rd machine, I'm still seeing the issue. I've restored my post, which is now a couple up from here. The operators list does not contain ==, <>, >=, etc. for brand new triggers. If I edit a trigger that is already there, I get all those operator choices. I cleared and reset all my settings in Chrome and still see it. Short of completely blowing away Reactor and creating a second/new instance, I'm not sure where to go. I have a feeling that if I went with the new Reactor docker, and I copy my config/rule files over, that the issue will come with it.

                        EDIT: Did the operators options code get an update? I was poking around and noticed that depending on what the triggers capability setting is set to, the operators are restricted to what is shown. I don't recall ever having this restriction/limitation before. For example I used to manually define the power_switch.state to T/F. Manually typing in the value to check again. But now my options are is TRUE, is FALSE, etc. Maybe my mind is just warped and I was used to seeing the full drop down list prior to now?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • toggledbitsT Offline
                          toggledbitsT Offline
                          toggledbits
                          wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                          #12

                          If you choose an attribute for which the data type is known, operators that do not apply to that datatype are removed. For example, if you choose a boolean attribute (like motion sensor state), the ==, <>, etc are removed, because you use is TRUE, is FALSE and is NULL to test that value type.

                          This is a change from the behavior of R4V, where all data was strings so you had to test for "0" or "1" on a boolean. MSR doesn't work that way.

                          Edit: to your other question, this was not a recent change. It happened around March 8.

                          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                          3 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                            If you choose an attribute for which the data type is known, operators that do not apply to that datatype are removed. For example, if you choose a boolean attribute (like motion sensor state), the ==, <>, etc are removed, because you use is TRUE, is FALSE and is NULL to test that value type.

                            This is a change from the behavior of R4V, where all data was strings so you had to test for "0" or "1" on a boolean. MSR doesn't work that way.

                            Edit: to your other question, this was not a recent change. It happened around March 8.

                            3 Offline
                            3 Offline
                            3rdStng
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            @toggledbits said in Unable to pull attributes into Global Expression (Hubitat):

                            This is a change from the behavior of R4V, where all data was strings so you had to test for "0" or "1" on a boolean. MSR doesn't work that way.

                            THANK YOU! Everything had been imported from R4V, so my mind was still in the state of seeing everything. I thought I was having issues. Since I'm migrating off Vera and onto HE, I'm starting to see the changes between R4V and MSR. Glad I'm not having PC/browser/docker issues.

                            Getting back on topic. What can I provide you to get the Expressions drop down populated? If I choose a different entity, those options are presented. If I then switch back to the HE Netatmo entity, I still see the options from the other device. It appears to only be these Netatmo entities. Not sure if this will help, but here is where/how I installed the client and drivers.

                            Jan 22, 2020

                            [RELEASE] HubConnect Netatmo Weather Station Client (HubConnect not req'd)

                            [RELEASE] HubConnect Netatmo Weather Station Client (HubConnect not req'd)

                            I am pleased to announce the release of a brand new, Netatmo integration to Hubitat. This is NOT a ported app.. It is a brand-new integration, written nearly from the ground up. It features driver support for the Base Station, Outdoor Module, Wind Gauge, Rain Gauge, and Indoor Modules. Despite...

                            3 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • 3 3rdStng

                              @toggledbits said in Unable to pull attributes into Global Expression (Hubitat):

                              This is a change from the behavior of R4V, where all data was strings so you had to test for "0" or "1" on a boolean. MSR doesn't work that way.

                              THANK YOU! Everything had been imported from R4V, so my mind was still in the state of seeing everything. I thought I was having issues. Since I'm migrating off Vera and onto HE, I'm starting to see the changes between R4V and MSR. Glad I'm not having PC/browser/docker issues.

                              Getting back on topic. What can I provide you to get the Expressions drop down populated? If I choose a different entity, those options are presented. If I then switch back to the HE Netatmo entity, I still see the options from the other device. It appears to only be these Netatmo entities. Not sure if this will help, but here is where/how I installed the client and drivers.

                              Jan 22, 2020

                              [RELEASE] HubConnect Netatmo Weather Station Client (HubConnect not req'd)

                              [RELEASE] HubConnect Netatmo Weather Station Client (HubConnect not req'd)

                              I am pleased to announce the release of a brand new, Netatmo integration to Hubitat. This is NOT a ported app.. It is a brand-new integration, written nearly from the ground up. It features driver support for the Base Station, Outdoor Module, Wind Gauge, Rain Gauge, and Indoor Modules. Despite...

                              3 Offline
                              3 Offline
                              3rdStng
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              The manual entry into the Expressions does work. The top expression is from my Vera entities. The bottom is from the HE entities.
                              TempDiff.jpg

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              Recent Topics

                              • Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
                                T
                                tamorgen
                                0
                                7
                                197

                              • [Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
                                CrilleC
                                Crille
                                0
                                5
                                142

                              • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                5
                                148
                                130.6k

                              • DynamicGroupController and attributes
                                therealdbT
                                therealdb
                                1
                                5
                                132

                              • Upgrade Issues
                                T
                                tbully
                                0
                                9
                                245

                              • [SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                0
                                10
                                273

                              • [SOLVED] Question regarding "in" vs "contains" vs contents of the string
                                G
                                gwp1
                                0
                                5
                                149

                              • openLuup console disappeared - 500 - Internal Server Error
                                A
                                a-lurker
                                0
                                2
                                178

                              • Logon screen timeout
                                G
                                gwp1
                                0
                                5
                                200

                              • [MSR] Copy&past of actions and/or drag&drop between set/reset
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                0
                                9
                                386

                              • Upgrade advice - upgrade from aarch64 to ARM64 image
                                toggledbitsT
                                toggledbits
                                0
                                4
                                223
                              Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                              Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • Unsolved